Oral Cefetamet Pivoxil Research Articles

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral and intravenous cefetamet in dog.

The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of intravenously (IV) administered cefetamet-Na and per os (PO) administered cefetamet pivoxil were investigated in eighteen healthy dogs at three different dose levels. The three doses for IV cefetamet-Na were 95, 190 and 380mg, while those for oral cefetamet pivoxil were 125, 250 and 500mg (both equivalent to 90, 180 and 360mg of cefetamet). An efficacy predictor, measured as the ratios of the time that the concentration of the free drug is over the MIC90 (T>MIC90) and the dosing interval (f% T>MIC90) of IV and PO administration were calculated. The PK parameters' maximum concentration (C max), half-life (t 1/2) and area under the curve (AUC0-t ) after three IV doses were 42.85±11.79μg/mL, 1.66±0.36h and 80.10±28.92mgh/L (95mg); 93.50±30.51μg/mL, 1.47±0.13h and 1.47±0.13mgh/L (190mg); 185.74±113.83μg/mL, 1.60±0.38h and 263.20±73.27mgh/L (380mg). After PO administration, the C max, t 1/2 and AUC0-t at three doses were 9.25±1.02μg/mL, 1.79±0.50h and 31.90±4.76mgh/L (125mg); 9.75±1.77μg/mL, 1.93±0.65h and 42.69±8.93mgh/L (250mg); 15.55±6.65μg/mL, 2.02±0.54h, and 68.72±24.11mgh/L (500mg). The IV f% T>MIC90 was greater than PO f% T>MIC90 when MIC90 was within the range of 0.25-256mg/L.

Influence of maturation and growth on cefetamet pivoxil pharmacokinetics: rational dosing for infants

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) cefetamet and the bioavailability of oral cefetamet pivoxil in infants aged 3.5 to 17.3 months who were hospitalized for urological surgery were characterized. The absorption of cefetamet pivoxil administered in a syrup formulation was 38 +/- 19% (n = 5) for infants, which was comparable to values observed for children and adults. The plasma half-life of i.v. cefetamet was 3.03 +/- 0.96 h (mean +/- standard deviation; n = 20) in the infants. This was not different from the value observed for normal adult subjects but was longer than that reported for children aged 3 to 12 years. Urinary recovery of cefetamet after i.v. administration to infants was 63.4 +/- 17.7% (n = 16), which was less than the 80% recovery found in older children and adults. The steady-state volume of distribution was 399 +/- 116 ml/kg of body weight. It was comparable in size and showed the same dependence on body weight as it did in children and adults. The mean systemic clearance per kilogram of body weight in the infants was lower than that in children and adults, apparently because of immaturity of clearance processes. A model that accounted for maturation and growth with increasing age was developed for the clearance. On the basis of this model, the clearance capacity increased from birth to 5 years by a factor of 4.5 because of maturation. Maturation progressed exponentially, with a half-life of 14 months. This model was used to develop dosing regimen guidelines for pediatric patients aged 3.5 months and older.

Cefetamet pivoxil in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections in children

The data from this multicenter comparison of oral cefetamet pivoxil (CAT) (10 and 20 mg/kg twice daily) and amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid (30 to 50 mg/kg/d, in three divided doses) in the treatment of acute (recurrent) urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children are reported. A total of 421 children (aged 2 months to 15 years) were treated for 7 to 10 days. At follow-up (day 28), there was bacteriologic success (eradication or reinfection) in 97% of those treated with CAT and in 93% of those treated with amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid. The overall cure rate was 97% for CAT and 93% for amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid. There was no difference in outcome between the two CAT dosages. With both drugs adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature. CAT is an appropriate drug for the treatment of acute UTIs in children, being at least as effective as amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid.

Parenteral-Oral Switch in the Management of Paediatric Pneumonia

In phase I of a 2-phase study, 56 evaluable children (0.8 to 5 years) with lobar or segmental pneumonia received intravenous or intramuscular ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg/day for 2 days followed by oral cefetamet pivoxil 20 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses to complete 7 days of treatment. All patients achieved a clinical cure. In phase II, a randomised open multicentre study, 62 children with pneumonia received an identical regimen to phase I (arm A), and 59 children received ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg/day for 1 day followed by 6 days' treatment with cefetamet pivoxil 20 mg/kg/day (arm B). Patients from phase I and arm A were combined giving a total of 118 evaluable patients in arm A. At the end of treatment, 100% of patients in arm A and 96% in arm B achieved a clinical cure; cure was maintained in 99 and 98% of patients, respectively. Two (4%) patients in arm B failed therapy; in both cases, factors other than treatment failure may have accounted for the poor response. 11 and 12% of patients in treatment arms A and B, respectively, experienced adverse events; gastrointestinal events (nausea and/or vomiting) were reported in 9 and 8% of patients, respectively. In conclusion, 1 or 2 days' treatment with parenteral ceftriaxone before switching to oral cefetamet pivoxil was safe and effective in the treatment of childhood pneumonia. Therefore, parenteral-oral switch is a feasible treatment option in the treatment of serious paediatric community-acquired pneumonia.

Cefetamet pivoxil clinical pharmacokinetics.

Cefetamet pivoxil is an orally absorbed prodrug ester of the microbiologically active cephalosporin, cefetamet. The prodrug ester is completely hydrolysed to the active compound cefetamet on its first pass through the gut wall, the liver or both. Cefetamet is classified as a third generation cephalosporin with excellent activity against streptococci, Enterobacteriaceae, Neisseria and Haemophilus species. It has enhanced stability against beta-lactamases compared with penicillins and first and second generation cephalosporins. The antibacterial spectrum is comparable with that of cefotaxime except for its poor activity against staphylococci. Following a 20-minute zero-order intravenous infusion, cefetamet had a rapid distribution phase followed by a monoexponential decline. The average pharmacokinetic parameters from 152 healthy volunteers were: total body clearance 136 ml/min (8.16 L/h); renal clearance 119 ml/min (7.14 L/h); nonrenal clearance 17 ml/min (1.02 L/h); volume of distribution at steady-state 0.29 L/kg; terminal elimination half-life 2.2 hours; 88% of the dose recovered in the urine. Cefetamet is not extensively bound to plasma proteins. Consequently, these data indicate that cefetamet is predominantly eliminated unchanged by the kidney via glomerular filtration with possibly a minor component of tubular secretion. Cefetamet has a relatively small apparent volume of distribution consistent with that of other beta-lactam antibiotics. Results following ascending intravenous doses of cefetamet in healthy young male volunteers demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet are independent of the dose. The absolute bioavailability of cefetamet tablets following oral cefetamet pivoxil administration is enhanced by the presence of food. Under fed conditions, 50 to 60% of the final oral dose is absorbed into the systemic circulation. This food effect is observed when cefetamet pivoxil is administered within 1 hour of a meal. Food also produces a slight delay in the time to reach peak plasma concentrations of this drug. Changes in fluid volume intake with cefetamet pivoxil administration have no effect on the bioavailability of this drug. Similar absorption characteristics have been observed for all of the tablet dosage formulations studied during clinical development. The absolute bioavailability of the final syrup dosage formulation was between 38 and 47%. Little improvement in the bioavailability of this preparation has been observed with food. The absorption and disposition of cefetamet in human subpopulations [i.e. children, elderly (< 75 years of age), renal impairment, liver disease and patients taking concomitant drugs] have been studied extensively. Only impaired renal function appears to significantly alter the elimination of this drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Models for describing absorption rate and estimating extent of bioavailability: application to cefetamet pivoxil.

Five absorption rate models have been compared for describing cefetamet data in 34 adults after oral administration of cefetamet pivoxil with food alone or in combination with either an antacid or an H2 antagonist. A sequential zero- then first-order input process provided the most flexible description of the absorption rate of cefetamet. If the first-order rate constant is linked to the zero-order input parameters the model can be interpreted as the consequence of solubility-limited absorption. While a sequential input is theoretically reasonable to assume, the first-order process appeared to be independent of the zero-order input. A population-based approach was applied to estimate the effect of dose and gastric pH increase on absorption and disposition. There appeared to be a dose-associated change in several parameters. The most marked change was an increase in volume of distribution of cefetamet. Treatments expected to increase gastric pH slowed the first-order component of the absorption process. Three models for estimating the extent of bioavailability have been compared using observations from 18 adults and 13 children receiving iv cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil on two separate occasions. The most consistent estimates of the disposition parameters and the extent of bioavailability were achieved with the sequential zero- and first-order model under the assumption that steady state volume of distribution and nonrenal clearance were the same after iv and oral treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil in children

The pharmacokinetics of cefetamet were determined after intravenous (i.v.) administration of cefetamet and oral administration of cefetamet pivoxil syrup to patients between the ages of 3 and 12 years. The patients were hospitalized for reconstructive urological surgery; to prevent infection, prophylactic i.v. cefetamet was administered on the day of surgery and oral cefetamet pivoxil was administered 2 days later. After i.v. administration, the mean (+/- standard deviation) half-life of cefetamet was 1.97 +/- 0.60 h (n = 18), which was different from the 2.46 +/- 0.33 h reported for nine adults (22 to 68 years old) in a previous study. The average values for the mean residence times were 2.35 +/- 0.94 and 2.83 +/- 0.34 h and the average values for the fraction of the dose eliminated unchanged in the urine were 79.9% +/- 8.99% and 80% +/- 11% in children and adults, respectively. Plots of mean systemic clearance and steady-state volume of distribution versus body weight for the children and comparative adults were linear on log-log coordinates, and the slopes of the plots were 0.661 and 0.880, respectively. These slope values suggested that mean systemic clearance values per unit of body surface area were similar in children and adults and that maintenance doses for children should be the adult maintenance dose multiplied by the child's surface area divided by 1.73 m2. The mean (+/- standard deviation) oral bioavailabilities of cefetamet pivoxil were 49.3% +/- 15.7% in 3- to 7-year-old children who received a 500-mg dose and 37.9% +/- 10.0% in 8- to 12-year-old children who received a 1,000-mg dose. These values were not different from that observed in the adult group after two 500-mg tablets. Likewise, the peak concentration of cefetamet in plasma and its time of occurrence in children were in line with the values which have been observed for adults.

Influence of antacid and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of oral cefetamet pivoxil

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the influence that treatment with antacid and ranitidine had on the pharmacokinetics of oral cefetamet pivoxil in 18 healthy male volunteers. Each subject received, in an open-labeled, randomized, three-way crossover design, a single oral dose of 1,000 mg (two tablets) of cefetamet pivoxil 10 min after a standard breakfast during each of the following treatments: treatment A, control period; treatment B, antacid (80 ml of suspension; Maalox 70) administered on the evening before cefetamet pivoxil dosing (-12.5 h) and again 2 h before and 2 h after a standard breakfast; treatment C, ranitidine (150 mg) administered twice a day for 4 days and again 1 h and 10 min prior to cefetamet pivoxil dosing. Plasma and urine samples were collected over a 24-h period following cefetamet pivoxil administration. Cefetamet was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Oral bioavailability parameters (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity, time to maximum concentration of drug in plasma, and maximum concentration of drug in plasma) were obtained by noncompartmental techniques. The results showed that none of these bioavailability parameters was significantly (P greater than 0.05) affected by antacid or rantidine coadministration. A compartmental analysis showed no significant differences. In addition, the terminal elimination half-life and the fraction of cefetamet excreted unchanged in the urine was also not significantly (P greater than 0.05) affected by antacid or ranitidine exposure. Relatively wide intrasubject variability was observed for time to maximum concentration of drug in plasma and terminal elimination half-life in several of the 18 subjects studied. Although these irregularities did not appear to be strongly associated with a particular treatment, they increased in subjects in both the antacid and H2-receptor antagonist treatment groups compared with those in subjects in the control treatment group. We conclude that antacid and ranitidine treatment likely does not alter the bioavailability of oral cefetamet pivoxil.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil in patients with hepatic cirrhosis

The pharmacokinetics of orally administered cefetamet pivoxil and intravenously administered cefetamet were studied in 12 healthy subjects and 12 patients with hepatic cirrhosis without ascites. Cirrhosis had no detectable effect on the pharmacokinetics of cefetamet and on the bioavailability of cefetamet pivoxil. After intravenous cefetamet in control versus cirrhotic subjects, respectively, the following mean +/- standard deviation values were observed: total body clearance, 128 +/- 10.2 versus 123 +/- 28.8 ml/min; steady-state volume of distribution, 23.2 +/- 2.2 versus 22.7 +/- 4.6 liters; half-life, 2.42 +/- 0.21 versus 2.35 +/- 0.41 h. Renal and nonrenal clearances of cefetamet were similar in both groups, as were the mean residence times and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve. For oral cefetamet pivoxil, no differences were detected in the mean values of the percentage of dose absorbed: 44.6 +/- 9.1 versus 50.1 +/- 12.9. The rate of appearance of cefetamet in the plasma also was not affected by cirrhosis: similar mean values were found for the mean residence time and the maximum concentration in plasma and its time of occurrence.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil in patients with renal insufficiency.

The pharmacokinetics of cefetamet after a short intravenous infusion of cefetamet (515 mg) and oral administration of 1,000 mg of cefetamet pivoxil were studied in 9 healthy subjects and in 38 patients with various degrees of renal impairment. The results showed that cefetamet elimination was dependent on renal function. After intravenous dosing, total body (CLS), renal (CLR), and nonrenal (CLNR) clearances were linearly related to creatinine clearance (CLCR; r = 0.95, 0.92, and 0.59, respectively). Elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) was prolonged from 2.46 +/- 0.33 h in normal subjects to 29.1 +/- 13.9 h in patients with CLCR of less than 10 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Correspondingly, CLS and CLR decreased from 1.77 +/- 0.27 and 1.42 +/- 0.25 ml/min per kg to 0.14 +/- 0.04 and 0.04 +/- 0.03 ml/min per kg, respectively. The volume of distribution at steady state (0.298 +/- 0.049 liter/kg) for cefetamet was not altered by renal insufficiency (P greater than 0.05). After oral administration, the elimination parameters, t1/2 beta and CLR, were insignificantly different from the intravenous data (P greater than 0.05). Furthermore, the bioavailability (F) of cefetamet pivoxil (45 +/- 13%) was not altered by renal failure (P greater than 0.05). However, maximum concentration in plasma and the time to achieve this value were significantly increased (5.86 +/- 0.74 versus 14.8 +/- 6.14 micrograms/ml and 3.9 +/- 1.1 versus 8.4 +/- 1.7 h, respectively; P less than 0.05). Based on these observations, it is recommended that patients with CLcr of <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and between 10 and 39 ml/min per 1.73 m2 be given one-quarter of the normal daily dose either once or twice daily. Patients with CLcr between 40 and 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2 should receive one-half of the normal dose twice daily. For patients with CLcr of <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2, it would be recommended that they receive a normal standard dose as a loading dose on day 1 of treatment.