What motivates a weaker country to pursue a security strategy that is not supported by a major power? In this paper, we examine the disconnect between the United States and Taiwan regarding the latter’s defense strategies against threats from China. For years, the U.S. has encouraged Taiwan to adopt an asymmetric defense strategy in response to security challenges posed by the PLA. Nonetheless, Taiwan continues to invest significant resources in conventional military platforms, diverging from U.S. recommendations. Why does Taiwan pursue a defense approach that contradicts the advice of its more powerful partner? Drawing from the literature, we propose four hypotheses: trust, organizational and bureaucratic factors, symbolism, and strategic concerns. To test these hypotheses, we conducted original elite interviews with decision-makers in Taipei. The results strongly support the organizational and bureaucratic factors and strategic concerns hypotheses. This research also contributes to security studies by highlighting the differences in threat perception between the two countries, which could hinder alliance cohesion and collaboration. Theoretical contributions and policy implications are discussed in the conclusion.
Read full abstract