ObjectiveConsidering the chronicity of osteoarthritis-associated pain, we aimed to evaluate long-term outcome differences between patients who received immediate or delayed acupuncture in addition to usual care, and to identify predictors for further acupuncture usage and a better long-term outcome. Materials and methodsThe Acupuncture in Routine Care study was an open-label, randomized pragmatic trial. As adjunct to usual care patients (>40 years, clinical and radiological diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of the knee or hip, pain duration >6 months) received either immediate acupuncture in the first 3 months or delayed acupuncture in the subsequent 3 months. After 36 months 613 from 632 patients were available and asked to complete follow-up questionnaires. Primary outcome was the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). ResultsA total of 500 (82%) of the contacted patients completed their questionnaires. After 36 months the WOMAC Index did not differ significantly between both groups (immediate acupuncture 36.53±26.19 versus delayed acupuncture 38.24±25.54, P=.420). Further acupuncture treatment during the follow-up period was reported by 202 patients and predicted by previous successful acupuncture treatment at baseline (odds ratio=2.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.6–3.9). Less osteoarthritis symptoms (WOMAC index) after 36 months were predicted by being an acupuncture responder at 6 months (P<.001), having higher school education (P=.005), not wanting to use medications (P=.016) and using additional therapies (P<.001 to P=.025). DiscussionNo long-term outcome differences were found between patients who received immediate versus those that received delayed acupuncture treatment. Education level and additional therapies were identified as predictors for a better long-term outcome.
Read full abstract