Open Conference Research Articles

Peer Review Declaration

The Organiser and/or the Editor(s) are required to declare details about their peer review processes. Therefore, please provide the following information: ➢ Type of peer review: Single-blind (the identity of reviewers is not known by the authors) Criteria used by reviewers: The papers underwent assessment based on their scientific substance, the novelty of the information they presented, language accuracy, and the quality of their presentation. Reviewers were provided with a structured review form encompassing sections on novelty, contextual relevance, manuscript coherence (including communication effectiveness and result clarity), abstract adequacy, language proficiency, and absence of commercial bias. Additionally, reviewers were required to provide constructive comments and suggestions for authors in designated sections. They were further tasked with recommending papers for publication, revision, or rejection. Subsequently, reviewers' feedback, facilitated by the track director, was relayed to the authors, who were then responsible for revising their papers in accordance with the reviewers' input and resubmitting them. Final acceptance (or rejection) decisions were made by the conference track director only after authors had made the necessary revisions. ➢ Conference submission management system: Open Conference System (https://siarcongress.eu/index.php/mvt/2022) ➢ Number of submissions received: 107 ➢ Number of submissions sent for review: 67 ➢ Number of submissions accepted:53 ➢ Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 49.53 % ➢ Average number of reviews per paper: 2 ➢ Total number of reviewers involved: 20 ➢ As additional info on review process the papers were checked for plagiarism with www.turnitinn.com platform (the papers ware uploaded in the platform, verified and presented a report with ➢ Contact person for queries: Liviu MIHON, Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania, email: liviu.mihon@upt.ro

ANALYSIS OF THE AVAILABLE SYSTEMS OF SUPPORTING THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OF EMPLOYEES OF HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

The article provides an analysis of the existing systems of support for the scientific activity of employees of higher educational institutions. In today’s world, in the conditions of the distancing of education, science and other industry of human activity caused by the pandemic and war, there is a need for high-quality and multifunctional software. For scientists at all stages of their activity, it is necessary to use modern web technologies and software. Nowadays, during the full-scale war between Russia and Ukraine, higher education institutions are actively practicing the implementation of web technologies for organizing not only online learning of students and pupils, but also implementing distance work of employees of the higher education institutions, a large part of which is scientific work. In the article we analyze the Open Conference System and the Easy Chair for organization and holding scientific conferences. There are a large number of systems that can perform tasks related to the organization of conference stages, materials management and other important tasks. During the research, it was determined that conference support systems are divided into several types depending on the functionality provided to the user. When people choose a web system for organizing scientific activities of employees, the main criteria is the availability of the resource, which includes convenient functionality, easy start in work, protection of personal materials and personal data. We have determined that among the analyzed systems there is a lack of functionality that would allow us to conduct statistics of employees. Systems for conducting conferences should be expanded in the field of supporting the results of scientific activity.

SPEAKS study: study protocol of a multisite feasibility trial of the Specialist Psychotherapy with Emotion for Anorexia in Kent and Sussex (SPEAKS) intervention for outpatients with anorexia nervosa or otherwise specified feeding and eating disorders, anorexia nervosa type

IntroductionAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe mental health condition associated with high mortality rates and significantly impaired quality of life. National guidelines outline psychotherapeutic interventions as treatments of choice for...

The Sixth World Professional Forum “The Book. Culture. Education. Innovations” – “Crimea–2021”. The review

The work of the Sixth World Professional Forum “The Book. Culture. Education. Innovations” (June 5–13, 2021, Sudak, Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation) is reviewed; its themes and topics are discussed: library mission in the digitization era; pandemic impact on libraries; prospects for library and information community; national information systems; libraries collaboration with research and educational organizations; modern competences of library specialists; partnerships of national libraries, etc. The focus is made on the following events: The Twenty Seventh International Conference «Libraries and information resources in the modern world of science, culture, education and business», The Third Scientific and Educational Symposium “Building and developing the modern digital environment for education and science”; The Fifth Industry Conference “Book publishing and libraries: Vectors of cooperation”. The authors also give overview of discussions and presentations at the open press conference, the work and conclusions of the central discussion site, Day of Crimean Libraries, Day of Rospatent, The Third Scientific Conference “Scientometrics, bibliometrics, open data and publications in science”, The Third International Conference on the global ecological problems, the research and practice events held within the framework of the Forum, as well as the opening and closing ceremonies, and Forum plenary session.

Designing a Library-use Instruction Educational Board Game with Situated History Story to Enhance Information Literacy Learning

These instructions give you guidelines for preparing papers for IIAI Open Conference Publication Series. Use this document as a template if you are using Microsoft Word. Otherwise, use this document as an instruction set. The electronic file of your paper will be edited further at IIAI. Define all symbols used in the abstract. Do not cite references in the abstract. Do not delete the blank line immediately above the abstract. Use only English to write a paper.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: single-blind (the identity of reviewers is not known by the authors)• Criteria used by reviewers: The papers were reviewed for scientific content, the novelty of information, language correctness and presentation. The reviewers were instructed to evaluate the papers according to a review form with the following sections: originality, relationship to literature, organization of manuscript (including quality of communication, clarity of results), information included in the abstract, English usage, and if the manuscript is free of commercialism. Then the reviewers had to fill in a box with comments and suggestions for authors. In addition, the reviewers had to propose the paper to be published, revised or rejected. The comments were sent to authors (by the track director), and the authors had to update their papers according to the reviewers’ comments and upload them again. The conference track director took the final decision of acceptance (or rejection) only after the authors had corrected their papers.• Conference submission management system: Open Conference System (www.siarcongress.eu).• Number of submissions received: 199• Number of submissions sent for review: 98• Number of submissions accepted: 84• Acceptance Rate: 42%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers: 71Plagiarism check system: Sistemantiplagiat.ro (papers were uploaded on the server, then the report was downloaded)Contact person for queries: Dinu COVACIU, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania, email: dinu.covaciu@unitbv.ro

Peer review declaration

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) MMS 2021 review form If you cannot review this manuscript within 2 weeks, please return it immediately without comments.If you answer on any question "No, see comments" fill your comment at the end of review form.Thank you for your assistance!1. Is the topic of the manuscript relevant, timely and of interest to the audience of this conference?*○ Yes○ No, see comments2. Does the title of the article accurately reflect its content?*○ Yes○ No, see comments3. Is the research methodology and treatment of the study appropriate and applied properly?*○ Yes○ No, see comments4. Is the length of the paper appropriate to the content?*○ Yes○ No, see comments5. Do the used notation and nomenclature meet the standards determined in the area of paper interest?*○ Yes○ No, see comments6. Is this paper clearly and concisely written and well organized?*○ Yes○ No, see comments7. Does the manuscript contain sufficient and appropriate references?*○ Yes○ No, see comments8. Are tables and figures appropriate and adequate?*○ Yes○ No, see comments9. Does the abstract of article satisfactorily show the aims, methods and result of the article?*○ Yes○ No, see comments10. Does the conclusion clearly summarize the main results and contributions of the manuscript?*○ Yes○ No, see comments11. Is the language and presentation clear to readers familiar with the field?*○ Yes○ No, see comments12. Comments: • Conference submission management system: https://www.mmsconf.eu/index.php/mms/mms2021 Open Conference System https://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/ • Number of submissions received: 143 • Number of submissions sent for review: 130 • Number of submissions accepted: 105 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (105/143)x100=73% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 70 • Any additional info on review process:- • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Eng. MSc. Lucia Knapčíková, Ph.D. Email: lucia.knapcikova@tuke.sk Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement.The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Preface

Second International Conference for Agricultural Science (ICFAS 2021) presents “The Scientific Research is the Gate to achieve Food Security and Sustainable Development” as the main conference theme. This conference provides a forum for international researchers, academics, practitioners, policymakers and related communities to discuss, share and exchange their latest research and experience progress associated with the field of Biotechnology and modern advanced methods in addressing various environmental problems related to all lands, air, animals, desertification and the green environment. In addition, this conference also aimed to address a common issue of georesources sustainability, renewable energy sources and climate change related geohazard and disasters in the development of urban areas.ICFAS 2021 provides opportunities to all participants in expanding their network collaboration at the regional and international. We invited research papers on the topic of Soil, Water Resources and Dessertification Combat Axis, Horticulture and Plant protection Axis, Field Crops Axis, Farm Machinery, Economic and Agricultural Extention Axis, Biotechnology Axis., geo-environmental engineering and any related geoscience. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic situation during the year, it is not easy to hold a regular conference in a specific place. There were travel restrictions and regulations from the World Health Organization and the Iraqi Government to be complied with to cut the spread of the COVID-19 virus in terms of physical distancing. In this uncertain condition, the ICFAS should not be postponed since participants have arranged to address their research findings at this conference. Thus, the committees of ICFAS 2021 have decided to switch the conference format into a virtual meeting.The ICFAS 2021 is held online from 29-30 September 2021, Muthanna, Iraq and managed by the University of Al-Muthanna and College of Agriculture. This conference has attracted more than 122 papers submitted to the open conference Submission System. After being reviewed, the scientific committee has selected around 91 papers to be presented at this conference. During the plenary session of the conference, we were pleased to welcome sex distinguished experts to share their experience and present their insightful keynote speech. Participants did their presentations live, engaged throughout plenary, panel discussion and parallel sessions. Feedbacks, comments and questions from participants in all sessions were very positive and constructive. About 91 papers received final decision to be accepted and submitted for publication into the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.We would like to acknowledge all of those who supported the ICFAS 2021. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all scientific committees who made in-depth reviews of full papers, to sponsors who give their support, and to each individual and institutional help that is very important for the success of this conference. Thank you to all the organizing committee and related parties who built this virtual conference feasible and successful.List of List of committees for Second International Conference for Agricultural Science (ICFAS 2021), Tables, Photos, Logos are available in this pdf.

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) • The peer review of all research at the Fourth International Conference for Agricultural and Sustainability Sciences (ICASS2021) was double-blind, and every reviewer responsible for two research. • Conference submission management system: • A temporary account was used in the open conference system (OCS), for pkp company with help from University of Al-Qasim Green. • Number of submissions received: 165 submissions received • Number of submissions sent for review: only 140 research sent for reviewers because 25 research did not comply with the conference instructions in terms of scientific creativity or scientific plagrisim less than 20%. • Number of submissions accepted: 140 research was accepted only. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): Acceptance Rate equal (84.84 %) • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews for each paper. • Total number of reviewers involved: 63 reviewers. • Any additional info on review process: The reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript. Contact person for queries:Name : Dr. Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Affiliation: University of Al-Qadisiyah Email : mohammed.ahmed@qu.edu.iq

Peer review declaration

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe)• The peer review of all research at the Second International Conference for Agricultural Science (ICFAS 2021) was double-blind, and every reviewer responsible for two research.• Conference submission management system: • A temporary account was used in the open conference system (OCS), for pkp company with help from University of Al-Muthanna.• Number of submissions received: 122 submissions received• Number of submissions sent for review: only 90 research sent for reviewers because 32 research did not comply with the conference instructions in terms of scientific creativity or scientific plagrisim less than 20%.• Number of submissions accepted: 90 research was accepted only.• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): Acceptance Rate equal (73.77 %)• Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews for each paper.• Total number of reviewers involved: 45 reviewers.• Any additional info on review process: The reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript.Contact person for queries:Name : Dr. Mohammed Ahmed MohammedAffiliation: University of Al-QadisiyahEmail : mohammed.ahmed@qu.edu.iq

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind (author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other).• Criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining paper: There are four main criteria for a paper to be accepted by reviewers. It presents new insight on essential issues in the field and should draw the reader’s interest. The explanation of the methods is understandable, and its presentation should be practical. The reviewers reject paper that lacks novelty, contains defects in procedure and or data analysis, cannot be adequately understood, and fails in technical evaluation. For papers that reviewers accept with “major or minor revision” condition, there is an opportunity to resubmit articles after revision. However, the option is not available for a manuscript that reviewer has rejected. • Conference submission management system: The organizing committee used Open Conference System (OCS) by Public Knowledge Project (PKP) installed on the university’s server and hosted by the university’s research and innovation management office. • Number of submissions received: 76 • Number of submissions sent for review: 60 • Number of submissions accepted: 40 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.63 % • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 or 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 26 • Any additional info on review process: The similarity checking process using i-Thenticate is carried out before sending each paper to the reviewer. • Contact person for queries: Dr. Ratna Yuniati (ratnayuniati@sci.ui.ac.id) Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA), Universitas Indonesia

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe): The peer review of all research at the 2nd International Virtual Conference on Pure Sciences (2IVCPS) was double-blind, and every reviewer responsible for 3 research.• Conference submission management system: A temporary account was used in the open conference system (OCS), with the help of the system used by Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Pure Science, Affiliated with the College of Science, which uses open journal system (OJS).• Number of submissions received: 411• Number of submissions sent for review: 368• Number of submissions accepted: 284• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 69.09 %• Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3• Total number of reviewers involved: 84• Any additional info on review process: The reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript.• Contact person for queries: Dr. Salwan Ali AbedDean and Chair of ConferenceUniversity of Al-Qadisiyah+9647711788882Salwan.abed@qu.edu.iq; Salwan_ali2000@yaho.com

Preface

The edition contains the proceedings of the All-Russian Open Conference on Cloud Physics and Weather Modification, held at the High-Mountain Geophysical Institute on September 08-10, 2021, and related to the Year of Science and Technology in Russia.The main part of the work is devoted to numerical modeling of cloud processes, including modeling of microphysical and electrical processes in clouds, verification of the results of numerical modeling of cloud processes, modeling of the conditions for the development and evolution of powerful convective clouds. The results of laboratory modeling and field studies of cloud processes, studies of electrical processes in clouds, as well as various aspects of active influence on thunderstorm processes, including the possibilities of their prediction, are presented. Part of the work is devoted to the issue of artificially increasing precipitation and evaluating the effectiveness of work on weather modification. The currently observed climate change has led to a significant number of papers presented at the conference on the environmental and climatological aspects of active influence and dangerous convective weather phenomena.The edition is intended for meteorologists, specialists in the field of physics of clouds and precipitation, weather modification, as well as for students and postgraduates.List of Program Committee and Organizing Committee are availble in this pdf.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: The submission process was proceeded in the Open Conference System (OCS). Authors, who has problem with the OCS were allowed to send their papers through conference email.• Number of submissions received: 194 • Number of submissions sent for review: 108 • Number of submissions accepted: 79 (48 papers are accepted to be submitted in Journal of Physics - IOP Conference Series) • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 40,72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 31 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Dr Farida Nurhasanah; SEAMEO QITEP IN MATHEMATICS; nurhasanahfarida@gmail.com.Ummy Salmah; SEAMEO QITEP IN MATHEMATICS; ummy.salmah@staff.qitepinmath.org; ummysalmah87@gmail.com

Peer Review Declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: OCS (Open Conference System): https://seminar.uns.ac.id/index.php?conference=icocc&schedConf=iccc• Number of submissions received: 147 articles• Number of submissions sent for review: 128 manuscripts• Number of submissions accepted: 119 papers• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 80.95%• Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviews• Total number of reviewers involved: 25 experts• Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 4-8 weeks for revisions after review.• Contact person for queries: Name : Komariah, PhD.Affiliation: Sebelas Maret University, IndonesiaEmail : komariah@staff.uns.ac.id

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: Open Conference System (OCS) and email (iceed@binus.edu, managed by Religiana Hendarti, Dave Pangindaan and Dwiyantari Widyaningrum• Number of submissions received: 441• Number of submissions sent for review: 421• Number of submissions accepted:261• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59.2• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 52• Any additional info on review process:-• Contact person for queries:Name: Dr Dave MangindaanAffiliation: Bina Nusantara UniversityEmail: dmangindaan@binus.edu

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: The peer review of all research at the 1st international virtual conference on Environment and Natural Resources (1IVCENR-2021), College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah was doubleblind, and every reviewer responsible for three research.• Conference submission management system: An account used in the open conference system (OCS), with the help of the system used by the Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Pure Sciences, Affiliated with the College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, which uses open journal system (OJS).• Number of submissions received: 168 submissions received.• Number of submissions sent for review: Only 102 research sent for reviewers because 66 research did not comply with the conference instructions in terms of scientific creativity or scientific plagrisim less than 20%.• Number of submissions accepted: 102 research was accepted only.• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): Acceptance Rate equal (60.7 %)• Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3 reviews for each paper.• Total number of reviewers involved: 72 reviewers.• Any additional info on review process: The reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript. Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Salwan Ali AbedAffiliation: Dean of the College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, IraqEmail : Salwan.abed@qu.edu.iq ; Salwan_ali2000@yahoo.com

Peer review declaration

Peer review declaration

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of Peer Review: Double Blind (both author and reviewer does not know the identities of each other). Conference Submission Management System: Open Conference System, installed in local server owned by Universitas Sumatera Utara (https://ocs.usu.ac.id/ICCAI/iccai2020) Number of Submissions Received: 87 Number of Submissions Sent for Review: 81 Number of Submissions Accepted: 49 Acceptance Rate: 56% Average Number of Reviews per Paper: 2 Total Number of Reviewers Involved: 21 Additional Info on Review Process: All submitted papers must go through preliminary review process by the internal editorial team that evaluate the use of provided template, the plagiarism level, and/or the use of English. Each paper is reviewed based on three main components: Originality, Significance of Topic, and Presentation. Additionally, the reviewer is asked to describe the strengths/weaknesses and contribution of the paper to the topic/conference. Lastly, the reviewer can suggest to the editor either to accept or reject the paper. Each paper is assigned with two reviewers. Editor will then decide whether to accept, reject, or request a revision to the author based on the suggestions from both reviewers. Rejected paper is not allowed to be resubmitted. Contact Person for Queries:Name : Jos Timanta TariganAffiliation : Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universitas Sumatera Utara Email : (jostarigan@usu.ac.id)

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: Single-blind & Double-blind (please describe) Reviewers’ identities were not revealed to authors. Some papers were sent to reviewers that are also the editorial board members who could access the information of the authors from the system, the identities of the authors were revealed to the reviewers (Single-blind). The rest of the papers who were assigned to other reviewers who are not part of the editorial board went to double-blind review process. The identities of the authors were deleted on the drafts that can be accessed by reviewers. Authors did not know who reviewed their papers and the identities of the authors were not revealed to the reviewers as well. Conference submission management system: Open Conference System (http://conference.unsyiah.ac.id/SEA-STEM/2020) Number of submissions received: 257 Number of submissions sent for review: 234 Number of submissions accepted: 165 Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.20 Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Total number of reviewers involved: 67 Any additional info on review process: Some papers were rejected after being reviewed by the track directors. This type of papers are those that are out of scope of the conference and those that are very poor in writing quality. Other papers was assigned to two reviewers for each paper, but not all reviewers sent back the papers to the editors. Only 103 papers had been reviewed by two independent reviewers (plus an editor), each of the other 113 papers was reviewed by one independent reviewer and an editor. Contact person for queries: Name : Rini Oktavia, S. Si., M. Si., Ph. D.Affiliation: Universitas Syiah KualaEmail : rini_oktavia@unsyiah.ac.id