Abstract Background Patients with oesophageal and oesophago-gastric Junction (OGJ) cancers require accurate staging to decide on intent of treatment (curative or palliative). The literature reported higher accuracy (82% vs. 64%, P = 0.004) and sensitivity (74% vs. 47%) for PET-CT when compared to CT for detecting distant disease. Consequently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends PET-CT for all oesophageal and GOJ cancers except T1a tumors. This audit investigated how PET-CT affected the treatment plan of oesophageal and OGJ cancer patients and its impact on MDT decisions and patients’ waiting time before first treatment is started. Methods Retrospective data collection from our institutional electronic database for all oesophageal and OGJ cancer patients that had undergone PET-CT as part of cancer staging in the last 9 months. Data collected was basic demographics, waiting time for PET-CT and discrepancy between CT and PET-CT in finding distant metastasis or other incidental findings. The influence of this on the MDT outcomes was investigated and the delay in cancer treatment secondary to further investigations was recorded. Results A total of 44 oesophageal and OGJ cancer patients had staging PET-CT. Out of 44 patients, 33 (75%) were males. The average age was 67 (45-85) years. Average waiting time for PET-CT was 17(1-57) days. Fourteen (32%) patients had discrepancy between CT and PET-CT. In Group A, 5 (11%) patients, PET-CT reported distant metastasis. In Group B, 9 (20%) patients, PET-CT detected active uptake in colon (n=4), cervical LNs (n=2), thyroid (n=1), tonsils & prostate (n=1) and spine (n=1). Further investigations (endoscopy, ultrasound, biopsy etc.) added a delay with an average of 15 (1-28) days. Conclusions It is proven that PET-CT is essential in staging non metastatic oesophageal and OGJ cancers. It is important for MDTs to be vigilant that PET-CT can delay the start of first treatment for those patients by picking up non UGI cancer related pathology. This initiates a cohort of further investigations, creating some delay. Therefore, timely PET-CT scanning and reporting is recommended e.g during pre-MDT referral triage meetings. Selecting patients for PET-CT may also be helpful based on accurate CT reporting of cancer TNM stage.
Read full abstract