SESSION TITLE: Advances in Pulmonary and Critical Care Training SESSION TYPE: Original Investigations PRESENTED ON: 10/08/2018 01:30 pm - 02:30 pm PURPOSE: To perform a qualitative assessment of current rounding practices in the Mayo Clinic Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU), and identify opportunities for improvement that would have the greatest impact on the learning experience of rotating residents. METHODS: This study was reviewed and deemed quality improvement by the Mayo Clinic IRB. A previously published survey based on 13 best ICU rounding practices from a recent systematic review was adapted and distributed electronically to the 307 interprofessional team members who participated in MICU rounds between July 2017 and January 2018 (critical care staff physicians, fellows, advance practice providers, internal medicine residents, ICU nurses and pharmacists). All questions used a 5 point anchored Likert scale (1 = never, 5 = always) with the exception of three summary questions on the efficiency, quality and educational environment of ICU rounds (10 point anchored scale, 1=low, 10 = high). Survey results were presented to a volunteer panel of interprofessional members (two from each group surveyed), who identified three areas to improve rounding efficiency and education using the Modified Nominal Group Technique (Rankin et al). RESULTS: Overall response rate was 33.6% (103 respondents, range 20.8% - 62.5% by subgroup). Median and mode scores for efficiency, quality and educational environment were 6, 7, and 7, respectively. The majority of median and mode responses assessing use of evidence-based best ICU rounding practices were 4 (usually) or above, with less perceived adherence in the areas of “implementing structured rounding tool and checklist” (median, mode = 3), and “a systemic approach to address interruptions during rounds” (median, mode = 3). The most disruptive perceived interruptions included returning pages, answering phones, new patient admissions and side conversations. Using Modified Nominal Group Technique the volunteer focus group identified the following areas for improvement: 1) Defining explicit roles for each health care provider participating on rounds; 2) Minimizing unnecessary interruptions; 3) Focusing patient centered discussion and documentation of daily goals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that trainee educational experience is closely linked to their effective integration into the interprofessional ICU team, clear understanding of team roles and responsibilities, and rounding efficiency with an emphasis on patient centeredness and minimizing interruptions. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings will inform the learning objectives for a revised orientation module in the resident MICU curriculum, and has prompted an ongoing pilot project to determine if more effective resident integration through ICU rounding processes results in overall improvements in rounding efficiency, education, and adherence to published best practices. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Crystal Breighner, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Alexander Niven, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Mahrukh Rizvi, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Can Wang, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Zhenmei Zhang, source=Web Response
Read full abstract