Abstract Healthy environments are essential for physical and mental wellbeing. Air pollution is considered to be one of the most significant environmental risk factors for ill health and premature death within the European Union. Poor air and noise quality have been linked to the exacerbation of symptoms, hospital admissions, and even premature deaths, especially for those with cardiorespiratory diseases. The associated medical costs and productivity losses therefore also impose a large economic cost. Exposure to environmental stressors disproportionately affects socially disadvantaged groups, and therefore contributes to the large socioeconomic inequities in health observed persistently in Europe. The EU has prioritised action on causes of pollution. For example, its Green Deal outlines ambitious plans to address climate challenges such as pollution and align air quality ambitions closer to the World Health Organization guidelines. Likewise, the European Environmental Agency routinely monitors the mortality burden associated with air pollution, while the impact of environmental noise on European citizens is examined through the Environmental Noise Directive. While in the political scene there is interest to advance the reduction of pollution, efforts are hindered by the lack of an harmonized methodology to quantify the socioeconomic cost of environmental stressors. Currently, researchers working with the burden of disease framework face many challenges in its application in the context of environmental stressors. Among others, these challenges include unmet data needs and major lack of transparency in methodological developments. In this skills-building seminar, we will outline an integrated approach for measuring the true health cost of pollution. This approach is currently being trialled in the EU-funded BEST-COST project, which sets out to improve methodologies for understanding the socioeconomic cost of environmental stressors, focusing on air and noise pollution. The project brings together a consortium of 17 partners from Europe and the USA, and is led by Sciensano, the Belgian institute for health. Through a synergy of theoretical outlines and real-life examples, seminar participants will gain methodological insights in the three key components of this integrated approach - i.e., the quantification of the health burden of environmental stressors via comparative risk assessment, the monetization of Disability-Adjusted Life Years to assess economic impact, and the quantification of environmental health inequalities via a novel area-level based framework. Key messages • There are significant unmet needs with respect to both data and methodologies for quantifying the socioeconomic cost of environmental stressors. • We outline an integrated approach for measuring the true health cost of pollution, combining health burden, economic burden, and environmental health inequalities.