Oscillometric Device Research Articles

Estimation of aortic stiffness by finger photoplethysmography using enhanced pulse wave analysis and machine learning.

Aortic stiffness plays a critical role in the evolution of cardiovascular diseases, but the assessment requires specialized equipment. Photoplethysmography (PPG) and single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) are readily available in healthcare and wearable devices. We studied whether a brief PPG registration, alone or in combination with single-lead ECG, could be used to reliably estimate aortic stiffness. A proof-of-concept study with simultaneous high-resolution index finger recordings of infrared PPG, single-lead ECG, and finger blood pressure (Finapres) was performed in 33 participants [median age 44 (range 21-66) years, 19 men] and repeated within 2 weeks. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV; two-site tonometry with SphygmoCor) was used as a reference. A brachial single-cuff oscillometric device assessed aortic pulse wave velocity (aoPWV; Arteriograph) for further comparisons. We extracted 136 established PPG waveform features and engineered 13 new with improved coupling to the finger blood pressure curve. Height-normalized pulse arrival time (NPAT) was derived using ECG. Machine learning methods were used to develop prediction models. The best PPG-based models predicted cfPWV and aoPWV well (root-mean-square errors of 0.70 and 0.52 m/s, respectively), with minor improvements by adding NPAT. Repeatability and agreement were on par with the reference equipment. A new PPG feature, an amplitude ratio from the early phase of the waveform, was most important in modelling, showing strong correlations with cfPWV and aoPWV (r = -0.81 and -0.75, respectively, both P < 0.001). Using new features and machine learning methods, a brief finger PPG registration can estimate aortic stiffness without requiring additional information on age, anthropometry, or blood pressure. Repeatability and agreement were comparable to those obtained using non-invasive reference equipment. Provided further validation, this readily available simple method could improve cardiovascular risk evaluation, treatment, and prognosis.

A comparison among oscillometric waveforms in healthy nonpregnant women, pregnancy and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Understanding of how oscillometric waveforms (OMW) vary between pregnant and nonpregnant individuals remains low. An exploratory analysis was completed to assess for quantitative and qualitative changes in OMW and oscillometric envelope features in pregnancy. Eighteen pregnant individuals (over 20 weeks gestational age) and healthy, nonpregnant (HNP) women were recruited. Six HNP were matched to six healthy pregnant (HP) women, and six pregnant women with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) by age, arm circumference, and cuff size. Blood pressure measurements were completed per the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) protocol using a custom-built oscillometric device as the test device and two-observer mercury auscultation as the reference measurement. Auscultatory blood pressure and blood pressure derived from slope-based and fixed ratio algorithms were determined. OMW and envelope features were compared among groups. In HNP, HP, and HDP groups respectively: mean auscultatory blood pressure (systolic mean ± SD/diastolic mean ± SD) was 103.4 ± 12.2/67.1 ± 7.9; 109.5 ± 3.1/58.1 ± 6.4; 135.6 ± 18.9/85.1 ± 14.2 mmHg. HDP had significantly higher auscultatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure than the HP group ( P = 0.001). The pregnant groups had a lower average pulse width (mean ± SD: HNP = 0.8 ± 0 s, HP = 0.6 ± 0.1 s, HDP = 0.6 ± 0.1 s; HP vs. HNP mean difference [adjusted P value]: 0.2 [ P = 0.004], HDP vs. HNP 0.1 [ P = 0.018]) compared with the HNP group. The HDP group had a larger area under the OMW envelope than the HNP group (mean ± SD: HNP = 22.6 ± 3.4; HDP = 28.5 ± 4.2; HDP vs. HNP mean difference [adjusted P value]: 5.9 P = 0.05). In this exploratory work, differences in the OMW morphology and parameters were found in pregnancy and in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with healthy controls. Even small differences may have important implications in algorithm development; further work comparing OMW envelopes in pregnancy is needed to optimize the algorithms used to determine blood pressure in pregnancy.

Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic sphygmomanometry, oscillometry and high-definition oscillometry for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats.

Systemic arterial hypertension is a common occurrence and can have serious adverse consequences in cats. Therefore, measuring blood pressure is very important. There are many indirect blood pressure measurement devices available. This study compared Doppler, oscillometric (petMAP Graphic II, SunTech Vet20, the Cardell Insight-X0000) and high-definition oscillometry devices for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. In this prospective study, blood pressure was measured in 32 cats using the different devices according to the recommendations of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Consensus Statement. Blood pressures (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP]), time to complete measurements, number of attempts needed, coefficient of variation (CV) between the blood pressure measurements of the different devices, ease of completing measurements and apparent stress level of the cat were assessed. There was a significant difference between devices in the time taken to obtain blood pressure readings and the number of attempts necessary to obtain six reliable measurements. The CV of the Doppler device was significantly smaller than that of the rest of the devices, but there were no other differences between the devices. The mean SBP, DBP and MAP measured by the petMAP device were significantly higher than the measurements from the other devices. The perceived ease of measurement was not significantly different between the various machines. The perceived level of stress of measurement with the Doppler device was significantly higher compared with the other devices but did not lead to an increased SBP. Using a Doppler device to measure blood pressure in conscious cats is fast, relatively easy and gives reliable results. A disadvantage is that the Doppler device can only measure SBP, while oscillometric devices also provide DBP and MAP. However, in veterinary medicine, systolic hypertension is considered the most relevant.

Single-Pill, Triple Antihypertensive Therapy in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Preliminary Experience.

Worldwide, arterial hypertension is the foremost preventable and modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. In addition to lifestyle changes, recent international guidelines recommend single-pill, low-dose combinations as initial treatment strategy. We investigated whether this approach is feasible in a rural sub-Saharan Africa setting. Diagnosis of hypertension was established over three sets of blood pressure measurements, performed according to the European Society of Hypertension recommendations by trained personnel, using a validated, automated, oscillometric device OMRON M7 IT-HEM-7322-E. In 98 individuals with arterial hypertension, aonce-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide was prescribed at an appropriate dose. Patients were instructed on its administration and potential side effects and encouraged towards lifestyle modifications. The treatment regimen was adjusted, if needed, at each outpatient clinic scheduled after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Seventy-nine patients (aged 61 [53-70] years; median and interquartile range) strictly adhered to the treatment schedule, while 19 individuals (70 [65-80] years) dropped out. Blood pressure was < 140/90 mmHg after 4 weeks in 44 (56%), after 8 weeks in 62 (78%), after 12 weeks in 69 (87%), and after 16 weeks in 74 (94%) participants. Excellent tolerance was reported. These results provide real-life evidence that hypertension management with aonce-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide as initial treatment is feasible and effective alsoin a rural sub-Saharan setting. Single-pill combinations should be made available also in rural and remote areas in low- and middle-income countries as a reliable first-line treatment strategy.

Comparison of Thames Medical CAT+ Doppler and SunTech Vet 20 oscillometric devices for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats.

A comparative assessment of systolic blood pressure (BP) measurement agreement and precision in two commonly used non-invasive BP devices was carried out in conscious cats. Systolic BP measurements were obtained from 50 conscious cats as part of their clinical investigations. All measurements were taken by the same operator and were performed according to the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) consensus guidelines. The same cuff location and cuff size were used for paired measurements. The order of device use was randomised, and an arousal score was assigned during each procedure. Precision was assessed using standard deviation and coefficient of variance comparisons. Agreement was assessed using graphical and statistical comparisons of derived 'delta mean' and 'mean of means' data. A total of 50 cats aged between 3 months and 15 years were enrolled (29 domestic shorthair, seven domestic longhair, three British Shorthair, two Ragdoll, two Sphynx, two Persian, one Siamese, one Burmese, one Russian Blue, one Maine Coon and one Oriental) with a body weight in the range of 1.2-6.2 kg. BP measurements were in the range of 95-179 mmHg. Oscillometric measurements were associated with lower arousal scores. The Doppler device demonstrated superior repeatability precision. Body weight, sex, cuff size, cuff location, arousal score and the order in which the devices were used had no significant effect on precision or agreement. Correlation between the two devices was 0.0837 and agreement was considered clinically acceptable (<10 mmHg) in 32/50 (64%) cats. Of the 18 cats with suboptimal agreement, the oscillometric mean BP was higher in 14 (78%) cats. Based on this study sample, suboptimal agreement between paired CAT+ Doppler and SunTech Vet20 oscillometric BP measurements in 36% of conscious cats suggests that these devices should not be used interchangeably. Compared with Doppler, oscillometric measurements were consistently higher, particularly at higher blood pressures. Further studies are required to assess which device has superior accuracy in conscious cats.

Replacing Mercury Sphygmomanometers With Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometers for the National Health Survey in Children: Direct Comparisons Applying Two Types of Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometer.

Blood pressure (BP) measurement using an auscultatory sphygmomanometer is recommended for diagnosing hypertension in children. As mercury sphygmomanometers (MSs) are banned owing to environmental concerns, it is crucial to determine the accuracy of mercury-free sphygmomanometers to replace them. We analyzed the accuracy of these devices to guide the National Survey selection. BP was measured thrice each with MS, auscultatory device (AD), and oscillometric device (OD) in 104 participants aged 10-18 using the National Survey data. The difference in BP was defined as the difference between MS and other devices. The BP differences, correlations, and influencing factors were analyzed. The frequencies of hypertension were also compared. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) differences between MS and AD were 0.88±3.36 mmHg and 0.63±3.95 mmHg, and those between MS and OD were 0.43±5.83 mmHg and 4.57±6.89 mmHg, respectively. The absolute error of <10 mmHg for DBP between MS and OD was 76%. The concordance correlation coefficient between MS and AD was 0.94 for SBP and 0.90 for DBP, and 0.81 and 0.67, respectively for MS and OD. Arm circumference negatively correlated with BP differences except for SBP between the MS and OD. The frequency of hypertension was not different between MS and AD but was underestimated by OD. AD correlated well with MS, while OD did not, especially for DBP. The superiority of AD over OD suggests AD as a possible alternative for MS in the National Survey.

Effect of Single Bout of Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Girth and Cardiovascular response: A Pretest, Post-test Quasi-experimental Study

Introduction: Blood Flow Restriction Training (BFRT) was developed by Southeast Asia Treaty Organisation (SATO) in Japan in 1966. BFRT is a method that mimics the effects of high-intensity training by combining low-intensity exercise with blood flow obstruction. It involves limb compression using compression cuffs to limit venous outflow and minimise arterial inflow during rehabilitation training. By allowing individuals to lift smaller loads and increase strength training gains, BFRT can reduce the overall stress exerted on the limb. Aim: To assess the difference in muscle girth and blood pressure after a single bout of BFRT. Materials and Methods: This was a single-blinded, singlesite pretest, post-test quasi-experimental study. A total of 30 subjects were enrolled (16 females and 14 males) between the ages of 18 to 25 years. This study was conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. Outcome measures included muscle girth measured using a flexible tape and blood pressure using an automatic oscillometric device (Omron Hem 7113, São Paulo, Brazil). Paired t-test and Wilcoxon test were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0. Results: It was found that an acute bout of BFRT caused improvement in all outcome measures. There was a statistically significant increase in muscle girth and blood pressure after BFRT (p-value&lt;0.001). Conclusion: There was a significant increase in blood pressure (both Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)) and muscle girth after BFRT with no reported adverse effects.

Simultaneous 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement on both arms: a consideration for improving hypertension management.

Arterial hypertension is one of the common treatment goals in today's medicine. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) performed by oscillometric cuff-based devices is considered as the gold standard in hypertension diagnostics. This study aims at examining the measurement accuracy of a widely used, ABPM device. Fifty-two young and healthy participants underwent simultaneous 24-h ABPM on the left and the right upper arm using two Boso/A&D TM-2430 oscillometric cuff-based devices. Pressure curves of the cuffs, as well as hydrostatic pressure difference between the cuffs were recorded. The mean differences between both simultaneous measurements were 1.16 mmHg with limits of agreement of 36.23 mmHg for SBP and 1.32 mmHg with limits of agreement of 32.65 mmHg for DBP. Excluding measurements where the pressure curves were disturbed and correcting for hydrostatic pressure difference between the cuffs, reduced the measurement error. However, limits of agreement remained around 20 mmHg. There were large differences in hypertension grading and dipping pattern classification between simultaneous measurements on the left and right arm. The cuff-based ABPM device reveals notable measurement uncertainties, influencing hypertension grading, dipping pattern classification and blood pressure variability. These effects are attributed in part to disturbances during cuff deflation and hydrostatic influences. Nonetheless, ABPM has shown its clinical values in several studies, while this study underscores its still unlocked potential to improve hypertension management.

Association between blood pressure and Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired adults

AbstractBackgroundHigh blood pressure is an established risk factor for dementia. However, the underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. We aimed to evaluate the association between blood pressure and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired adults from the ALFA+ study.MethodWe analyzed data from 301 participants with available cross‐sectional blood pressure measures (acquired by trained staff with an oscillometric device after 5 minutes of rest) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD core biomarkers data (CSF p‐tau and t‐tau were measured with Elecsys® immunoassays and CSF Aβ42 and Aβ40 with the Roche NeuroToolKit, a panel of robust prototype assays, both from Roche Diagnostics International Ltd), and a subset of 278 participants with amyloid PET data, of whom 110 had a second follow‐up PET acquisition (3.4 years after in average). We used separate linear regression models to analyze the association of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP = SBP‐DBP) with CSF and PET biomarkers at a cross‐sectional level, and their association with the annualized rate of change in amyloid PET [(follow‐up centiloids – baseline centiloids) / years between PET scan acquisition]. We adjusted all models by age, sex, APOE status, waist‐to‐hip ratio, dyslipidemia, diabetes, tobacco and alcohol consumption, physical activity, and antihypertensive treatment.ResultHigher baseline SBP (but not DBP or PP) was significantly associated with increased amyloid PET uptake over time (p = 0.043). In cross‐sectional analyses, DBP was negatively associated with Aβ42 (p = 0.013), Aβ40 (p = 0.026), and t‐tau (p = 0.045), and marginally associated with p‐tau (p = 0.069), but not with the Aβ42/40 ratio nor baseline amyloid PET uptake. Associations with Aβ42 and t‐tau were no longer significant after further adjustment by CSF Aβ40 levels. SBP and PP were not associated with CSF biomarkers or baseline amyloid PET uptake.ConclusionHigher SBP is associated with longitudinal brain amyloid accumulation, which reinforces the importance of blood pressure control in AD prevention. DBP is also associated at a cross‐sectional level with AD biomarker concentration in CSF, but the attenuation of this association after adjusting by Aβ40 suggests a non‐specific.

Association of central blood pressure with an exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise among elite athletes

PurposeThe systolic blood pressure/workload (SBP/MET) slope was recently reported to be a reliable parameter to identify an exaggerated blood pressure response (eBPR) in the normal population and in athletes. However, it is unclear whether an eBPR correlates with central blood pressure (CBP) and vascular function in elite athletes.MethodsWe examined 618 healthy male elite athletes (age 25.8 ± 5.1 years) of mixed sports with a standardized maximum exercise test. CBP and vascular function were measured non-invasively with a validated oscillometric device. The SBP/MET slope was calculated and the threshold for an eBPR was set at > 6.2 mmHg/MET. Two groups were defined according to ≤ 6.2 and > 6.2 mmHg/MET, and associations of CBP and vascular function with the SBP/MET slope were compared for each group.ResultsAthletes with an eBPR (n = 180, 29%) displayed a significantly higher systolic CBP (102.9 ± 7.5 vs. 100 ± 7.7 mmHg, p = 0.001) but a lower absolute (295 ± 58 vs. 384 ± 68 W, p < 0.001) and relative workload (3.14 ± 0.54 vs. 4.27 ± 1.1 W/kg, p < 0.001) compared with athletes with a normal SBP/MET slope (n = 438, 71%). Systolic CBP was positively associated with the SBP/MET slope (r = 0.243, p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression analyses, systolic CBP (odds ratio [OR] 1.099, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.045–1.155, p < 0.001) and left atrial volume index (LAVI) (OR 1.282, CI 1.095–1.501, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of an eBPR.ConclusionSystolic CBP and LAVI were independent predictors of an eBPR. An eBPR was further associated with a lower performance level, highlighting the influence of vascular function on the BPR and performance of male elite athletes.

Validation of the automated oscillometric upper-arm cuff home blood pressure monitor AVITA BPM82 in a general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard.

This study evaluated the accuracy of the automated oscillometric upper-arm cuff device AVITA BPM82 intended for home use in a general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) and its Amendment 1.2020-01. Participants were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, blood pressure (BP), and limb distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard and its Amendment 1.2020-01 in a general population using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Two cuffs of the test device were used for arm circumference 22-33 (medium) and 33-42 cm (large). One-hundred-one individuals were recruited and 85 were analyzed [mean age 57.3 ± 15.1 (SD) years, 46 men, arm circumference 32 ± 5.1 cm, range 22.3-42 cm]. For validation Criterion 1, the mean difference ±SD between the test device and reference BP readings (N = 255) was 1.3 ± 6.5/3.6 ± 5.9 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤5 ± 8 mmHg). For Criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences between the test device and reference BP per individual (N = 85) was 5.70/5.25 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤6.82/5.89 mmHg). The automated oscillometric home BP monitor AVITA BPM82 comfortably fulfilled all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) and its Amendment 1.2020-01 in a general population and can be recommended for clinical use.

Hybrid Deep Morpho-Temporal Framework for Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement.

Oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement devices are widely utilized as the primary automated BP measurement tools in non-specialist environments. However, their accuracy and reliability vary under different settings and for different age groups and health conditions. An essential constraint of current oscillometric BP measurement devices is their analysis algorithms' incapacity to capture the BP information encoded in the pattern of recorded oscillometric pulses to its fullest extent. In this paper, we propose a new 2D oscillometric data representation that enables a full characterization of arterial system and empowers the application of deep learning to extract the most informative features correlated with BP. A hybrid convolutional-recurrent neural network was developed to capture the oscillometric pulses morphological information as well as their temporal evolution over the cuff deflation period from the 2D structure, and estimate BP. The performance of the proposed method was verified on three oscillometric databases collected from the wrist and upper arms of 245 individuals. It was found that it achieves a mean error and a standard deviation of error of as low as 0.08 mmHg and 2.4 mmHg in the estimation of systolic BP, and 0.04 mmHg and 2.2 mmHg in the estimation of diastolic BP, respectively. Our proposed method outperformed the state-of-the-art techniques and satisfied the current international standards for BP monitors by a wide margin. The proposed method shows promise toward robust and objective BP estimation in a variety of patients and monitoring situations.

The Accuracy and Reliability of Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease

Comparing the accuracy and reliability of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measured by an oscillometric device with the Doppler method in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). 122 patients admitted to the department of interventional radiology with PAD were studied. ABI was measured with the 2 methods in random order. After excluding the inconclusive results, Doppler ABIs were compared with the oscillometric ABIs in each limb, the reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the accuracy and consistency were assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves and Bland-Altman method. In 122 patients (244 legs), 27 legs got inconclusive oscillometric results, 4 legs got inconclusive oscillometric and inconclusive dorsalis pedis artery Doppler results, 2 legs had oscillometric cuff pressure intolerance. Using Doppler ABI <0.9 as a diagnostic threshold, compared with the high Doppler ABI, oscillometric method had a sensitivity of 57.81%, a specificity of 95.18%, the ICC was 0.626 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.536-0.701), Bland-Altman method showed 11/211 (5.21%) difference points outside the 95% limits of agreement. Compared with the low Doppler ABI, oscillometric method had a sensitivity of 50.66%, a specificity of 98.31%, the ICC was 0.541(95% CI: 0.483-0.630), Bland-Altman method showed 11/211 (5.21%) difference points outside the 95% limits of agreement. Using 1.00 as the diagnostic threshold and considering error oscillometric results as abnormal ABIs, the sensitivity improved to 88.05% with high Doppler ABI and 81.42% with the low. The accuracy and reliability of oscillometric ABI in patients with PAD is unsatisfied, which makes it not suitable as an alternative method in clinic disease assessment. Using 1.0 as the ABI oscillometric threshold for PAD diagnosis can improve the diagnostic value.

Accuracy and User Acceptability of 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring by a Prototype Cuffless Multi-Sensor Device Compared to a Conventional Oscillometric Device

Objective 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24ABPM) is state of the art in out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Due to discomfort and technical limitations related to cuff-based 24ABPM devices, methods for non-invasive and continuous estimation of BP without the need for a cuff have gained interest. The main aims of the present study were to compare accuracy of a pulse arrival time (PAT) based BP-model and user acceptability of a prototype cuffless multi-sensor device (cuffless device), developed by Aidee Health AS, with a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device (ReferenceBP) during 24ABPM. Methods Ninety-five normotensive and hypertensive adults underwent simultaneous 24ABPM with the cuffless device on the chest and a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device on the non-dominant arm. PAT was calculated using the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors incorporated in the chest-worn device. The cuffless device recorded continuously, while ReferenceBP measurements were taken every 20 minutes during daytime and every 30 minutes during nighttime. Two-minute PAT-based BP predictions corresponding to the ReferenceBP measurements were compared with ReferenceBP measurements using paired t-tests, bias, and limits of agreement. Results Mean (SD) of ReferenceBP compared to PAT-based daytime and nighttime systolic BP (SBP) were 129.7 (13.8) mmHg versus 133.6 (20.9) mmHg and 113.1 (16.5) mmHg versus 131.9 (23.4) mmHg. Ninety-five % limits of agreements were [-26.7, 34.6 mmHg] and [-20.9, 58.4 mmHg] for daytime and nighttime SBP respectively. The cuffless device was reported to be significantly more comfortable and less disturbing than the ReferenceBP device during 24ABPM. Conclusions In the present study, we demonstrated that a general PAT-based BP model had unsatisfactory agreement with ambulatory BP during 24ABPM, especially during nighttime. If sufficient accuracy can be achieved, cuffless BP devices have promising potential for clinical assessment of BP due to the opportunities provided by continuous BP measurements during real-life conditions and high user acceptability.

Blood pressure measurement device change in the Healthy Finland health examination survey

Abstract Background Blood pressure (BP) measurements in health examination surveys (HESs) are needed for public health monitoring. In Finland, population-based HESs with BP measurements have been performed with mercury sphygmomanometers since the 1960's. The use of oscillometric devices has rendered sphygmomanometers impractical for health surveys. This study describes the change in BP measurement method and mean BP values in Finnish HESs. Methods 66 000 randomly selected adults living in Finland were invited to the Healthy Finland questionnaire-based health survey in 2022-2023. Of those, 10 000 were asked to participate in a HES including BP, anthropometric, and functional capacity measurements as well as collection of biological samples. Prior to the selection of the new oscillometric BP device, validation studies for devices were evaluated, and the availability was checked. BP measurements were performed using WatchBP Office Vascular (TWIN200 VSR) device. Results Two consecutive BP measurements were obtained from 3424 participants aged 30 years or older (ongoing until 6/2023). The mean (95% CI) systolic blood pressures (SBP) for men and women were 137.1 (136.2-140.0) and 134.7 mmHg (133.7-135.6), respectively. The corresponding values for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 82.3 (81.8-82.8) and 79.3 mmHg (78.9-79.8). The mean difference (95% CI) between the 1st and the 2nd SBP measurements were -2.4 (-2.7- -2.0) and -1.8 (-2.1- -1.4) in men and women, while the corresponding values for DBP were -1.1 (-1.4- -0.9) and -1.2 (-1.5- -1.0). Distribution of measurements was Gaussian apat from some values, that were unlikely to be obtained (SBP: 155, 156, 157; DBP: 96, 99). Conclusions Oscillometric BP provide reliable data in HESs. Finnish BP levels may be on the rise. Further reseach is needed to estimate the effects of gaps in the measurement algorithm of TWIN200 VSR and the differences in consecutive measurements. Key messages • In a health examination survey, oscillometric blood pressure measurements led to similar results as with a sphygmomanometer. • Algorithm gaps and smaller difference on successive measurements were seen.

Blood pressure in atrial fibrillation and in sinus rhythm during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: data from the TEMPLAR project

The coexistence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and accounts for a worse prognosis. Uncertainties exist regarding blood pressure (BP) measurements in AF patients by automated oscillometric devices. The Microlife WatchBP 03 AFIB ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) device including an AF algorithm with each measurement was used in 430 subjects aged >65 years referred for ABPM and with assumed paroxysmal AF to perform intra-individual comparisons of BP during both AF-indicated and sinus rhythm. Only subjects with >30% of measurements indicating AF and episodes >30 min for assumed AF and for sinus rhythm were included. Mean age was 78 ± 7 years, 43% were male, 77% hypertensive, and 72% were treated. Compared to sinus rhythm, 24-h mean arterial pressure was similar (87.2 ± 9.5 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 mm Hg, p = 0.47), whereas 24-h systolic BP tended to be lower (123.6 ± 13.9 vs 124.7 ± 16.1 mm Hg, p = 0.05) and night-time diastolic BP higher (64.6 ± 10.9 vs 63.3 ± 10.4 mm Hg, p = 0.01) in assumed AF. Diastolic (not systolic) BP variability was higher in AF (p < 0.001). Results were similar with heart rates <90 and ≥90 bpm. In conclusion, this is the first study to use intra-individual comparisons of averaged BP during an ABPM in assumed paroxysmal AF and sinus rhythm. Our results imply that ABPM is feasible and informative also in patients with AF. We also suggest that an AF detection algorithm offers a new approach to evaluate the reliability of averaged BP values in AF compared to SR during an ABPM.

Relationship of blood pressure measured in the calf with arm blood pressure and arterial stiffness: a general population study.

Leg blood pressure (BP) measurement is needed when arm BP evaluation is not feasible, and calf BP, especially when measured in standing position, may have greater association with cardiovascular remodeling than arm BP. This study evaluated the relationship between calf and arm BP, and investigated whether calf BP would be superior to arm BP in predicting increased arterial stiffness [pulse wave velocity (PWV) > 10 m/s]. We evaluated clinical and laboratory characteristics, BP measurements, and PWV in 1397 individuals resident in Baependi, Brazil, between 2017 and 2019. Arm BP was measured in the seated and supine positions while calf BP was measured in supine and standing positions using digital oscillometric devices. Carotid-femoral PWV was measured using a noninvasive mechanotransducer. The sample had 62.7% females, age = 48.1 ± 15.4 years and 8.4% with PWV >10 m/s. Results of linear regression analysis showed that BP values of 140/90 mmHg measured in the arm in supine and seated position were equivalent to calf supine BP values of 164/81 mmHg and 166/78 mmHg and calf standing BP values of 217/137 mmHg and 221/137 mmHg, respectively. Calf-arm BP differences were associated with age, glomerular filtration rate, body mass index, smoking, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, diabetes and height. Furthermore, stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that arm supine systolic BP, but not calf BP measurements, was independently associated with increased arterial stiffness. Thresholds of ≈165/80 mmHg and ≈220/135 mmHg could be used for diagnosing hypertension when only calf measurements in supine and standing positions, respectively, are available. Conversely, calf BP was not superior to arm BP in predicting increased arterial stiffness.

Role of muscle mass in the association between handgrip strength and blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Studies have reported conflicting results on the association between handgrip strength (HGS) and blood pressure during childhood and adolescence. High multicollinearity involving somatic components that influence both HGS and blood pressure might be an important source of bias. This study sought to investigate the independent effects of HGS and muscle mass on blood pressure levels in children and adolescents. Muscle mass and fat mass (Multifrequency Electrical Bioimpedance) and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure (Automatic oscillometric device) were assessed in 833 volunteers aged 6-18 years, of both sexes. Handgrip strength-for-age quartiles were calculated and participants were assigned to groups by HGS quartiles. Analysis of covariance was conducted to address the linear association between HGS and SBP adjusted for height, muscle mass, and fat mass. To test for linear trend, contrast analysis was conducted. Partial eta-squared was used to confirm or rule out a small significant effect of the independent variables on SBP. The effect size of HGS on SBP was not significant in both sexes. In girls, 1.7% of the between-groups variance in SBP was accounted for by muscle mass (P = 0.016). In boys, 2.3% and 1.8% of the between-groups variance in SBP was accounted for by muscle mass (P = 0.001) and height (P = 0.005), respectively. In conclusion, children with a more advanced physical maturity for their age, that is, who are taller, stronger, and have greater fat-free mass, may be nearly reaching the physiological parameters of adulthood, and consequently have higher systolic blood pressure.

Technical evaluation of a simulator for accurate reproduction of oscillometric blood pressure pulses, providing traceability for automated oscillometric sphygmomanometers

Oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices are not directly traceable to primary standards. Currently, device accuracy is measured by comparison between a sample device and reference measurements in a clinical trial. We researched in this study the potential for an alternative evaluation with a simulator. Our research simulator was studied for repeatability and accuracy in delivering simulated blood pressure pulses. Clinical cuff pressure measurements were obtained, along with simultaneous recordings of oscillometric pulse waveforms, spanning the clinical range of cuff pressures, pulse intervals and pulse shapes. Oscillometric pulse peak amplitudes ranged from 1.1 to 3.6 mmHg. Simulated repeatability results showed an average Standard Deviation (SD) for pulse peaks of 0.018 mmHg; 1.0% of peak amplitudes. Comparing simulated pulse shapes, the average repeat SD was 0.015 mmHg; 0.8% of the normalised pulse shapes. The simulated accuracy results had a mean error of − 0.014 ± 0.042 mmHg with a mean accuracy of 97.8%. For pulse shape the corresponding values were − 0.104 ± 0.071 mmHg with a mean accuracy of 95.4%. The correlation between the reference and simulated pulse shapes ranged from 0.991 to 0.996 (all p < 0.00003), with a mean 0.994. We conclude that oscillometric pulses can be reproduced with high repeatability and high accuracy with our research simulator. The extended uncertainty U(p sim ) = 0.3 mmHg for the simulated pulses is dominated by the uncertainty (64%) of the clinical reference data. These results underpin the potential of the simulator to become a secondary standard for millions of oscillometric sphygmomanometers.

Screening for hypertension in adults - the use of tonometric blood pressure monitoring.

Arterial hypertension increases the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Reliable screening tools for diagnosing hypertension are important to ensure correct risk stratification of subjects. In this study, we aimed to analyse if a wrist-worn device using a tonometric technique for measuring of 24-hour blood pressure could be used to diagnose hypertension and non-dipping. A conventional device using oscillometric measurements was used as golden standard. Secondary aim was to compare the degree of discomfort related to monitoring with the two devices. In 89 subjects with a history of normal blood pressure and naive to ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), 24-hour ABPM was measured simultaneously with A&D TM2430 (oscillometric technique) and BPro (tonometric technique). When comparing measurements from the two devices, we found that the tonometric device misclassified 46% of hypertensive subjects and 69% of non-dippers. The tonometric device measured significantly lower systolic 24-hour and daytime blood pressure. The subjects reported less discomfort related to the tonometric than the oscillometric device. Despite less discomfort related to usage of the tonometric device for 24-hour blood pressure monitoring compared to an oscillometric device, misclassification of hypertension and non-dipping makes the tonometric device inappropriate as a screening instrument.