You have accessJournal of UrologyGeneral & Epidemiological Trends & Socioeconomics: Practice Patterns, Cost Effectiveness II1 Apr 2014MP11-10 BEST PRACTICES IN SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY: ADOPTION OF GUIDELINES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE Robert Brown, Shubha De, Carl Sarkissian, and Manoj Monga Robert BrownRobert Brown More articles by this author , Shubha DeShubha De More articles by this author , Carl SarkissianCarl Sarkissian More articles by this author , and Manoj MongaManoj Monga More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.425AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Evidence based treatment guidelines for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) have been developed to improve outcomes and minimize adverse affects. In this study we aim to evaluate regional differences in adaptation of best practice recommendations for SWL across four distinct geographical regions. METHODS A retrospective study was performed using a prospective database maintained by a mobile lithotripsy provider (Fortec Medical, Ohio). SWL cases performed in Ohio, Northern Illinois/Southern Wisconsin, Florida, and New York were included. Treatment parameters evaluated included treatment rate, use of a power ramp-up protocol, use of a pretreatment pause after the initial 100 shocks, ancillary procedures and need for retreatment. Regional and physician specific patterns were examined. Statistical analyses using chi square and ANOVA was performed with a significance of p<0.05. RESULTS Data from 2240 SWL procedures were included in the study. The mean patient age was 54.7, mean BMI was 29.9, and 52.5% were male. Overall adaptation of power ramp-up protocols and treatment rates were high while use of pause was lower (Table 1). Ancillary procedures were performed in 34% of patients with 8.3% of patients receiving stents for stones <1cm. Comparing regions, Florida had the lowest use of ramp up (83%, p<0.001) but had highest use of a pause (98%, p<0.001) while all other regions had less than 80% rate of pause. Both Florida and Ohio were more likely to implement a slow SW rate (95%, p<0.001). New York had the highest retreatment rate (14.7%, p<0.001). Florida performed the most ancillary procedures (43%, p<0.001) and placed the highest percentage of stents for stone burden less than 1 cm (11%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The recommendations for slower SW rates and power ramp protocols have reached high penetration in urologic practices, however the more recent recommendation for a pause after the initial 100 shocks has been less uniformly implemented. Inconsistencies in regional adaptation of best practices may identify opportunities for further education. Table 1. Treatment choices and outcome Ohio WI/IL Florida New York Total p-value Variables 844 429 715 252 2240 Ramp-up, N (%) 817 (96.8) 426 (99.3) 595 (83.2) 250 (99.2) 2088 (93.2) < 0.001 Pause, N (%) 581 (68.8) 342 (79.7) 701 (98.0) 61 (24.2) 1685 (75.2) < 0.001 Rate<120, N (%) 807 (95.6) 372 (86.7) 684 (95.7) 212 (84.1) 2075 (92.6) < 0.001 Retreatment, N (%) 20 (2.4) 7 (1.6) 32 (4.5) 37 (14.7) 96 (4.3) < 0.001 All analysis was done by Chi-squared test © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e99 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Robert Brown More articles by this author Shubha De More articles by this author Carl Sarkissian More articles by this author Manoj Monga More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...