Oral Anticoagulants In Patients Research Articles

A decade of experience in over 300 surgically treated spine patients with long-term oral anticoagulation: a propensity scorematched cohort study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the risks and outcomes of patients with long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing spine surgery. All patients on long-term OAC who underwent spine surgery between 01/2005 and 06/2015 were included. Data were prospectively collected within our in-house Spine Surgery registry and retrospectively supplemented with patient chart and administrative database information. A 1:1 propensity score-matched group of patients without OAC from the same time interval served as control. Primary outcomes were post-operative bleeding, wound complications and thromboembolic events up to 90days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, death and 3-month post-operative patient-rated outcomes. In comparison with the control group, patients with OAC (n = 332) had a 3.4-fold (95%CI 1.3-9.0) higher risk for post-operative bleeding, whereas the risks for wound complications and thromboembolic events were comparable between groups. The higher bleeding risk was driven by a higher rate of extraspinal haematomas (3.3% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.001), while there was no difference in epidural haematomas and haematoma evacuations. Risk factors for adverse events among patients with OAC were mechanical heart valves, posterior neck surgery, blood loss > 1000mL, age, female sex, BMI > 30kg/m2 and post-operative PTT levels. At 3-month follow-up, most patients reported favourable outcomes with no difference between groups. Although OAC patients have a higher risk for complications after spine surgery, the risk for major events is low and patients benefit similarly from surgery.

State-of-the-Art of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an increasingly used alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, especially in patients with absolute/relative contraindications to these therapies. This review will cover three main aspects of the procedure. In the fist part of the manuscript, we focus on patient selection. We describe three main categories of patients with primary indication to LAAO, namely patients with previous or at a high risk of intracerebral bleeding, patients with a history of major gastrointestinal bleeding and patients with end-stage renal disease and absolute contraindication to novel oral anticoagulants. Some other potential indications are also described. In the second part of the manuscript, we review available devices, trying to highlight different aspects and potential specific advantages. The last section overviews different ways for pre-, intra- and postprocedural imaging, in order to improve procedural safety and efficacy and ameliorate patient outcome. The characteristics of available contemporary devices and the role of imaging in procedural planning, intraprocedural guidance and follow-up are described.

Abstract WP182: Effect of Prior Anticoagulation With Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Functional and Procedural Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Thrombectomy

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown to be associated with better procedural outcomes in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (aLVO) undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT). However, data surrounding the impact of pre-treatment with NOACs on procedural outcomes among patients with AF undergoing EVT for aLVO remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained institutional database of EVT cases on all patients with a diagnosis of AF between Jan 2021 and Mar 2023, grouped by anticoagulation (AC) status (AC vs no AC). In the anticoagulated group, only patients on NOACs were included. Outcomes compared between groups were 90-day mRS, successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b-3), first-pass effect (FPE), time from skin puncture to recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results: Of 197 AF patients included, 97 (49.2%) had a history of being on NOAC at the time of stroke. Forty-four percent of the no AC group received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). In the NOAC group, 59.5% of patients achieved 90-day mRS of 0-2 vs 49.3% in the no AC group (aOR=1.32, p=0.57). The rate of successful reperfusion in the NOAC group was 98.7% vs 93% in no AC group, (aOR 0.48, p=0.24). No difference was observed with regards to FPE and skin puncture to recanalization time. There was a non-significant trend of higher mortality in the no AC group (23.9% versus 12.2% in NOAC group), despite similar sICH rates (5.0% in no AC and 6.2% in NOAC group, aOR 1.08, p=0.91). Subgroup analysis of patients with a single, non-tandem occlusion of ICA or M1 analyzed by NOAC status yielded similar findings. All outcomes were adjusted for age, gender, baseline NIHSS, and IVT status. Conclusion: Among patients with AF undergoing EVT for LVO, our study did not find an association of prior anticoagulation with NOACs on procedural outcomes, although there was a trend towards better functional outcomes and numerically higher successful reperfusion rate among patients pretreated with NOACs. Further research is needed to study the impact of NOACs on procedural outcomes among patients undergoing EVT.

Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

Since several studies have examined the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), we conducted a meta-analyses to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population. We conducted a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2024. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect measures to compare DOACs with VKAs. A total of 9 observational studies were included. The pooled analysis revealed that a trend towards higher complete recanalization rates with DOACs (71.4%) compared to VKAs (55.3%), though not statistically significant (OR 1.95; 95%CI 0.70 to 5.44). For SVT extension, a significant effect was observed favoring DOACs (OR 0.12; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.54). No significant differences were found in other efficacy outcomes or safety outcomes, except for major bleeding, which was significantly lower with DOACs (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.56). DOACs are superior to VKAs in SVT extension and major bleeding, suggesting that DOACs may be a favorable treatment option in the treatment of SVT.

Use of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation.

There are limited data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation with significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), which can lead to hepatic dysfunction and intestinal malabsorption. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs and warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation with significant (moderate to severe) TR. A total of 1215 patients with significant TR and atrial fibrillation who were treated with warfarin (N=491) or DOACs (N=724) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events, and hospitalization for major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage, hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding, all-cause mortality, and a composite outcome. The median follow-up duration was 2.4 years. In the inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted cohort, DOACs and warfarin had a similar risk for ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.67-1.36]; P=0.79) and major bleeding (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.57-1.06]; P=0.11). For the secondary outcomes, relative to warfarin, DOACs had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and the composite outcome, and a comparable risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and all-cause mortality. In the subgroup analysis, the effects of DOACs on ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events were comparable to the effects ofwarfarin, even in patients with inferior vena cava plethora (increased right atrial pressure) or severe TR. In this study, relative to warfarin, DOACs demonstrated comparable efficacy for ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events and major bleeding, with a lower intracranial hemorrhage risk in patients with significant TR and atrial fibrillation, indicating their effectiveness and safety.

Use of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias, which results in disability and death in the patients. The mechanisms of systemic and local atrial activation of the coagulation system provoke the risk of stroke in the presence of even short AF episodes. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), particularly rivaroxaban, have shown their efficacy in preventing stroke in patients with AF. The international ROCKET AF, XANTUS, PREFER, and RIVER studies have studied different aspects of anticoagulant therapy, on the basis of which, the use of rivaroroxaban has been approved for the prevention of ischemic stroke and systemic embolisms in patients with non-valvular AF; the efficacy and safety of the drug have been proven.

Uninterrupted direct-acting oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary procedures: The DOAC-NOSTOP study rationale and design

Backgroundpatients with atrial fibrillation (AF) under treatment with chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) often require coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Deciding the management of OAC during this periprocedural period requires balancing the risks of hemorrhage and thrombotic complications. Guidelines recommend an uninterrupted strategy in patients receiving Vitamin-K Antagonists (VKA). However, for patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI while on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), withdrawal 12–24 h prior to the procedure is still recommended. This is based on expert opinions given the lack of evidence. Therefore, whether DOAC discontinuation prior to trans-radial coronary procedures should be the strategy of choice is a matter of debate and solid evidence is needed to guide clinical decision making. MethodsThe DOAC-NOSTOP study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label study evaluating the safety of DOACs continuation in 200 patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary procedures. DOAC treatment will not be interrupted throughout the periprocedural period. Primary outcome will be Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 events, assessed at a 30-day follow-up. ConclusionsThe DOAC-NOSTOP is the first study prospectively assessing the risk of bleeding with uninterrupted DOAC in patients undergoing trans-radial percutaneous coronary procedures.

Infrequent transition to direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are challenging aspects of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy in patients with cancer. We evaluated the prevalence of potential DOAC/antineoplastic agent DDIs and the one-year cumulative incidence of switching from low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to a DOAC in patients with cancer. Patients with cancer and an indication of LMWH were included from Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark, in the 2014-2019 period. Follow-up was initiated when the first dose of LMWH was dispensed. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. One-year cumulative incidence of switching from LMWH to DOAC was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Potential DDIs were evaluated using a report from the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and a review by Hellfritzsch et al. RESULTS. A total of 161 patients were included with a median age of 70.8 (interquartile range: 64.2-76.1) years. The one-year cumulative incidence of switching from LMWH to DOAC was 32% (95% confidence intervals: 21-43%) in patients eligible for DOACs. Using the EHRA report, a total of 24% of antineoplastic agents were not identified. This percentage decreased to 8% using data from Hellfritzsch et al. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with cancer, the one-year cumulative incidence of switching from LMWH to DOAC was less-t 35% in patients eligible for DOAC, revealing a potential for improved anticoagulant treatment. Furthermore, contemporary data elaborated on potential DDIs between DOACs/antineoplastic agents. "Helsefonden" (21-B-0350) and the "Karen Elise Jensens Fonden" (29-4-2021) funded the study. Not relevant.

Renal function and periprocedural complications in patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation: A comparison between uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants and phenprocoumon administration.

Data regarding uninterrupted oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during catheter ablation for left atrial arrhythmias is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of periprocedural uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared with uninterrupted phenprocoumon in patients with CKD undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation between 2016 and 2019 with underlying chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 15 and 45ml/min). The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy or warfarin presents a superior safety profile in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. We compared periprocedural complications (arteriovenous fistula, aneurysm, significant hematoma (> 5cm)) and/or bleeding (drop in hemoglobin of >2g/dl, pericardial effusion, retroperitoneal bleeding, other bleeding, stroke) between patients receiving either uninterrupted DOAC or warfarin therapy. Secondary analysis included patient baseline characteristics as well as procedural data. A total of 188 patients (female n = 108 (57%), mean age 75.3 ± 8.1years, mean GFR 36.8 ± 6ml/min) were included in this study. Underlying arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation (n = 104, 55.3%) and atypical atrial flutter (n = 84, 44.7%). Of these, n = 132 patients (70%) were under a DOAC medication, and n = 56 (30%) were under phenprocoumon. Major groin complications including pseudoaneurysm and/or AV fistula occurred in 8.9% of patients in the phenprocoumon group vs. 11.3% of patients in the DOAC group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.62). Incidence of cardiac tamponade (2.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.55) and stroke (0% vs. 0%) were low in both DOAC and phenprocoumon groups with similar post-procedural drops in hemoglobin levels (1.1±1g/dl vs 1.1±0.9g/dl; p= 0.71). The type of anticoagulation had no significant influence on bleeding or thromboembolic events as well as groin complications in this retrospective study. Despite observing an increased rate of groin complications, the uninterrupted use of DOAC or phenprocoumon during left atrial catheter ablation in patients with CKD appears to be feasible and effective.

Central American and Caribbean Consensus Document for the Optimal Management of Oral Anticoagulation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Endorsed by the Central American and Caribbean Society of Arterial Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prevention.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults. Prevention of the ischaemic risk with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is widely recommended, and current clinical guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as preference therapy for stroke prevention. However, there are currently no clinical practice guidelines or recommendation documents on the optimal management of OACs in patients with AF that specifically address and adapt to the Central American and Caribbean context. The aim of this Delphi-like study is to respond to doubts that may arise in the management of OACs in patients with non-valvular AF in this geographical area. A consensus project was performed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, a recommended ADOLOPMENT-like approach, and the application of a two-round Delphi survey. In the first round, 31 recommendations were evaluated and 30 reached consensus, of which, 10 unanimously agreed. The study assessed expert opinions in a wide variety of contextualized recommendations for the optimal management of DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There is a broad consensus on the clinical practice guideline (CPG) statements used related to anticoagulation indication, patient follow-up, anticoagulation therapy complications, COVID-19 management and prevention, and cardiac interventions.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Low Body Weight Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents are established as the anticoagulation strategy of choice for a variety of clinical risks. Despite this, uncertainty still exists with regard to their efficacy and safety for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in some patient populations; most notably those with low body weight (LBW) (<60 kg or body mass index [BMI] <18 kg/m2). Currently, there is a paucity of trial and non-trial data to support a prescriptive recommendation for their use in these patient cohorts. We have carried out a pooled systematic review of the most up to date published data of patients stabilized on various DOAC analogs with the view to ascertaining the exact matrices of their efficacy and safety in these cohorts of patients. We initially carried out a comprehensive search of databases from inception to June 2023 for eligible studies exploring the efficacy and safety of various analogs of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation who had low body weight. Databases accessed include PubMed, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness. We carried out a weighted comparison of derived pooled odd ratios (with their corresponding confidence intervals) of mortality outcomes between various DOACs using the random effects model. Thirteen studies (n = 165,205 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. DOAC analogs were associated with increased stroke-related events, composite outcome, and mortality in low body weight patients compared to non-low body weight patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.92), (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.29-1.86), (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.87-4.58), respectively. There was no significant difference in the safety outcome (major bleeding events) between the DOAC analogs (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.93-1.52). In this meta-analytical review comprising both real-world and randomized controlled studies, the use of DOAC analogs in low body weight patients (body weight of <60 kg or BMI<18 kg/m2) with atrial fibrillation was associated with increased risks of stroke-related events, composite outcomes, and mortality compared to non-low body weight cohorts patients. At the same time, there was no significant difference in terms of major bleeding events. This finding has provided the first resolution of pervading uncertainty surrounding the use of DOAC analogs in these patient cohorts and suggests the need for follow-up confirmatory systematic studies in this group of patients.

Does atrial fibrillation still increase the risk of death? One-year follow-up results of the NOMED-AF study.

Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well‑known risk factor for ischemic stroke and hospitalization, its effect on mortality has not been clearly established. We aimed to assess whether AF is an independent risk factor for death. A secondary objective was to evaluate the role of oral anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke and death in 1‑year follow‑up of patients included in the NOMED‑AF (Noninvasive Monitoring for Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation) study. The NOMED‑AF study included 3014 patients. The participants underwent continuous long‑term electrocardiographic monitoring using a wearable vest for up to 30 days. The present analysis involved 2795 patients who completed the 1‑year follow‑up. The median (interquartile range) follow‑up time was 365 (365-365) days. AF was diagnosed in 617 participants. Independent risk factors for death in the patients who completed the 1‑year follow‑up were AF, age equal to or above 65 years, and chronic kidney disease. The individuals with diagnosed AF had an almost 2‑fold higher risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% CI, 1.18-2.44; P <0.001) and a 2.5‑fold higher risk of stroke (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.41-4.44; P <0.001), as compared with those without an AF diagnosis. The participants with AF who received oral anticoagulants had an almost 5‑fold lower risk of death than those who were not on anticoagulation (2.9% vs 14.2%, respectively; P <0.001). AF is an independent risk factor for death and cardiovascular hospitalization. The risk of death and stroke in patients with AF is significantly higher than in the patients without this arrhythmia. Oral anticoagulation in patients with AF significantly reduces the rates of death and stroke; however, its use is suboptimal in this group of patients.

АНТИКОАГУЛЯНТНАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ У БОЛЬНЫХ С ФИБРИЛЛЯЦИЕЙ ПРЕДСЕРДИЙ И ЦИРРОЗОМ ПЕЧЕНИ

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common arrhythmias. In patients with liver cirrhosis, the presence of atrial fibrillation is accompanied by additional risks of thromboembolic complications and death. Prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with liver dysfunction presents significant difficulties due to the presence of coagulopathies, which contribute to an increased risk of thrombus formation and hemorrhagic events. Warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with mild to moderate liver dysfunction and concomitant atrial fibrillation are comparable in effectiveness in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke, but direct oral anticoagulants demonstrate a better safety profile due to reduced risk of bleeding. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants rarely include patients with severe liver impairment (Child-Pugh class C), and the benefit of anticoagulant therapy in this population requires further study.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in patients at extremes of body weight: a review of pharmacological considerations and clinical implications.

Patients at extremes of body weight are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Therefore, their optimal anticoagulant treatment remains a topic of debate. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of DOACs for treating patients at extremes of body weight in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in the prevention of cardioembolic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). A literature search was conducted in the main bibliographic databases, and the most relevant reviews and original articles on the topic were selected. Although data in these patient groups are limited, apixaban and rivaroxaban show a favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile in obese VTE treatment and NVAF patients and, in the case of apixaban, also in underweight patients. In particular, these drugs demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to standard therapy. Very few data were available for dabigatran and edoxaban; the latter drug was safer at a lower dose, mainly in underweight patients. Our findings are in line with the last International Society of Haemostasis and Thrombosis position paper and European Heart Rhythm Association 2021 practical guide, suggesting the use of apixaban and rivaroxaban in morbidly obese patients (>120 kg or body mass index ≥40 kg/m 2 ) and the reduced dosage of edoxaban in low-weight patients. Future studies should focus on large populations of patients at extremes of body weights to acquire more clinical and pharmacokinetic evidence on all available DOACs, especially those currently less investigated.

Adherence to direct or vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a long-term observational study

Our objectives were to measure long-term adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to identify patient factors associated with adherence. Using linked, population-based administrative data from British Columbia, Canada, an incident cohort of adults prescribed OACs for AF was identified. We calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) as a time-dependent covariate for each 90-day window from OAC initiation until the end of follow-up. Associations between patient attributes and adherence were assessed using generalized mixed effect linear regression models. 30,264 patients were included. Mean PDC was 0.69 (SD 0.28) over a median follow-up of 6.7 years. 54% of patients were non-adherent (PDC < 0.8). After controlling for confounders, factors positively associated with adherence were number of drug class switches, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, history of vascular disease, time since initiation, and age. Age > 75 years at initiation, polypharmacy (among VKA users only), and receiving DOAC (vs. VKA) were negatively associated with adherence. PDC decreased over time for VKA users and increased for DOAC users. Over half of AF patients studied were, on average, nonadherent to OAC therapy and missed 32% of their doses. Several patient factors were associated with higher or lower adherence, and adherence to VKA declined during therapy while DOAC adherence increased slightly over time. To min im ize the risk stroke, adherence-supporting interventions are needed for all patients with AF, particularly those aged > 75 years, those with prior stroke or vascular disease, VKA users with polypharmacy, and DOAC recipients.

Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Impact of Treatment Strategy and on Patients' Health Status.

The discontinuation of oral anticoagulants (OACs) remains as a significant concern in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The discontinuation rate may vary depending on management strategy, and physicians may also discontinue OACs due to concerns about patient satisfaction with their care. We aimed to assess the incidence of OAC discontinuation and its relationship to patients' health in an outpatient AF registry. From a multicenter registry for newly recognized AF patients (n = 3313), we extracted 1647 (49.7%) patients with OACs and a CHA2DS2-Vasc score of ≥2. Discontinuation was defined as sustained cessation of OACs within a 1-year follow-up. We examined predictors associated with discontinuation and its relations to health status defined by the AFEQT questionnaire. Of the 1647 patients, 385 (23.6%) discontinued OACs after 1 year, with discontinuation rates varying across treatment strategies (15.3% for catheter ablation, 4.9% for rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs, and 3.0% for rate control). Successful rhythm control was associated with discontinuation in the catheter ablation (OR 6.61, 95% CI 3.00-14.6, p < 0.001) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.62-15.9, p < 0.001) groups, whereas the incidence of bleeding events within 1 year was associated with discontinuation in the rate control group. One-year AFEQT scores did not significantly differ between patients who discontinued OACs and those who did not in each treatment strategy group. OAC discontinuation was common among AF patients with significant stroke risk but varied depending on the chosen treatment strategy. This study also found no significant association between OAC discontinuation and patients' health status.

Pharmacist-led interventions in optimising the use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation in general practice in England: a retrospective observational study.

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for increasing OAC in patients with AF. However, prescribing DOACs for patients with established AF poses various challenges and general practice pharmacists may have an important role in supporting their management. To investigate the effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions in general practice in optimising the use of OAC therapies in AF. A retrospective observational study in general practices in Bradford. The data were collected retrospectively from 1 November 2018-31 December 2019 using electronic health record data. The data were analysed: 1) to identify patients with AF not on OAC; 2) to describe inappropriate DOAC prescriptions; and 3) to calculate HAS-BLED scores. Overall, 76.3% (n = 470) of patients with AF received OAC therapy, and of these, 63.4% received DOACs. Pharmacist-led interventions increased DOAC prescribing by 6.0% (P = 0.03). Inappropriate DOAC use was identified in 24.5% of patients with AF, with underdosed and overdosed identified in 9.7% and 14.8%, respectively. Post-intervention, inappropriate prescribing was reduced to 1.7%. The mean HAS-BLED score decreased from 3.00 to 2.22 (P<0.01). Successful transition from vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy to DOACs was achieved in 25.7% of patients. Pharmacist-led interventions have successfully improved the use of OAC therapies in patients with AF, and effectively managed the bleeding risks and transition from VKA to DOAC therapy, in line with guidelines.

Management of edoxaban therapy and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing major or nonmajor surgery: a subanalysis of the EMIT-AF/VTE study

BackgroundOptimising periprocedural management of direct oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic treatment undergoing major surgeries is an important aspect of balancing the risk of surgery-related bleeding with the risk of thromboembolic events, which may vary by surgery type.MethodsThis subanalysis of the prospective EMIT-AF/VTE programme assessed periprocedural-edoxaban management, according to physicians’ decisions, and bleeding and thromboembolic event rates in patients who underwent major vs. nonmajor surgeries. Edoxaban interruption and clinical outcomes were compared between major vs. nonmajor surgeries and between renal function subgroups (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≤ 50 mL/min vs. > 50 mL/min).ResultsWe included 276 major and 512 nonmajor surgeries. The median pre- and postprocedural duration of edoxaban interruption in major vs. nonmajor surgeries was 4 vs. 1 days, whereas median duration of interruption for those with preprocedural-only and postprocedural-only interruption was 2 vs. 1 days and 2 vs. 0 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Rates of all bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were numerically higher in major vs. nonmajor surgeries. Event rates (number of events per 100 surgeries) were low overall (< 6 events per 100 surgeries), independent of renal function subgroups.ConclusionIn this subanalysis of the EMIT-AF/VTE programme, periprocedural-edoxaban interruption was significantly longer in patients undergoing major vs. nonmajor surgery. This clinician-driven approach was associated with low rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events following both major and nonmajor surgeries.Trial registrationNCT02950168, registered October 31, 2016; NCT02951039, registered November 1, 2016.

A cross-sectional study of appropriateness evaluation of anticoagulation therapy for inpatients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are essential for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the appropriateness of anticoagulation treatment in locally practice remains unclear. This study evaluated compliance with anticoagulation therapy concerning the guidelines and drug labels in patients with NVAF. Methods: Hospitalized patients diagnosed with NVAF between 1 November 2020, and 31 December 2021, were retrospectively enrolled. The appropriateness of anticoagulation regimens at discharge was evaluated based on a flowchart designed according to atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines and medication labels. Furthermore, we explored factors potentially influencing the "no-use of OACs" using binary logistic regression and verified anticoagulation-related issues through a physician questionnaire. Results: A total of 536 patients were enrolled in this study, including 254 patients (47.4%) with inappropriate anticoagulation regimens. 112 patients (20.9%) were categorized as "underdosing-use of OACs," 134 (25%) who needed anticoagulation therapy were "no-use of OACs" and eight (1.5%) were "over-use of OACs." The results of a binary logistic regression analysis showed that paroxysmal AF (odds ratio [OR], 7.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.57-13.10), increased blood creatinine levels (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.11-3.16), hospitalized pacemaker implantation (OR, 6.76; 95% CI, 2.67-17.11), percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.44-7.80), and an increased HAS-BLED score (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.11-2.35) were associated with "no-use of OACs" in patients with NVAF who had indications for anticoagulation therapy. Conclusion: For patients with NVAF with severe renal dysfunction and paroxysmal AF, anticoagulation therapy was inadequate. The underdosing-use of OACs in patients with NVAF was frequently observed. We recommend an anticoagulation management team to tailor anticoagulation regimens to suit each patient's needs.

Country and health expenditure are major predictors of withholding anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of stroke

BackgroundGuidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high thromboembolic risk recommend oral anticoagulants (OACs) for preventing stroke and systemic embolism (SE). The reasons for guideline non-adherence are still unclear.AimThe...