Cone-beam Computed Tomography Numbers Research Articles

A retrospective comparison of setup accuracy from CBCT and SGRT data in breast cancer patients

IntroductionBoth cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) are used for breast patient positioning verification before treatment delivery. SGRT may reduce treatment time and imaging dose by potentially reduce the number of CBCT needed. The aim of this study was to compare the displacements resulting in positioning from the Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) 3D and SGRT methods and to design a clinical workflow for SGRT implementation in breast radiotherapy to establish an imaging strategy based on the data obtained. MethodsFor this study 128 breast cancer patients treated with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions using 3D conformal radiotherapy with free breathing technique were enroled. A total of 366 CBCT images were evaluated for patient setup verification and compared with SGRT. Image registrations between planning CT images and CBCT images were performed in mutual agreement and in online mode by three health professionals. Student's paired t‐test was used to compare the absolute difference in vector shift, measured in mm, for each orthogonal axis (x, y, z) between SGRT and CBCT methods. The multidisciplinary team evaluated a review of the original clinical workflow for SGRT implementation and data about patients treated with the updated workflow were reported. ResultsComparison of the shifts obtained with IGRT and SGRT for each orthogonal axis (for the x-axes the average displacement was 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, y = 1.1 ± 0.8 mm and z = 1.0 ± 0.7 mm) revealed no significant statistical differences (p > 0.05). Using the updated workflow the difference between SGRT and IGRT displacements was <3 mm in 91.4 % of patients with a reduction in total treatment time of approximately 20 %, due to the reduce frequency of the CBCT images acquisition and matching. ConclusionsThis study has shown that IGRT and SGRT agree in positioning patients with breast cancer within a millimetre tolerance. SGRT can be used for patient positioning, with the advantages of reducing radiation exposure and shorter overall treatment time.

CBCTs in a Swiss university dental clinic: a retrospective evaluation over 5 years with emphasis on radiation protection criteria

ObjectivesTo retrospectively evaluate all cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired from 2017 to 2022 in a Swiss university dental clinic with particular emphasis on radiation protection aspects.Material and methodsRadiological databases at the dental clinic of the University of Bern, Switzerland, were explored using a self-developed search algorithm. Data of all acquired CBCT from 01.01.2017 to 27.06.2022 were screened. Exposure parameters (exposure time, exposure angle, milliampere (mA), kilovoltage (kV), field of view (FOV) size), dose area product (DAP), age, and sex of the patient were recorded anonymously. The collected data were analyzed mainly descriptively. Correlations measured the statistical relationships between the variables.ResultsA total of 10,348 CBCT datasets were analyzed. Patient age ranged from 5 to 96 years (mean: 49.4 years, SD: 21.6 years). The number of CBCTs in patients under 25 years was around 20% each year. In total, 10,313 (99.7%) CBCTs were acquired in small to medium FOV (FOV up to 10 cm of height), and 35 (0.3%) in large FOV (height > 10 cm). DAPs of small FOVs were 518.3 ± 233.2 mGycm2 (mean ± SD), of medium FOV 1233 ± 502.2 mGycm2, and of large FOV 2189 ± 368.7 mGycm2. DAP (ρ = 0.4048, p < 0.0001) and kV (ρ = 0.0210, p = 0.0327) correlated positively with age. Reduced scan angle correlated with young age (rpb 0.2729, p < 0.001). mA did not correlate with age (p = 0.3685).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that certain well-known radiation protection aspects as the reduction of FOV, mA, kV, and scan angle were only partly considered.Clinical relevanceKnown radiation protection aspects, especially in young patients, should be fully applied in regular clinical practice.

Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience

PurposeStereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) delivered in a single fraction (SF) can be considered to have higher uncertainty given that the error probability is concentrated in a single session. This study aims to report the variation in technology and technique used and its effect on intrafraction motion based on a 10 years of experience in SF SABR. Methods and MaterialsRecords of patients receiving SF SABR delivered at our instruction between 2010 and 2019 were included. Treatment parameters were extracted from the patient management database by using an in-house script. Treatment time was defined as the time difference between the first image acquisition to the last beam off of a single session. The intrafraction variation was measured from the 3-dimensional couch displacement measured after the first cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquired during a treatment. ResultsThe number of SF SABR increased continuously from 2010 to 2019 and were mainly lung treatments. Treatment time was minimized by using volumetric modulated arc therapy, flattening filter-free dose rate, and coplanar field (24 ± 9 min). Treatment time increased as the number of CBCTs per session increased. The most common scenario involved both 2 and 3 CBCTs per session. On the average, a CBCT acquisition added 6 minutes to the treatment time. All treatments considered, the average intrafraction variation was 1.7 ± 1.6 mm. ConclusionsSF SABR usage increased with time in our institution. The intrafraction motion was acceptable and therefore a single fraction is an efficacious treatment option when considering SABR.

Less Time Is Less Motion: Analysis of Practical Efficiencies Gained With a Modified Workflow Integrating Planar kV Midimaging With CBCT for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PurposeOur purpose was to optimize an image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) workflow to achieve practical setup accuracy in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We assessed the time-saving efficiencies gained from incorporating planar kV midimaging as a surrogate for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for intrafraction motion monitoring. Methods and MaterialsWe selected 5 thoracic spine SBRT patients treated in 5 fractions and analyzed patient shifts captured by a modified IGRT workflow using planar kV midimaging integrated with CBCT to maintain a tolerance of 1 mm and 1°. We determined the frequency at which kV midimaging captured intrafraction motion as validated on repeat CBCT and assessed the potential time and dosimetric advantages of our modified IGRT workflow. ResultsPatient motion, detected as out-of-tolerance shifts on planar kV midimaging, occurred during 6 of 25 fractions (24%) and were validated on repeat CBCT 100% of the time. Observed intrafraction absolute shifts (mean ± standard deviation) for the 25 fractions were 0.39 ± 0.21, 0.56 ± 0.22, and 0.45 ± 0.21 mm for lateral-longitude-vertical translations and 0.38 ± 0.12°, 0.32 ± 0.09°, and 0.47 ± 0.14° for pitch-roll-yaw rotation, which if uncorrected, could have significantly affected target coverage and increased spinal cord dose. The average times for pretreatment imaging, midtreatment verification, and total treatment time were 8.94, 2.81, and 16.21 minutes. Our modified IGRT workflow reduced the total number of CBCTs required from 120 to 35 (70%) and imaging dose from 126.2 to 43.4 cGy (65.6%) while maintaining high fidelity for our patient population. ConclusionsAccurate patient positioning was effectively achieved with use of multiple 2-dimensional-3-dimensional kV images and an average of 1 verification CBCT scan per fraction. Integration of planar kV midimaging can effectively reduce treatment time associated with spine SBRT delivery and minimize the potential dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion on target coverage and spinal cord dose.

Current trends in the adoption and education of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.

This is a follow-up study to assess growth in the number of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiography (PR) machines in Australia. It is also the first study to evaluate the current status of both CBCT and PR education in Australia. CBCT and PR machine numbers were obtained from the radiation regulators across Australia. Australian dental schools were surveyed via email. The number of machines relative to population size and the number of dentists were calculated. In 2020, there were 706 CBCT machines and 3,059 PR machines, representing a 204.3% increase in the number of CBCT machines and an 82.0% increase in the number of PR machines over six years. Majority of Australian dental schools owned PR and CBCT machines. Most taught PR acquisition and interpretation, however only one-third taught CBCT image acquisition and interpretation to predoctoral students. CBCT machine numbers increased by nearly three-fold while PR machines only increased by 1.6 times over a six-year period relative to population size and number of dentists. Only very few Australian dental schools provide CBCT education to predoctoral students, raising concern as to whether graduates are adequately trained upon program completion.

The growth of Medicare rebatable cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in Australia.

There is a lack of objective data documenting the growth of cone beam radiology in Australia. Medicare rebates for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans have been available since 1 July 2011. The aim of this study was to examine the Medicare data on the use of CBCT in order to quantify the growth of this technology over a three-year period and to assess if the growth of CBCT was impacting upon the use of dental panoramic radiology. The Medicare dataset was accessed, and data relating to the number and distribution of CBCTs and panoramic radiographs (PRs) were extracted. The data were broken down by state and territory, as well as by age group and gender of the patient, for the financial year periods July 2011 to June 2012, July 2012 to June 2013 and July 2013 to June 2014. Items relating to PRs were also extracted for the periods 2005-2008 and 2008-2011. In the period July 2011 to June 2014, a total of 226232 CBCTs and 2881351 PRs were rebated through Medicare. The rate of CBCT services provided per 100000 population increased by 42.3% over the three-year period, whereas the rate of PRs remained fairly constant. From the age group 5-14 years through to 55-64 years, females received more CBCTs and PRs than males. The total number of PRs rebated through Medicare increased slightly over each previous three-year period (2005-2008 and 2008-2011). There has been rapid growth of the use of CBCT over a three-year period, most marked in the State of Victoria. The higher number of CBCT examinations in females across almost all age groups, but most notably in the 15-24 years age group, raises questions about clinical decision making in the selection of cone beam imaging. There was little evidence that CBCTs were being used as a substitute for PRs, except for a small but consistent drop in the number of PRs being requested for diagnosis of surgically related dental conditions.

Tissue Density Mapping of Cone Beam CT Images for Accurate Dose Calculations

Purpose: To improve the accuracy in megavoltage photon beam dose calculation in CBCT-based radiation treatment (RT) plans, using a kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-to-density-step (CBCT-SF) function. Materials and Methods: The CBCT-SF table is constructed from differential histograms of the voxel values of CBCT and Fan-beam CT (FBCT). From the CBCT histograms, frequency peaks representing air, lung, soft tissue and bone are observed and their widths in CT numbers are assigned to the lower and higher bounds of the steps in the CBCT-SF. The CBCT-SF is entered into a planning system as an alternative to the clinical CT-to-density table. The CT image sets studied in this work consist of FBCT and CBCT scans of three patients: a prostate cancer patient, a lung cancer patient and a head and neck patient; and of a humanoid phantom at sections of the pelvis, the thorax and the head. Deformable image registration is used to map the patient FBCT scans to the corresponding CBCT images to minimize anatomical variations. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans are made on the FBCT image sets of the patients and the phantom. The plans are recalculated on the CBCT scans using both the conventional CT-to-density table and the CBCT-SF. Dose calculations on the CBCT images and FBCT images are compared using dose differences, distance to agreement (DTA), Gamma analyses and dose volume histogram (DVH) analyses. Results: The results show that IMRT plans optimized using CBCT scans and FBCT scans agree dosimetrically within 1% when the CBCT-SF is used for the CBCT-based plans, including thoracic IMRT plan. In contrast, up to 5% dose difference is observed between IMRT plans optimized on FBCT scans and CBCT scans for thoracic cases if conventional CT-to-density table is used on CBCT images. Conclusions: The simple stepwise mapping of the CBCT numbers to density using the CBCT-SF resolves the inaccuracies in dose calculations previously reported in CBCT-based RT plans. CBCT-SF can be used in Image-Guided adaptive radiotherapy planning.

Correction for ‘artificial’ electron disequilibrium due to cone-beam CT density errors: implications for on-line adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has rapidly become a clinically useful imaging modality for image-guided radiation therapy. Unfortunately, CBCT images of the thorax are susceptible to artefacts due to scattered photons, beam hardening, lag in data acquisition, and respiratory motion during a slow scan. These limitations cause dose errors when CBCT image data are used directly in dose computations for on-line, dose adaptive radiation therapy (DART). The purpose of this work is to assess the magnitude of errors in CBCT numbers (HU), and determine the resultant effects on derived tissue density and computed dose accuracy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung cancer. Planning CT (PCT) images of three lung patients were acquired using a Philips multi-slice helical CT simulator, while CBCT images were obtained with a Varian On-Board Imaging system. To account for erroneous CBCT data, three practical correction techniques were tested: (1) conversion of CBCT numbers to electron density using phantoms, (2) replacement of individual CBCT pixel values with bulk CT numbers, averaged from PCT images for tissue regions, and (3) limited replacement of CBCT lung pixels values (LCT) likely to produce artificial lateral electron disequilibrium. For each corrected CBCT data set, lung SBRT dose distributions were computed for a 6 MV volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique within the Philips Pinnacle treatment planning system. The reference prescription dose was set such that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received at least 54 Gy (i.e. D95). Further, we used the relative depth dose factor as an a priori index to predict the effects of incorrect low tissue density on computed lung dose in regions of severe electron disequilibrium. CT number profiles from co-registered CBCT and PCT patient lung images revealed many reduced lung pixel values in CBCT data, with some pixels corresponding to vacuum (−1000 HU). Similarly, CBCT data in a plastic lung phantom were reduced by 200 HU compared with known CT number values. For the three patients, dose results using the CBCT number data registered with PCT showed a prescription dose reduction ranging from 4 to 13% (D95 = 47 Gy). Therefore, accurate determination of lung density, especially for very low lung density (<0.2 g cm−3) is essential, but difficult to achieve using the CBCT data. Applying corrective techniques (1) and (2) to CBCT patient data produced unacceptable dose differences. For one typical VMAT SBRT patient, the D95 for the corrected CBCT and BCT image-based plans differed by −4% (D95 = 52 Gy) and 9% (D95 = 59 Gy) compared to the co-registered PCT image-based plan. However, corrective technique (3) produced negligible dose differences comparing LCT and PCT image-based plans. With regard to implementing on-line DART, dose errors must be minimized because they affect re-optimization decisions, and prevent accurate accumulation of the dose distribution.

Clinical evaluation of a commercial surface-imaging system for patient positioning in radiotherapy

Laser scanning-based patient surface positioning and surveillance may complement image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) as a nonradiation-based approach. We investigated the performance of an optical system compared to standard kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and its potential to reduce the number of daily CBCTs. We analyzed the patient positioning of 153 treatment fractions in 21 patients applied to three different treatment regions. Patients were first scanned with CBCT, shifted to the optimal isocenter position, and an optical scan was performed to verify the matching in relation to CBCT. For the head-and-neck region, the lateral/longitudinal/vertical/rotational/roll and pitch shift was 0.9 ± 1.8 mm/-2.7 ± 3.8 mm/-0.8 ± 3.6 mm/0.0 ± 1.1°/-0.5 ± 2.1°/0.2 ± 1.6°. For the thorax, the lateral/longitudinal/vertical/roll and pitch shift was -1.2 ± 3.6 mm/0.8 ± 5.1 mm/0.8 ± 4.3 mm/0.6 ± 1.4°/0.1 ± 0.9°/0.3 ± 1.0°. For the pelvis, the respective values were -2.5 ± 4.1 mm/4.6 ± 7.3 mm/-5.1 ± 7.4 mm/0.3 ± 1.1°/-0.5 ± 1.0°/0.3 ± 2.1°. In total, the recorded disagreement was -1.0 ± 3.6 mm/1.0 ± 6.3 mm/-1.8 ± 5.9 mm/0.3 ± 1.2°/-0.3 ± 1.5°/0.2 ± 1.7°. This analysis showed good agreement between the optical scanner approach and CBCT. The optical system holds potential to ensure precise patient positioning and reduced CBCT frequency in tumor locations with fixed relation to surface structures.

Cone Beam Computed Tomography Number Errors and Consequences for Radiotherapy Planning: An Investigation of Correction Methods

The potential of keV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for guiding adaptive replanning is well-known. There are impediments to this, one being CBCT number accuracy. The purpose of this study was to investigate CBCT number correction methods and the affect of residual inaccuracies on dose deposition. Four different correction strategies were applied to the same patient data to compare performance and the sophistication of correction-method needed for acceptable dose errors. Planning CT and CBCT reconstructions were used for 12 patients (6 brain, 3 prostate, and 3 bladder cancer patients). All patients were treated using Elekta linear accelerators and XVI imaging systems. Two of the CBCT number correction methods investigated were based on an algorithm previously proposed by the authors but only previously applied to phantoms. Two further methods, based on an approach previously suggested in the research literature, were also examined. Dose calculations were performed using scans of a "worst" subset of patients using the Pinnacle³ version 9.0 treatment planning system and the patients' clinical plans. All mean errors in CBCT number were <50 HU, and all correction methods performed well or adequately in dose calculations. The worst single dose discrepancy identified for any of the examined methods or patients was 3.0%. Mean errors in the doses to treatment volumes or organs at risk were negatively correlated with the mean error in CT number. That is, a mean CT number that was too large, averaged over the entire CBCT volume, implied an underdosing in a volume-of-interest and vice versa. Results suggest that (1) the correction of CBCT numbers to within a mean error of 50 HU in the scan volume provides acceptable discrepancies in dose (<3%) and (2) this is achievable with even quite unsophisticated correction methods.

Endodontic Application of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in South Korea

Introduction This study aimed to investigate the incidence of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) associated with endodontic procedures during 2009 in South Korea and to retrospectively evaluate information from CBCT with large field of view (FOV), which is popular in South Korea. Methods The Health Insurance Review and Assessment agency, which reviews all medical and dental expenses covered under the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system, was queried for data on the nationwide number of CBCTs associated with some treatment procedures. To compare digital periapical radiography and CBCT retrospectively, 470 roots of 257 root canal–infected teeth were enrolled. Results In total, 13,209 cases of NHI-covered CBCT were performed in South Korea during 2009, excluding cases for implant restoration and orthodontics. In total, 1253 and 95 CBCT cases were combined with root canal length measuring and apicoectomy, respectively. In a retrospective comparison, CBCT with large FOV provided more information about the presence of apical periodontitis, distortion of cortical bone, and identification of root compared with digital periapical radiography. Conclusions CBCT with large FOV is useful in nonsurgical endodontic treatment and provides more information compared with digital periapical radiography.

Removal and effects of scatter-glare in cone-beam CT with an amorphous-silicon flat-panel detector

Scatter in a detector and its housing can result in image degradation. Typically, such scatter leads to a low-spatial frequency ‘glare’ superimposed on the primary signal. We infer the glare-spread function (GSF) of an amorphous-silicon flat-panel detector via an edge-spread technique. We demonstrate that this spread (referred to as ‘scatter-glare’ herein) causes a low-spatial frequency drop in the associated modulation-transfer function. This results in a compression of the range of reconstructed CT (computed tomography) numbers and is an impediment to accurate CT-number calibration. We show that it can also lead to visual artefacts. This explains previously unresolved CT-number discrepancies in an earlier work (Poludniowski et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 3847). We demonstrate that after deconvolving the GSF from the projection images, in conjunction with a correction for phantom-scatter, the CT-number discrepancies disappear. We show results for an in-house-built phantom with inserts of tissue-equivalent materials and for a patient scan. We conclude that where scatter-glare has not been accounted for, the calibration of cone-beam CT numbers to material density will be compromised. The scatter-glare measurement method we propose is simple and requires no special equipment. The deconvolution process is also straightforward and relatively quick (60 ms per projection on a desktop PC).

Three-dimensional surgical simulation

In this article, we discuss the development of methods for computer-aided jaw surgery, which allows us to incorporate the high level of precision necessary for transferring virtual plans into the operating room. We also present a complete computer-aided surgery system developed in close collaboration with surgeons. Surgery planning and simulation include construction of 3-dimensional surface models from cone-beam computed tomography, dynamic cephalometry, semiautomatic mirroring, interactive cutting of bone, and bony segment repositioning. A virtual setup can be used to manufacture positioning splints for intraoperative guidance. The system provides further intraoperative assistance with a computer display showing jaw positions and 3-dimensional positioning guides updated in real time during the surgical procedure. The computer-aided surgery system aids in dealing with complex cases with benefits for the patient, with surgical practice, and for orthodontic finishing. Advanced software tools for diagnosis and treatment planning allow preparation of detailed operative plans, osteotomy repositioning, bone reconstructions, surgical resident training, and assessing the difficulties of the surgical procedures before the surgery. Computer-aided surgery can make the elaboration of the surgical plan a more flexible process, increase the level of detail and accuracy of the plan, yield higher operative precision and control, and enhance documentation of cases.