The selection of a machining process involves the choice of machine tools, fixture elements, and fixture locator layout, as well as the allocation of tolerance in each operation. In practice, manufacturers frequently choose identical machine tools and fixture elements for each operation to reduce purchase cost. As such, fixture layout and tolerance allocation are critical in selecting or designing appropriate manufacturing processes. Conventional research deals with robust fixture layout design and simultaneous tolerance allocation for multiple types of error source separately. However, fixture layout design could also affect tolerance stackup caused by multiple error (not only the fixture error) sources. Therefore, considering the interaction between fixture layout and other types of error source is critical in the process selection to improve the process selection strategy. In this paper, a two-stage framework is proposed to optimize the process selection based on our previously developed error equivalence model, which transforms multiple errors into equivalent errors that occur on a fixture. In the first stage, a process is selected by determining the allowable tolerance for an aggregated base error given a fixture layout. In the second stage, a computer experiment model is established to search for the globally optimal fixture layout by exploring a large number of fixture layout alternatives. A real-world case study based on a two-operation machining process demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed strategy in controlling manufacturing cost while ensuring product quality via proper fixture layout design.
Read full abstract