Donor Outcomes Research Articles

Changes in Donor Utilization and Outcomes for Patients Bridged With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.

We studied the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on donor characteristics and posttransplant outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-bridged heart transplant (HT) recipients. Left ventricular assist device-bridged adult HT recipients from October 2014 to October 2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized into old allocation policy (OAP) and new allocation policy (NAP) cohorts. Baseline characteristics, posttransplant outcomes, and subgroup analyses of unstable and stable LVAD-bridged recipients were assessed. The study included 7,384 HT recipients; 4,345 (58.8%) were transplanted in the OAP era and 3,039 (41.2%) in the NAP era. Old allocation policy recipients were most frequently status 1A at transplantation (71.1%), whereas NAP recipients were most frequently status 3 (40.0%), and status 4 (31.9%). Median donor sequence number (DSN) was higher in the NAP versus OAP era (9 vs. 3, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, NAP recipients had 20% higher 1 year mortality compared to OAP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.04-1.40], p = 0.01). Status 1 or 2 recipients had 28% higher 1 year mortality compared to status 1A (aHR = 1.28 [95% CI: 1.01-1.63], p = 0.04). Status 1 and 2 LVAD-supported recipients had higher mortality following the 2018 allocation change, indicating the need for closer surveillance of LVAD-bridged patients who may decompensate on the waitlist.

Long-term outcomes of peripheral blood stem cell unrelated donors mobilized with filgrastim

AbstractAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a life-saving procedure used to treat a variety of devastating diseases. It requires hematopoietic stem cells collected via filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) harvest from volunteer unrelated donors (URDs). There is a paucity of safety data regarding donors’ long-term adverse events. This prospective, observational study combined PBSC donors enrolled in the NMDP Investigational New Drug trial and BM donors between 1 July 1999 and 30 September 2015. The primary objective was to describe the long-term incidence of myeloid malignancies. The secondary objectives included describing the long-term incidence of lymphoid malignancies, nonhematologic malignancies, autoimmune disorders, and thrombotic events. A total of 21 643 donors (14 530 PBSCs and 7123 BM) were included. The incidence rate of myeloid disorders per 100 000 person-years in donors of PBSCs was 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-7.84) and in donors of BM, it was 4.13 (95% CI, 1.33-12.8). The incidence rate ratio of PBSCs/BM donors was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.12-3.03; P = .55). The incidence of other malignancies, autoimmunity, and thrombosis did not differ between the donor types. This comprehensive study of the long-term effects of filgrastim in URDs of PBSCs provides strong evidence that donors who receive filgrastim are not at an increased risk of these events compared with BM donors. It also provides reassurance to current donors undergoing stem cell mobilization as well as individuals considering joining stem cell registries, such as NMDP.

Measuring the effectiveness of online search ads on blood donor recruitment and donation.

Acutely highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the tenuousness of the blood supply continues to be a lynchpin of the most important medical procedures. Online advertisements have become a mainstay in donor recruitment. We set out to determine the effectiveness of online search ads and variations thereof on blood donations with an emphasis on first-time donors. From September 01, 2022 through March 31, 2023, we performed a campaign comparison experiment through a major search-ads platform with two distinct messages: one altruistic ("Altruistic") and one with a prospect of rewards ("Promotion"). We developed a method to track donation outcomes and associated them with impressions, click-throughs, and conversions. We compared the performance of the Altruistic and Promotion arms to a control group that was not associated with any search-ads ("Baseline"). Analyzing 34,157 donations during the study period, the Promotion group, and not Altruistic, had a significant difference of first-time donors over Baseline (24% vs. 12%, p = 7e-6). We analyzed 49,305 appointments and discovered that appointments made from the Altruistic arm resulted in a significantly higher percentage of donations when compared to Baseline (57% vs. 53%, p = .009); however, the Promotion group had a higher percentage of donations from first-time donors when compared to Baseline (12% vs. 8%, p = .006). We developed a method for determining the effectiveness of online search ads on donation outcomes. Rewards/promotions messaging was most effective at recruiting first-time donors. Our methodology is generalizable to different blood centers to explore messaging effectiveness among their unique communities.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA, gene expression profile, and acute rejection in donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplant recipients

BackgroundAcute rejection (AR) is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. There is limited data in donor after circulatory death (DCD) HTx recipients where ischemia reperfusion injury may contribute to development of AR and may be detected early with non-invasive biomarkers such as donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and gene expression profile (GEP). The goal of this study is to compare dd-cfDNA, GEP and rejection outcomes in DCD and donor after brain death (DBD) HTx recipients. MethodsThis single-center, retrospective study included DCD and DBD HTx recipients from January 2020 to September 2022. Patients were excluded from the study if dd-cfDNA and GEP were not available. The CareDx HeartCare platform was used to obtain dd-cfDNA (AlloSure-Heart) and GEP (AlloMap) with the highest values for each patient recorded at 6 and 12 months. The mean values for these non-invasive markers were compared between DCD and DBD groups. Patients were followed for clinical outcomes, including treated AR, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and death, through September 2023. ResultsA total of 156 HTx patients were included with 50 DCD and 106 DBD recipients. Baseline characteristics were similar between DCD and DBD recipients including mean age (58.5 years vs 56.9 years, p = 0.48), male sex (82% vs 76%, p = 0.56) and Caucasian race (46% vs 43%, p = 0.78). There were no significant differences in mean AlloSure-Heart at 6 and 12 months between DCD and DBD recipients. AlloMap was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.04), but not at 12 months between DCD and DBD recipients. With respect to clinical outcomes at 1 year, there were no significant differences in treated AR (22% vs 14%, p = 0.32), ISHLT grade ≥ 2 CAV (0 vs 4%, p = 0.44) or mortality (2% vs 0%, p = 0.69) between DCD and DBD recipients. ConclusionsIn this single center study, there were no significant differences in mean dd-cfDNA and treated AR at 1 year between DCD and DBD HTx recipients. There was a significant increase in mean GEP at 6 months, but not at 12 months in the DBD cohort. Overall, there does not appear to be clinically significant cardiac allograft injury related to DCD as measured by non-invasive markers. Further work is needed to confirm these findings.

The Outcome after Laser Therapy of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome with Coexistent Selective Fetal Growth Restriction.

Background: Most previous studies evaluated outcomes of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) without considering the coexistence of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR). The objectives of this study were to compare twin survival and pregnancy complications after laser therapy of TTTS with and without sFGR. Methods: For this purpose, a retrospective cohort study including 98 monochorionic diamniotic twins and three dichorionic triamniotic triplets treated in a single tertiary center was conducted. Results: Overall, 46 twins had selective fetal growth restriction (26 type I, 13 type II, 7 type III). At birth, donor survival (61% vs. 91%), double survival (57% vs. 82%), and overall survival (75% vs. 88%) were significantly lower in the group with coexistent sFGR. Recipient survival (89% vs. 86%), miscarriage (7% vs. 2%), PPROM < 32 weeks (48% vs. 29%), and preterm delivery < 32 weeks (52% vs. 45%) were not significantly higher in the group with coexistent sFGR. Donor twins with sFGR type I (69% vs. 91%) and types II-III (50% vs. 91%) showed significantly lower survival than those without sFGR. Multivariate regression analysis identified sFGR and its subtypes as independent predictors of donor demise. Conclusions: the coexistence of sFGR in TTTS pregnancies was associated with poor donor outcomes and is probably the most important predictor of donor survival.

From Patients to Providers: Assessing Impact of Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Liver Transplant Practices in the US.

Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of livers allows for the expansion of the donor pool and minimization of posttransplant complications. Results to date have focused on both donor and recipient outcomes, but there remains potential for NMP to also impact transplant providers. Using United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis file data, adult deceased donors who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, were identified. Transplanted livers were divided by preservation methods (static cold storage [SCS] and NMP) and case time (day-reperfusion 8 am to 6 pm ). Patient factors, transplant characteristics, and short-term outcomes were analyzed between Mahalanobis-metric-matched groups. NMP livers represented 742 (1.4%) of 52,132 transplants. NMP donors were more marginal with higher Donor Risk Index scores (1.78 ± 0.50 NMP vs 1.49 ± 0.38 SCS, p < 0.001) and donation after cardiac death frequency (36.9% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001). NMP recipients more often had model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception status (29.9% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001), lower laboratory MELD scores (20.7 ± 9.7 vs 24.3 ± 10.9, p < 0.001), and had been waitlisted longer (111.5 [21.0 to 307.0] vs 60.0 [9.0 to 245.0] days, p < 0.001). One-year graft survival (90.2% vs 91.6%, p = 0.505) was similar between groups, whereas length of stay was lower for NMP recipients (8.0 [6.0 to 14.0] vs 10.0 [6.0 to 16.0], p = 0.017) after adjusting for confounders. Notably, peak case volume occurred at 11 am with NMP livers (vs 9 pm with SCS). Overall, a higher proportion of transplants was performed during daytime hours with NMP (51.5% vs 43.0%, p < 0.001). NMP results in increased use of marginal allografts, which facilitated transplantation in lower laboratory MELD recipients who have been waitlisted longer and often have exception points. Importantly, NMP also appeared to shift peak caseloads from nighttime to daytime, which may have significant effects on the quality of life for the entire liver transplant team.

Pediatric donor heart utilization variability among organ procurement organizations.

Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are responsible for the medical management of organ donors. Given the variability in pediatric donor heart utilization among OPOs, we examined factors that may explain this variability, including differences in donor medical management, organ quality, and candidate factors. The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database was queried for pediatric (<18 years) heart donors and candidates receiving pediatric donor heart offers from 2010 to 2019. OPOs were stratified by pediatric donor heart utilization rate, and the top and bottom quintiles were compared based on donor management strategies and outcomes. A machine learning algorithm, combining 11 OPO, donor, candidate, and offer variables, was used to determine factors most predictive of whether a heart offer is accepted. There was no clinically significant difference between the top and bottom quintile OPOs in baseline donor characteristics, distance between donor and listing center, management strategies, or organ quality. Machine learning modeling suggested neither OPO donor management nor cardiac function is the primary driver of whether an organ is accepted. Instead, number of prior donor offer refusals and individual listing center receiving the offer were two of the most predictive variables of organ acceptance. OPO clinical practice variation does not seem to account for the discrepancy in pediatric donor heart utilization rates among OPOs. Listing center acceptance practice and prior number of donor refusals seem to be the important drivers of heart utilization and may at least partially account for the variation in OPO heart utilization rates given the regional association between OPOs and listing centers.

Email Campaigns That Suit the Candidate: Leveraging Automated Text Analysis to Increase Political Donations

This research employs automated text analysis to explore how textual characteristics in campaign emails affect monetary donations received by political candidates. The authors outline a new methodological framework that combines a machine learning approach for natural language processing with fixed effect regressions, thereby enabling researchers to study and interpret the impact of textual characteristics on donations while also accounting for individual differences across candidates and their email recipients. Using this framework, the authors analyze 764 emails from 19 candidates in the 2020 U.S. Democratic presidential primary election and evaluate how certain textual characteristics (e.g., empathy, vulnerability) in campaign emails affect donation outcomes. Identifying these effects would enable candidates to improve their email text and increase their donations by 9% on average. This research provides a practical and flexible roadmap for automated text analysis in situations where political campaigns do not have clear a priori hypotheses about which textual characteristics will be effective for them.

Liver regeneration of living donor after liver donation for transplantation: Disparity in the left and right remnant liver.

Donor safety is crucial for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and sufficient liver regeneration significantly affects outcomes of living donors. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with liver regeneration in living donors. The study retrospectively reviewed 380 living donors who underwent liver donation at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou. The clinical characteristics and medical parameters of donors were analyzed and compared according to liver donation graft type. There were 355 donors (93.4%) with right hemi-liver donations and 25 donors (6.6%) with left hemi-liver donations. Left hemi-liver donors had a higher body mass index (BMI) and a larger ratio of remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV). However, the 2 groups showed no significant difference in the liver regeneration ratio. The type of remnant liver (P < .001), RLV/body weight (P = .027), RLV/TLV (P < .001), serum albumin on postoperative day 7 and total bilirubin levels on postoperative day 30 were the most significant factors affecting liver regeneration in living donors. In conclusion, adequate liver regeneration is essential for donor outcome after liver donation. The remnant liver could eventually regenerate to an adequate volume similar to the initial TLV before liver donation. However, the remnant left hemi-liver had a faster growth rate than the remnant right hemi-liver in donors.

(209) - Outcomes in Donation After Circulatory Death Pediatric Lung Transplants: An Analysis of the ISHLT Registry

(209) - Outcomes in Donation After Circulatory Death Pediatric Lung Transplants: An Analysis of the ISHLT Registry

(231) - Outcomes in Donation After Circulatory Death Cardiac Transplantation Following Direct Procurement and Perfusion Compared with Normothermic Regional Perfusion

(231) - Outcomes in Donation After Circulatory Death Cardiac Transplantation Following Direct Procurement and Perfusion Compared with Normothermic Regional Perfusion

(941) - High Donor Sequence Number and Outcomes Following Lung Transplantation in the United States

(941) - High Donor Sequence Number and Outcomes Following Lung Transplantation in the United States

(52) - Transient versus Persistent Donor Specific Antibodies and Outcomes After Lung Transplantation

(52) - Transient versus Persistent Donor Specific Antibodies and Outcomes After Lung Transplantation

Improving outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplant for leukemia in children and young adults in resource-limited setting

IntroductionAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative approach in patients with relapsed and high-risk leukemia. This retrospective analysis aimed to investigate outcomes and risk factors associated with HSCT in children and young adults with hematological malignancies in a resource-limited setting. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 48 pediatric and young adult patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies who underwent HSCT at our institution between April 2017 and Jan 2023. ResultThe median age of the cohort was 10 years (6 months - 21 years), and the majority of patients underwent transplants for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n = 24; 50 %) and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 18; 37.5%). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 15 days (range 9–28) and 18 days (range 9–40), respectively. One patient had primary graft failure. Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurred in 21 patients (43.8%). Seventeen patients received escalated donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). With a median follow-up of 902 days (52–2490), the probability of event free survival and overall survival (OS) was 65.9% and 69.4%. OS for lymphoid and myeloid malignancies were 64.7% and 75.2%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier probabilities of OS for patients in first complete remission (CR), CR2, CR3, or with refractory disease were 80%, 76.2%, 0%, and 40%, respectively (p = 0.02). OS of the patients undergoing matched sibling donor (n = 17) or haploidentical HSCT (n = 31) was 70.6% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.989). ConclusionsOur study demonstrates excellent outcomes of patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic HSCT with similar outcomes in HLA-identical sibling donors and haploidentical first-degree family donors. Prophylactic DLI might be considered in patients with high-risk leukemia to prevent relapse, including ALL.

Clinical-care management and outcomes of potential organ and tissue donors for transplants

Analyze the clinical-epidemiological aspects and outcomes of the organ and tissue donation process for transplants. Prospective cohort study, whose sample consisted of 127 eligible donors, most of them men, with low education, and at least one comorbidity. There was a statistical association between the age group of 60 years and over and the largest number of donors; the family approach on the same day of brain death diagnosis was associated with a greater chance of donating. The organ donation process is time-dependent, the agility used in management and care dynamics positively reflects the results.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in India: Are we ready for 2040?

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been widely researched and is well established worldwide. The cornerstone of this treatment lies in the various criteria formulated by expert consensus and experience. The variations among the criteria are staggering, and the short- and long-term out comes are controversial. To study the differences in the current practices of LT for HCC at different centers in India and discuss their clinical implications in the future. We conducted a survey of major centers in India that performed LT in December 2022. A total of 23 responses were received. The centers were classified as high- and low-volume, and the current trend of care for patients und ergoing LT for HCC was noted. Of the 23 centers, 35% were high volume center (> 500 Liver transplants) while 52% were high-volume centers that performed more than 50 transplants/year. Approximately 39% of centers had performed > 50 LT for HCC while the percent distribution for HCC in LT patients was 5%-15% in approximately 73% of the patients. Barring a few, most centers were divided equally between University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and center-specific criteria when choosing patients with HCC for LT, and most (65%) did not have separate transplant criteria for deceased donor LT and living donor LT (LDLT). Most centers (56%) preferred surgical resection over LT for a Child A cirrhosis patient with a resectable 4 cm HCC lesion. Positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) was the modality of choice for metastatic workup in the majority of centers (74%). Downstaging was the preferred option for over 90% of the centers and included transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy and atezolizumab/bevacizumab with varied indications. The alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) cut-off was used by 74% of centers to decide on transplantation as well as to downstage tumors, even if they met the criteria. The criteria for successful downstaging varied, but most centers conformed to the UCSF or their center-specific criteria for LT, along with the AFP cutoff values. The wait time for LT from down staging was at least 4-6 wk in all centers. Contrast-enhanced CT was the preferred imaging modality for post-LT surveillance in 52% of the centers. Approximately 65% of the centers preferred to start everolimus between 1 and 3 months post-LT. The current predicted 5-year survival rate of HCC patients in India is less than 15%. The aim of transplantation is to achieve at least a 60% 5-year disease free survival rate, which will provide relief to the prediction of an HCC surge over the next 20 years. The current worldwide criteria (Milan/UCSF) may have a higher 5-year survival (> 70%); however, the majority of patients still do not fit these criteria and are dependent on other suboptimal modes of treatment, with much lower survival rates. To make predictions for 2040, we must prepare to arm ourselves with less stringent selection criteria to widen the pool of patients who may undergo transplantation and have a chance of a better outcome. With more advanced technology and better donor outcomes, LDLT will provide a cutting edge in the fight against liver cancer over the next two decades.

Safety of right liver donation after improving steatosis through weight loss in living donors: a retrospective study.

Living donor liver transplantation using hepatic steatosis-improved grafts mitigates donor shortage. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of right-lobe adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using grafts improved through donor weight loss. In this retrospective study conducted in a single institution in the Republic of Korea, we reviewed the medical records of living liver donors who lost ≥ 10% of their body weight to improve steatosis before right lobe donation between January 2015 and December 2020. Overall, 1040 right-lobe donors were included, with 150 and 890 donors in the weight loss and control (non-steatosis) groups, respectively. We performed 1:1 individual matching using the greedy matching method, by which 124 patients were included in each group. The median period from the date of the first visit to donation was 113 (interquartile range: 78-184) days in the weight loss group. As body weight changed from 82.8 ± 13.7kg to 70.8 ± 11.8kg (p < 0.0001), body mass index also improved from 27.8 ± 3.9kg/m2 to 23.8 ± 3.1kg/m2 (p < 0.0001). No significant between-group differences existed in the postoperative laboratory data for living donors and recipients. The incidence of postoperative complications in donors was comparable between the groups (control group, 9.7%; weight loss group, 13.7%; p = 0.3185). The graft and recipient survival rates were comparable between the groups (p = 1.000). Weight loss through diet and exercise significantly could improve hepatic steatosis in living donor candidates for liver transplantation, with the surgical outcomes in recipients and donors being equivalent to those in recipients and non-steatotic donors.

Implications of drug intoxication on donor utilization and outcomes in liver transplantation.

This study evaluates the implications of drug intoxication (DI) on donor utilization and outcomes in liver transplantation (LT). The UNOS STAR database was evaluated for all potential donors and adult, first-time, whole LT between 2005 and 2019. Logistic regression analyses evaluated liver utilization; proportional hazards modeling assessed risk of 1-year graft loss. A total of 132783 potential donors (10205, 7.7% from DI), and 90612 adult LT were identified (7490, 8.3% from DI). DI donors had median age 32 years (IQR 26-40 years, p<.001), were 42.6% female (n=4346), and 15.5% were DCD donors (n=1583). Utilization of DI donors changed over time, such that by 2015-2019 they were the most likely donor cause of death (COD) to be utilized. Among LT recipients, there were insignificant differences (<2% variance) in age, gender, ethnicity, and etiology of liver disease according to donor COD. Recipients with MELD scores>30 more frequently received grafts from donors with trauma (23.8%) and DI (21.8%) versus cardiovascular (20.0%) and CVA/stroke (19.9%, p<.001). Among DBD donors, DI-COD was associated with superior 1-year graft survival compared to donors from trauma (HR 1.172, 95% CI 1.057-1.300) and CVA/stroke (HR 1.404, 95% CI 1.264-1.561, p<.001). Donor COD was not significantly associated with 1-year graft loss among DCD donors. There is an increased likelihood of donor utilization when COD is drug overdose and an increased likelihood of 1-year graft survival compared to donors from trauma, CVA/stroke, and other COD.

Organ Donation from Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review

The mismatch between the demand for and supply of organs for transplantation is steadily growing. Various strategies have been incorporated to improve the availability of organs, including organ use from patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at the time of death. However, there is no systematic evidence of the outcome of grafts from these donors. Systematic literature review (Scopus and PubMed, up to October 11, 2023). All study designs. Organ recipients from patients on ECMO at the time of death. Outcome of organ donation from ECMO donors. The search yielded 1,692 publications, with 20 studies ultimately included, comprising 147 donors and 360 organ donations. The most frequently donated organs were kidneys (68%, 244/360), followed by liver (24%, 85/360). In total, 98% (292/299) of recipients survived with a preserved graft function (92%, 319/347) until follow-up within a variable period of up to 3 years. Organ transplantation from donors supported with ECMO at the time of death shows high graft and recipient survival. ECMO could be a suitable approach for expanding the donor pool, helping to alleviate the worldwide organ shortage.

Clinical performance of the iPREDICTLIVING tool for the prediction of the post-transplant recipient and living donor outcomes in a European cohort.

A living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) is the best treatment for ESRD. A prediction tool based on clinical and demographic data available pre-KT was developed in a Norwegian cohort with three different models to predict graft loss, recipient death, and donor candidate's risk of death, the iPREDICTLIVING tool. No external validations are yet available. We sought to evaluate its predictive performance in our cohort of 352 pairs LKDT submitted to KT from 1998 to 2019. The model for censored graft failure (CGF) showed the worse discriminative performance with Harrell's C of.665 and a time-dependent AUC of.566, with a calibration slope of.998. For recipient death, at 10 years, the model had a Harrell's C of.776, a time-dependent AUC of.773, and a calibration slope of 1.003. The models for donor death were reasonably discriminative, although with a poor calibration, particularly for 20 years of death, with a Harrell's C of.712 and AUC of.694 with a calibration slope of.955. These models have moderate discriminative and calibration performance in our population. The tool was validated in this Northern Portuguese cohort, Caucasian, with a low incidence of diabetes and other comorbidities. It can improve the informed decision-making process at the living donor consultation joining clinical and other relevant information.