Pain Side Effects Research Articles

Comparison of Analgesia Methods Through a Web Platform in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: Pilot Design, Implementation, and Validation Study.

Pain management is a vital and essential part of postoperative pectus excavatum (PE) care. Given the lack of an international consensus on guidelines for postoperative handling and evaluation, further research is necessary to compare the efficacy of existing pain management methods regarding pain relief, side effects, and long-term outcomes. In this context, the use of eHealth solutions for data mining can enhance data collection efficiency, reduce errors, and improve patient engagement. However, these digital health care frameworks are currently underused in the context of pain management for PE. This research is part of the broader Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) study conducted by Giannina Gaslini Children's Hospital to address postoperative pain and recovery in PE patients treated with either standard thoracic epidural analgesia or cryoanalgesia, which is considered its innovative alternative approach. Specifically, this work is aimed at introducing a valuable tool for a comprehensive and quantitative comparison of the 2 analgesia strategies. The tool is a web and mobile app designed to facilitate data collection, management, and analysis of clinical data for pain assessment. The adopted approach involves a careful design based on clinician input, resulting in an intuitive app structure with 3 main screens. Digital surveys are borrowed from paper surveys, including medical history and preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up evaluations. XTENS 2.0 was used to manage the data, and Ionic facilitated cross-platform app development, ensuring secure and adaptable data handling. Preliminary analysis on a pilot cohort of 72 patients (36 treated with standard therapy and 36 treated with cryoanalgesia) indicated successful patient enrollment and balanced representation across treatment groups and genders. Notably, hospital stay was significantly shorter with cryoanalgesia than with standard therapy (Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon 2-sided test with Bonferroni correction; P<.001; U statistic=287.5), validating its treatment efficacy. This work is a step toward modernizing health care through digital transformation and patient-centered models. The app shows promise in streamlined data collection and patient engagement, although improvements in multilingual support, data validation, and incentivization of questionnaire completion are warranted. Overall, this study highlights the potential of digital health solutions in revolutionizing health care practices, fostering patient involvement, and improving care quality.

What determines the overall quality of postoperative pain management? Aquestion of perspective

The outcome domains pain intensity, pain-related interference, side effects, (treatment) information, participation and personal interaction have all been identified as relevant factors in the management of perioperative pain. However, it is not yet clear which of these are particularly significant for the subjectively perceived overall quality of postoperative pain management. Anewly developed questionnaire was used in this cross-sectional study to assess the relevance of these domains for patients and compare the relevance to healthcare professionals (HCP). The patient survey (n = 40) was conducted on the first postoperative day at Jena University Hospital, Germany. In order to investigate group differences, 63 HCP (disciplines: n = 15 anaesthesiology, n = 17 surgery, n = 31 nursing) were recruited. The questionnaire primarily included all pairwise comparisons between the domains with regard to the overall quality of postoperative pain management. The resulting sum scores for each domain were the primary outcome measure, which were analysed using generalized estimating equations. Within the group of patients, there were significant differences in the prioritization of the six outcome domains, with personal interaction followed by intensity and interference having received the highest ratings. There were also significant differences within the domains between the perspectives of patients and HCP, as well as between the HCP themselves. The study demonstrates that personal interaction and the reduction of pain intensity and interference are three key factors that are significant for patients' experience of postoperative pain management. However, the extent to which the harmonisation of these three factors with those given prominence by HCP would positively impact postoperative pain management remains unclear and should be investigated further.

Monitoring surgical nociception using multisensor physiological models

Monitoring nociception, the flow of information associated with harmful stimuli through the nervous system even during unconsciousness, is critical for proper anesthesia care during surgery. Currently, this is done by tracking heart rate and blood pressure by eye. Monitoring objectively a patient's nociceptive state remains a challenge, causing drugs to often be over- or underdosed intraoperatively. Inefficient management of surgical nociception may lead to more complex postoperative pain management and side effects such as postoperative cognitive dysfunction, particularly in elderly patients. We collected a comprehensive and multisensor prospective observational dataset focused on surgical nociception (101 surgeries, 18,582 min, and 49,878 nociceptive stimuli), including annotations of all nociceptive stimuli occurring during surgery and medications administered. Using this dataset, we developed indices of autonomic nervous system activity based on physiologically and statistically rigorous point process representations of cardiac action potentials and sweat gland activity. Next, we constructed highly interpretable supervised and unsupervised models with appropriate inductive biases that quantify surgical nociception throughout surgery. Our models track nociceptive stimuli more accurately than existing nociception monitors. We also demonstrate that the characterizing signature of nociception learned by our models resembles the known physiology of the response to pain. Our work represents an important step toward objective multisensor physiology-based markers of surgical nociception. These markers are derived from an in-depth characterization of nociception as measured during surgery itself rather than using other experimental models as surrogates for surgical nociception.

Opioid Treatment Is Associated with Recurrent Healthcare Visits, Increased Side Effects, and Pain

Introduction: Pain is a major driver of visits to the emergency department (ED). Clinicians must consider not only the efficacy of treatment options but also subsequent healthcare utilization and patient-centered outcomes such as side effects from prescribed medications. Our goal in this study was to determine whether there was an association between acute pain treatment regimen (opioids, intranasal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], or both) and unscheduled healthcare visits following ED discharge. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the Acute Management of Pain from the Emergency Department (AMPED) prospective, observational cohort study. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the relationship between treatment regimen and time to first unscheduled healthcare visit. Repeated measures logistic regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between treatment regimen and any unscheduled visits, and to evaluate whether this relationship was mediated by pain severity and/or medication side effects. Results: Of 831 total enrolled participants, 141 (16.9%) experienced an unplanned healthcare visit within five days of ED discharge. A majority of these visits happened one day after the ED visit. Those who were treated with intranasal NSAIDs only were less likely to have an unscheduled healthcare visit compared to those who received opioids only, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 0.63. The higher odds of unscheduled healthcare visits with opioids were mediated by both the presence of side effects and higher pain levels, with AORs of 2.24 and 1.33, respectively. Conclusion: Opioid treatment for acute pain is associated with increased unscheduled healthcare visits compared to those treated with intranasal ketorolac. This difference can be explained by higher levels of ongoing pain and greater medication side effects.

Real-world data on long-acting intramuscular maintenance therapy with cabotegravir and rilpivirine mirror Phase 3 results.

Cabotegravir, an integrase strand transfer inhibitor, and rilpivirine, an NNRTI, constitute the first long-acting (LA), injectable, two-drug ART regimen approved for the maintenance of virological suppression in persons living with HIV-1 (PLHIV). The aim of this study was to assess clinical effectiveness and tolerability of LA cabotegravir/rilpivirine in a real-world setting. We conducted a retrospective, single centre study, including all PLHIV receiving LA cabotegravir/rilpivirine as standard-of-care in our tertiary centre even if initiated in clinical trials. Between 2014 and 2022, 126 PLHIV initiated LA cabotegravir/rilpivirine. All were ART-experienced, and 98.4% had a viral load (VL) of <50 copies/mL before LA cabotegravir/rilpivirine initiation. Median BMI at cabotegravir/rilpivirine initiation was 24 IQR (23-28). During a median follow-up of 9 months IQR (7-24), 27 patients discontinued cabotegravir/rilpivirine because of virological failure, 6 for adverse events, 11 for personal reasons unrelated to treatment tolerance and 5 for other reasons. Virological failure was not associated with a higher BMI, nor with weight gain during LA intramuscular (IM) cabotegravir/rilpivirine treatment, inadequate cabotegravir and rilpivirine concentrations, VL blips or the use of oral lead-in (OLI) or not. No drug resistance-associated mutation emerged. Adverse events leading to treatment interruption were injection-site pain (n = 3) and neuropsychological side effects (n = 3). A correlation between BMI and both cabotegravir and rilpivirine concentrations at 1 month post-initiation of LA-IM cabotegravir/rilpivirine was observed, with no impact of OLI. Data from this real-world cohort of PLHIV who received cabotegravir/rilpivirine LA injections suggest that this regimen is effective and well tolerated. Virological failures were not associated with the acquisition of resistance mutations.

Intrathecal administration of MCRT produced potent antinociception in chronic inflammatory pain models via μ-δ heterodimer with limited side effects

An important goal in the opioid field is to discover effective analgesic drugs with minimal side effects. MCRT demonstrated potent antinociceptive effects with limited side effects, making it a promising candidate. However, its pharmacological properties and how it minimizes side effects remain unknown. Various mouse pain and opioid side effect models were used to evaluate the antinociceptive properties and safety at the spinal level. The targets of MCRT were identified through cAMP measurement, isolated tissue assays, and pharmacological experiments. Immunofluorescence was employed to visualize protein expression. MCRT displayed distinct antinociceptive effects between acute and chronic inflammatory pain models due to its multifunctional properties at the μ opioid receptor (MOR), µ-δ heterodimer (MDOR), and neuropeptide FF receptor 2 (NPFFR2). Activation of NPFFR2 reduced MOR-mediated antinociception, leading to bell-shaped response curves in acute pain models. However, activation of MDOR produced more effective antinociception in chronic inflammatory pain models. MCRT showed limited tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia in both acute and chronic pain models and did not develop cross-tolerance to morphine. Additionally, MCRT did not exhibit addictive properties, gastrointestinal inhibition, and effects on motor coordination. Mechanistically, peripheral chronic inflammation or repeated administration of morphine and MCRT induced an increase in MDOR in the spinal cord. Chronic administration of MCRT had no apparent effect on microglial activation in the spinal cord. These findings suggest that MCRT is a versatile compound that provides potent antinociception with minimal opioid-related side effects. MDOR could be a promising target for managing chronic inflammatory pain and addressing the opioid crisis.

Unveiling the science behind erectile dysfunction topical therapy: investigating transdermal papaverine as a novel treatment approach.

Erectile dysfunction is among the most prevalent urologic issues affecting men globally and is characterized by a high incidence rate. This condition significantly affects the quality of life of patients and their sexual partners. Due to the interactions, contraindications, and side effects associated with systemic drugs, recent research has increasingly focused on topical and transdermal medications for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Based on previous studies, this article examines papaverine in terms of local effectiveness, methods of increasing therapeutic efficiency, possible local side effects, and evaluation of its various formulations. Among these approaches, notable strategies include using novel formulations and nanoformulations as compared with classic ones, employing permeation enhancers, and combining treatments with other oral and topical drugs with synergistic mechanisms. These methods aim to improve transdermal papaverine's bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects and enhancing patient compliance. Transdermal papaverine may not be as effective as its injectable form, but the treatment path is more pleasant, with less pain and fewer side effects for patients. For this reason, using solutions that remove the penile skin and fascial absorption barrier can be very effective.

Long-term efficacy and reduced side-effects of buprenorphine in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain.

Chronic pain significantly impacts quality of life and poses substantial public health challenges. Buprenorphine, a synthetic analog of thebaine, is recognized for its potential in managing moderate to severe chronic pain with fewer side effects and a lower incidence of tolerance compared to traditional opioids. This retrospective study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal patches in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain, with a focus on pain relief sustainability and tolerance development. This retrospective observational study involved 246 patients prescribed buprenorphine transdermal patches. We evaluated changes in pain intensity using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), assessed opioid tolerance based on FDA guidelines for morphine-equivalent doses, and measured patient-reported outcomes through the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Any adverse events were also recorded. Over the 36-month period, there was a significant reduction in NRS scores for both moderate and severe pain patients, demonstrating buprenorphine's sustained analgesic effect. Tolerance measurement indicated that no patients required increases in morphine-equivalent doses that would meet or exceed the FDA's threshold for opioid tolerance (60mg/day of morphine or equivalent). Additionally, patient satisfaction was high, with the PGIC reflecting significant improvements in pain management and overall wellbeing. The side effects were minimal, with skin reactions and nausea being the most commonly reported but manageable adverse events. The study findings validate the long-term use of buprenorphine transdermal patches as an effective and safe option for chronic pain management, maintaining efficacy without significant tolerance development. These results support the continued and expanded use of buprenorphine in clinical settings, emphasizing its role in reducing the burdens of chronic pain and opioid-related side effects. Further research is encouraged to refine pain management protocols and explore buprenorphine's full potential in diverse patient populations.

Combined nefopam-fentanyl use in PCA for postoperative analgesia in spinal surgery patients: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial

Background &amp; objective: The use of fentanyl to manage postoperative pain in spinal surgery patients is common, although there have been concerns about potential of drug abuse and dependence. We investigated the effects of the combined administration of nefopam and fentanyl through intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on early postoperative pain and possible side effects in patients undergoing spinal surgeries. Methodology: In this randomized, controlled study, 70 patients were allocated to receive either fentanyl 10 µg/mL (Group F) or fentanyl 10 µg/mL with nefopam 1.2 mg/mL (Group FN), with a total PCA volume of 100 mL per infusion bag. Patients received a background dose of 0.25 µg/kg/h and bolus dose of 0.5 mL SOS (fentanyl 5 µg). The lockout interval was set at 10 min and upper limit was set at 15 mL/4 h. The PCA parameters were set according to the body weight of each patient. Results: The cumulative postoperative fentanyl consumptions after 48 h for Group F and Group NF were reported as 744.6 ± 94.2 µg and 631 ± 62.5 µg (P &lt; 0.05) respectively. The average number of bolus doses requested by the patients in Group F and FN were 20.8 ± 11.0, and NF 11.4± 7.6). The A/D ratio of both groups for the bolus doses were 70%. Group NF consistently scored a lower VAS and VAS-D score during the 48-hour postoperative period. However, the VAS scores significantly differ statistically between groups at 1, 6, 9, and 12 hours. Within group differences, the VAS score differed significantly statistically during the 0-1, 1-2, and 2-3 hours for Group F, while 24-36 hours for Group NF. Conclusion: The inclusion of nefopam in patient-controlled analgesia for spine surgery patients significantly reduced total use of fentanyl within the 48 hours postoperatively after the surgery. Patients receiving fentanyl with nefopam consistently had lower VAS scores at different time points. Abbreviations: PCA - patient-controlled analgesia; VAS - Visual Analogue Scale Keywords: postoperative pain, fentanyl, nefopam, patient-controlled analgesia Citation: Le XD, Nguyen ML, Nguyen DT, Do TH, Nguyen HG. Combined nefopam-fentanyl use in PCA for postoperative analgesia in spinal surgery patients: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):687−691; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2370 Received: January 06, 2024; Reviewed: April 14, 2024; Accepted: April 14, 2024

Postoperative Cesarean Section Pain Management Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PurposeCompare and evaluate the effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus intrathecal morphine (ITM) on elective postcesarean section pain, opioid consumption, and related side effects. DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. MethodsA search for evidence was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration Database, UpToDate, Health Source, and gray literature. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the study. The methodological quality of evidence assessment was conducted using the Risk of Bias and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. The meta-analysis used Review Manager (RevMan 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration). FindingsA total of 11 RCTs involving 1,129 patients were analyzed. Compared to ITM, TAP has a similar effect on static (mean difference [MD]; 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.04 to 0.79; P = .08) and dynamic pain scores (MD, 0.43; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.92; P = .09) within the first 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, the TAP block had a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.66; P < .0001) and increased opioid consumption (MD, 6.78; 95% CI, 3.79 to 9.77; P < .00001). Overall, TAP block and ITM did not differ in the time to first to rescue analgesia, incidence of sedation, and pruritus. ConclusionsEvidence suggests that TAP blocks are equivalent to ITM in pain scores and more effective at lowering the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet ITM has been shown to be more effective in reducing postoperative opioid consumption.

High-frequency, high-intensity TENS compared to standard treatment with opioids for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Adverse effects of opioids could prolong the duration of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). This study aimed to assess time in the PACU and the pain-relieving effect of high-frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (HFHI TENS) versus standard treatment with intravenous (IV) opioids. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at two Swedish hospitals were invited to participate. Patients reporting postoperative pain intensity ≥3 according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the PACU were randomized to receive standard treatment with IV opioids or HFHI TENS, administered with an intensity of 40-60 mA for 1 min, repeated once if insufficient pain relief. If NRS remained ≥3 after two TENS stimulation the patients received IV opioids. In total, 163 patients were randomized to receive HFHI TENS (n = 85) or IV opioids (n = 78). There was no difference between the HFHI TENS group versus the opioid group regarding time in the PACU (138 min [SD 69] vs. 142 min [SD 95], mean difference -4.42 [95% CI-30:22], p = 0.74), time to pain relief NRS < 3 (median 10 min) and pain intensity at PACU discharge (NRS 1.7 [SD 1.45] vs. 1.6 [SD 1.20], p = 0.58). In the HFHI TENS group, 39 patients (46%) needed additional treatment with IV opioids. Mean opioid consumption was significantly lower in the HFHI TENS group than in the opioid group (4.5 vs. 11.0 morphine equivalents; p < 0.001). HFHI TENS may be an opioid-sparing alternative for postoperative pain relief. In this multicentre, RCT time in the PACU and the pain-relieving effect of HFHI TENS was compared to standard treatment with IV opioids. There were no differences between the groups regarding time in the PACU, time to pain relief and side effects but opioid consumption in the HFHI TENS group was significantly lower. Both groups reported high satisfaction with pain treatment and care. In summary, HFHI TENS should be considered a safe, fast-onsetting, opioid-sparing option for postoperative pain relief.

Payor denial after prior authorization request for long-acting pain medication: Provider and patient perspectives.

11004 Background: For patients with cancer, uncontrolled pain can reduce quality of life, lead to treatment breaks, and result in worse cancer outcomes. Guideline-concordant treatment for chronic, severe pain can include long-acting opioid formulations. Pain medications, however, often face prior authorization (PA), which requires providers to obtain payor pre-approval and may result in delayed or denied care. This analysis characterizes PA-related denials for pain medications for patients with cancer. Methods: At an urban comprehensive cancer center, we identified all PA requests for outpatient long-acting opioid (i.e., buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, tapentadol) prescriptions from 2023 and described frequency of PA approvals and denials. For denials, chart review 2 weeks post-PA was conducted of provider notes and patient communications with results summarized qualitatively. Results: 1752 new long-acting opioids prescriptions for 982 unique patients required PA. Of those, 1567 (89.4%) were approved after PA process, 99 (5.6%) were denied, 81 (4.6%) were cancelled after PA initiation, and 6 (0.3%) were unresolved. Most were prescribed by pain specialists including supportive care (n = 699, 40.0%) and anesthesia/pain medicine (n = 444, 25.3%) with most common indication: “Neoplasm related pain (chronic)” (61.1%). Oxycodone was the most common long-acting opioid requiring PA (n = 551, 31.4% of prescriptions), followed by fentanyl (n = 501, 28.6%), hydromorphone (n = 205, 11.7%), and methadone (n = 137, 7.8%). Long-acting morphine was denied most frequently (16.3% of n = 129 PA requests denied), followed by buprenorphine (12.1% of n = 33), and hydromorphone (7.3%). Fentanyl was denied the least (2.8%). The 99 denials affected 62 unique patients, including a patient with 7 denials. Chart review (n = 62) of the 2 weeks post-denial revealed a median of 2 (range 0-8) provider notes mentioning pain or PA barriers and median of 1 (range 0-5) patient calls or messages about the same. 22.6% (n = 14) patients ended up in the ER or admitted to the hospital for pain crisis or failure to thrive. Providers documented poor pain control, weight loss, need to “try and fail” other medications, and noted 11.3% (n = 7) patients ending up paying out of pocket for their medications. Patient messages document uncontrolled pain and unmanageable side effects with some literally begging for relief; one patient spoke of their fear of “dying in pain”. Conclusions: The vast majority of PA requests for long-acting pain medication result in approvals, suggesting that the process -which can delay essential pain management- is largely unnecessary. For the 1 in 20 requests that were denied, provider and patient concerns highlight the negative impact of uncontrolled pain. An improved, transparent PA process is essential for adequately treating chronic, cancer-related pain.

Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in major spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Major spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and increased opioid consumption. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is thought to provide adequate intraoperative analgesia with reduced postoperative opioid consumption. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of intraoperative OFA approach to the conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and related side effects in patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery. Forty-eight patients undergoing elective major spine surgery were randomly allocated to either receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine and lidocaine (OFA group) or fentanyl during induction and intraoperative remifentanil (OBA group). All patients received intraoperative sevoflurane, propofol, rocuronium, ketamine, dexamethasone, ondansetron and postoperative paracetamol and patient-controlled analgesia device set to deliver intravenous morphine for 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was measured using numerical rating scale. Opioid side effects were documented, when present. OFA group required less morphine in the first 24 hours post-surgery (17.28±12.25 mg versus 27.96±19.75 mg, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in the OFA group. More patients in the OFA group required antihypertensive medications compared to patients in the OBA group (P<0.05). In the post anesthesia care unit, OFA patients had a significantly longer stay than OBA patients (114.1±49.33 min versus 89.96±30.71 min, P<0.05). OFA can be an alternative to OBA in patients undergoing multilevel spine fusion surgery. OFA reduces opioids consumption in the first 24 hours and PONV.

Long Prime-Boost Interval and Heightened Anti-GD2 Antibody Response to Carbohydrate Cancer Vaccine.

The carbohydrate ganglioside GD2/GD3 cancer vaccine adjuvanted by β-glucan stimulates anti-GD2 IgG1 antibodies that strongly correlate with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Thirty-two patients who relapsed on the vaccine (first enrollment) were re-treated on the same vaccine protocol (re-enrollment). Titers during the first enrollment peaked by week 32 at 751 ± 270 ng/mL, which plateaued despite vaccine boosts at 1.2-4.5 month intervals. After a median wash-out interval of 16.1 months from the last vaccine dose during the first enrollment to the first vaccine dose during re-enrollment, the anti-GD2 IgG1 antibody rose to a peak of 4066 ± 813 ng/mL by week 3 following re-enrollment (p < 0.0001 by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test). Yet, these peaks dropped sharply and continually despite repeated boosts at 1.2-4.5 month intervals, before leveling off by week 20 to the first enrollment peak levels. Despite higher antibody titers, patients experienced no pain or neuropathic side effects, which were typically associated with immunotherapy using monoclonal anti-GD2 antibodies. By the Kaplan-Meier method, PFS was estimated to be 51%, and OS was 81%. The association between IgG1 titer during re-enrollment and β-glucan receptor dectin-1 SNP rs3901533 was significant (p = 0.01). A longer prime-boost interval could significantly improve antibody responses in patients treated with ganglioside conjugate cancer vaccines.

24-Hour Compared With 12-Hour Mifepristone–Misoprostol Interval for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial [ID 2683386

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare 24- and 12-hour mifepristone to misoprostol intervals for second-trimester medical abortion. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial. Women were allocated to receive mifepristone either 24 or 12 hours before misoprostol administration. The primary outcome was time from mifepristone administration to fetal expulsion and from first misoprostol administration to fetal expulsion. RESULTS: Eighty women were enrolled between July 2020 and June 2023, 40 women per group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median time from mifepristone to fetal expulsion was 33.0 and 24.5 hours in the 24- and 12-hour interval groups, respectively (P&lt;.001). Median time from first misoprostol dose to fetal expulsion was 9.5 and 12.5 hours in the 24- and 12-hour interval arms, respectively (P=.028). At 12 hours from misoprostol administration, 25 (62.5%) and 18 (45.0%) of women in the 24- and 12-hour arms completed abortion (P=.178). At 24 hours from misoprostol administration, 36 (90.0%) and 30 (75.0%) in the 24- and 12-hour arms had complete abortion (P=.139). Need for additional medical and/or surgical treatment for uterine evacuation were comparable between groups. Pain scores, side effects, and satisfaction levels were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: A 12-hour mifepristone-to-misoprostol regimen for medical abortion in the second trimester provides an 8.5-hour shorter mifepristone-to-fetal-expulsion rate compared with the 24-hour interval. However, misoprostol-to-fetal-expulsion time is 3 hours longer in the 12-hour interval regimen. Medical regimen success rate, side effects, and satisfaction levels are also similar. These findings can aid in shared decision-making prior to medical abortion in the second trimester.

WALANT surgery of the hand: state of the art.

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet is named the WALANT technique. WALANT has had a major positive impact on cost, convenience, ecology, patient satisfaction, access to surgical care, and outcomes in hand surgery in the last 20 years. Safe and efficient application of the technique is based on two principles. The first principle is the tumescent injection of a large volume low concentration 0.25-1% lidocaine, with 1:100 000-1:400 000 epinephrine. The second principle of WALANT is that the proper injection should be almost painless, with the patient only feeling the first needle poke of a tiny 30G needle. This wide awake patient approach reduces pain, neuropraxia, and systemic side effects of sedation with preservation of motor control, thereby aiding balanced reconstruction in hand surgery.

Impact of intra-operative ketamine on postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgery: a narrative review.

Ketamine offers a promising solution to common postoperative issues in abdominal surgery, including pain, nausea, opioid use, and opioid-related side effects. The purpose of this literature review is to analyze the benefits and potential adverse effects associated with the intraoperative utilization of ketamine during abdominal surgeries. A comprehensive search of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE was conducted by two independent reviewers. Studies were included if they targeted adult patients and evaluated intra-operative use of ketamine for abdominal operations. We identified 13 studies of intraoperative use of ketamine in abdominal surgery. The results of these studies showed improved pain management as demonstrated by lower pain scores, decreased hyperalgesia, and a decreased need for additional analgesics. The results also demonstrated a decrease in opioid consumption during the critical 24-hour postoperative period. However, a few studies reported undesirable side effects such as hallucinations and delirium. The intraoperative use of ketamine holds promise as a valuable adjunct to anesthesia during abdominal surgeries. Studies support its use in improving post-operative pain and decreasing opioid consumption. Due to risks of adverse effects, further studies in larger patient populations may help identify which patients will benefit the most. This review offers a succinct selection of the pertinent literature.

Efficacy and safety of nalbuphine for epidural labor analgesia at high altitude: An observational study.

Xining is located at the eastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, with an average altitude of >7000 feet (>2000 m). Nalbuphine is a kappa-opioid receptor agonist that can provide analgesia with fewer side effects than other opioid analgesics. This study aimed to evaluate pain control, side effects, and neonatal outcomes from combining nalbuphine with sufentanil and ropivacaine in 600 women during epidural anesthesia while giving birth at a high altitude in Xining, China. A total of 600 parturients receiving epidural labor analgesia were randomly divided into 2 groups, each group 300 parturients. The nalbuphine group received nalbuphine, sufentanil, and ropivacain, the control group only received sufentanil and ropivacain. The analgesic effect was evaluated through the Visual Analogue Scale scores. Neonatal outcomes were mainly evaluated through the Apgar Scores. Compared to the control group, the nalbuphine group showed lower Visual Analogue Scale scores at all time points after analgesia (P < .05). In comparison with the control group, parturients in the nalbuphine group showed lower incidence rates of fever at delivery, 24-hour postpartum bleeding, and pruritus (P < .05). However, between the 2 groups, there were no statistically significant differences in the remaining maternal and infant outcomes and neonatal outcomes (P > .05). Moreover, no adverse effects on neonatal outcomes were observed. The findings from this study support findings from previous studies that nalbuphine provided safe epidural analgesia without significant side effects for the mother and infant, and showed both safety and efficacy when used during labor at high altitude.

Evaluation of the safety, efficacy and technical advantages of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing single lower lumbar level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, as an alternative to general anesthesia: a prospective study

Background: In spinal anesthesia, patients experience shorter OT, quicker recovery and ambulation, better post-operative analgesia and fewer complications than general anesthesia. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) shows fewer complications and early ambulation than open TLIF. Our study aims to assess spinal anesthesia’s safety, efficacy and technical benefits in MIS-TLIF. Methods: Patients unresponsive to conservative treatment for 6-8 weeks underwent MIS TLIF for lower lumbar degenerative pathologies. The demographic data, OT entry to incision time, blood loss, bandaging to exit from OT time, post anesthesia care unit (PACU) time, post-op complications, requirement of analgesia, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, hospital stay, fusion rates and satisfaction scores were noted and assessed. Results: The study included a total of 200 patients undergoing MIS-TLIF with mean age being 54.32±10.36 years; mean surgery time being 165.23±21.41 minutes; and mean blood loss being 123.56±65.14 ml. The mean OT entry to incision time was 28.91±9.63 minutes, while the mean bandaging to exit time was 7.43±4.12 minutes. The mean PACU stay was 41.35±5.78 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 3.28±1.23 days, with 97% patients showing solid radiographic fusion while 92.5% patients were fully satisfied with the surgery. VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved as compared to the pre operative status. Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia for lower lumbar MIS-TLIF is cost effective and safe alternative to general anesthesia with lesser post operative pain and other side effects; taking into consideration proper patient selection for the same.

Lived Experiences of Cognitive Dysfunction in Fibromyalgia: How Patients Discuss Their Experiences and Suggestions for Patient Education

Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is a common, impairing symptom experienced by persons with fibromyalgia (FM). This study explored how individuals with FM describe their experience of CD in an online peer support environment. Posts referencing cognitive symptoms were extracted from two Facebook FM peer support groups at two timepoints. Using inductive Thematic Analysis, key discussion themes were identified and compared across groups and time. Four themes represented the way members described their cognitive experiences in FM: understanding and describing CD experiences, distrust of cognitive abilities, choosing between pain and medication side effects, and misunderstanding and judgement from others. Two themes represented the impact of CD on members’ lives: impaired social interaction and loss of identity. Group members described broad impairments in daily functioning that significantly and negatively impacted their quality of life, indicating CD symptoms may play a more prominent role in the FM experience than previously understood. An infographic is included to aid patient education and help facilitate patient-provider discussions of CD symptoms.