You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy II (PD19)1 Sep 2021PD19-12 EXAMINING THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF LYMPH-VASCULAR INVASION IN PATIENTS WITH VERY HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER Nikola Rakic, Ivan Rakic, Jacob Keeley, Christian Meyer, Markus Graefen, Randi Pose, Perre Tennstedt, Nicholas Corsi, Chandler Bronkema, Akshay Sood, Sohrab Arora, Craig Rogers, Mani Menon, and Firas Abdollah Nikola RakicNikola Rakic More articles by this author , Ivan RakicIvan Rakic More articles by this author , Jacob KeeleyJacob Keeley More articles by this author , Christian MeyerChristian Meyer More articles by this author , Markus GraefenMarkus Graefen More articles by this author , Randi PoseRandi Pose More articles by this author , Perre TennstedtPerre Tennstedt More articles by this author , Nicholas CorsiNicholas Corsi More articles by this author , Chandler BronkemaChandler Bronkema More articles by this author , Akshay SoodAkshay Sood More articles by this author , Sohrab AroraSohrab Arora More articles by this author , Craig RogersCraig Rogers More articles by this author , Mani MenonMani Menon More articles by this author , and Firas AbdollahFiras Abdollah More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002008.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Lymph-vascular invasion (LVI) at radical prostatectomy (RP) is recognized as an adverse pathological feature in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Recent literature showed a detrimental impact of LVI on overall survival in all patients with PCa, regardless of risk stratification. That said, the predictive performance of LVI in patients with very have high-risk disease, where it could serve as a guide for the necessity of multimodal treatment has not been elucidated. We tested the hypothesis that LVI is an independent predictor of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with very high-risk PCa. METHODS: We included 2,058 PCa cM0 patients who underwent RP with lymph node dissection, between 2001 and 2019, in two tertiary care centers. Included patients were considered high-risk due to harboring ≥2 of the following adverse disease features: ≥pT3b stage, pathological Gleason 8-10, and/or positive nodal involvement (pN1). Cumulative incidence curves were used to estimate CSM, after accounting for other cause mortality. Regression analysis tested the relationship between LVI and CSM after accounting for the following covariates: PSA, pathological tumor stage, Gleason grade, pathological nodal status, and surgical margin status. RESULTS: Within our cohort, most patients had a pT3b disease (86.2%), pN1 status (75.4%), positive margins (PSM) (73.9%), LVI (59.0%) and pathological Gleason 9 disease (69.1%). Median (IQR) follow-up of the cohort was 36 months (13-61). At 5-year, CSM rate was 11.2% in patients with LVI vs 7.2% in patients without LVI (p=.03). However, on multivariable analysis, LVI was not an independent predictor of less favorable CSM rate (hazard ratio [HR]:1.071, 95% CI:0.718–1.599, p=0.7366). Covariates that were found to be independent predictors of CSM included Gleason score ≥ 8 (HR: 5.668, 95% CI: 2.704-11.830, p<.0001), PSM (HR: 1.774, 95% CI: 1.080-2.915, p=.02), pN1 (HR: 2.147, 95% CI: 1.278-3.607, p=.003), and stage ≥ pT3b (HR: 3.113, 95% CI: 1.334-7.265, p=.008). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with very high-risk PCa, where the stakes are the highest, and multimodal treatment is frequently discussed after radical prostatectomy, LVI fails to provide further guidance when compared to routinely available and utilized clinical and pathological features. In a quest to continuously optimize outcomes for our patients, our findings highlight an important shortcoming for LVI in very high-risk patients and further show the prognostic value of widely accepted adverse disease characteristics. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e366-e366 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Nikola Rakic More articles by this author Ivan Rakic More articles by this author Jacob Keeley More articles by this author Christian Meyer More articles by this author Markus Graefen More articles by this author Randi Pose More articles by this author Perre Tennstedt More articles by this author Nicholas Corsi More articles by this author Chandler Bronkema More articles by this author Akshay Sood More articles by this author Sohrab Arora More articles by this author Craig Rogers More articles by this author Mani Menon More articles by this author Firas Abdollah More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Read full abstract