The diagnosis of conversion hysteria is difficult. On the one hand, the elimination of a somatic pathology comes up against the sensitivity limits of paraclinical explorations and on the other hand, a positive psychopathological explanation is far from being systematically found when no organicity is retained to explain the symptoms. In this work, we will progress from a Freudian conception of the conversion as a hieroglyphic inscription on the body of an unconscious decipherable conflict, to a modern vision of conversion disorders which integrates the results of recent functional cerebral neuroimaging studies. If the representation of the action at cortex level seems to be conserved in the conversion paralyses, the blocking of the gesture occurs later at an execution stage whereas hyperactivity of the medial frontal region seems to inhibit the action of the motor cortex via the influence of limbic afferents. In addition to a psychogenic origin, the conversion can also be defined as a functional paralysis of a neuronal zone which is the place of abnormal cerebral activity, potentially reversible pathological activity. All these recent data question the evolution of the definition of conversion disorders. At a time when the clinical perception was the main means of investigating illnesses, Freud had the intelligence to differentiate conversion and simulation: modern neurology has proved him right as the images confirm that conversion and simulation involve distinct cerebral mechanisms. Furthermore, the implication of similar functional neuropathological mechanisms as biological supports of dissociative and conversion disorder has restored the Freudian unity of hysteria, through a detour into neuroscience.
Read full abstract