Hypothetical mass generation and reduction constants are derived considering a particular conceptual framework, presence versus absence of mass. A mass generation constant accounts for dissipation. Another for reduction, accounts for masses which would otherwise be in motion before dissipation. It's important to note that there is no data generated or presented; that is, the foregoing exposition is theoretical and also contains a significant correction to the previous submission. A comparison is made between masses at a hypothetical vertex and those presumed to divert away from it in space time. At the vertex, identical, equal mass pairs are thought to be unchanged, perhaps force resistant for some time. Otherwise, masses which descend away from the vertex are hypothesized to decrease down the electromagnetic spectrum with a related function. That is, in a mathematical arrangement established in the foregoing, equal masses at the vertex yield light speed and its exact reciprocal. A question later ensues whether or not masses, surrounding the hypothetical pair at the vertex, are in line for immolation in such a way that maintains or protects the pair from forces such as those from a black hole. Accordingly, unequal descending masses, per the approach provided, do not appear to establish such exact points as those at vertex unless conservation eventually ensues. It is then proposed that unequal descending masses from the vertex may establish points of conservation at exactly 94.8% inside and outside a conserved hole. As such, an ideal situation appears established for reciprocal energy and negligible mass. A further consideration was whether conservation, establishing the latter percentage, occurs under a premise that some unequal masses descending down the spectrum are captured by others and paired. The latter was further based on a calculation, with use of constants, that the hypothetical generation speed of one of the unequal masses is exactly equal to its speed, at another point, where its paired arrangement may suggest mass capture. Accordingly, a further question was whether or not this mass is captured, at its point of generation, by the second unequal mass at c. Upon hypothetical pairing, the next challenge was to consider how masses are reduced. That is, where the vertex demonstrates a mathematical reciprocal yield of time per negligible mass at 1/c, no masses can be reduced as there can be no boundary between the yield of the vertex and that of any new equal pair with the same value. Accordingly, unequal mass pairs are suggested to match the closest possible point, by approximation, to the 1/c reciprocal yield at the vertex where there is thought to be a newly established boundary and an influx of mass accepted. Hence, where there was previously a void of reciprocal mass energy, despite presence of mass, a new reciprocal measure accommodates time taken for masses crossing the boundary to become negligible. It follows that this closest point of approximation possible to c and its reciprocal measure are established, as mentioned by conservation. Exact conservation and reciprocal energy, established by unequal descending masses, appear to fit with an idea that reactive forces by mass enveloping an equal pair, at the vertex, may help divert the equal pair from a change in its inert state for as long as possible. This was important to consider per special relativity suggesting a tendency for inert mass to resist change. Accordingly, the last two formulas include generation and reduction constants coupled with the two descending mass factors. The two unequal mass factors, per hypothetical pairing, are meant to account for a mathematical threshold at which this important aspect of special relativity may be maintained at the limits of space time. Hence, a last formula demonstrates this premise that unique masses for m may remain unchanged at such thresholds, as at the vertex, despite being subject to mass reduction. The latter is schematized by respective constants and a foregoing final formula. The equal mass pair at the vertex and one of the unequal masses considered to be conserved, inside and outside a hypothetical hole, were thought to remain unchanged for at least some time. That is, after a boundary is established to create a link to a reciprocal yield, time per distance at the vertex, a delay appears established during which the schema indicates a 5 unit reduction of all other masses. While this mass does not appear initially subject to the mathematical boundary, unless in a paired relationship with another at c, it was thought to be conserved, when alone, for some time to enhance pairing and further reciprocal energy inside a hole. Hence, the presence of the unequal pair establishing conservation was factored into two formulas for generation and reduction. Last, use of the same mass m, for all numbers, yields two separate quotients consistent with mass equivalence.
Read full abstract
Oct 8, 2024
Johana Brokešová + 1
Open Access