Orthopaedic Research Research Articles

OPIOID PRESCRIBING AFTER DISCHARGE FROM ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY: AN INTERNATIONAL STUDENT- AND TRAINEE-LED COLLABORATION

Excessive postoperative opioid prescribing is a significant contributor to the opioid crisis. Prescribing in orthopaedic surgery is often further complicated by high use of opioid-based preoperative analgesia. ‘Opioid PrEscRiptions and usage After Surgery’ (OPERAS) is an international multicentre prospective student- and trainee-led collaborative study which aims to quantify the amount of opioids prescribed at discharge after common orthopaedic surgeries against what is consumed by patients at 7-days, and assess the impact of opioids on patient-reported outcomes.Data is being collected over 6 14-day periods on consecutive adult patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, shoulder labral repair, anterior cruciate ligament repair, hip arthroplasty, and knee arthroplasty, with follow-up via telephone call at 7-days after discharge. The primary outcome is the proportion of oral morphine equivalents (OME) of prescribed opioids versus consumed opioids at 7-days post-discharge.This ongoing study is actively recruiting in over 20 countries. Globally, 65 centres are collecting orthopaedic, including 10 New Zealand centres and 17 Australian centres. To date, 284 orthopaedic patients have been prospectively enrolled with complete data (mean age 59.6 ± 16.7 years; 51.6% female). Overall, 77% and 89% of patients were prescribed opioids on discharge in New Zealand and Australia respectively. On average, 60% of prescribed opioids were consumed at 7-days post-discharge globally (150 OME (75-500) vs. 90 OME (15-200); p<0.01). In New Zealand and Australia, 42.1% (285 OME (150-584) vs. 120 OME (6-210); p<0.01) and 63.3% (150 OME (86-503) vs. 95 OME (28-221); p<0.01) of prescribed opioids were consumed at 7-days, respectively.OPERAS will provide the first high-quality global data on opioid prescription and consumption patterns with patient perspectives. These data can inform prescribing practice and inform guidelines. The growing interest in New Zealand and Australia in student- and trainee-led orthopaedic collaborative research, as evidenced by this study should be actively encouraged and fostered.

Is There Gender Disparity in Orthopedic Surgery Resident Research Productivity?

Background: Compared with male senior authors, female senior authors publish less often in orthopedic journals than expected based on their population proportion. It is unknown whether this trend is also present among orthopedic trainees. Purpose: We sought to determine whether there is a gender discrepancy in the publication volume and authorship status among orthopedic residents. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the research productivity of male and female orthopedic residents. The top 10 ranked US orthopedic surgery residencies by research output in 2021-2022 were obtained from Doximity. Residents' names were recorded from each institution's residency website. We classified each resident as male or female, searched on PubMed, and recorded the number of publications relevant to orthopedic surgery. Resident contribution to each publication was recorded as either a first/last author or a middle author. To assess contributions by postgraduate year, we compared male and female junior residents (PGY1-3) and senior residents (PGY4-5) using the number of total publications, middle author publications, first/last author publications, and the difference between the number of middle and first/last author publications. Results: Among the 335 male and 117 female residents included, male residents had more total publications than female residents. Among PGY4-5, male residents had more total publications and middle author publications. There was no difference in the number of first/last author publications between male and female PGY4-5 residents. Conclusions: Our cross-sectional analysis found that in the 2021-2022 academic year, male orthopedic surgery residents published more often than female residents, although among PGY4-5 residents, we found no gender differences in number of first/last author publications. The difference in total publications among PGY4-5 residents is likely due to differences in middle author publications. Future research should consider residents' self-identified gender, including non-binary and gender-fluid identity.

Fewer Than One in 20 Current Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons Have Obtained National Institutes of Health Funding.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding is a key driver of orthopaedic research, but it has become increasingly difficult to obtain in recent years. An understanding of the types of grants that are commonly funded, how productive they are, and the factors associated with obtaining funding may help orthopaedic surgeons better understand how to earn grants. In this study, we sought to determine (1) the proportion of current academic orthopaedic surgeons who have obtained NIH grant funding, (2) the productivity of these grants by calculating grant productivity metrics, and (3) the factors (such as gender, subspecialty, and additional degrees) that are associated with obtaining grant funding. Current academic orthopaedic surgeons at the top 140 NIH-funded institutions were identified via faculty webpages; 3829 surgeons were identified. Demographic information including gender (men constituted 88% of the group [3364 of 3829]), academic rank (full professors constituted 22% [856 of 3829]), additional degrees (those with MD-PhD degrees constituted 3% [121 of 3829]), leadership positions, and orthopaedic subspecialty was collected. Funding histories from 1985 through 2021 were collected using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results. Grant type, funding, publications, and citations of each article were collected. A previously used grant impact metric (total citations per USD 0.1 million) was calculated to assess grant productivity. Multivariable binomial logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with obtaining funding. Four percent (150 of 3829) of academic orthopaedic surgeons obtained USD 338.3 million in funding across 301 grants, resulting in 2887 publications over the entire study period. The R01 was the most commonly awarded grant in terms of the total number awarded, at 36% (108 of 301), as well as by funding, publications, and citations, although other grant types including T32, F32, R03, R13, and R21 had higher mean grant impact metrics. There was no difference between men and women in the by-gender percentage of academic orthopaedic surgeons who obtained funding (4% [135 of 3229] versus 3% [15 of 450]; odds ratio 0.9 [95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.7]; p = 0.80). A department having a single funded PhD researcher may be associated with surgeon-scientists obtaining grant funding, but with the numbers available, we could not demonstrate this was the case (OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.9 to 2.2]; p = 0.12). Fewer than one in 20 academic orthopaedic surgeons have received NIH funding. R01s are the most commonly awarded grant, although others demonstrate increased productivity metrics. Future studies should investigate the role of co-principal investigators on productivity and the role of different funding sources. Individuals should pursue both R01 and non-R01 grants, and departments should consider cultivating relationships with funded PhDs. The specific research infrastructure and departmental policies of the most productive institutions and grants should be surveyed and emulated.

Medial Calcar Osteotomy in Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Orthopedic Research Online Journal Medial Calcar Osteotomy in Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty Alireza* Tehran university of medical science, Iran *Corresponding author: Alireza, Tehran university of medical science,Iran Submission: November 18, 2022;Published: January 06, 2023 DOI: 10.31031/OPROJ.2023.10.000736 ISSN: 2576-8875 Volume10 Issue3

The Influence of Industry Affiliation on Randomized Controlled Trials of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis

Background: Industry funding and corporate sponsorship have played a significant role in the advancement of orthopaedic research and technology. However, this relationship raises concerns for how industry association may bias research findings and influence clinical practice. Purpose: To determine whether industry affiliation plays a role in the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases for RCTs published between 2011 and the present comparing PRP versus hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid, or placebo for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis was performed. To determine industry affiliation, the conflict of interest, funding, and disclosure sections of publications were assessed, and all authors were assessed through the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons disclosure database and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services open payments database. Studies were classified as industry affiliated (IA) or non–industry affiliated (NIA). The outcomes of each study were rated as favorable, analogous, or unfavorable according to predefined criteria. Results: A total of 37 studies (6 IA and 31 NIA) were available for analysis. Overall, 19 studies (51.4%) reported PRP as favorable compared with other treatment options, while 18 studies (48.6%) showed no significant differences between PRP and other treatment methods. There was no significant difference in qualitative conclusions between the IA and NIA groups, with the IA group having 3 favorable studies and 3 analogous studies and the NIA group having 16 favorable studies and 15 analogous studies (P = .8881). When comparing IA versus NIA studies using 6- and 12-month Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, there were no significant differences in outcomes. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that qualitative conclusions and outcome scores were found to not be associated with industry affiliation. Although the results of this study suggest that there is no influence of industry involvement on RCTs examining PRP, it is still necessary to carefully evaluate pertinent commercial affiliations when reviewing recommendations from studies before adopting new treatment approaches, such as the use of PRP for knee osteoarthritis.

In vitro analysis and in vivo assessment of fracture complications associated with use of locking plate constructs for stabilization of caprine tibial segmental defects

PurposeLocking plate fixation of caprine tibial segmental defects is widely utilized for translational modeling of human osteopathology, and it is a useful research model in tissue engineering and orthopedic biomaterials research due to its inherent stability while maintaining unobstructed visualization of the gap defect and associated healing. However, research regarding surgical technique and long-term complications associated with this fixation method are lacking. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of surgeon-selected factors including locking plate length, plate positioning, and relative extent of tibial coverage on fixation failure, in the form of postoperative fracture.MethodsIn vitro, the effect of plate length was evaluated using single cycle compressive load to failure mechanical testing of locking plate fixations of caprine tibial gap defects. In vivo, effects of plate length, positioning, and relative tibial coverage were evaluated using data from a population of goats enrolled in ongoing orthopedic research which utilized locking plate fixation of 2 cm tibial diaphyseal segmental defects to evaluate bone healing over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.ResultsIn vitro, no significant differences in maximum compressive load or total strain were noted between fixations using 14 cm locking plates and 18 cm locking plates. In vivo, both plate length and tibial coverage ratio were significantly associated with postoperative fixation failure. The incidence of any cortical fracture in goats stabilized with a 14 cm plate was 57%, as compared with 3% in goats stabilized with an 18 cm plate. Craniocaudal and mediolateral angular positioning variables were not significantly associated with fixation failure. Decreasing distance between the gap defect and the proximal screw of the distal bone segment was associated with increased incidence of fracture, suggesting an effect on proximodistal positioning on overall fixation stability.ConclusionsThis study emphasizes the differences between in vitro modeling and in vivo application of surgical fixation methods, and, based on the in vivo results, maximization of plate-to-tibia coverage is recommended when using locking plate fixation of the goat tibial segmental defect as a model in orthopedic research.

Authorship Patterns in the Orthopaedic Journals of Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries.

Extensive research collaborations exist between researchers from high-income countries (HICs) and those from low-income countries (LICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Previous research has suggested that authors from LICs and LMICs are underrepresented as first and last authors in the orthopaedic literature on local populations, particularly in LICs. We present a bibliometric analysis of authorship solely in studies published in orthopaedic journals that are based in LICs and LMICs. The Global Index Medicus was queried, and all articles published from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, in journals with a focus on orthopaedic surgery that were based in an LIC or an LMIC were included. Logistic regressions were calculated to assess the predictors of local authorship. Over 92% of studies included in our analysis had first or last authors from LICs or LMICs. In terms of study type, the majority (89%) of studies were clinical, although largely of low-level evidence (78% of clinical studies were case reports, case series, or descriptive studies). None received funding. LIC or LMIC first authorship and last authorship were less likely for most types of nonclinical studies. LIC or LMIC first authorship was more likely when there were more study authors. LIC or LMIC first authorship and last authorship were less likely when there were more countries affiliated with the study authors. Finally, when compared with studies with only LIC or LMIC authors, those with a combination of HIC and LIC or LMIC authors had significantly lower rates of LIC or LMIC first authorship (93.3% versus 62.5%) and last authorship (97.7% versus 70.8%). Our study presents one of the first analyses to assess authorship patterns in the orthopaedic literature of locally published journals in LICs and LMICs. Future studies are needed to contextualize our findings within a broader bibliometric landscape in order to better address the ongoing challenges to building research capacity in LICs and LMICs. Our study highlights important observations regarding authorship in international, collaborative research in orthopaedics.

Factors Associated with the Success and Timing of Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Research Thesis Project Publication.

Resident research thesis projects performed over the past 15 years were aggregated and reviewed. Additional data regarding the projects and former trainees who performed them were collected using public resources which included measures of current academic aptitude (i.e., H-index and number of publications) as well as project and publication characteristics. Cox and linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the relation between numerous predictor variables and the success and time to publication. All analyses were conducted at the 95% confidence interval (CI) level. Sixty-eight (n = 68; 83%) resident research thesis projects were published an average of 2,582.8 days, or roughly 7 years from the start of their residency training. Graduate adjusted H-index was associated with increased success and decreased time to publication (hazard ratio 1.183 [95% CI: 1.059-1.322], p = 0.003). A lower journal impact factor was associated with taking significantly shorter time to reach publication (F(1,66) = 7.839, p = 0.007; Β1 = 146.45, p = 0.007). Study type (clinical vs. laboratory), posttraining practice setting (academic vs. private), and whether the research topic was within the same area of the trainee's matched fellowship(s) did not predict publication success. Over the past 15 years, 83% of orthopaedic resident research thesis projects at our institution were published. A higher adjusted H-index was associated with greater completion and faster timing to publication. A lower journal impact factor was also associated with quicker publication. These data highlight the publication metrics of a formalized resident research program and identify factors associated with success and timing of publication.

Microbiological Profile of Osteomyelitis and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Bacterial Isolates with Special Reference to MDR Strains at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Introduction: Osteomyelitis is an inflammatory process that affects bone due to the contiguous infection, direct inoculation, or haematogenous spread of microorganisms. It is an infectious disease that is difficult to diagnose and treatment is complex because of its heterogeneity, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management. Aim: To determine microbiological profile osteomyelitis and antibiotic resistance pattern of bacterial isolates with special reference to Multidrug Resistance (MDR) strains. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology and Department of Orthopedics Rama Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. A total of 100 samples from osteomyelitis cases were aerobically cultured and isolates from culture positives were identified by standard procedures. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) was done following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Staphylococcal isolates were screened for methicillin resistance and Gram negative bacilli were screened for MDR production. Results: Out of 100 samples, 76% were culture positive and 24% were culture negative. Males were more affected than females. Staphylococcal spp. (47.3%) was predominant, E. coli (14.4%) and Klebsiella spp. (11.8%), Pseudomonas spp. (9.2%), Proteus spp. (5.2%), Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) (3.9%). Among the MDR strains, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was 44.4%. All the MDR Staphylococcal isolates were 100% sensitive for linezolid. Among the MDR Gram negative bacilli were Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamases (ESBL) (50%), AmpC (17.6%) and Metallo Beta Lactamase (MBL) (14.7%) and they were 100% sensitive for polymixin B and colistin. Conclusion: The microbiological profile of osteomyelitis in the present study showed high prevalence of MRSA44% as the commonest agent, sensitive only to linezolid. E. coli ESBL (50%) and MBL-14.7% were sensitive only to colistin and polymixin B, therefore proper infection control practices and antibiotic policy has to be followed to reduce the incidence of MDR strains.

Doximity Orthopaedic Surgery Program Rankings Are Associated with Academic Productivity.

Orthopaedic program rankings, size, type, and research productivity were recorded from Doximity. An academic productivity score was calculated by averaging the mean percentage of alumni clinical trials and alumni publications. Analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed to determine whether academic productivity was associated with program reputation, size, and type. One hundred seventy-five orthopaedic residency programs were included. Program rankings, size, and type had a statistically significant association with academic productivity (p < 0.0001). The 44 orthopaedic programs in the top quartile had an academic productivity score of 79.1 ± 13 in comparison with programs in the bottom quartile, who had a score of 38.3 ± 12.1 (p < 0.0001). Of the programs in the top quartile of reputation rankings, 32 (73%) were also in the top quartile for academic productivity. Programs with more residents demonstrated greater academic productivity than smaller programs. Twenty-three programs (13%) had more than 30 residents and a mean academic productivity of 76.2 ± 14.8. In comparison, 13 programs (7.5%) had 10 or fewer residents with an academic productivity score of 40.6 ± 16.3 (p < 0.0001). An academic productivity score differed significantly based on program type: university (63.9 ± 14.8), military (54.7 ± 16.9), university/community (46.3 ± 15.6), and community (38.7 ± 15) (p < 0.0001). Academic productivity among orthopaedic residency programs is associated with Doximity ranking, program size, and type. This information can be used by medical students, residents, and physicians to understand the Doximity rankings and how they correlate with this objective measure. III.

Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Utilization in Orthopedic Sports Medicine: A Scoping Review.

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed by the National Institutes of Health provides a standardized method for collecting outcomes data from sports medicine patient populations. Methods: The objective of this scoping review is to report on PROMIS utilization in orthopedic sports medicine research and practice. We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library using keywords and database-specific subject headings to identify studies that reported PROMIS utilization. Inclusion criteria were the use or mention of PROMIS in any population of patients commonly treated by orthopedic sports medicine physicians. Results: Following a screening process, we included 67 studies published from 2019 through 2022 in this review. A near-equal distribution of studies was published per year during this period. Twenty-four domains were assessed across the studies. Among studies with adult populations, the Pain Interference (45 studies, 67%) and Physical Function (37 studies, 55%) domains were the 2 most reported by researchers. Upper Extremity (4 studies, 6%) and Mobility (3 studies, 4%) were the 2 most used domains in studies involving pediatric populations. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate consistent utilization of PROMIS domains in the field of sports medicine. Researchers commonly used PROMIS with other legacy measures, comparing the scores to one another to assess responsiveness and validity. This review provides evidence that PROMIS domains are being used to collect data on a variety of factors related to sports medicine patient outcomes that may help physicians better understand the complexities of the recovery and rehabilitation process.

Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering.

The advent of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has enabled impressive progress in the development of 3D cellular constructs to mimic the structural and functional characteristics of natural tissues. Bioprinting has considerable translational potential in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. This review highlights the rational design and biofabrication strategies of diverse 3D bioprinted tissue constructs for orthopedic tissue engineering applications. First, we elucidate the fundamentals of 3D bioprinting techniques and biomaterial inks and discuss the basic design principles of bioprinted tissue constructs. Next, we describe the rationale and key considerations in 3D bioprinting of tissues in many different aspects. Thereafter, we outline the recent advances in 3D bioprinting technology for orthopedic tissue engineering applications, along with detailed strategies of the engineering methods and materials used, and discuss the possibilities and limitations of different 3D bioprinted tissue products. Finally, we summarize the current challenges and future directions of 3D bioprinting technology in orthopedic tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. This review not only delineates the representative 3D bioprinting strategies and their tissue engineering applications, but also provides new insights for the clinical translation of 3D bioprinted tissues to aid in prompting the future development of orthopedic implants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: 3D bioprinting has driven major innovations in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine; aiming to develop a functional viable tissue construct that provides an alternative regenerative therapy for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. 3D bioprinting-based biofabrication strategies could open new clinical possibilities for creating equivalent tissue substitutes with the ability to customize them to meet patient demands. In this review, we summarize the significance and recent advances in 3D bioprinting technology and advanced bioinks. We highlight the rationale for biofabrication strategies using 3D bioprinting for orthopedic tissue engineering applications. Furthermore, we offer ample perspective and new insights into the current challenges and future direction of orthopedic bioprinting translation research.

Supracondylar elbow fracture management (Supra Man)

Management of displaced paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures remains widely debated and actual practice is unclear. This national trainee collaboration aimed to evaluate surgical and postoperative management of these injuries across the UK. This study was led by the South West Orthopaedic Research Division (SWORD) and performed by the Supra Man Collaborative. Displaced paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures undergoing surgery between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 were retrospectively identified and their anonymized data were collected via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). A total of 972 patients were identified across 41 hospitals. Mean age at injury was 6.3 years (1 to 15), 504 were male (52%), 583 involved the left side (60%), and 538 were Gartland type 3 fractures (55%). Median time from injury to theatre was 16 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 6.6 to 22), 300 patients (31%) underwent surgery on the day of injury, and 91 (9%) underwent surgery between 10:00 pm and 8:00 am. Overall, 910 patients (94%) had Kirschner (K)-wire) fixation and these were left percutaneous in 869 (95%), while 62 patients (6%) had manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) and casting. Crossed K-wire configuration was used as fixation in 544 cases (59.5%). Overall, 208 of the fixation cases (61%) performed or supervised by a paediatric orthopaedic consultant underwent lateral-only fixation, whereas 153 (27%) of the fixation cases performed or supervised by a non-paediatric orthopaedic consultant used lateral-only fixation. In total, 129 percutaneous wires (16%) were removed in theatre. Of the 341 percutaneous wire fixations performed or supervised by a paediatric orthopaedic consultant, 11 (3%) underwent wire removal in theatre, whereas 118 (22%) of the 528 percutaneous wire fixation cases performed or supervised by a non-paediatric orthopaedic consultant underwent wire removal in theatre. Four MUA patients (6%) and seven K-wire fixation patients (0.8%) required revision surgery within 30 days for displacement. The treatment of supracondylar elbow fractures in children varies across the UK. Patient cases where a paediatric orthopaedic consultant was involved had an increased tendency for lateral only K-wire fixation and for wire removal in clinic. Low rates of displacement requiring revision surgery were identified in all fixation configurations.Cite this article: Bone Joint J2023;105-B(1):82-87.

Gender Representation in Major Orthopaedic Surgery Meetings: A Quantitative Analysis.

Orthopaedic surgery suffers from gender disparity, and annual conferences are visible opportunities to quantify gender representation within a field. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript was to investigate the prevalence of female speakers and moderators, and male-only panel sessions, at 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings. Conference programs and details of faculty moderating or presenting in 10 Orthopaedic Surgery annual meetings in 2021 were retrieved. Conferences were selected with the aim of size and diversity in subspecialty topics and included American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, North American Spine Society, Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA). Primary outcomes included percentage of female chairs and speakers and percentage of male-only panels, while secondary outcomes included number of publications, number of citations, and H-indexes of faculty. Further subgroup comparisons were performed between male-only panels and non-male-only panels and female members and male members. Of 207 included sessions, 121 (58.5%) were male-only panels and 150 (12.6%) of 1,188 faculty members were women. Conferences organized by the COA, ORS, and POSNA had higher percentages of female representation, while spine surgery and adult hip/knee reconstruction sessions had more than 70% male-only panels and fewer than 10% female members. There were no significant differences between male members and female members regarding years of practice; however, male members were more likely to hold the title of professor (p < 0.001). Male members and female members stratified by quartiles of publications, citations, and H-indexes, moderated or participated in similar numbers of sessions, indicating an absence of selection bias. There is a high prevalence of male-only panels (58.5%) and an overall lack of female representation (12.6%) in 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings. Male members and female members from these conferences were found to have similar qualifications academically. Specific strategies such as the elimination of male-only panels, selecting diverse conference organizers, and forming conference equity, diversity, and inclusion committees can help achieve cultural change. Level V.

Changes in tibial cortical dimensions and density associated with long-term locking plate fixation in goats

PurposeCortical porosis, secondary to either vascular injury or stress-shielding, is a comorbidity of fracture fixation using compression bone plating. Locking plate constructs have unique mechanics of load transmission and lack of reliance on contact pressures for fixation stability, so secondary cortical porosis adjacent to the plate has not been widely investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effects of long-term locking plate fixation on cortical dimensions and density in a caprine tibial segmental ostectomy model.MethodsData was acquired from a population of goats enrolled in ongoing orthopedic research which utilized locking plate fixation of 2 cm tibial diaphyseal segmental defects to evaluate bone healing over periods of 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Quantitative data included tibial cortical width measurements and three-dimensionally reconstructed slab density measurements, both assessed using computed tomographic examinations performed at the time of plate removal. Additional surgical and demographic variables were analyzed for effect on cortical widths and density, and all cis-cortex measurements were compared to both the trans-cortex and to the contralateral limbs.ResultsThe tibial cis-cortex was significantly wider and more irregular than the trans-cortex at the same level. This width asymmetry differed in both magnitude and direction from the contralateral limb. The bone underlying the plate was significantly less dense than the trans-cortex, and this cortical density difference was significantly greater than that of the contralateral limb. These cortical changes were independent of both duration of fixation and degree of ostectomy bone healing.ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that cortical bone loss consistent with cortical porosity is a comorbidity of locking plate fixation in a caprine tibial ostectomy model. Further research is necessary to identify risk factors for locking-plate-associated bone loss and to inform clinical decisions in cases necessitating long-term locking plate fixation.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT involvement in orthopaedic research activities, the good, the bad, and the Ugly

Abstract “Scientific writing is a mandatory skill for most researchers, and orthoapedic surgeons are no exception. However, improvement of the writing quality could be achieved using some assistive tools. The most recent ones involve using artificial intelligence (AI), specifically ChatGPT. Although it seems appealing for improving scientific writing and assisting non-native English speakers, its usage is still not well regulated, and ethical issues were raised regarding the misuse of these tools in the scientific research and writing process. Strict regulations controlling the involvement of these tools are still needed, and their judicious and honest utilization is mainly dependent on the researchers themselves.”

The 50 Most Cited Publications on Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspirate with Application in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) has garnered widespread and increasing attention in recent years. We aimed to characterize the most influential articles in cBMA research while clarifying controversies surrounding its use and clinical efficacy and identifying important areas on which to focus future research efforts. The Science Citation Index Expanded subsection of the Web of Science Core Collection was systematically searched to identify the top 50 most cited publications on orthopaedic cBMA research. Publication and study characteristics were extracted, and Spearman's correlations were calculated to assess the relationship between citation data and level of evidence. The top 50 articles were published between the years 1996 and 2018, with 58% published in the year 2010 or later. Of the 29 studies for which level of evidence was assessed, the majority were Level IV (24, 83%). Twenty-one articles (42%) were classified as basic science or translational (9 cell culture, 8 animal study, and 4 using human blood samples). Application to treat cartilage defects was the most common focus of studies (17 studies, 34%), followed by analysis of cBMA composition (14 studies, 28%). No correlation was found between rank, citation rate, or year of publication and level of evidence. The most influential articles on cBMA are recent and consist of a majority low level of evidence studies. Cohort studies were the most common study type among the top 50 most cited articles, while basic science articles were relatively less common. These results suggest a rapidly evolving field with the potential to better explain inconsistent clinical results with improved understanding and documentation of basic science concepts in addition to large-scale, prospective clinical trials. Orthobiologics especially cBMA holds great promise for the future, and higher level clinical trials will help better define the best clinical uses for this treatment.

The Terms "Multivariate" and "Multivariable" Are Used Incorrectly and Interchangeably in Orthopaedic Publications: Should We Care About the Distinction?

Orthopaedic surgery research increasingly utilizes statistical models to adjust for confounding, provide additional precision, and describe complex relationships. Traditionally, a statistical model is termed "multivariable" if it examines the relationship between multiple independent variables (e.g., covariables). The term "multivariate" is used to describe statistical models with multiple dependent variables (e.g., outcomes). The precise use of statistical terminology is important for study appraisal and reproducibility. The term "multivariate" is frequently used incorrectly in the orthopaedic literature to describe statistical models with a single dependent variable. In our analysis, we found that the term "multivariate" was used frequently, and in >90% of cases, the term was used to describe models that contain only a single dependent variable. Consistent with our perception, the terms "multivariable" and "multivariate" are not used with optimal precision. Below, we discuss the impact of the misuse of statistical terminology and present suggestions for improving statistical reporting.

Analytical validation and quality control/quality assurance practices for improved rigor and reproducibility of biochemical assays in orthopaedic research.

Orthopaedic research, and biomedical research in general, has made enormous strides to develop treatments for conditions long thought to be inevitable or untreatable; however, there is growing concern about the quality of published research. Considerable efforts have been made to improve overall research quality, integrity, and rigor, including meaningful proposals focused on transparency of reporting, appropriate use of statistics, and reporting of negative results. However, we believe that there is another key component to rigor and reproducibility that is not discussed sufficiently-analytical validation and quality control (QC). In this commentary, we discuss QC and method validation principles and practices that are systematically applied in the clinical laboratory setting to verify and monitor the analytical performance of quantitative assays, and the utility of applying similar practices to biochemical assays in the orthopaedic research setting. This commentary includes (1) recommendations for validation and QC practices, including examples of assay performance limitations uncovered by validation experiments performed in our laboratory, and (2) a description of an ongoing QC program developed to monitor the ongoing performance of commonly used assays in our lab. We hope that this commentary and the examples presented here will be thought-provoking and inspire further discussion and adaptation of analytical validation and QC procedures to advance our shared pursuit of high-quality, rigorous, and reproducible orthopaedic research.

The impact of a meta-analysis on orthopaedic surgeons' practice with regards to vancomycin graft pre-soaking in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A paper questionnaire survey study.

Understanding the impact of orthopaedic scientific research is vital in identifying facilitators and barriers to its implementation in clinical practice. A meta-analysis was carried out which showed that presoaking hamstring (HT) autografts in vancomycin was associated with a 10-fold reduction in infection rate in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Our aim was to determine the practice of orthopaedic surgeons with regards to vancomycin presoaking and explore whether they would adopt the findings of this meta-analysis. A paper questionnaire survey was administered to attendees of an annual EFORT podium presentation of the meta-analysis findings. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of respondents and their responses. A total of 29 senior surgeons/subspecialists performing a median of 40 ACL reconstructions per year completed the survey of whom 7 (24.1%) had encountered an ACL graft infection in the previous 2 years and 14 (48.3%) in the previous 5 years. Only 3 (10.3%) presoaked the ACL graft with an antibiotic. About 1/4 of those who up to then did not pre-soak the graft (6/26, 23.1%) would consider changing their practice to pre-soaking with vancomycin, with similar findings (5/20, 25.0%) in those that used a HT autograft as their first choice. Orthopaedic surgeons are receptive to the findings of a meta-analysis reporting on the effectiveness of vancomycin graft presoaking in ACL reconstruction, which can thus have a substantial impact upon clinical care. Addressing concerns about vancomycin induced graft toxicity and comparing the pre-soaking effect to that of specific intravenous antibiotic regimens may further enhance the uptake of this practice.