Pax6 Transcription Research Articles

The LIM homeobox transcription factor Lhx2 is required to specify the retina field and synergistically cooperates with Pax6 for Six6 trans-activation

In mammals, a limited set of homeobox-containing transcription factors are expressed in the presumptive eye field and required to initiate eye development. How these factors interact together at the genetic and molecular level to coordinate this developmental process is poorly understood. We found that the Lhx2 and Pax6 transcription factors operate in a concerted manner during retinal development to promote transcriptional activation of the Six6 homeobox-gene in primitive and mature retinal progenitors. Lhx2 demarcates the presumptive retina field at the neural plate stage and Lhx2 inactivation delays initiation of Rx, Six3 and Pax6 expression in this domain. The later expressed Six6 is properly activated in the pituitary/hypothalamic axis of Lhx2 −/− embryos, but expression fails to be initiated in the optic vesicle. Lhx2 and Pax6 associate with the chromatin at several regions of Six6 in vivo and cooperate for trans-activation of Six6 regulatory elements in vitro. In retinal progenitor/stem cells, both Lhx2 and Pax6 are genetically required for proper Six6 expression and forced co-expression of Lhx2 and Pax6 can synergistically trans-activate the Six6 locus. Our work reveals how two master regulators of eye development coordinate their action to sequentially promote tissue-specific transcriptional initiation and full activation of a retinal determinant gene.

Developmental and daily expression of the Pax4 and Pax6 homeobox genes in the rat retina: localization of Pax4 in photoreceptor cells

Pax4 is a homeobox gene encoding Pax4, a transcription factor that is essential for embryonic development of the endocrine pancreas. In the pancreas, Pax4 counters the effects of the related transcription factor, Pax6, which is known to be essential for eye morphogenesis. In this study, we have discovered that Pax4 is strongly expressed in retinal photoreceptors of the rat. Pax4 expression is not detectable in the foetal eye; however, postnatal Pax4 transcript levels rapidly increase. In contrast, Pax6 exhibits an inverse developmental pattern of expression being more strongly expressed in the foetal eye. Histological analysis revealed that Pax4 mRNA is exclusively expressed in the retinal photoreceptors, whereas Pax6 mRNA and protein are present in the inner nuclear layer and in the ganglion cell layer of the mature retina. In the adult retina, Pax4 transcripts exhibit a diurnal rhythm with maximal levels occurring during the light period, whereas retinal Pax6 transcript levels do not change throughout the day. The daily changes in Pax4 expression may contribute to daily changes in function in the differentiated retinal photoreceptor.

Expression of CXCR4 and CXCR7 Receptors for Stromal Derived Factor-1 (SDF- 1) Is Differently Regulated in Human Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS): The Biological Consequences

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma of adolescents and children that frequently infiltrates bone marrow (BM). RMS is divided in two sub-types, alveolar-RMS (ARMS) and embryonal-RMS (ERMS). The ARMS subtype is often associated with a more aggressive phenotype, poorer clinical prognosis, and expression of Pax3-FKHR and Pax7-FKHR fusion proteins that function as potent transcriptional activators with enhanced activity as compared to normal Pax3 or Pax7 transcription factors. We reported that the stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1)-CXCR4 receptor axis plays a crucial role in RMS metastasis to BM (Blood 2002; 100:2597, Cancer Res 2003; 63:7926, Cancer Res. 2007; 67:213). After the recent identification of CXCR7, a new receptor for SDF-1, we became interested in its potential role in metastases of RMS cells. We found that CXCR7 was expressed and functional on all 10 human RMS cell lines investigated in this study. Furthermore, we noticed that while CXCR4 was more involved in regulating RMS chemotaxis, CXCR7 primarily regulated adhesion of RMS cells. Based on this observation, we assessed the mechanisms that regulate expression of these receptors. We noticed that CXCR4 is highly expressed on the more metastatic ARMS while CXCR7 is expressed at higher levels on the less metastatic ERMS cell lines. However, both receptors express several hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1a binding sites, expression of CXCR4 was not affected by exposure to hypoxia, and expression of CXCR7 was even paradoxically downregulated in hypoxic conditions. We also observed that ERMS cells transduced with Pax3-FKHR, a gene typical for ARMS fusion that enhances RMS metastatic behavior, highly upregulated expression of CXCR4. In contrast, expression of CXCR7 was again down-regulated. To learn more on the role of Pax-3-FKHR in the expression of CXCR4, we performed a functional analysis of promoter fragments subcloned into luciferase vector. To our surprise, expression of CXCR4 did not depend on direct binding of Pax3-FKHR to classical Pax3 binding sites in promoter sequences but on direct protein-to-protein interaction with nuclear respiratory factor (NRF)-1 transcription factor. These results suggest that the Pax3-FKHR-NRF-1 complex binds to the NRF-1 binding site and aberrantly activates transcription. In conclusion, both of the SDF-1 binding receptors (CXCR4 and CXCR7) are differently regulated in RMS cells. Since CXCR7 is more important in adhesion and becomes downregulated during hypoxia, this may give an advantage for SDF-1 to signal through CXCR4 receptor to activate pathways critical for chemotactic responses. As a biological consequence, this may increase the metastatic potential of RMS by “mobilizing” RMS cells from the primary tumor to migrate and metastasize. In addition, the novel transcriptional mechanism for the Pax3-FKHR-NRF-1 complex in regulating CXCR4 receptors in RMS cells has been identified.

Identification and characterization of subpopulations of Pax3 and Pax7 expressing cells in developing chick somites and limb buds

Pax3 and Pax7 are closely related paired-boxed family transcription factors that are known to play important roles in embryonic and adult myogenesis. Previous reports describing the expression of Pax3 and Pax7 transcripts reveal expression in many overlapping domains. In this manuscript, we extend these studies by examining the protein expression profiles for Pax3 and Pax7 in developing chick somites and limbs with cellular resolution. Our studies show the existence of distinct subpopulations of cells in the somite and developing limb that are defined by the relative expression levels of Pax3 and Pax7. We also show that Pax3 and Pax7 negatively regulate each other's expression in the dermomyotome, thus providing a possible mechanism for the maintenance of observed expression patterns in the dermomyotome. Further characterization of Pax3- and/or Pax7-positive cells in the dermomyotome and myotome with respect to proliferation and differentiation reveals subpopulations of cells with distinct properties.

Concise Review: Pax6 Transcription Factor Contributes to both Embryonic and Adult Neurogenesis as a Multifunctional Regulator

Pax6 is a highly conserved transcription factor among vertebrates and is important in various developmental processes in the central nervous system (CNS), including patterning of the neural tube, migration of neurons, and formation of neural circuits. In this review, we focus on the role of Pax6 in embryonic and postnatal neurogenesis, namely, production of new neurons from neural stem/progenitor cells, because Pax6 is intensely expressed in these cells from the initial stage of CNS development and in neurogenic niches (the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus and the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle) throughout life. Pax6 is a multifunctional player regulating proliferation and differentiation through the control of expression of different downstream molecules in a highly context-dependent manner.

Oncogenic Role of Engrailed-2 (En-2) in Prostate Cancer Cell Growth and Survival

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States of America. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease remain largely unknown. Therefore, the identification of tumor specific molecules that serve as targets for the development of new cancer drugs is considered to be a major goal in cancer research. The mouse Engrailed-2 (En-2) gene, which is a homeobox-containing transcription factor was recently identified as a candidate oncogene in breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate that En-2 is over-expressed in human prostate cancer cells as compared to normal prostate epithelial cells. In addition, our data suggests that EN2 expression may be positively modulated by PAX2 transcription factor. Furthermore, down-regulation of EN2 expression by siRNA resulted in a decrease in PAX2 expression. We also provide evidence that down-regulation of EN2 expression causes a dramatic decrease in prostate cancer cell proliferation. Therefore, from our studies we conclude that En-2 is a candidate oncogene in prostate cancer and its PAX2-regulated expression contributes to prostate cancer cell growth.

Positive and negative regulatory inputs restrict pax-6/vab-3 transcription to sensory organ precursors in Caenorhabditis elegans

The Pax-6 gene encodes a transcription factor essential for the development of eyes and other sensory organs in species ranging from planaria to mice. Because Pax-6 activity can be both necessary and sufficient for eye organogenesis, much work has focused on PAX-6 function and regulation of target genes. However, less is known about the genetic mechanisms that establish the Pax-6 expression pattern. We have utilized Caenorhabditis elegans as a relatively simple model system to characterize the regulation of Pax-6 transcription in sensory organ precursors. In C. elegans males, two sensory mating structures, the copulatory spicules and the post-cloacal sensilla, are formed from stereotyped divisions of the two post-embryonic blast cells, B.a and Y.p, respectively. A C. elegans pax-6 transcript, vab-3, is necessary for the development of these sensory structures. Using a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-based vab-3 transcriptional reporter, we show that expression is restricted to the sensory organ lineages of B.a and Y.p. Transcription of vab-3 in the tail region of the worm requires the Abdominal B homeobox gene, egl-5. Opposing this activation, a transcription factor cascade and a Wnt signaling pathway each act to restrict vab-3 expression to the appropriate cell lineages. Thus we have identified multiple genetic pathways that act to restrict pax-6/vab-3 gene expression to the sensory organ precursor cells.

Optic nerve axon number in mouse is regulated by PAX2

Papillorenal syndrome is an autosomal-dominant disease caused by mutations in the PAX2 transcription factor gene. Patients often exhibit congenital excavation of the optic nerve and a spectrum of congenital kidney abnormalities. Using a novel mouse model of this syndrome (C57BL/6J PAX2(A220G/+)), we investigated the effect of PAX2 haploinsufficiency on optic nerve axon number. Because PAX2 expression and retinal pigment epithelium pigmentation have a mutually exclusive relationship during development and because tyrosinase (Tyr) has been shown to modify the penetrance of other ocular development genes, we also investigated whether tyrosinase modified the mutant PAX2 phenotype. C57BL/6J PAX2(A220G/+)Tyr(+/+) mice were crossed with mice of the same genetic background (C57BL/6J) that are homozygous for an effective null allele of tyrosinase (Tyr(c-2J/c-2J)) over two generations to create mice with four distinct genotypes: PAX2(A220G/+) Tyr(+/c-2J), PAX2(A220G/+) Tyr(c-2J/c-2J), PAX2(+/+) Tyr(c-2J/+), and PAX2(+/+)Tyr(c-2J/c-2J). Mouse optic nerves were examined clinically and histologically. Axon number was assessed in a masked fashion in optic nerves from mice of all four genotypes and compared with parental strains. Mice heterozygous for a PAX2 mutation show reduced optic nerve axon number compared with age-matched controls. Tyrosinase does not appear to modify this phenotype. Our results show that PAX2 is important in determining axon number in mouse optic nerve. The developmental effects of tyrosinase and PAX2 mutation appear to act via different pathways.

PAX6 P46 Binds Chromosomes in the Pericentromeric Region and Induces a Mitosis Defect When Overexpressed

Haploinsufficiency and overexpression of the Pax6 gene are responsible for defective central nervous system development. The purpose of the current work was to identify and characterize a new potential role for the Pax6 transcription factor in cellular proliferation in addition to its role at the level of gene expression. Expression vectors encoding tagged Pax6p46 protein were used to observe directly protein localization during the cell cycle in cells lines. Three dimensional (3-D) fluorescence microscopy imaging was used to observe in vivo mitotic progression and chromosome dynamics to define the mitotic step affected by p46DsRed as well as to validate endogenous p46 localization on chromosomes in quail retinal cells. Video imaging was used to identify the precise moment of onset of effects related to p46 overexpression in living cells. A pulldown assay in HEK cells was used to identify a specific partner of p46. Pax6p46 protein in transfected cells is localized on the chromosomes, predominantly in a pericentromeric area, and its localization changes as mitosis progresses. Overexpression of p46 protein induces incomplete chromatid separation, resulting in defective mitosis at the onset of the anaphase. A physical interaction between p46 and ESPL1 was identified. The results suggest that Pax6 exerts an effect on mitosis through protein-protein interactions with proteins localized on chromosomes. Supported by the observation that p46 interacts with separase, an enzyme required for chromatid separation, the authors propose that this interaction is responsible for the mitosis defect observed in cells overexpressing Pax6.

Overexpression of pairedless Pax6 in the retina disrupts corneal development and affects lens cell survival

The Pax6 transcription factor is required for multiple aspects of vertebrate eye development. The Pax6 gene encodes isoforms that either contain (Pax6 + PD) or lack (Pax6ΔPD) the N-terminal paired-box DNA-binding domain, in addition to the homeodomain. Alternative promoters control the expression of Pax6 + PD and Pax6ΔPD in the eye. Using a modified bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgene that specifically expresses Pax6ΔPD, but not paired-containing Pax6, in the normal endogenous pattern, we show that overexpression of Pax6ΔPD causes a severe microphthalmic phenotype in both wild-type and Pax6-deficient ( Sey /+ ) mice in a dosage-dependent manner. The microphthalmic phenotype is due to lens degeneration during embryonic development. Lens development initiates correctly, but cells in the lens undergo apoptotic cell death between E12 and E13. Concomitantly, in these mice, changes in Bmp4, Msx1, and Wnt2b expression were observed in the mesenchymal cells of the developing cornea. To visualize Pax6ΔPD expression, we developed a dual-reporter Pax6 BAC transgene in which EGFP and DsRed demonstrate paired-containing and pairedless transcripts, respectively. In BAC transgenic mice, DsRed is predominantly expressed in the peripheral neural retina during early eye development, but not in the developing lens or cornea. Later DsRed is strongly expressed in the developing ciliary body, but not in the iris. We suggest that the ratio of Pax6 + PD and Pax6ΔPD isoforms in the distal retina is important for both cornea and lens development, either directly by controlling transcription of necessary growth factors or indirectly by controlling development of the distal neural retina.

Pax6 transcription factor is required for the interkinetic nuclear movement of neuroepithelial cells

The mammalian cerebral cortex develops from proliferative neuroepithelial cells that exhibit a cell cycle-dependent nuclear movement (interkinetic nuclear migration; INM). Pax6 transcription factor plays pivotal roles in various aspects of corticogenesis. From live observation using cultured cortical slices from the Pax6 mutant rat, we identified the premature descent of S phase cells, the unsteady ascent or descent of G2 phase cells, and ectopic cell division within the basal side of the ventricular zone (VZ). The centrosome normally stayed at the most apical side, apart from the nucleus, in the neuroepithelial cell during the S to G2 phase, while the Pax6 mutant showed unstable movement of the centrosome associated with an abnormal INM. Our results suggest the possibility that Pax6 regulates the INM by stabilizing the centrosome at the apical side.

169 INVITED Recent research in opioid treated cancer pain

Investigations into pigment cell biology have relied on the ability to culture both murine and human melanocytes, numerous melanoma cell lines and more recently, murine and human melanoblasts. Melanoblast culture requires medium supplemented with a range of growth factors including Stem Cell Factor, Endothelin-3 and Fibroblast Growth Factor-2, withdrawal of which causes the cells to differentiate into melanocytes. Using the human melanoblast culture system, we have now examined the expression and/or DNA binding activity of several transcription factors implicated in melanocytic development and differentiation. Of these, the POU domain factor BRN2 and the SOX family member SOX10 are both highly expressed in unpigmented melanocyte precursors but are down-regulated upon differentiation. In contrast, the expression levels of the previously described MITF and PAX3 transcription factors remain relatively constant during the melanoblast–melanocyte transition. Moreover, BRN2 ablated melanoma cells lack expression of SOX10 and MITF but retain PAX3. A novel finding implicates a second SOX protein, SOX9, as a potential melanogenic transcriptional regulator, as its expression level is increased following the down-regulation of BRN2 and SOX10 in differentiated melanoblasts. Our results suggest that a complex network of transcription factor interactions requiring proper temporal coordination is necessary for acquisition and maintenance of the melanocytic phenotype.

Influence of Thyroid Hormone and Thyroid Hormone Receptors in the Generation of Cerebellar γ-Aminobutyric Acid-Ergic Interneurons from Precursor Cells

Thyroid hormones have important actions in the developing central nervous system. We describe here a novel action of thyroid hormone and its nuclear receptors on maturation of cerebellar gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic interneurons from their precursor cells. In rats, the density of GABAergic terminals in the cerebellum was decreased by hypothyroidism, as shown by immunohistochemistry for the GABA transporter GAT-1. This was due, at least partially, to a decreased number of GABAergic cells, because the number of Golgi II cells in the internal granular layer was decreased. GABAergic interneurons in the cerebellum differentiate from precursors expressing the Pax-2 transcription factor, generated in the subventricular zone of the embryonic fourth ventricle from where they migrate to the cerebellum. Hypothyroidism caused both decreased proliferation and delayed differentiation of precursors, with the net effect being an accumulation of immature cells during the neonatal period. The contribution of thyroid hormone receptors was studied by treating hypothyroid rats with T(3) or with the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) beta-selective agonist GC-1. Whereas treatment with T(3) reduced the number of precursors to control levels, GC-1 had only a partial effect, indicating that both TRalpha1 and TRbeta mediate the actions of T(3). Deletion of TRalpha1 in mice decreased cerebellar GAT-1 expression and Pax-2 precursor cell proliferation. It is concluded that thyroid hormone, acting through the nuclear receptors, has a major role in the proliferation and further differentiation of the Pax-2 precursors of cerebellar GABAergic cells.

A Complex Expression Pattern ofPax6in the Pigeon Retina

The retina of some avian species contains two macular regions, making it an excellent model for retinal, and especially macular, development. Previous studies have provided evidence of the involvement of Pax6 in macular development. The purpose was to perform a comprehensive expression analysis of Pax6 isoforms in different regions of the pigeon retina. The different mRNA transcripts were amplified by RT-PCR and characterized by sequencing analysis. Semiquantitative PCR and quantitative real-time PCR analyses were used to study the level of expression of each transcript. Western blot analysis was performed on both the cytosolic and nuclear cell fractions. An evolutionary analysis of all human-chicken retinal homologues revealed that Pax6 is one of the most conserved retinal genes. By alternative splicing and alternative initiation of transcription, Pax6 produces 41 different mRNA transcripts, encoding 17 protein isoforms in the pigeon retina, five of which are paired-less cytosolic proteins. Semiquantitative expression analysis revealed that the short, paired-less, transcripts have a relatively high level of expression. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the central macula, red area, and peripheral retina revealed a spatial and temporal expression profile indicating that many Pax6 transcripts take a part in macular development. These data suggest that Pax6, a highly conserved gene, can maintain evolutionarily conserved variability at the protein level by alternative splicing and initiation mechanisms, allowing it to perform multiple functions. The variability in the length of the paired domain suggests that the different Pax6 isoforms activate different sets of genes.

Global gene expression profiling of PAX‐FKHR fusion‐positive alveolar and PAX‐FKHR fusion‐negative embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas

Paediatric rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) are classified into two major subtypes based on histological appearance, embryonal (ERMS) and alveolar (ARMS), but this clinically critical distinction is often difficult on morphological grounds alone. ARMS, the more aggressive subtype, is associated in most cases with unique recurrent translocations fusing the PAX3 or PAX7 transcription factor genes to FKHR. In contrast, ERMS lacks unique genetic alterations. To identify novel diagnostic markers and potential therapeutic targets, we analysed the global gene expression profiles of these two RMS subtypes in 23 ARMS (16 PAX3-FKHR, 7 PAX7-FKHR) and 15 ERMS (all PAX-FKHR-negative) using Affymetrix HG-U133A oligonucleotide arrays. A statistically stringent supervised comparison of the ARMS and ERMS expression profiles revealed 121 genes that were significantly differentially expressed, of which 112 were higher in ARMS, including genes of interest as potential diagnostic markers or therapeutic targets, such as CNR1, PIPOX (sarcosine oxidase), and TFAPbeta. Interestingly, many known or putative downstream targets of PAX3-FKHR were highly overexpressed in ARMS relative to ERMS, including CNR1, DCX, ABAT, ASS, JAKMIP2, DKFZp762M127, and NRCAM. We validated the highly differential expression of five genes, including CNR1, DKFZp762M127, DCX, PIPOX, and FOXF1 in ARMS relative to ERMS by quantitative RT-PCR on an independent set of samples. Finally, we developed a ten-gene microarray-based predictor that distinguished ARMS from ERMS with approximately 95% accuracy both in our data by cross-validation and in an independent validation using a published dataset of 26 samples. The gene expression signature of ARMS provides a source of potential diagnostic markers, therapeutic targets, and PAX-FKHR downstream genes, and can be used to reliably distinguish these sarcomas from ERMS.

Mechanisms controlling Pax6 isoform expression in the retina have been conserved between teleosts and mammals

The Pax6 gene plays several roles in retinal development, including control of cell proliferation, maintenance of the retinogenic potential of progenitor cells, and cell fate specification. Emerging evidence suggests that these different aspects of Pax6 gene function are mediated by different isoforms of the Pax6 protein; however, relatively little is known about the spatiotemporal expression of Pax6 isoforms in the vertebrate retina. Using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) technology, we modified a zebrafish Pax6a BAC such that we could distinguish paired-containing Pax6a transcripts from paired-less Pax6a transcripts. In the zebrafish, the spatial and temporal onset of expression of these transcripts suggests that the paired-less isoform is involved in the cell fate decision leading to the generation of amacrine cells; however, because of limitations associated with transient transgenic analysis, it was not feasible to establish whether this promoter was active in all amacrine cells or in a specific population of amacrine cells. By making mice transgenic for the zebrafish Pax6a BAC reporter transgene, we were able to show that paired-containing and paired-less Pax6a transcripts were differentially expressed in amacrine subpopulations. Our study also directly demonstrates the functional conservation of the regulatory mechanisms governing Pax6 transcription in teleosts and mammals.

A homeo-paired domain-binding motif directs Myf5 expression in progenitor cells of limb muscle

Recruitment of multipotent mesodermal cells to the myogenic lineage is mediated by the transcription factor Myf5, the first of the myogenic regulatory factors to be expressed in most sites of myogenesis in the mouse embryo. Among numerous elements controlling the spatiotemporal pattern of Myf5 expression, the -58/-56 kb distal Myf5 enhancer directs expression in myogenic progenitor cells in limbs and in somites. Here, we show by site-directed mutagenesis within this enhancer that a predicted homeobox adjacent to a putative paired domain-binding site is required for the activity in muscle precursor cells in limbs and strongly contributes to expression in somites. By contrast, predicted binding sites for Tcf/Lef, Mef3 and Smad transcription factors play no apparent role for the expression in limbs but might participate in the control in somites. A 30mer oligonucleotide sequence containing and surrounding the homeo and paired domain-binding motifs directs faithful expression in myogenic cells in limbs and also enhances myotomal expression in somites. Pax3 and Meox2 transcription factors can bind to these consensus sites in vitro and therefore constitute potential regulators. However, genetic evidence in the Meox2-deficient mouse mutant argues against a role for Meox2 in the regulation of Myf5 expression. The data presented here demonstrate that a composite homeo and paired domain-binding motif within the -58/-56 enhancer is required and sufficient for activation of the Myf5 gene in muscle progenitor cells in the limb. Although Pax3 constitutes a potential cognate transcription factor for the enhancer, it fails to transactivate the site in transfection experiments.

The MH1 domain of Smad3 interacts with Pax6 and represses autoregulation of the Pax6 P1 promoter.

Pax6 transcription is under the control of two main promoters (P0 and P1), and these are autoregulated by Pax6. Additionally, Pax6 expression is under the control of the TGFβ superfamily, although the precise mechanisms of such regulation are not understood. The effect of TGFβ on Pax6 expression was studied in the FHL124 lens epithelial cell line and was found to cause up to a 50% reduction in Pax6 mRNA levels within 24 h. Analysis of luciferase reporters showed that Pax6 autoregulation of the P1 promoter, and its induction of a synthetic promoter encoding six paired domain-binding sites, were significantly repressed by both an activated TGFβ receptor and TGFβ ligand stimulation. Subsequently, a novel Pax6 binding site in P1 was shown to be necessary for autoregulation, indicating a direct influence of Pax6 protein on P1. In transfected cells, and endogenously in FHL124 cells, Pax6 co-immunoprecipitated with Smad3 following TGFβ receptor activation, while in GST pull-down experiments, the MH1 domain of Smad3 was observed binding the RED sub-domain of the Pax6 paired domain. Finally, in DNA adsorption assays, activated Smad3 inhibited Pax6 from binding the consensus paired domain recognition sequence. We hypothesize that the Pax6 autoregulatory loop is targeted for repression by the TGFβ/Smad pathway, and conclude that this involves diminished paired domain DNA-binding function resulting from a ligand-dependant interaction between Pax6 and Smad3.

Direct non-cell autonomous Pax6 activity regulates eye development in the zebrafish

BackgroundModifications in Pax6 homeogene expression produce strong eye phenotypes. This suggested to us that eye development might be an appropriate model to verify if homeoprotein intercellular passage has important functions in early development. Similar to other homeoproteins, Pax6 has two domains that enable secretion and internalization by live cells and, thus, intercellular passage. In principle, a straightforward way to test the hypothesis would be to mutate one of the two sequences to produce a 'cell autonomous only' Pax6. However, this was not possible because these sequences are in the homeodomain and their modification would affect Pax6 transcriptional properties. We have thus developed an approach aimed at blocking Pax6 only in the extracellular milieu of developing zebrafish embryos.ResultsA first strategy was to inject a one-cell embryo with a mRNA encoding a secreted single-chain anti-Pax6 antibody. A second, complementary, strategy was to inject a Pax6 antibody in the blastula extracellular milieu. In both cases, 'dissymmetric eyes', 'one eye only' and 'no eye' phenotypes were produced. In most cases, lens phenotypes paralleled retina malformations. Although eye phenotypes were analyzed 30 hours post-fertilization, there was a strong correlation between early eye field asymmetry, early asymmetry in Pax6 expression and later-occurring eye malformations. Several controls were introduced, demonstrating that the effect is specific to Pax6 and cannot be explained by intracellular antibody activities.ConclusionThis study supports the hypothesis that the Pax6 transcription factor is also a signaling molecule with direct non-cell autonomous activity.

Pax6 Regulation in Retinal Cells by CCCTC Binding Factor

A previous study demonstrated that CTCF (CCCTC binding factor) regulates homeobox Pax6 gene expression in early embryonic stages and plays a dominant role in eye development. The purpose of the present study was to explore further the mechanism of CTCF controlling Pax6 gene expression in human retinoblastoma (Rb) cells and in the development of chicken and mouse retinas. Northern and Western analyses were used to detect expressions of CTCF and Pax6 in Rb cells. Pax6 transcription reporter and deletion mutants were used to study the regulatory interaction between CTCF and Pax6 in Rb cells and in the retina of chicken embryos. CTCF transgenic chicken embryos and mice were established by lipofection and microinjection of linearized cytomegalovirus (CMV)-CTCF construct into fertilized eggs and mouse oocytes, respectively. Injected oocytes were implanted in the uterus of foster mothers through microinjection into the ovarian duct. The expression of CTCF and Pax6 was determined in embryo sections by immunochemistry. Stimulation of Rb cells with 10% FBS resulted in an increase in CTCF expression and a decrease in Pax6 expression. To study the regulatory mechanism, the Pax6 reporter and its deletion mutant activities were determined in transfected Rb cells and chicken embryonic retinas, revealing that CTCF interacts with the Pax6 gene in Rb cells through transcription control in the 5'-flanking region upstream from the Pax6 P0 promoter. Overexpression of CTCF in Rb cells suppressed Pax6 reporter activity and downregulated endogenous Pax6 expression. In contrast, downregulation of CTCF expression by knockdown of CTCF mRNA using specific small interfering (si)RNA markedly enhanced Pax6 expression in Rb cells. Further study in CTCF transgenic mouse embryos verified that overexpression of CTCF suppressed Pax6 gene expression in the retina. CTCF plays an important role in regulating Pax6 expression in Rb cells and in the developmental retina, and the regulation of Pax6 gene expression by CTCF in the retina is through transcriptional regulation.