Partial Accommodative Esotropia Research Articles

Factors influencing the therapeutic effect of hyperopic correction on esotropia in patients with partially accommodative esotropia.

To collate data on partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) to better understand this condition's aetiology and to evaluate and predict the therapeutic effect of a hyperopic correction on PAET. Eighty-nine consecutive patients diagnosed with PAET with a spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error >+2.50 D were included in this retrospective review. Clinical characteristics, including gender, age, SE, angle of esodeviation, accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio, near-distance disparity (NDD) and anatomical features of the rectus muscles were compared among different PAET subgroups. Multiple linear regression was used to identify independent factors that influenced the therapeutic effect of a hyperopic correction on esotropia. No significant differences were observed for the angle of esodeviation as a function of age in individuals with PAET. The incidence of SE in PAET participants >9 years old was significantly greater than in those <5 and 6-8 years of age. The therapeutic effect of hyperopic correction on esotropia was positively associated with SE both at distance and near. In addition, the limbus insertion distance (LID) of the lateral rectus (LR) muscle was positively associated with NDD at distance, but negatively associated at near. A greater incidence of hyperopia was observed in older (>9 years old) PAET patients. A hyperopic correction had a greater effect on esotropia in individuals with a higher SE, larger LID of the LR muscle and a smaller NDD.

Long-Term Effects of Botulinum Toxin A Versus Incisional Surgery for Management of Partially Accommodative Esotropia in Children: Comparison of Three Approaches

Purpose: To compare the effect of bilateral medial rectus injection of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A), bilateral medial rectus muscle recession surgery (BMR rc), or unilateral medial rectus muscle recession combined with lateral rectus muscle resection surgery (R&R), in the management of partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) in children.Design: Retrospective comparative clinical study.Methods: The study cohort included 98 patients diagnosed with PAET who had BTX-A injection or incisional surgery between December 2014 and January 2023. The main outcome measures included motor and sensory results as well as complications. Follow-up was at least 12 months for all patients.Results: There were 28 patients in the BTX-A group, 45 in the R&R group, and 25 in the BMR rc group. The motor success rates at distance and near fixation respectively were 50% (14/28) and 54% (15/28) in the BTX-A group, which were lower than that of the R&R group [78% (35/45), 84% (38/45)] and the BMR rc group [72% (18/25), 84% (21/25)] (P = 0.042 for near and P=0.006 for distance). For patients with onset age <2.5 years old, there was no statistical difference amongst the three surgical approaches (P=0.656). For patients with onset age ≥2.5 years, the motor success rate of the R&R group [81% (26/32)] and the BMR rc group [88% (14/16)] was higher than that in the BTX-A group [38% (5/13); P=0.004]. There was no statistical difference in sensory outcomes for patients regardless of onset age or treatment methods (P>0.05 for all). During follow-up, 4% (2/45) of patients in the R&R group and 20% (5/25) in the BMR rc group developed consecutive exotropia; no patient in the BTX-A group was overcorrected (P=0.017).Conclusions: Bilateral medial rectus muscle injection with BTX-A in patients with PAET is a safe, accessible, and low-cost alternative. Although motor success rates were higher, overall, in patients treated with incisional surgery, for patients with earlier age of onset (≤ 2.5 years old), BTX-A injection may be preferred to incisional surgery. In older children treated with unilateral recession-resection surgery, fewer developed consecutive exotropia.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Infantile and Refractive Accommodative Esotropia

Purpose: To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with refractive accommodative esotropia (RAET) and infantile esotropia (IET).Methods: The medical records of patients with RAET and IET who were followed-up for more than 36 months were retrospectively analyzed. The RAET patients were prescribed spectacles to correct cycloplegic refraction and those with IET underwent bilateral, medial rectus recession. Visual acuity, refraction, the angle of esodeviation at far and near distances, and near-stereopsis were measured at each visit. The IET patients were divided into two groups by the time of surgery (before and after 24 months of age). Patients in both groups who underwent reoperations after diagnosis of partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) and recurrent IET during follow-up were analyzed.Results: Sixty-nine patients (40 with RAET and 29 with IET) were included. The follow-up period was 69.48 ± 28.41 months. At the final visit, the angles of esodeviation were 2.82 ± 5.46 prism diopters (PD) in the RAET group and 9.28 ± 8.37 PD in the IET group (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.01). In IET patients who underwent surgery before and after 24 months of age, the angles of esodeviation were 4.62 ± 5.25 and 13.06 ± 8.63 PD and the median near-stereopsis values 60 and 140 arcsec at the final visit (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.01, 0.03). Seven patients (17.5%) in the RAET group, and 2 (15.4%) and 10 (62.5%) IET patients who underwent surgery before and after 24 months of age, required reoperations (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.01).Conclusions: RAET and IET patients who underwent surgery before 24 months of age exhibited better alignment and stereopsis at the final visit than those who underwent later surgery and the reoperation rate was lower.

Accommodative esotropia

The aim of this study is to determine the outcome of accommodative esotropia (ET) and influencing factors in young Omani children. In this retrospective cohort, children diagnosed with accommodative ET who had followed up in a tertiary hospital from 2006 to 2011 were identified. Parameters studied included cycloplegic refraction and its change with time, ocular alignment, binocularity, visual acuity (VA), amblyopia, and requirement for surgery. A total of 51 patients were identified. Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with fully accommodative ET (FAET) and 27 with partially accommodative ET (PAET). The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of onset and reporting were 2.6 (±1.58) and 3.2 (±1.84) years in the two groups, respectively. The mean (SD) cycloplegic refraction at presentation was 4.50 (±1.66) in the FAET group and 3.65 (±1.67) in the PAET group. Anisometropia was present in 28% of patients. The mean follow-up period was 4.9 years. The following were detected in the final visit. A reduction in amblyopia from 43% to 6% of patients, binocularity in 75% of patients, and a mean increase of 0.64 (±1.3) D in cycloplegic refraction from the first visit (P = 0.005). The mean angle of deviation at near and distance was 29.86 (±15.21) and 17.80 (±10.14) prism diopters, respectively, in FAET patients and 30.15 (±14.83) and 29.53 (±15.53), respectively, in PAET patients. Thirty-seven percent of the PAET patients underwent surgery within 5 years from diagnosis. All participants in this cohort continued to wear glasses in the last follow-up visit. Most children with refractive accommodative ET have an excellent outcome in terms of VA and binocular vision. The PAET group was characterized by delayed reporting, the presence of anisometropia, and lower hypermetropia. Further study is required to determine the possibility of weaning glasses in FAET patients.

Comparison of Dose Increments of Botulinum Toxin A with Surgery as Primary Treatment for Infantile Esotropia and Partially Accommodative Esotropia.

PurposeTo compare the effect of increment dose of botulinum toxin (BTX) injection in correlation to the angle of deviation to bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) in infantile esotropia and partially accommodative esotropia (PAET).MethodsThis was a retrospective study that included pediatric patients ≤16 years old with infantile esotropia and PAET at Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital (DESH) from 2014 till 2021 treated with increment dose of BTX or BMR. A successful outcome is defined as ocular alignment within 10 PD of deviation after 1–3 BTX injections or one surgery with a minimum follow-up of 6 months.ResultsOf 177 patients, 101 patients received BTX treatment for either infantile esotropia (n = 37) or PAET (n = 64) and 76 patients underwent BMR for either infantile ET (n = 25) or PAET (n = 51). BTX showed a higher success rate than BMR {65.3% vs 55.3% (p = 0.174)}. In patients with infantile esotropia, the success rate was comparable between BTX group and BMR group {40.5% vs 52% (p = 0.440)}. However, the success rate was statistically significantly higher in BTX group in compare to BMR group {79.7% vs 56.9% (p = 0.014)}. Consecutive exotropia was 0% in BTX group and 9.2% in BMR group (p = 0.002).ConclusionThe increment dose of BTX injection is comparable to surgery in patients with infantile esotropia but superior to the routine surgery in patients with PAET. BTX has the advantage of a shorter procedure duration, lower costs, less exposure to general anesthesia and being minimally invasive intervention.

Preplaced posterior fixation suture to improve surgical accessibility in partial accommodative esotropia with convergence excess

This video article may be viewed at jaapos.org.

Conventional surgery versus botulinum toxin injections for partially accommodative esotropia

To compare the effect of botulinum toxin injection (BTX) to bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) in partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). The medical records of children 1-14 years of age treated for PAET with BMR or BTX between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. PAET was defined as residual esotropia of at least 14Δ after 6 weeks of continuous wear of full cycloplegic refraction (> +2.5 D). Success was defined as esotropia of 0Δ-10Δ after a single surgery or ≥1 BTX injections. Of 224 patients, 121 received BTX and 103 underwent BMR. BMR showed a higher success rate than BTX (70.9% vs 53.7% [P = 0.006]). BMR was more successful in males, in patients >5 years of age, and when spherical equivalent was ≤ +5.00 D (79.2%, 74.3%, and 67.5%, resp. [P < 0.05]). Mean follow-up was shorter in the BMR group than in the BTX group (16.7 ± 14.7 vs 31.4 ± 29.5 months [P = 0.0001]). Mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the BTX group (5.2 ± 4.3 vs 70.5 ± 31.4 min [P = 0.0001]). Postoperative inferior oblique overaction was more common in the BTX group (7.4%; P = 0.02 [Fisher exact test]), and persistent ptosis was only seen in the BTX group (0.8%); consecutive exotropia was only seen in the BMR group (2%). In our study cohort, BMR had a higher success rate than BTX. Conventional surgery allowed for shorter follow-up and fewer complications than BTX in the treatment of PAET.

Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Treatment of Infantile and Partially Accommodative Esotropia.

We aimed to investigate the effect of botulinum toxin (BT) injection on the treatment of infantile and partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). This retrospective cohort study included patients who received BT injections for infantile and PAET between January 2015 and December 2018. Treatment was considered successful if orthotropia, consecutive exotropia, or esotropia within 10 prism diopters (PD) was achieved. The overall success rate was 47.4%, with a mean follow-up period of 27.8 months in 403 children. BT treatment was considered successful in 37.1% of cases of infantile esotropia and 53.1% of cases of partially accommodative esotropia. The average deviation angle before starting treatment was 35.5 ± 13.9 PD. Side effects 1 week after BT injections included transient overcorrection (63.8%) and transient ptosis (41.7%). There were no significant differences in the success rates between the different doses of BT (P = 0.69). The angle of deviation at presentation was significantly associated with the success rate of BT injection (failed group, mean: 38.1 ± 15.3 PD vs. success group, mean: 32.6 ± 11.6 PD; P < 0.001). Other factors associated with higher success rates were overcorrection at 1 week and PAET, while multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a smaller angle of deviation and overcorrection (1 week after injection) were associated with a higher success rate. A smaller angle of deviation and transient overcorrection were associated with a higher success rate, and no significant difference was observed in the success rates of different BT doses.

Augmented medial rectus muscle recession versus medial rectus recession with posterior scleral fixation in partially accommodative esotropia: a randomized clinical trial

To compare the postoperative alignment after medial rectus muscle posterior scleral fixation versus augmented recession in children with partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) without convergence excess. In this prospective study, 60 children with PAET without convergence excess were randomly assigned to either augmented medial rectus recession, based on the average of distance angle with correction and near angle without correction, or medial rectus recession, based on distance angle with correction, combined with posterior scleral fixation. The ductions, versions, angles of deviation, and difference between angles were analyzed before and 6months after surgery. Complete success was defined as orthotropia to within 8Δ of esophoria/tropia for both distance and near, with spectacle correction, at 6months. Patients who developed any exophoria/tropia with their original spectacles and needed reduction of their hyperopic correction to achieve successful outcome were defined as qualified successes. Of the 60 children, 25 in the augmented group and 28 in the posterior fixation group completed follow-up. The mean age at surgery was 4.90±2.34years. The complete success rate was 48% and 64% in the augmented and posterior fixation groups, respectively (P=0.15); the qualified success rate was 80% and 92.9%, respectively (P=0.17). Success rate was significantly higher (P=0.04) in the posterior fixation group (56%) than in the augmented group (18%) when the preoperative angle disparity was ≥20Δ. Medial rectus posterior scleral fixation can improve the success rate in PAET with large angle disparity.

Effect of prism adaptation in patients with partially accommodative esotropia: clinical findings and surgical outcomes.

To assess the effects of prism adaptation on the surgical outcomes of individuals with partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). The medical records of 51 patients with PAET who were managed surgically at single referral center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to prism adaptation. Data about sex, age, initial angle of deviation, final angle of deviation, stereoacuity, surgical dosage, and follow-up periods were collected. The main outcome of this study was motor outcomes at 12months. Eighteen patients had a history of prism adaptation (PA group) and 33 did not (augmented surgery group, AS group). One year after surgery, 12 (66.7%) patients in the PA group and 21 (63.6%) in the AS group achieved an angle of deviation less than 5 PD. The surgical success rate in both groups did not significantly differ (p = 1). After the first prism adaptation test, six patients had an angle of deviation similar to the previous angle; however, 12 patients had larger angle, and consequently required additional prism (prism builder). Two (33.3%) patients who were prism non-builders had deviation less than 5 PD during the final visit. However, among the prism builders, four (57.1%) and five (100%) patients who had prism added once and more than once, respectively, had less than 5 PD deviation during the final visit (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in terms of surgical outcomes between both groups. Nonetheless, in PA group, prism builders have better surgical outcomes than non-builders.

The Role of Heredity and the Prevalence of Strabismus in Families with Accommodative, Partial Accommodative, and Infantile Esotropia

Objectives:To investigate the prevalence of strabismus in families of a proband with accommodative, partial accommodative, or infantile esotropia (IET), and to evaluate the mode of inheritance and the role of consanguineous marriages in this prevalence.Materials and Methods:Families of probands with comitant strabismus were invited to participate in the study. The family members of 139 subjects with accommodative esotropia (AET), 55 with partial accommodative esotropia (PAET), and 21 with IET agreed to participate. Detailed family trees were constructed. The first- and second-degree relatives were invited for a complete ophthalmological examination, and 518 individuals from 168 families were evaluated. The role of consanguinity, the presence of tropia, phoria (≥8 PD), microtropia, and hypermetropia (≥3.00 D) among first- and second-degree relatives were analyzed.Results:A non-Mendelian pattern was found in 49 families (23%), an autosomal dominant pattern in 39 families (18%), and an autosomal recessive pattern in 6 families (3%). The prevalence of consanguineous marriages among parents of probands was 18.1%, 22.6%, and 14.3% in the AET, PAET, and IET groups, respectively (p=0.652). The prevalence of strabismus in first-degree relatives was 58.9%, 45.5%, and 38.1%, respectively (p=0.07). The prevalence of microtropia in probands’ siblings was significantly higher in the AET group (p=0.034).Conclusion:Sporadic cases and non-Mendelian inheritance were more frequent than autosomal recessive inheritance. Autosomal recessive inheritance was found not to be frequent in consanguineous marriages. The prevalence of strabismus and microtropia was significantly higher in families of esotropia cases than in the general population.

Long-term outcomes of prismatic correction in partially accommodative esotropia.

In partially accommodative esotropia (PAET), prism glasses can correct small angles of residual esotropia but the long-term effect of prismatic correction alone without surgery has not been reported. We aimed to investigate the long-term outcome of prism glasses after full hypermetropic correction for PAET. This retrospective, case-control study was performed for children aged 10 years or younger with a residual esotropia of ≤ 20 prism diopters (PD) after full hypermetropic correction who were fitted with prism glasses and followed-up for 3 years or more. Clinical characteristics and the angle of esodeviation were obtained at each follow-up examination. Successful motor outcome after 3 years of prismatic correction was determined if the residual angle of esotropia after full hypermetropic correction was ≤ 10PD. Patients who eventually weaned off prism glasses were noted. Among 124 patients, 30.6% achieved success and 7.3% weaned off prism glasses after 3 years of prism-wear. Smaller amount of latent esodeviation (P = 0.001) revealed by prism adaptation and good fusional response at near with the Worth 4-dot test were significant prognostic factors of success by multivariate analysis (P = 0.033). After 3 years of wearing prism glasses, the rate of improvement in stereoacuity was higher in the Success group (60.5% vs 27.9%) (P = 0.001), however, there was no significant difference between the prism-weaned group and prism-wearing group within the Success group (P>0.05). Prism glasses for small angle PAET can be a treatment option in patients who have a small angle of latent esodeviation revealed by prism adaptation and good sensory fusion at near. Otherwise, early surgery may be advisable as the majority of patients showed suboptimal outcome even after long-term prism-wear.

Long-term development of refractive error in refractive, nonrefractive and partially accommodative esotropia.

Accommodative esotropia (AE) is a convergent deviation due to an excess of the convergence linked to the innervational stimulus for accommodation and it is usually associated to the presence of hyperopia. The development of hyperopia over time has been widely described but the lack of comparative analysis among accommodative esotropia subtypes, does not allow to verify the existence of different developmental patterns. In this study we aimed to describe the long term changes of refractive error in patients affected by accommodative esotropia as a function of the strabismus type: refractive (RAE), non-refractive (NRAE) and partially accommodative esotropia (PAE). The medical records of 66 patients (24 RAE, 22 PAE, 20 NRAE), who wore the full correction of their cycloplegic refraction error during the entire follow up period, were retrospectively reviewed. Mean outcome was the analysis of the variations, among groups, of refractive error over time; differences between mild (≤3.00D) and high (≥5.00D) hyperopia, effects of amblyopia and relationship with AC/A ratio were also investigated. All patients were followed up from approximately 4 years of age to 20, with mean follow up of 16.06±0.29 years. Our results described similar non-linear trend of refractive error development among groups. The initial increase of hyperopia (up to 7–8 years) was followed by a decreasing trend persisting up to adulthood (approximately 20 years of age). During this period, spherical equivalent decreased at a lower mean annual rate in patients affected by RAE (-0.07D) compared to other groups (NRAE -0.11D, p = 0.003 and PAE 0.13D, p = 0.002). In all groups, however, significant amount of hyperopia was found at last examination; indeed the observed difference in SE values from baseline to the end of follow up, was not significant (RAE: +0.27D, 95% C.I. -0.49 to +1.04D, p = 0.472; PAE: -0.69D, 95% C.I. -1.67 to +0.28D, p = 0.154; NRAE: -0.39D, 95% C.I. -1.11 to +0.34D, p = 0.278). AC/A ratio, amblyopia and amount of initial hyperopia appeared to have no significant role in longitudinal change of the refractive error. In conclusion, this study provides a complete overview, from childhood to adulthood, of refractive error development in different form of accommodative esotropia.

Comparison between augmented recession and medial rectus recession with posterior scleral fixation in partially accommodative esotropia

Surgery for partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) has been to correct the residual angle that was not corrected with glasses. The most common approaches are the standard and augmented surgeries.

Stereoacuity outcomes following surgical correction of the nonaccommodative component in partially accommodative esotropia

Previous studies of partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) have assessed factors requiring surgery and alignment outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to additionally evaluate stereoacuity in patients who required surgery for their nonaccommodative component. The medical records of consecutive patients with PAET who underwent bilateral medial rectus recession from April 1990 to July 2010 to treat the nonaccommodative component were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative data included visual acuity, stereoacuity, cycloplegic refraction, deviation at distance and near, and age at surgery. The primary outcomes were stereoacuity and alignment. A total of 84 patients were included. Stereopsis by the Titmus StereoTest was demonstrated in 51 (61%) by the final visit. The average follow-up time was 4.4±2.8years (range, 0.8-11.0years). Fine stereopsis (100 arcsec or better) was appreciated in 29 patients(35%, 57% of those with stereopsis). Of those with residual esotropia, 11 (50%) demonstrated stereopsis, and 7 (32%) appreciated fine stereoacuity. No exotropic patient had stereopsis. There was a statistically significant correlation between age at time of surgery and stereopsis at 1year (ρ=0.233; P=0.033) but not at the final visit (ρ=0.106, P=0.34). Of the 84 patients, 56 (67%) had a favorable alignment (within 10Δ of orthotropia) at the final visit; 22 (26%) had residual esotropia; and 6 (7%) had consecutive exotropia. In this subset of esotropic patients who required surgery for their nonaccommodative component, favorable sensory outcomes can be achieved. Furthermore, favorable stereoacuity can be found even when there is a residual esodeviation.

Photorefractive keratectomy influences the angle of ocular deviation in strabismus patients with hyperopia.

To evaluate refractive, binocular vision and ocular alignment outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the treatment of hyperopia in esotropic patients. Medical charts of hyperopic patients with full or partial accommodative esotropia (FAE or PAE) or consecutive exotropia (CE) undergone PRK from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of PRK in improving ocular alignment. The secondary outcomes were the assessments of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) and stereoacuity. Sixty-four eyes of 32 hyperopic patients were included. Three patients were affected by FAE, 24 by PAE and 5 by CE. All FAE patients and 4 PAE patients underwent only PRK; the remaining 25 patients underwent PRK plus strabismus surgery. After PRK, the mean corrected esodeviation decreased significantly in the overall esotropic population [7.15 ± 9.42 prism diopters (PD) vs. 5.04 ± 8.83PD; p = 0.03] and in particular in the group with small-angle esodeviation (< 20PD). Conversely, the only 2 patients with an angle of strabismus ≥20 PD as well as all CE patients did not show any postoperative variation of the deviation angle. Mean preoperative BCVA did not differ from postoperative UCVA (p = 0.19), while the mean postoperative SE decreased significantly after PRK (p < 0.0001). Our study confirmed that PRK eliminates the accommodative component of the deviation. In addition, this procedure seems to reduce or eliminate also the non-accommodative component of esodeviation (especially in small-angle deviation), thus suggesting to postpone strabismus surgery after PRK when esotropia and hyperopia coexist.

Botulinum toxin; indications, success rates and complications in the management of horizontal strabismus in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction: This study aims to analyze the indications, effectiveness and side effects of Botulinum toxin in the management of different horizontal strabismus entities. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cases underwent botulinum toxin injection for strabismus in Dhahran Eye Hospital from November 2013 till September 2016 where no previous surgery or intervention have been performed or a previous facial or ocular trauma. Main success indicator was a remaining angle of less than 10 prism diopter. Results: A total of 74 cases were included. 52.7% males and 47.3% females. Age ranged from two months to forty-five years. The most prevalent diagnosis was partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). The mean angle of deviation was 37.3 prism diopters (PD) with a range of 10 to 90 PD. Overall success rate was 54% with PAET scoring the highest (70.6%). No clinical significance was found regarding age, angle of deviation or the presence of amblyopia. However, the absence of inferior oblique overaction was statistically significant on the success rate of infantile esotropia. No serious peri-operative complications were documented. Conclusion: Botulinum toxin represents a cost effective, safe, repeatable alternative to surgery in the management of different entities of horizontal strabismus. Success rate differs in different diagnoses with PAET scoring the highest. Presence of inferior oblique overaction leads to a significant lower rate of success.

Long-Term Changes in Refractive Error and Clinical Evaluation in Partially Accommodative Esotropia after Surgery.

We investigate the changes in refractive error and clinical evaluation in partially accommodative esotropia(PAET) after surgery. A total of 68 patients PAET who received at least 2 years of follow-up after surgery were enrolled in this study. We performed a retrospective study in patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral medial rectus recession for a non-accommodative component of PAET between January 2005 and March 2013. Patients were divided into groups according to the presence of dominancy (dominant, non-dominant, alternative eye), and presence of amblyopia (amblyopic, fellow, normal eye). Changes and changing pattern in SE refractive error were analyzed in all patients and compared between groups. Patients were divided into two groups, those weaned off of hyperopic glasses and those who continued using them, then factors that significantly influenced the continued use of glasses were analyzed. The changes and changing pattern in SE refractive error according to time after operation and presence of amblyopia or dominancy. The mean length of follow-up was 4.89±1.74 years after surgery and the mean change in SE refractive error rate per year was -0.284±0.411 diopters (D). The pattern of changes in the mean SE refractive error for those with dominant, non-dominant, and alternative eyes was not significantly different (p = 0.292). The pattern of changes in the mean SE refractive error for those with amblyopic, fellow, and normal eyes was significantly different (p = 0.0002). Patients were successfully weaned off of hyperopic glasses at an average age of 9.41±2.74 years. The average SE refractive error in the group weaned off of hyperopic glasses was significantly lower than that in the group maintained on hyperopic glasses (p = 0.0002). The change of SE refractive error in amblyopic eyes decreased less than that in fellow or normal eyes, which may be correlated with the presence of amblyopia. Patients with a smaller esodeviated angle without hyperopic correction, a lower degree of hyperopia, and who were older at the time of disease onset were discontinued from hyperopic glasses sooner after surgery.

Spontaneous Regression of Over-elevation in Adduction Following Esotropia Surgery.

To evaluate the course of over-elevation in adduction in patients who had esotropia following correction of horizontal deviation. The review of the medical files identified 28 patients who had esotropia with over-elevation in adduction. Data collected from the patients' full ophthalmological examinations included visual acuity, ocular alignment, duction, versions and sensory tests for binocularity and stereopsis, cycloplegic retinoscopy, and fundus evaluation. Oblique muscle function was graded on a scale of -4 to +4. The primary outcome measure was the amount of improvement in over-elevation in adduction following esotropia surgery. Of the 28 patients (mean age: 53.5 ± 53.7 months), 13 were males and 15 were females. Of these, 22 (78.6%) had infantile esotropia and 6 (21.4%) had partial accommodative esotropia. The mean follow-up was 16.3 ± 7.9 months. All patients underwent bilateral medial rectus recession for correction of esotropia. The mean preoperative inferior oblique overaction was +2.1 ± 0.7 and the final postoperative value was +0.8 ± 0.9 (P < .001). There was a statistically significant decrease in postoperative over-elevation in adduction at all postoperative visits compared to the preoperative value (P < .001 at 3- and 6-month and final visits). Over-elevation in adduction regressed in 42 eyes (80.8%). Of these, 18 eyes (34.6%) completely resolved without any additional surgery to the inferior oblique muscle. Spontaneous regression in over-elevation in adduction was observed after esotropia surgery without additional inferior oblique weakening surgery. This may affect presurgical evaluation of and surgical planning for patients.

Stereoacuity in children with accommodative esotropia versus partially accommodative esotropia

• Accommodative esotropia was defined as > 10 PD of intermittent or constant esotropia. • Fully accommodative esotropia (FAET) was diagnosed in those children having 4 weeks and maintaining such alignment for > one year. • Partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) was diagnosed in those children with 10 PD or more residual ET after wearing their full hyperopic spectacle correction for > 4 weeks. • Stereoacuity was tested with the fly and circles on the Stereo Fly Test (Stereo Optical Co., Inc.) at 40 cm.