You have accessJournal of UrologyGeneral & Epidemiological Trends & Socioeconomics: Practice Patterns, Cost Effectiveness II1 Apr 2010496 MANAGEMENT OF BONE LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A STUDY OF CURRENT PRACTICE PATTERNS IN A CENTER WITH UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO CARE Matthew Christman, Sean Stroup, Preston Gable, Daniel Cooper, Brian Auge, and James L'Esperance Matthew ChristmanMatthew Christman More articles by this author , Sean StroupSean Stroup More articles by this author , Preston GablePreston Gable More articles by this author , Daniel CooperDaniel Cooper More articles by this author , Brian AugeBrian Auge More articles by this author , and James L'EsperanceJames L'Esperance More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.571AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Recent attention has been given to bone loss associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. We aimed to assess the practices of screening and treating bone loss within a population with universal access to health care. METHODS Patients who received ADT for PCa between OCT2004 and SEP2007 were identified. Data pertaining to demographics, Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) results, prescribed medications, fracture incidence, and cause of death (if applicable) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Fisher′s exact test for categorical variables and a t-test or ANOVA for continuous variables. Significance was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS A total of 272 patients received ADT for management of prostate cancer. The mean age of the group was 75.8±10.2 years. Of these patients, 44.9% (122/272) underwent DEXA scans with findings of normal in 24%, osteopenia in 41%, and osteoporosis in 35%. A total of 32.7% (89/272) of the cohort received some form of pharmacologic treatment for bone loss, either preventatively or therapeutically. Fractures occurred in 10.7% (29/272) and directly contributed to death in 2.2% (6/272). Death related fractures occurred in 9% (4/43) of those with osteoporosis, which trended towards significance (p=0.059). Overall treatment rates were similar for normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic patients (48%, 44%, 58%, respectively; p=0.410). The occurrence of a fracture did not result in significant differences in treatment rate (p=0.092) or bisphosphonate use (p=0.303). CONCLUSIONS Despite universal access to care, the majority of our population was not screened for bone loss. A minority received preventative or therapeutic medications of any kind. Those diagnosed with bone loss were undertreated, despite the known morbidity and mortality related to fractures. Strides in management of this issue have been made, however opportunities to provide more optimal care remain. San Diego, CA© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e196 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Matthew Christman More articles by this author Sean Stroup More articles by this author Preston Gable More articles by this author Daniel Cooper More articles by this author Brian Auge More articles by this author James L'Esperance More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract