Improvement In Overall Survival Research Articles

Quantitative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Following 177Lu-PSMA-617 (VISION Trial).

Background Lutetium 177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Quantitative PSMA PET/CT analysis could provide information on 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment benefits. Purpose To explore the association between quantitative baseline gallium 68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT parameters and treatment response and outcomes in the VISION trial. Materials and Methods This was an exploratory secondary analysis of the VISION trial. Eligible participants were randomized (June 2018 to October 2019) in a 2:1 ratio to 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for up to six cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) or to SOC only. Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET parameters, including the mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax), PSMA-positive tumor volume, and tumor load, were extracted from five anatomic regions and the whole body. Associations of quantitative PET parameters with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and prostate-specific antigen response were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses (with treatment as the only other covariate). Outcomes were assessed in subgroups based on SUVmean quartiles. Results Quantitative PET parameters were well balanced between study arms for the 826 participants included. The median whole-body tumor SUVmean was 7.6 (IQR, 5.8-9.9). Whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy, with a hazard ratio (HR) range of 0.86-1.43 for all outcomes (all P < .001). A 1-unit whole-body tumor SUVmean increase was associated with a 12% and 10% decrease in risk of an rPFS event and death, respectively. 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC prolonged rPFS and OS in all SUVmean quartiles versus SOC only, with no identifiable optimum among participants receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617. Higher baseline PSMA-positive tumor volume and tumor load were associated with worse rPFS (HR range, 1.44-1.53 [P < .05] and 1.02-1.03 [P < .001], respectively) and OS (HR range, 1.36-2.12 [P < .006] and 1.04 [P < .001], respectively). Conclusion Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy in participants in the VISION trial. Improvements in rPFS and OS with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC were greater among participants with higher whole-body tumor SUVmean, with evidence for benefit at all SUVmean levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03511664 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

Temporal evolution of living donor liver transplantation survival—A United Network for Organ Sharing registry study

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a curative treatment for various liver diseases, reducing waitlist times and associated mortality. We aimed to assess the overall survival (OS), identify predictors for mortality, and analyze differences in risk factors over time. Adult patients undergoing LDLT were selected from the United Network for Organ Sharing database from inception (1987) to 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were conducted. In total, 7257 LDLT recipients with a median age of 54 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 45-61 years), 54% male, 80% non-Hispanic White, body mass index of 26.3 kg/m2 (IQR: 23.2-30.0 kg/m2), and model for end-stage liver disease score of 15 (IQR: 11-19) were included. The median cold ischemic time was 1.6 hours (IQR: 1.0-2.3 hours) with 88% right lobe grafts. The follow-up was 4.0 years (IQR: 1.0-9.2 years). The contemporary reached median OS was 17.0 years (95% CI: 16.1, 18.1 years), with the following OS estimates: 1 year 95%; 3 years 89%; 5 years 84%; 10 years 72%; 15 years 56%; and 20 years 43%. Nine independent factors associated with mortality were identified, with an independent improved OS in the recent time era (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.71). The median center-caseload per year was 5 (IQR: 2-10), with observed center-specific improvement of OS. LDLT is a safe procedure with excellent OS. Its efficacy has improved despite an increase of risk parameters, suggesting its limits are yet to be met.

Impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on survival outcomes in patients with unilateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To synthesize contemporary evidence of the impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) on survival outcomes in patients with unilateral breast cancer (UBC). PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases were searched for observational studies published up to November 15, 2023. Random-effects model was used to obtain pooled effect estimates that were reported as hazards ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), recurrence free survival (RFS) and risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Twenty-one studies were included. Most studies had a retrospective design. CPM was associated with significant improvement of OS (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.85), BCCS (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.90), and RFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.86) and significantly reduced risk of CBC (HR 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.09) in patients with UBC. No evidence of publication bias was detected. Our results provide strong evidence supporting the positive impact of CPM on survival outcomes in patients with UBC. Further research and long-term follow-up studies are warranted to validate these findings.

The landscape of checkpoint inhibitors in oncology

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have become increasingly popular treatment options for patients with cancer, even for patients in non-metastatic settings. Survival and responses have been reported for individual tumor types, but little is known about these outcomes, collectively. We sought to provide an overview of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in ICI drugs tested in registration trials. MethodsIn a cross-sectional analysis of US FDA oncology ICI drug approvals (2011–2023), we searched for supporting ICI registration trials. We characterized these trials, regarding differences in median OS and PFS between patients in intervention and control arm participants in ICI registration trials; percentage of patients who receive ICI crossover; and whether there is correlation between the percentage of crossover and differences in OS or PFS. ResultsFifty-six (54.4 %) approvals had trials that reported median OS for both intervention and control arms (median difference was 2.8 months; IQR: 2.2 to 5.0 months). Sixty-five (63.1 %) approvals had trials that reported PFS data for both arms (median of 0.9 months; IQR: −0.2 to 3.0 months). Subsequent therapy was common (median=18.9 %) and was significantly correlated with a higher difference in median OS in all studies with reported differences (R2 =0.15; p = 0.001). ConclusionICIs are increasingly used in the treatment of cancer, yet the median OS improvement is modest, and many ICIs have not been tested for OS benefit. OS is the outcome most meaningful for patients, and drug regulation should require better testing and reporting of these data.

Benmelstobart, anlotinib and chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

Immunochemotherapy is the first-line standard for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Combining the regimen with anti-angiogenesis may improve efficacy. ETER701 was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart (a novel programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor) with anlotinib (a multi-target anti-angiogenic small molecule) and standard chemotherapy in treatment-naive ES-SCLC. The ETER701 trial assessed two primary endpoints: Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Here the prespecified final progression-free survival and interim OS analysis is reported. Patients randomly received benmelstobart and anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC; n = 246), placebo and anlotinib plus EC (n = 245) or double placebo plus EC (‘EC alone’; n = 247), followed by matching maintenance therapy. Compared with EC alone, median OS was prolonged with benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC (19.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.61; P = 0.0002), while improvement of OS was not statistically significant with anlotinib plus EC (13.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.86; P = 0.1723). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 93.1%, 94.3% and 87.0% in the benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC, anlotinib plus EC, and EC alone groups, respectively. This study of immunochemotherapy plus multi-target anti-angiogenesis as first-line treatment achieved a median OS greater than recorded in prior randomized studies in patients with ES-SCLC. The safety profile was assessed as tolerable and manageable. Our findings suggest that the addition of anti-angiogenesis therapy to immunochemotherapy may represent an efficacious and safe approach to the management of ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04234607.

Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A SEER Database Study, 2000-2020

IntroductionWith advances in therapeutics and longer survival across different cancer spectrums, the incidence of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) has continued to rise. This study aims to evaluate the trend of survival outcomes and their association with sociodemographic factors in tAML over the last 20 years. MethodsWe identified tAML patients between 2000 and 2020 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were divided into 4 age groups: 18-39, 40-59, 60-69, and >= 70 years, and 4 diagnostic periods: 2000-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan Meier and log-rank methods. ResultsThe 1-year (and 5-year) OS in patients with tAML was 59.3% (33.7%), 48.2% (24.8%), 37.2% (11.1%), and 32.9% (5.5%) in age groups 18-39, 40-59, 60-69, and >=70 years, respectively. The 1-year (and 5-year) OS based on the year of diagnosis was 20.9% (13.2%), 36.8% (15.2%), 41.9% (13.88%), and 40.4% (not reached) for 2000-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020 respectively. Among the youngest cohort aged 18-39 years, 1-year OS was 35.7%, 57.7%, 66.7%, and 59.6%, respectively, in 4 diagnostic periods, whereas 1-year OS was 10.5%, 23.9%, 32.2%, and 36.9%, respectively, in the oldest cohort aged >=70 years. Age, year of diagnosis, and geographic location were independent prognostic markers of OS. ConclusionOur study demonstrates a significant improvement in the 1-year OS of tAML patients over the last decade, but the long-term prognosis remains dismal. Older patients continue to show improved survival in recent years with the addition of newer intensive and nonintensive options.

Post-Operative Radiation in Early Breast Cancer with N1 Disease: 10-Year Follow-Up.

Post-operative radiotherapy for post-menopausal women with early breast cancer and N1 disease is controversial. Although locoregional control is improved, overall survival (OS) benefit is unclear. The clinical benefit of post-operative irradiation in this group of patients over 10 years was reviewed. We aimed to evaluate the OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and factors affecting OS and DFS. A retrospective review of 191 post-menopausal women with early breast cancer and N1 disease from 2004 to 2011 was performed. Demographics, post-operative histology, adjuvant treatment, OS, and DFS were evaluated. Post-operative radiation was given to 95 of 191 women (49.7%). Younger age at diagnosis (p < 0.001), a greater number of involved nodes (p = 0.004), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and a higher tumor grade (p = 0.001) were more likely in women who received post-operative radiation. Nodal radiation did not improve 10-year DFS (p = 0.084) or OS (p = 0.203). Post-operative nodal radiation was associated with significant improvement in 10-year OS in women who received only hormonal therapy (p = 0.047) and no other systemic therapy. Women with unfavorable risk factors were more likely to receive post-operative radiation, likely due to a perceived higher risk of recurrence. Nodal radiation did not significantly improve 10-year DFS or OS in early breast cancer patients with N1 disease, and the benefit was not clearly demonstrated. However, in those who were on hormonal therapy, radiotherapy was beneficial in improving overall survival.

FDA Approval Summary: Durvalumab and Pembrolizumab, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer.

On September 2, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved durvalumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC). On October 31, 2023, the FDA approved pembrolizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine for the same indication. Approvals were based on two randomized, multiregional, placebo-controlled trials that randomly allocated patients to receive durvalumab (TOPAZ-1) or pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-966) in combination with chemotherapy or placebo in combination with chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint in both studies. In both studies, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS was demonstrated. In the TOPAZ-1 trial, the median OS of patients receiving durvalumab was 12.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.1-14.0] and 11.5 months (95% CI, 10.1-12.5) in patients receiving placebo [hazard ratio (HR), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66-0.97)]. In the KEYNOTE-966 trial, the median OS of patients receiving pembrolizumab was 12.7 months (95% CI, 11.5-13.6) and 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.9-11.6) in patients receiving placebo [HR, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.95)]. The addition of checkpoint inhibitors to standard of care chemotherapy for this indication did not reveal any new adverse event signals, and the safety profile was generally consistent with the known clinical experience with durvalumab, pembrolizumab, and the backbone chemotherapy regimen. The approvals of durvalumab and pembrolizumab in combination with standard of care cisplatin and gemcitabine for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BTC add two new therapeutic options for these patients.

The efficiency and safety of Chemoradiation Therapy in Limited Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Introduction: Limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with a poor prognosis, and standard treatments provide limited survival benefits. Current approaches often combine platinum-based chemotherapy with etoposide and radiation therapy. The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is currently under investigation to improve outcomes in LD-SCLC. Methods: This network meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines to compare randomized controlled trials evaluating chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and chemoradiation plus ICIs in LD-SCLC. Relevant studies were identified through database searches, and data were extracted for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Mean differences (MD) and odds ratios (OR) were analyzed using R’s meta-analysis packages. Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria, examining the Etoposide-Platinum with Durvalumab (EP_DUR), Etoposide-Lobaplatin (EL), Paclitaxel-Etoposide-Cisplatin (TEP), and Etoposide-Cisplatin followed by Irinotecan-Cisplatin (EP_IP) regimens, all in combination with radiation therapy. The EP_DUR regimen demonstrated significant improvements in OS and PFS compared to EP alone, with an MD of 4.2 months for OS (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.01, 7.39) and 8.2 months for PFS (95% CI: 6.52, 9.88). The OR for AEs was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.51). Although both the EL and TEP regimens showed gains in OS, these were not statistically significant. The EP_IP regimen was associated with the lowest risk of AEs, with an OR of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.83). Conclusion: EP_DUR demonstrated survival benefits and a favorable safety profile, positioning it as a promising option for LD-SCLC. Future studies should continue to explore ICI combinations to further optimize patient outcomes.

Comparison between Reirradiation by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Combination with Temozolomide for Treatment of Recurrent High Grade Glioma.

High grade glioma (HGG) is considered a lethal disease with a high recurrence rate. There is no standard of care in recurrent HGG. Many treatment options are present, such as resurgery, systemic therapy, and re-irradiation. Re-irradiation seems to be a promising option. In this study, we aimed at comparing the efficacy and toxicity of two re-irradiation protocols. Forty patients with recurrent HGG were randomized equally into two arms. Arm A received 30 Gy/10f/2w, and arm B received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) 30 Gy/5f/1w. Concurrent temozolamide (TMZ) was given in both arms. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and brain MRI was done after 2 months of radiotherapy and then every 2 months, with documented toxicity using the Common Terminology of Adverse Events version 5 (CTCAE). The median follow-up time after the re-irradiation course was 11 months (range 8-15 months). The median PFS after recurrence was 6.4 months (95% CI 5.3-7.4), the median OS after recurrence was 8.6 months (95% CI 7.5-8.7), and the median total OS form date of diagnosis was 18.5 months (95% CI 17.3-19.8) among the included patients. There was a statistically significant difference in PFS favoring arm B, with a median PFS of 7.3 versus 6.2 months in arm A, with p values of 0.004. There was no statistically significant difference in in median OS (9.3 months in arm B versus 8.4 months in arm A) with p values of 0.088. All patients tolerated their treatment well, and acute and subacute G1-G2 toxicity, consisting of headache, malaise, and nausea, were recorded during and shortly after the end of the re-irradiation course. Re-irradiation in recurrent HGG by both protocols is safe and effective, with a significant improvement in PFS in SBRT arm but no significant improvement in OS.

Outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated in the lenvatinib and immunotherapy era (2018-2021) compared to the sorafenib era (2008-2018).

Lenvatinib (LEN) and atezolizumab + bevacizumab (A + B) have drastically changed the treatment paradigm for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Before these landmark trials, sorafenib (SOR) served as the standard first-line treatment for a decade. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes of HCC patients treated during the SOR era (2008-2018) in contrast to those in the post-SOR era (2018-2021), of which the predominant first-line treatments were LEN or A + B. Inclusion criteria of the study were all HCC patients in the Canadian province of Alberta who started first-line systemic therapy at cancer centers between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2021. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), along with clinician-assessed response rate (RR), were subject to retrospective analysis. Of 372 total patients, 230 received treatment in the SOR era and 142 in the post-SOR era. The demographic and clinical characteristics for the SOR era and post-SOR era groups are as follows, respectively: the median age was 63 and 64 years, 80% and 81% were male, and 24% and 11% were of East Asian ethnicity. Before receiving systemic treatment, 40% and 33% received TACE, 7% and 9% received TARE, and 3% and 14% received SBRT in the two eras, respectively. In the post-SOR era, patients received A + B (23%), LEN (51%), and SOR (23%) as first-line treatment. There was a statistically significant improvement in RR (15% vs. 26%; p = 0.02), median PFS (3.8 months vs. 7.9 months; p < 0.0001), and median OS (9.8 months vs. 17.0 months; p < 0.0001). In this retrospective multicenter real-world study, HCC patients treated in the post-SOR era, where LEN and A + B were commonly used first-line treatments, exhibited superior OS, PFS, and RR compared to patients treated in the SOR era. The findings of this study affirm the tangible progress achieved in the real world in enhancing outcomes for HCC patients through advancements in treatments over the past 15 years.

Biomarker Testing Disparities in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), data are limited on disparate biomarker testing and its association with clinical outcomes on a national scale. To evaluate the socioeconomic and demographic inequities in microsatellite instability (MSI) and KRAS biomarker testing among patients with mCRC and to explore the association of testing with overall survival (OS). This cohort study, conducted between November 2022 and March 2024, included patients who were diagnosed with mCRC between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017. The study obtained data from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based cancer registry in the US. Patients with mCRC and available information on biomarker testing were included. Patients were classified based on whether they completed or did not complete MSI or KRAS tests. Demographic and socioeconomic factors, such as age, race, ethnicity, educational level in area of residence, median household income, insurance type, area of residence, facility type, and facility location were evaluated. The main outcomes were MSI and KRAS testing between the date of diagnosis and the date of first-course therapy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify the relevant factors in MSI and KRAS testing. The OS outcomes were also evaluated. Among the 41 061 patients included (22 362 males [54.5%]; mean [SD] age, 62.3 [10.1] years; 17.3% identified as Black individuals, 78.0% as White individuals, 4.7% as individuals of other race, with 6.5% Hispanic or 93.5% non-Hispanic ethnicity), 28.8% underwent KRAS testing and 43.7% received MSI testing. A significant proportion of patients had Medicare insurance (43.6%), received treatment at a comprehensive community cancer program (40.5%), and lived in an area with lower educational level (51.3%). Factors associated with a lower likelihood of MSI testing included age of 70 to 79 years (relative risk [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74; P < .001), treatment at a community cancer program (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.79; P < .001), rural residency (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92; P < .001), lower educational level in area of residence (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P < .001), and treatment at East South Central facilities (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.73; P < .001). Similar patterns were observed for KRAS testing. Survival analysis showed modest OS improvement in patients with MSI testing (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96; P < .001). The median (IQR) follow-up time for the survival analysis was 13.96 (3.71-29.34) months. This cohort study of patients with mCRC found that older age, community-setting treatment, lower educational level in area of residence, and treatment at East South Central facilities were associated with a reduced likelihood of MSI and KRAS testing. Highlighting the sociodemographic-based disparities in biomarker testing can inform the development of strategies that promote equity in cancer care and improve outcomes for underserved populations.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with chemotherapy: a population-based study.

In inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), chemotherapy is a common treatment strategy. However, there is a lack of reliable methods to predict the prognosis of patients with inoperable HCC after chemotherapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with inoperable HCC and to establish and validate nomogram models for predicting the survival outcomes in this patient group following chemotherapy. The data of patients diagnosed with HCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively collected. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify potential factors for inoperability in patients with HCC. Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on prognosis. Additionally, Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the potential risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with inoperable HCC treated with chemotherapy. Finally, we constructed prognostic nomograms for predicting the 1- and 3-year survival probabilities. A total of 3,519 operable patients with HCC and 4,656 patients with inoperable HCC were ultimately included in this study. Logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between patient age, gender, race, tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage, tumor size, pretreatment alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and marital status with inoperability. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed a significant improvement in both OS and CSS with the administration of chemotherapy. Moreover, 1,456 patients with inoperable HCC were enrolled in the training group and 631 patients with inoperable HCC were enrolled in the validation group to develop and validate the prognostic models. Cox regression models indicated that TNM stage, tumor size, and pretreatment AFP were independent risk factors for predicting OS and CSS in patients with inoperable HCC receiving chemotherapy. These factors were subsequently integrated into the predictive nomograms. We preliminarily developed survival models with strong predictive capabilities for estimating survival probabilities in patients with HCC following chemotherapy. These models hold potential for clinical application and warrant further exploration through additional studies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of random controlled trials.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and chemotherapy (CT) have been used to treat recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M-NPC), with demonstrated survival benefits and good safety. However, whether combination therapy is superior to CT alone remains unclear. We summarized the existing evidence comparing the effectiveness and toxicities of ICI combined with CT versus CT alone. Online databases was conducted for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to November 1, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoint. Objective response rates (ORRs) and adverse events (AEs) were the secondary endpoint. Three randomized controlled trials (Capture-1st, JUPITER-02, and RATIONALE-309) were included. First-line ICI therapy combined with CT showed significant improvement in PFS (hazard ratio[HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval[CI]: 0.44-0.64), OS (HR, 0.63;95%CI: 0.49-0.81) and ORRs (odds ratio[OR], 1.79;95%CI: 1.30-2.46), when compared with CT alone. AEs ≥ grade 3 during treatment and treatment-related deaths were not significantly different between the two groups. In patients with R/M-NPC, ICI therapy combined with CT showed improved ORRs, PFS, and OS, with similar safety as CT alone.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.

Chemotherapy for breast cancer can cause neutropenia, increasing the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and serious infections. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis has been explored to mitigate these risks. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. A systematic literature review was conducted according to the "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development" using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing using G-CSF as primary prophylaxis in invasive breast cancer were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and FN incidence. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes with sufficient data. Eight RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis, and five RCTs were meta-analyzed for FN incidence. The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in FN incidence with primary G-CSF prophylaxis (risk difference [RD] = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, p = 0.04). Evidence for improvement in OS with G-CSF was inconclusive. Four RCTs suggested a tendency for increased pain with G-CSF, but statistical significance was not reported. Primary prophylactic use of G-CSF is strongly recommended for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, as it has been shown to reduce the incidence of FN. While the impact on OS is unclear, the benefits of reducing FN are considered to outweigh the potential harm of increased pain.

The survival benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy in the management of small (T1mic, T1a, T1b, T1c), node negative HER2+ breast cancer

There is limited data regarding the added benefit of adjuvant systemic therapy in the management of small, node-negative, HER2+ breast cancer. In a multi-institutional retrospective analysis using the American Society of Clinical Oncology CancerLinQ database, we compared survival outcomes among T1a-c N0 HER2+ patients diagnosed between 2010 to 2021 who received locoregional therapy alone or in combination with adjuvant trastuzumab (+/− chemotherapy). Primary outcomes were invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the 1,184 patients, 436 received locoregional therapy alone. We found a statistically significant improvement in iDFS (HR 0.73, P = 0.003) and OS (HR 0.63, P = 0.023) on univariate analysis with adjuvant trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy which remained statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Three-arm univariate analysis found that iDFS was significantly improved with trastuzumab monotherapy (P = 0.003) and combination therapy (P = 0.027) compared to observation. Subgroup data suggests that T1b/c tumors derive the greatest benefit.

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs docetaxel (doc) in patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) previously treated with platinum (PT)-based chemotherapy (chemo) and PD(L)-1inhibitors (IO): Primary results from the phase 3 EVOKE-01 study.

LBA8500 Background: In pts with mNSCLC who progress on PT-based chemo and IO, doc is standard of care, but outcomes remain poor. SG, a Trop-2-directed antibody drug conjugate, showed durable response and tolerable safety in pretreated mNSCLC. We report results from the phase 3, randomized, open-label EVOKE-01 study comparing SG vs doc. Methods: Pts with mNSCLC with disease progression after PT-based chemo and IO were randomized 1:1 (stratified by histology, best response to last prior IO, and prior treatment for actionable genomic alterations [yes/no]) to receive SG (10 mg/kg IV, days 1 and 8) or doc (75 mg/m2 IV, day 1) in 21-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); key secondary endpoints were investigator assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and safety. Results: As of Nov 29, 2023, 603 pts were randomized. Median (range) age was 65 (31–84) yrs; 55% had 1 prior therapy line. The study was not statistically significant for OS. A numerical improvement in OS, favoring SG, was seen (HR 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68–1.04; 1-sided P = 0.0534]) including in pts with squamous and nonsquamous histology. PFS and ORR are shown in the Table. A clinically meaningful difference in median OS favoring SG (3.5 mo) was seen in pts without response to last prior IO. PROs were improved with SG vs doc. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence was 66.6% (SG) and 75.7% (doc). Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 6.8% (SG) and 14.2% (doc). Conclusions: Although statistical significance was not met, SG showed numerical improvement in OS vs doc. Results were consistent across all major subgroups including histology. Clinically meaningful improvement in OS was noted in pts without response to prior IO. SG was better tolerated than doc; observed safety was consistent with the known profile. Clinical trial information: NCT05089734 . [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC: 4-year update from CheckMate 816.

LBA8010 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 816 study established neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care for eligible pts with resectable NSCLC. Here, we report the 4-year survival update from this study, representing the longest follow-up among all global phase 3 studies evaluating neoadjuvant or perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Methods: Adults with stage IB (≥ 4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC v7) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no known EGFR/ ALK alterations were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO 360 mg + chemo Q3W or chemo alone Q3W for 3 cycles, followed by surgery. Event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR; both per blinded independent review) were primary endpoints and were both statistically significant. Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint. Exploratory analyses included efficacy by pCR status and extent of resection. Results: At the 23 Feb 2024 database lock (median follow-up, 57.6 mo), NIVO + chemo continued to improve EFS vs chemo (median, 43.8 mo vs 18.4 mo; HR [95% CI], 0.66 [0.49–0.90]); 4-year EFS rates were 49% vs 38%. EFS favored NIVO + chemo vs chemo regardless of whether pts had lobectomy or pneumonectomy (Table), with 56%–57% vs 40%–43% of pts without disease recurrence at 4 years. NIVO + chemo also continued to show OS improvement vs chemo (HR [98.36% CI], 0.71 [0.47–1.07]; P = 0.0451; median OS was not reached [NR] in both arms, and the significance boundary was not met at this interim analysis). An OS improvement of 13% was sustained over time for NIVO + chemo vs chemo; 4-year OS rates were 71% vs 58%. Pts in the NIVO + chemo arm who had pCR continued to have improved OS vs those who did not (HR [95% CI], 0.08 [0.02–0.34]); 4-year OS rates, 95% vs 63%); a similar trend was seen in the chemo arm, although few pts had pCR with chemo (n = 4). No new safety signals were observed at this update. Additional survival analyses in pt subgroups and by ctDNA levels will be presented. Conclusions: In this 4-year analysis from CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo sustained EFS and OS separation vs chemo over time and demonstrated the long-term survival benefit of having pCR in pts with resectable NSCLC. These data provide the first understanding of the long-term benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy when added to chemo, reinforcing neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care, and providing a benchmark to assess the benefits of all perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02998528 . [Table: see text]

A phase III randomized, open-label study to establish the superiority of triple oral metronomic therapy (OMCT) used in addition to chemotherapy regimen (paclitaxel + carboplatin) over chemotherapy alone for the treatment of advanced unresectable head and neck cancer squamous cell cancer (HNSCC).

LBA6053 Background: Advanced HNSCC has poor outcomes and limited treatment options, especially in resource-constrained settings. Immunotherapy is affordable for less than 5% of patients in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Triple OMCT, employing low-dose continuous chemotherapy, shows promise, but its safety and efficacy along with chemotherapy remain unproven. We aimed to assess whether the addition of OMCT to first-line chemotherapy can improve overall survival (OS) as compared to chemotherapy alone. Methods: This phase 3 randomized, prospective, open-label, superiority design study enrolled patients with advanced HNSCC who were planned for palliative intent platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were stratified for the site of the tumor and ECOG PS, and were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either triple OMCT (Erlotinib 150 mg OD, Celecoxib 200 mg BD and Methotrexate 9mg/m2 once weekly) in addition to 3-weekly paclitaxel carboplatin (PC) chemotherapy (Arm A) or, PC chemotherapy alone (Arm B). Sample size calculation assumed no OS improvement with OMCT+PC (5% type I error, 80% type II error). The primary endpoint was OS, while secondary endpoints included PFS, quality of life (QoL) assessments, and safety. OS and PFS were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test; HR estimated via Cox proportional hazard models. QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee and registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI/2022/10/046520). Results: Between Nov 02, 2022, and Dec 20, 2023, 238 patients were randomly assigned with 119 in each arm. Median age was 47 years, with 97.8% being males, and 78% of patients had ECOG PS 0-1. The median OS for patients in Arm A was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.3-10.4) while it was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.7-7.4), in Arm B (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47–0.83; p=0.00011). The corresponding median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.3-8.8) and 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.2-4.7) (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.98-3.93; P&lt;0.000). Significant differences in EORTC-C30 were found for the physical functioning domain between baseline and 1-month follow-up visit. PC chemotherapy combined with triple OMCT showed good tolerability, with common toxicities including fatigue (40.3%), and hyponatremia (25.4%), similar to the incidence observed with PC chemotherapy alone. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the addition of triple OMCT to paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with advanced HNSCC in platinum-sensitive settings. This treatment option is particularly valuable in LMICs, where cetuximab and pembrolizumab are not feasible. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2022/10/046520 . [Table: see text]

Trends in Outcomes After Upfront Autologous Transplant for Multiple Myeloma Over Three Decades

Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) remains standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), although recently its role has been questioned. The aim of the study was to evaluate trends in patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of NDMM who underwent upfront auto-SCT over three decades. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with NDMM who underwent upfront auto-SCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1988 to 2021. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were grouped by the year of auto-SCT: 1988-2000 (n = 249), 2001-2005 (n = 373), 2006-2010 (n = 568), 2011-2015 (n = 815) and 2016-2021 (n = 1036). High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were defined as del (17p), t (4;14), t (14;16), and 1q21 gain or amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. We included 3041 MM patients in the analysis. Median age at auto-SCT increased from 52 years (1988-2000) to 62 years (2016-2021), as did the incidence of high-risk cytogenetics from 15% to 40% (P < .001). Comorbidity burden, as measured by a Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) of >3, increased from 17% (1988-2000) to 28% (2016-2021) (P < .001). Induction regimens evolved from predominantly chemotherapy to immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitor (PI) based regimens, with 74% of patients receiving IMiD-PI triplets in 2016-2021 (39% bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) and 35% carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone [KRD]). Response rates prior to auto-SCT steadily increased, with 4% and 10% achieving a ≥CR and ≥VGPR compared to 19% and 65% between 1988-2000 and 2016-2021, respectively. Day 100 response rates post auto-SCT improved from 24% and 49% achieving ≥CR and ≥VGPR between 1988-2000 to 41% and 81% between 2016-2021, respectively. Median PFS improved from 22.3 months between 1988-2000 to 58.6 months between 2016-2021 (HR 0.42, P < .001). Among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, median PFS increased from 13.7 months to 36.8 months (HR 0.32, P < .001). Patients aged ≥65 years also had an improvement in median PFS from 33.6 months between 2001 and 2005 to 52.8 months between 2016-2021 (HR 0.56, P = .001). Median OS improved from 55.1 months between 1988-2000 to not reached (HR 0.41, P < .001). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had an improvement in median OS from 32.9 months to 66.5 months between 2016-2021 (HR 0.39, P < .001). Day 100 non-relapse mortality from 2001 onwards was ≤1%. Age-adjust rates of second primary malignancies were similar in patients transplanted in different time periods. Despite increasing patient age and comorbidity burden, this large real-world study demonstrated significant improvements in the depth of response and survival outcomes in patients with NDMM undergoing upfront auto-SCT over the past three decades, including those with high-risk disease.