Oxaliplatin-based Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with secondary cytoreduction for platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Background/purposeThis retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. MethodsPatients diagnosed with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, including fallopian tube and peritoneal origin, who underwent oxaliplatin-based HIPEC with secondary CRS, were enrolled. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and adverse events. ResultsA total of 33 patients were included in the analysis. The mean PFS and OS were 20.4 months (95% CI 16.3–24.5 months) and 26.7 months (95% CI 23.7–29.7), respectively. Furthermore, the OS and PFS between platinum-sensitive and resistant recurrence showed no significant difference. Univariate and multivariate analysis of PFS identified a pre-operative peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score of ≥5 as a poor prognostic factor. Among them, the incidence of acute kidney injury was 9.0 % & none had grade ≧3 adverse events. ConclusionOxaliplatin-based HIPEC with secondary CRS might provide a survival benefit for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with a decreased incidence of renal toxicity compared to cisplatin-based regimens. It might be effective and feasible in selected recurrent ovarian cancer patients, regardless of platinum-sensitive or resistant.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

This study evaluated the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (pmCRC) in a large international data set of patients. Patients with pmCRC from 39 centres who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC between 1991 and 2018 were selected and compared for the HIPEC protocols received-oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus mitomycin-HIPEC. Following analysis of crude data, propensity-score matching (PSM) and Cox-proportional hazard modelling were performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the HIPEC dose-response effects (high versus low dose, dose intensification and double drug protocols) on OS, RFS and 90-day morbidity. Furthermore, the impact of the treatment time period was assessed. Of 2760 patients, 2093 patients were included. Median OS was 43 months (95% c.i. 41 to 46 months) with a median RFS of 12 months (95% c.i. 12 to 13 months). The oxaliplatin-HIPEC group had an OS of 47 months (95% c.i. 42 to 53 months) versus 39 months (95% c.i. 36 to 43 months) in the mitomycin-HIPEC group (P = 0.002), aHR 0.77, 95% c.i. 0.67 to 0.90, P < 0.001. The OS benefit persisted after PSM of the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group and mitomycin-HIPEC group (48 months (95% c.i. 42 to 59 months) versus 40 months (95% c.i. 37 to 44 months)), P < 0.001, aHR 0.78 (95% c.i. 0.65 to 0.94), P = 0.009. Similarly, matched RFS was significantly higher for oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus others (13 months (95% c.i. 12 to 15 months) versus 11 months (95% c.i. 10 to 12 months, P = 0.02)). High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC protocols had similar OS compared to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. HIPEC dose intensification within each protocol resulted in improved survival. Oxaliplatin + irinotecan-HIPEC resulted in the most improved OS (61 months (95% c.i. 51 to 101 months)). Ninety-day mortality in both crude and PSM analysis was worse for mitomycin-HIPEC. There was no change in treatment effect depending on the analysed time period. Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC provided better outcomes compared to mitomycin-based HIPEC. High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC was similar to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. The 90-day mortality difference favours the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group. A trend for dose-response between low- and high-dose HIPEC was reported.

Should Cytoreductive Surgery Alone for Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Origin be Centralized? A National Study of 4159 Procedures.

Addition of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin (CRPM) did not show any survival benefit in the PRODIGE 7 trial (P7). This study aimed to investigate whether perioperative outcomes after CRS alone for CRPM patients is mediated by hospital volume and to determine the effect of P7 on French practice for CRPM patients treated respectively with CRS alone and CRS/HIPEC. Data from CRPM patients treated with CRS alone between 2013 and 2020 in France were collected through a national medical database. The study used a cutoff value of the annual CRS-alone caseload affecting the 90-day postoperative mortality (POM) determined from our previous study to define low-volume (LV) HIPEC and high-volume (HV) HIPEC centers. Perioperative outcomes were compared between no-HIPEC, LV-HIPEC, and HV-HIPEC centers. The trend between years and HIPEC rates was analyzed using the Cochrane-Armitage test. Data from 4159 procedures were analyzed. The patients treated in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers were older compared withHV-HIPEC centers (p < 0.0001) and had a higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) and less complex surgery (p < 0.0001). Whereas the major morbidity (MM) rate did not differ between groups (p = 0.79), the 90-day POM was lower in HV-HIPEC centers than in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers (5.4% vs 15% and 13.3%; p < 0.0001), with lower failure-to-rescue (FTR) (p < 0.0001). After P7, the CRS/HIPEC rate decreased drastically in Cancer centers (p < 0.001), whereas patients treated with CRS alone are still referred to expert centers. Centralization of CRS alone should improve patient selection as well as FTR and POM. After P7, CRS/HIPEC decreased mostly in Cancer centers, without any impact on the number of CRS-alone cases referred to expert centers.

In vitro 3D microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model for testing different oxaliplatin-based HIPEC regimens.

Treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is still evolving. Conducting a randomized trial is challenging due to the high heterogeneity in the presentation of peritoneal disease and various surgical approaches. Biological research may facilitate more rapid translation of information into clinical practice. There is an emerging need for a preclinical model to improve HIPEC treatment protocols in terms of drug doses and treatment durations. The aim of the study is to design a tool that serves as an invitro three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model to test the efficacy of different HIPEC treatments. We determined the effects of current therapy options using a 3D static disease model on human colon carcinoma cell lines (HCT 116) and transforming growth factor-β1 induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) HCT 116 lines at 37 °C and 42 °C for 30, 60, and 120 min. We determined oxaliplatin's half maximal inhibitory concentrations in a 3D static culture by using viability assay. Clinical practices of HIPEC were applied in the developed model. EMT-induced HCT 116 cells were less sensitive to oxaliplatin treatment compared to non-induced cells. We observed increased cytotoxicity when increasing the temperature from 37 °C to 42 °C and extending the treatment duration from 30 to 120 min. We found that 200 mg/m2 oxaliplatin administered for 120 min is the most effective HIPEC treatment option within the framework of clinic applications. The tool map provide insights into creating more realistic pre-clinical tools that could be used for a patient-based drug screening.

The SAlzburg PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (SAPESUCA): The First Web-Based Application for Peritoneal Surface Area Quantification.

(1) Background: Peritoneal metastasized colorectal cancer is associated with a worse prognosis. The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) showed promising results in selected patients, but standardization is lacking so far. We present the first tool enabling standardized peritoneal surface area (PSA) quantification in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC: The SAlzburg PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (SAPESUCA). (2) Methods: SAPESUCA was programmed using the R-Shiny framework. The application was validated in 23 consecutive colon cancer patients who received 27 closed oxaliplatin-based HIPECs between 2016 and 2020. The programming algorithm incorporates the patient's body surface area and its correlated peritoneal surface area (PSA) based on the 13 Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) regions. (3) Results: Patients' median age was 56 years. Median PCI was 9. SAPESUCA revealed a mean PSA of 18,613 cm2 ± 1951 of all patients before compared to 13,681 cm2 ± 2866 after CRS. The Central PCI region revealed the highest mean peritonectomy extent (1517 cm2 ± 737). The peritonectomy extent correlated significantly with PCI score and postoperative morbidity. The simulated mean oxaliplatin dose differed significantly before and after CRS (558 mg/m2 ± 58.4 vs. 409 mg/m2 ± 86.1; p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusion: SAPESUCA is the first free web-based app for standardized determination of the resected and remaining PSA after CRS. The tool enables chemotherapeutic dose adjustment to the remaining PSA.

Elevated temperatures and longer durations improve the efficacy of oxaliplatin- and mitomycin C-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a confirmed rat model for peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer origin.

In patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (PM) originating from colorectal cancer, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a potentially curative treatment option. This combined treatment modality using HIPEC with mitomycin C (MMC) for 90 minutes proved to be superior to systemic chemotherapy alone, but no benefit of adding HIPEC to CRS alone was shown using oxaliplatin-based HIPEC during 30 minutes. We investigated the impact of treatment temperature and duration as relevant HIPEC parameters for these two chemotherapeutic agents in representative preclinical models. The temperature- and duration- dependent efficacy for both oxaliplatin and MMC was evaluated in an in vitro setting and in a representative animal model. In 130 WAG/Rij rats, PM were established through i.p. injections of rat CC-531 colon carcinoma cells with a signature similar to the dominant treatment-resistant CMS4 type human colorectal PM. Tumor growth was monitored twice per week using ultrasound, and HIPEC was applied when most tumors were 4-6mm. A semi-open four-inflow HIPEC setup was used to circulate oxaliplatin or MMC through the peritoneum for 30, 60 or 90 minutes with inflow temperatures of 38°C or 42°C to achieve temperatures in the peritoneum of 37°C or 41°C. Tumors, healthy tissue and blood were collected directly or 48 hours after treatment to assess the platinum uptake, level of apoptosis and proliferation and to determine the healthy tissue toxicity. In vitro results show a temperature- and duration- dependent efficacy for both oxaliplatin and MMC in both CC-531 cells and organoids. Temperature distribution throughout the peritoneum of the rats was stable with normothermic and hyperthermic average temperatures in the peritoneum ranging from 36.95-37.63°C and 40.51-41.37°C, respectively. Treatments resulted in minimal body weight decrease (<10%) and only 7/130 rats did not reach the endpoint of 48 hours after treatment. Both elevated temperatures and longer treatment duration resulted in a higher platinum uptake, significantly increased apoptosis and lower proliferation in PM tumor lesions, without enhanced normal tissue toxicity. Our results demonstrated that oxaliplatin- and MMC-based HIPEC procedures are both temperature- and duration-dependent in an in vivo tumor model.

Surgical Options for Peritoneal Surface Metastases from Digestive Malignancies—A Comprehensive Review

The peritoneum is a common site for the dissemination of digestive malignancies, particularly gastric, colorectal, appendix, or pancreatic cancer. Other tumors such as cholangiocarcinomas, digestive neuroendocrine tumors, or gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) may also associate with peritoneal surface metastases (PSM). Peritoneal dissemination is proven to worsen the prognosis of these patients. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), along with systemic chemotherapy, have been shown to constitute a survival benefit in selected patients with PSM. Furthermore, the association of CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) seems to significantly improve the prognosis of patients with certain types of digestive malignancies associated with PSM. However, the benefit of CRS with HIPEC is still controversial, especially due to the significant morbidity associated with this procedure. According to the results of the PRODIGE 7 trial, CRS for PSM from colorectal cancer (CRC) achieved overall survival (OS) rates higher than 40 months, but the addition of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC failed to improve the long-term outcomes. Furthermore, the PROPHYLOCHIP and COLOPEC trials failed to demonstrate the effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC for preventing peritoneal metastases development in high-risk patients operated for CRC. In this review, we discuss the limitations of these studies and the reasons why these results are not sufficient to refute this technique, until future well-designed trials evaluate the impact of different HIPEC regimens. In contrast, in pseudomyxoma peritonei, CRS plus HIPEC represents the gold standard therapy, which is able to achieve 10-year OS rates ranging between 70 and 80%. For patients with PSM from gastric carcinoma, CRS plus HIPEC achieved median OS rates higher than 40 months after complete cytoreduction in patients with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤6. However, the data have not yet been validated in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the controversies regarding the most efficient drugs that should be used for HIPEC and the duration of the procedure. We also discuss the current evidence and controversies related to the benefit of CRS (and HIPEC) in patients with PSM from other digestive malignancies. Although it is a palliative treatment, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) significantly increases OS in patients with unresectable PSM from gastric cancer and represents a promising approach for patients with PSM from other digestive cancers.

Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version.

Despite a trend showing continued improvement in survival by combing targeted agents in colorectal cancer, the improvement was limited, and clinically meaningful benefits were not achieved in peritoneal metastasis. The role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and proportion of the benefit from hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been questioned. The PRODIGE 7 study aimed to assess the specific contribution of HIPEC to the survival benefit of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC-PM) by grouping CRS alone versus CRS with oxaliplatin-based HIPEC, but failed to show any survival improvement. Of these criticisms, oxaliplatin resistance was suggested as the main cause of the negative result. In this regard, the relative resistance to oxaliplatin in consensus molecular subtype 4 colorectal cancer (CRC) is of great interest. Recent treatments for metastatic CRC have gradually moved to precision medicine based on individual biological information through high-throughput technology such as next generation sequencing. This review aimed to provide an overview of the current status of studies reporting the molecular knowledge of CRC-PM.

Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer

Background: Despite a trend showing continued improvement in survival by combing targeted agents for colorectal cancer (CRC), the improvement observed is limited. Moreover, clinically relevant benefits were not achieved in peritoneal metastasis cases. The role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and the benefits of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been questioned. This review aimed to provide an overview of the current status of the studies reporting on the molecular knowledge of peritoneal metastasis from CRC (CRC-PM).Current Concepts: The PRODIGE 7 study was performed to assess the specific contributions of HIPEC to the survival benefit in CRC-PM cases by comparing CRS treatment alone and CRS with oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. However, this study did not reveal any survival improvement, and oxaliplatin resistance was suggested as the main cause of this negative outcome. Hence, the relative resistance to oxaliplatin in consensus molecular subtype (CMS) 4 CRC is of great interest.Discussion and Conclusion: Recent treatments for metastatic CRC have gradually moved to precision medicine based on individual biological information through high-throughput technology, such as next-generation sequencing. In the transcriptome study, CRC-PM was identified as an almost homogeneous CMS4 classification, which is known to have strong resistance to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. These results suggest the need to clarify complex sub-signal transmission pathways derived from transcriptome or proteome studies of CRC-PM. Finally, to compare two studies, it is necessary to establish a representative patient group and consider standardized sample collection, treatment, and analysis.

Pharmacologic Effects of Oxaliplatin Instability in Chloride-Containing Carrier Fluids on the Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Colorectal Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo

Oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) involves mixing oxaliplatin with 5% dextrose solution (5DW) to prevent the structural degradation of oxaliplatin in chloride-containing fluids. This study evaluated oxaliplatin degradation in carrier fluids containing different chloride ion concentrations to determine a carrier fluid that is optimal for use in oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. Five types of carrier fluids (normal saline, half saline, 5DW, Dianeal PD-2 peritoneal dialysis solution, and non-chloride Dianeal solution) were compared. An in vitro study was performed that monitored an oxaliplatin concentration of 1 ml (2 mg/ml) oxaliplatin mixed in 24 ml of each carrier fluid during 3 days to evaluate the rate of oxaliplatin degradation in each carrier fluid. An in vivo study, which subjected Sprague-Dawley rats to HIPEC for 60 min, also was performed. The efficacy of each carrier fluid for preserving oxaliplatin was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) ratios between peritoneal fluid and plasma. The degradation rate of oxaliplatin in non-chloride fluids was significantly lower than in chloride-containing fluids. However, the rate was less than 10 to 15% at 30 min. The in vivo study indicated that oxaliplatin concentrations in peritoneal fluids did not differ significantly, whereas those in plasma did differ. The AUC ratios of both normal saline and Dianeal were higher than those of 5DW and non-Cl- Dianeal solutions. Chloride-containing fluids, such as normal saline or Dianeal, which display high absorption rates of oxaliplatin and acceptable degradation rates, may be more beneficial for use in oxaliplatin-based HIPEC than 5DW.

Current status of surgical treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer

Cytoreductive surgery, often in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has been instrumental in improving the survival of patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of complete cytoreduction, while the role of the HIPEC treatment remains unclear. An oxaliplatin-based HIPEC over 30 min could not achieve any clear benefits in studies on colorectal cancer, neither in the therapeutic nor in the prophylactic setting, but caused relevant side effects and increased the morbidity. The negative results of these studies with respect to oxaliplatin-based HIPEC require critical appraisal; however, they should by no means be regarded as ageneral setback for surgical treatment of peritoneal metastases and be misunderstood as ageneral failure of this treatment. While HIPEC after complete surgical cytoreduction of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer requires further research, cytoreductive surgery should still be regarded as ahighly effective treatment for suitable patients with limited abdominal tumor dissemination.

Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Origin Treated with Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: The Efficiency of Mitomycin C.

Survival of patients affected by colorectal cancerperitoneal metastases (CRC-PM) can be improved with combined complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Two chemotherapeutic agents are mainly used: mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin. A recent prospective randomized clinical trial showed that oxaliplatin-based HIPEC does notimprove survival compared with CCRS alone. The purpose of our study was to compare the survival effectiveness of MMC versus oxaliplatin-based HIPEC using a homogeneous surgical technique and drug protocol. This retrospective monocentric study included all patients prospectively registered for having undergone CCRS and HIPEC using MMC or oxaliplatin for CRC-PM in Strasbourg University Hospital, France, from December 2004 until December 2019. MMC-basedHIPEC and oxaliplatin-basedHIPEC groups were compared with an inverse probability of treatment weighting. A total of 137 patients were included. Groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics except for peritoneal carcinomatosis index. In the weighted multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) and peritoneal disease-free survival (PDFS) were significantly higher in the MMC-based HIPEC group compared with the oxaliplatin-based HIPEC group with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (CI 95% 0.56-0.98), p = 0.035 and 0.59 (CI 95% 0.40-0.98), p = 0.0084, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival or postoperative morbidity between groups. These results favor a superiority of MMC for DFS and PDFS in comparison with oxaliplatin in HIPEC after CCRS in treatment with curative intent for CRC-PM.

Prolonged Exposure to Oxaliplatin during HIPEC Improves Effectiveness in a Preclinical Micrometastasis Model.

Simple SummaryAbsence of survival benefits when adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with oxaliplatin to cytoreductive surgery in peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer has recently been shown in the randomized controlled PRODIGE 7 trial. We therefore aimed to investigate the effects of this treatment modality in a preclinical micrometastasis model. Cancer cells were incubated with either patient samples obtained during HIPEC procedures or with defined oxaliplatin-containing solutions prepared according to clinically established HIPEC protocols. Our results demonstrate a limited effectiveness of short-term HIPEC in simulations with oxaliplatin to eliminate micrometastases, although we used platinum-sensitive cell lines for our model. Since these results are in line with findings from current research, our studies might offer further convincing evidence and potential explanations for HIPEC futility observed in clinical application.Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was considered a promising treatment for patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer. However, the recently published randomized controlled PRODIGE 7 trial failed to demonstrate survival benefits through the addition of short-term oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. Constituting a complex multifactorial treatment, we investigated HIPEC in a preclinical model concerning the elimination of minimal tumor residues, thereby aiming to better understand the size of effects and respective clinical trial results. Patient samples of peritoneal perfusates obtained during HIPEC treatments and oxaliplatin-containing solutions at clinically relevant dosages, conforming with established HIPEC protocols, were assessed regarding their ability to eliminate modelled ~100 µm thickness cancer cell layers. Impedance-based real-time cell analysis and classical end-point assays were used. Flow cytometry was employed to determine the effect of different HIPEC drug solvents on tumor cell properties. Effectiveness of peritoneal perfusate patient samples and defined oxaliplatin-containing solutions proved limited but reproducible. HIPEC simulations for 30 min reduced the normalized cell index below 50% with peritoneal perfusates from merely 3 out of 9 patients within 72 h, indicating full-thickness cytotoxic effects. Instead, prolonging HIPEC to 1 h enhanced these effects and comprised 7 patients’ samples, while continuous drug exposure invariably resulted in complete cell death. Further, frequently used drug diluents caused approximately 25% cell size reduction within 30 min. Prolonging oxaliplatin exposure improved effectiveness of HIPEC to eliminate micrometastases in our preclinical model. Accordingly, insufficient penetration depth, short exposure time, and the physicochemical impact of drug solvents may constitute critical factors.

Postoperative mortality after cytoreductive surgery alone for peritoneal metastasis of colorectal origin need centralization in expert centers: a national study of 5,893 patients.

Background: Oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreduction surgery (CRS) in peritoneal metastasis (PM) of colorectal origin did not show any survival benefit in PRODIGE-7 trial and additional value of other regimen-based HIPEC is under debate. However, centralization has been shown to improve post-operative mortality (POM) in CRS and HIPEC for PM of various origins. We aimed to evaluate the impact of centralization on POM after CRS alone.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Mitomycin C versus Oxaliplatin after Cytoreductive Surgery for the Treatment of Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Cancer Origin.

Background: Mitomycin C and oxaliplatin are considered the main chemotherapeutic agents used in the context of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after the performance of cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer origin. However, there is lack of a generally accepted consensus regarding the optimal choice between them as upfront chemo-therapetic agent. Our paper aims to summarize in a comprehensive manner the available evidence, while individualised schemes with targeted therapies are under development. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive, narrative review of the literature including all previous studies until 03/2022, which reported perioperative and/ or oncological outcomes after the use of mitomycin C and/ or oxaliplatin as main hyperthermic chemotherapy agents after cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastatic disease. Results: Data from a total of 23 single-agent and 13 comparative studies were included in our review. Despite the demonstrated safety profile of both chemotherapeutics, the heterogeneity of the included studies, their retrospective nature and the absence of relevant randomized trials prohibits the drawing of safe conclusions regarding the superiority of one of the two agents. However, it seems that perioperative morbidity is less with oxaliplatin-based HIPEC, while mitomycin C appears as a more cost-effective option. Conclusions: Selection of the optimal intraperitoneal chemotherapy agent for peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer origin after the completion of cytoreductive surgery is still a matter of debate, with significant institutional variation. Further randomized clinical trials between the two commonest HIPEC agents are required, assessing the differences in perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, healthcare-associated costs and patientsâ?? quality of life.

Outcomes of Cytoreduction and Oxaliplatin-Based Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal Cancer.

Among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 25% have isolated peritoneal carcinomatosis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin. Eleven studies were included in the final assessment. Pooled three- and five-year OS rates were 58.60% and 42.19%, respectively. The estimated pooled three- and five-year DFS rates were 23.47% and 14.26%, respectively.

Postoperative oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an effective and safe palliative treatment option for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BackgroundThe prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastasis (CRC-PM) after incomplete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) or palliative surgery is poor. Novel and effective therapies are urgently needed. This study aimed to assess the effects of palliative postoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with CRC-PM.MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with CRC-PM at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University in 05/2014–05/2019. Observation indicators included overall survival (OS), ascites-free survival, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and completeness of cytoreduction (CC). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine the factors associated with OS and ascites-free survival. The ascites-specific quality of life (QoL) was measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Ascites Index (FACIT-AI).ResultsEighty-two patients were included, including 37 and 45 in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups, respectively. Mean OS was 10.3±3.7 (95% CI 9.5–11.2) months. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression suggested that PCI (HR=6.086, 95% CI 3.187–11.620, P < 0.0001) was independently associated with OS. The degree of ascites (HR=2.059, 95% CI 1.412–3.005, P < 0.0001), PCI (HR=6.504, 95% CI 2.844–14.875, P < 0.0001), and HIPEC (HR=0.328, 95% CI 0.191–0.562, P < 0.0001) were independently associated with ascites-free survival. In patients with survival >6 months, postoperative ascites-specific QoL was significantly improved after HIPEC compared with the non-HIPEC group (P < 0.001). Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC significantly increased the rates of neutropenia and peripheral neurotoxicity (both P < 0.05).ConclusionThese data indicate that postoperative oxaliplatin-based HIPEC might help increase ascites-free survival in CRC-PM patients after incomplete CRS or palliative surgery, with improved QoL after 6 months of follow-up.

The impact of PRODIGE 7 on the current worldwide practice of CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A web-based survey and 2021 statement by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI)

IntroductionThe PRODIGE 7-trial investigated the additional value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The results of PRODIGE 7 were presented at the 2018 ASCO meeting showing that 30 min oxaliplatin-based HIPEC did not improve overall survival. The current study investigated the impact of PRODIGE 7 on the worldwide practice of CRS and HIPEC. Materials and methodsCRS-HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning the current CRS-HIPEC practice in their hospital and country, and were asked to appraise the effect of PRODIGE 7. ResultsThe survey was completed by 18/19 experts. Although their personal opinions of CRS-HIPEC were barely influenced by PRODIGE 7, they reported a substantial impact on daily practice. This included a switch towards Mitomycin-C based HIPEC-regimens and prolongation of HIPEC perfusion time, a reduction in the number of referrals from non-HIPEC centers, a reduction in national consensus, the removal of HIPEC from national guidelines, and a reduced reimbursement rate. ConclusionThe PRODIGE 7 has had a major impact on the practice of CRS-HIPEC for CPM worldwide. HIPEC remains an attractive option with potential for control and eradication of disease and further studies into the optimal HIPEC-regimen are urgently needed. Meanwhile, given the complexity of the treatment of patients with CPM, and the proven benefits of optimal CRS, referral of patients with potentially resectable CPM to expert centers is recommended whilst the precise role of HIPEC is further evaluated.

Oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with single drug versus multiple drug treatment for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases: an observational cohort study.

Long-term survival for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is possible when treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The objective of this study was to compare three different oxaliplatin-based (OX)-HIPEC regimens. Primary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints, morbidity and overall survival (OS). This is a retrospective study of all patients with colorectal PM treated with CRS and HIPEC between 2004 and 2015 from the prospectively maintained Uppsala HIPEC database. One hundred and thirty-three patients were identified. Three HIPEC regimens were included: OX-HIPEC, OX-HIPEC + post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin-irinotecan-based (OXIRI)-HIPEC. Multivariable Cox regression for DFS was performed. Sixty-one patients received OX-HIPEC, 24 patients received OX-HIPEC + 5-FU EPIC, and 48 patients received OXIRI-HIPEC. The DFS for the OX-HIPEC group was 10.5 months, OX-HIPEC + EPIC 11.9 months, and OXIRI-HIPEC 13.4 months (OX-HIPEC vs. OXIRI HIPEC, P=0.049). The morbidity and OS did not differ between the groups. In the multivariable analysis, low peritoneal cancer index (PCI), absence of liver metastases, low completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score, and multiple drug (EPIC or OXIRI) HIPEC regimen were independent prognostic factors for DFS. This study showed improved DFS with an intensification of HIPEC by adding irinotecan or EPIC compared to oxaliplatin alone without an increase in morbidity or mortality.

Wide variation in tissue, systemic, and drain fluid exposure after oxaliplatin-based HIPEC: results of the GUTOX study

PurposeIn this exploratory study, the effect of postprocedural flushing with crystalloids after oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on platinum concentrations in peritoneal tissue, blood, and drain fluid was studied. Interpatient variability in oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics and the relation between platinum concentration in peritoneal fluid and platinum exposure in tissue and blood was explored.MethodsTen patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin were treated with HIPEC including postprocedural flushing, followed by ten patients without flushing afterwards. Tissue, peritoneal fluid, blood, and drain fluid samples were collected for measurement of total and ultrafiltered platinum concentrations.ResultsPeritoneal tissue concentration and systemic ultrafiltered platinum exposure showed large inter individual variability, ranging from 65 to 1640 µg/g dry weight and 10.5 to 28.0 µg*h/ml, respectively. No effect of flushing was found on geometric mean platinum concentration in peritoneal tissue (348 vs. 356 µg/g dry weight), blood (14.8 vs. 18.1 µg*h/ml), or drain fluid (day 1: 7.6 vs. 7.7 µg/ml; day 2: 1.7 vs. 1.9 µg/ml). The platinum concentration in peritoneal fluid at the start of HIPEC differed twofold between patients and was positively correlated with systemic exposure (p = .04) and peak plasma concentration (p = .04).ConclusionIn this exploratory study, no effect was found for postprocedural flushing on platinum concentrations in peritoneal tissue, blood, or drain fluid. BSA-based HIPEC procedure leads to large interpatient variability in platinum exposure in all compartments.The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 7 December 2017 under registration number NCT03364907.