Lisa Lowe, The Intimacies of Four Continents, Durham NC and London, Duke University Press, 2015, 319pp; £16.99 paperbackJames Epstein, Scandal of Colonial Rule: Power and Subversion in the British Atlantic during the Age of Revolution, New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012, 314pp; £21.99 paperbackOur history is destined in this chapter to go backwards and forwards in a very irresolute manner seemingly, and having conducted our story to tomorrow presently, we shall immediately again have occasion to step back to yesterday, so that the whole of the tale may get a hearing.-Vanity Fair (1848)'Intimacy' has become a busy term in contemporary cultural theory with few signs of agreement about its endlessly contestable meanings and usage. While some critics would still locate it primarily within the most highly personalised 'zones of familiarity and comfort', 'intimacy' frequently invokes what Lauren Berlant has concisely described as 'the modes of attachment that make persons public and collective and that make collective scenes spaces.'1 So, in Jurgen Habermas's classic account of the 'surreptitious hollowing out of the family's sphere' by the predatory powers of states and businesses, a paradoxical condition of 'fl oodlit privacy' is all that remains.2 Lisa Lowe's ambitious new book is a reminder of the deft footwork now required of anyone attempting to negotiate this tricky terrain. In The Intimacies of Four Continents she aligns herself with postcolonial scholars like Ann Laura Stoler, Antoinette Burton, or Nayan Shah who have each provided a distinctive take on how 'the intimate sphere of sexual, reproductive, or household relations' served as 'a site of empire'. But, in the next breath, Lowe fi rmly differentiates her project from theirs as one that aims rather to open up what she calls 'a economy of intimacies' in which geographical distances are radically foreshortened by highlighting the close historical and conceptual relations between changing categories of labour and eighteenth- and nineteenthcentury struggles for emancipation (pp17-18). From Lowe's perspective, our common-sense notions of 'intimacy' can no longer be said to ground the inner self-certainty of the modern individual or of liberal individualism more generally; instead, the limited cultural forms that interiority and domesticity characteristically take must ultimately be viewed as the obscured or unrecognised product - in the most literal sense - of the colony's specifi c work in sustaining, not to say constantly re-creating, the metropolis or imperial centre that once brought it into being. In her introductory remarks, Lowe turns to Foucault, characterising her study as 'an unlikely or unsettling genealogy of modern liberalism' that will pave the way for 'a historical ontology of ourselves', an analysis of the categories that continue to defi ne who we are and allow us to refl ect on what we might still become (p3). This formulation sits uneasily with the residues of a Marxist theory of ideology that sometimes informs the structure of her arguments, regardless of her critical observations on the shortcomings of the Western Marxist tradition.On the one hand: slaves, sharecroppers, convicts, day workers, debt peonage, indentured labour; on the other: freedom, utilitarian discipline, free trade, and liberal governance. Rather than striving for a synoptic overview, Lowe engages with the problem-space of liberalism selectively, exploring the links between these twinned poles of hegemony and domination through a series of well-chosen case studies that not only revisit the colonial archive, but also extend that archive to include works of fi ction and autobiography, as well as major political treatises and long-term changes in decor and fashion. In so doing she seeks to identify key episodes in the emergence of a postabolitionist political and economic world-system, what one might call the long conjuncture defi ned by Britain's unprecedented industrial presence and virtually indestructible sea power as older mercantilist economic ideologies were increasingly swept away by liberal notions of free trade. …
Read full abstract