Nucleosome Substrates Research Articles

Nucleosome sliding by Chd1 does not require rigid coupling between DNA‐binding and ATPase domains

Chromatin remodellers are ATP-dependent motor proteins that physically reposition and reorganize nucleosomes. Chd1 and Iswi-type remodellers possess a DNA-binding domain (DBD) needed for efficient nucleosome mobilization; however, it has not been clear how this domain physically contributes to remodelling. Here we show that the Chd1 DBD promotes nucleosome sliding simply by tethering the remodeller to nucleosome substrates. Nucleosome sliding activity was largely resistant to increasing length and flexibility of the linker connecting the DBD and ATPase motor, arguing that the ATPase motor does not shift DNA onto the nucleosome by pulling on the DBD.

Histone H2A Ubiquitination Inhibits the Enzymatic Activity of H3 Lysine 36 Methyltransferases

Histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) methylation and H2A monoubiquitination (ubH2A) are two closely related histone modifications that regulate Polycomb silencing. Previous studies reported that H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) rarely coexists with H3K36 di- or tri-methylation (H3K36me2/3) on the same histone H3 tails, which is partially controlled by the direct inhibition of the enzymatic activity of H3K27-specific methyltransferase PRC2. By contrast, H3K27 methylation does not affect the catalytic activity of H3K36-specific methyltransferases, suggesting other Polycomb mechanism(s) may negatively regulate the H3K36-specific methyltransferase(s). In this study, we established a simple protocol to purify milligram quantities of ubH2A from mammalian cells, which were used to reconstitute nucleosome substrates with fully ubiquitinated H2A. A number of histone methyltransferases were then tested on these nucleosome substrates. Notably, all of the H3K36-specific methyltransferases, including ASH1L, HYPB, NSD1, and NSD2 were inhibited by ubH2A, whereas the other histone methyltransferases, including PRC2, G9a, and Pr-Set7 were not affected by ubH2A. Together with previous reports, these findings collectively explain the mutual repulsion of H3K36me2/3 and Polycomb modifications.

Drosophila SETs Its Sights on Cancer: Trr/MLL3/4 COMPASS-Like Complexes in Development and Disease

Drosophila SETs Its Sights on Cancer: Trr/MLL3/4 COMPASS-Like Complexes in Development and Disease

Establishing Real-Time, Single-Molecule Approaches to Study RSC Complex Mediated Nucleosome Remodeling Activities

Chromatin remodeling complexes utilize the energy of ATP hydrolysis to dynamically alter the histone-DNA interaction and thus regulate the DNA transcription, replication, repair and recombination. yRSC, an essential chromatin remodeling complex in budding yeast belongs to SWI/SNF family remodelers, is shown to possess the ability to alter the nucleosome structure by translocating along DNA or pulling off the histone from nucleosomal DNA. Up to now, many papers have focused on studying nucleosome remodeling process. However, the interaction between RSC and its DNA / nucleosomal substrate and how RSC remodels the nucleosome structure require additional information on its detailed kinetic mechanism. In this study, we combine the single-molecule techniques and traditional biochemical approaches to understand the RSC remodeling activities.

Piccolo NuA4-Catalyzed Acetylation of Nucleosomal Histones: Critical Roles of an Esa1 Tudor/Chromo Barrel Loop and an Epl1 Enhancer of Polycomb A (EPcA) Basic Region

Piccolo NuA4 is an essential yeast histone acetyltransferase (HAT) complex that targets histones H4 and H2A in nucleosome substrates. While Piccolo NuA4's catalytic subunit Esa1 alone is unable to acetylate nucleosomal histones, its accessory subunits, Yng2 and Epl1, enable Esa1 to bind to and to act on nucleosomes. We previously determined that the Tudor domain of Esa1 and the EPcA homology domain of Epl1 play critical roles in Piccolo NuA4's ability to act on the nucleosome. In this work, we pinpoint a loop within the Esa1 Tudor domain and a short basic region at the N terminus of the Epl1 EPcA domain as necessary for this nucleosomal HAT activity. We also show that this Esa1 Tudor domain loop region is positioned close to nucleosomal DNA and that the Epl1 EPcA basic region is in proximity to the N-terminal histone H2A tail, the globular region of histone H4, and also to nucleosomal DNA when Piccolo NuA4 interacts with the nucleosome. Since neither region identified is required for Piccolo NuA4 to bind to nucleosomes and yet both are needed to acetylate nucleosomes, these regions may function after the enzyme binds nucleosomes to disengage substrate histone tails from nucleosomal DNA.

Asymmetric Unwrapping of Nucleosome Revealed by Single Molecule Fluorescence-Force Spectroscopy

The nucleosome is the fundamental unit of eukaryotic chromatin structure which compacts DNA in the nucleus. It is a stable yet dynamic complex which is significant to transcriptional regulation. In cells, DNA is likely to be under tension to varying extents. For example enzymes such as RNA polymerase and chromatin remodelers can generate force on nucleosomes. Thus it is important to understand the dynamics of nucleosomes under mechanical constraints. We are utilizing a cutting-edge single-molecule optomechanical technology which combines fluorescence with optical tweezers (aka ‘fleezers') to probe the conformational transitions of nucleosomes under force. Our hybrid fleezers instrument provides fluorescence readouts with nm resolution under pN levels of force applied in order to locally monitor conformational dynamics of nucleosome at various coordinates. Here, we report the first observation of force-dependent gradual unwrapping and rewrapping of the nucleosome using fluorescence reporters. Moreover, we observed force-induced two-state hopping corresponding to the opening and closing of the outer DNA wrap as well as more complex transitions for the inner wrap. Interestingly, our fluorescence probes at various locations report significant asymmetric unwrapping behavior. In our pulling experiments, it takes less than 6 pN to unwrap the outer DNA at the 3' end of the 601 positioning sequence but takes up to ∼15-17 pN to unwrap the DNA from the 5' end. Asymmetric unwrapping may have implications for how enzymes such as chromatin remodelers interact with nucleosome substrates.

ARID1a-DNA Interactions Are Required for Promoter Occupancy by SWI/SNF

Every known SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex incorporates an ARID DNA binding domain-containing subunit. Despite being a ubiquitous component of the complex, physiological roles for this domain remain undefined. Here, we show that disruption of ARID1a-DNA binding in mice results in embryonic lethality, with mutant embryos manifesting prominent defects in the heart and extraembryonic vasculature. The DNA binding-defective mutant ARID1a subunit is stably expressed and capable of assembling into a SWI/SNF complex with core catalytic properties, but nucleosome substrate binding and promoter occupancy by ARID1a-containing SWI/SNF complexes (BAF-A) are impaired. Depletion of ARID domain-dependent, BAF-A associations at THROMBOSPONDIN 1 (THBS1) led to the concomitant upregulation of this SWI/SNF target gene. Using a THBS1 promoter-reporter gene, we further show that BAF-A directly regulates THBS1 promoter activity in an ARID domain-dependent manner. Our data not only demonstrate that ARID1a-DNA interactions are physiologically relevant in higher eukaryotes but also indicate that these interactions facilitate SWI/SNF binding to target sites in vivo. These findings support the model wherein cooperative interactions among intrinsic subunit-chromatin interaction domains and sequence-specific transcription factors drive SWI/SNF recruitment.

An H3K36 Methylation-Engaging Tudor Motif of Polycomb-like Proteins Mediates PRC2 Complex Targeting

Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) regulates pluripotency, differentiation, and tumorigenesis through catalysis of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) on chromatin. However, the mechanisms that underlie PRC2 recruitment and spreading on chromatin remain unclear. Here we report that histone H3 lysine 36 trimethylation (H3K36me3) binding activity is harbored in the Tudor motifs of PRC2-associated polycomb-like (PCL) proteins PHF1/PCL1 and PHF19/PCL3. Ectopically expressed PHF1 induced Tudor-dependent stabilization of PRC2 complexes on bulk chromatin and mediated spreading of PRC2 and H3K27me3 into H3K36me3-containing chromatin regions. In murine pluripotent stem cells, we identified coexistence of H3K36me3, H3K27me3, and PHF19/PCL3 at a subset of poised developmental genes and demonstrated that PHF19/PCL3 Tudor function is required for optimal H3K27me3 and repression of these loci. Collectively, our data suggest that PCL recognition of H3K36me3 promotes intrusion of PRC2 complexes into active chromatin regions to promote gene silencing and modulate the chromatin landscape during development.

Alternative Modes of Binding of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 to Free DNA and Nucleosomes

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is an abundant nuclear protein that binds chromatin and catalyzes the transfer of ADP-ribose groups to itself and to numerous target proteins upon interacting with damaged DNA. The molecular basis for the dual role of PARP-1 as a chromatin architectural protein and a first responder in DNA repair pathways remains unclear. Here, we quantified the interactions of full-length PARP-1 and its N-terminal half with different types of DNA damage and with defined nucleosome substrates. We found that full-length PARP-1 prefers nucleosomes with two linker DNA extensions over any other substrate (including several free DNA models) and that the C-terminal half of PARP-1 is necessary for this selectivity. We also measured the ability of various substrates to activate PARP-1 activity and found that the most important feature for activation is one free DNA end rather than tight interaction with the activating nucleic acid. Our data provide insight into the different modes of interaction of this multidomain protein with nucleosomes and free DNA.

Multivalent di-nucleosome recognition enables the Rpd3S histone deacetylase complex to tolerate decreased H3K36 methylation levels

The Rpd3S histone deacetylase complex represses cryptic transcription initiation within coding regions by maintaining the hypo-acetylated state of transcribed chromatin. Rpd3S recognizes methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me), which is required for its deacetylation activity. Rpd3S is able to function over a wide range of H3K36me levels, making this a unique system to examine how chromatin regulators tolerate the reduction of their recognition signal. Here, we demonstrated that Rpd3S makes histone modification-independent contacts with nucleosomes, and that Rpd3S prefers di-nucleosome templates since two binding surfaces can be readily accessed simultaneously. Importantly, this multivalent mode of interaction across two linked nucleosomes allows Rpd3S to tolerate a two-fold intramolecular reduction of H3K36me. Our data suggest that chromatin regulators utilize an intrinsic di-nucleosome-recognition mechanism to prevent compromised function when their primary recognition modifications are diluted.

ATP-Independent Cooperative Binding of Yeast Isw1a to Bare and Nucleosomal DNA

Among chromatin remodeling factors, the ISWI family displays a nucleosome-enhanced ATPase activity coupled to DNA translocation. While these enzymes are known to bind to DNA, their activity has not been fully characterized. Here we use TEM imaging and single molecule manipulation to investigate the interaction between DNA and yeast Isw1a. We show that Isw1a displays a highly cooperative ATP-independent binding to and bridging between DNA segments. Under appropriate tension, rare single nucleation events can sometimes be observed and loop DNA with a regular step. These nucleation events are often followed by binding of successive complexes bridging between nearby DNA segments in a zipper-like fashion, as confirmed by TEM observations. On nucleosomal substrates, we show that the specific ATP-dependent remodeling activity occurs in the context of cooperative Isw1a complexes bridging extranucleosomal DNA. Our results are interpreted in the context of the recently published partial structure of Isw1a and support its acting as a “protein ruler” (with possibly more than one tick).

Abstract A160: Recognition of UbcH5c and the nucleosome by the Bmi1/Ring1b ubiquitin ligase complex.

Abstract Background and Objectives: The Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) mediates gene silencing, in part by monoubiquitination of histone H2A on lysine 119 (uH2A). Bmi1 and Ring1b are critical components of PRC1 that heterodimerize via their N-terminal RING domains to form an active E3 ubiquitin ligase. A longstanding question in this field is how a single lysine residue in the nucleosome is singled out for ubiquitin modification and why only one ubiquitin is added rather than a chain of ubiquitins. To better understand how Bmi1/Ring1b controls monoubiquitination of H2A, we structurally characterized the E2 and nucleosome interaction sites on Bmi1/Ring1b. Methods: X-ray crystallography was used to determine the structure of a complex between Bmi1/Ring1b and UbcH5c, its cognate E2 enzyme. Fluorescence-polarization assays were used to measure the binding of Bmi1/Ring1b to a synthetic DNA duplex. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to assess the importance of residues at the potential Bmi1/Ring1b-DNA interface, and in vitro ubiquitin ligase assays were used to measure the catalytic activity of mutant complexes. Molecular modeling studies were performed using HADDOCK v2.0. Results: We have determined the crystal structure of a complex between the Bmi1/Ring1b RING-RING heterodimer and the E2 enzyme UbcH5c and find that UbcH5c interacts with Ring1b only, in a manner fairly typical of E2-E3 interactions. However, we further show that the Bmi1/Ring1b RING domains bind directly to duplex DNA through a basic surface patch unique to the Bmi1/Ring1b RING-RING dimer. Mutation of residues on this interaction surface leads to a loss of H2A ubiquitination activity. Through site-directed mutagenesis we have been able to uncouple the E2 binding and the DNA binding activities of Bmi1/Ring1b, indicating that Bmi1/Ring1b uses distinct binding surfaces to recognize E2 and the nucleosomal substrate. Computational modeling of the interface between Bmi1/Ring1b-UbcH5c and the nucleosome suggests that Bmi1/Ring1b interacts with both nucleosomal DNA and an acidic patch on histone H4 to achieve specific mono-ubiquitination of H2A. Conclusions: Our data show that the direct interaction of the RING domains with nucleosomal DNA is crucial for the ubiquitin ligase activity of Bmi1/Ring1b. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a RING-domain E3 ligase binding directly to its substrate via the RING domain. Our results point to a novel mechanism of substrate recognition, and control of product formation, by Bmi1/Ring1b. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A160.

Nucleosome Disruption by DNA Ligase III-XRCC1 Promotes Efficient Base Excision Repair

Each day, approximately 20,000 oxidative lesions form in the DNA of every nucleated human cell. The base excision repair (BER) enzymes that repair these lesions must function in a chromatin milieu. We have determined that the DNA glycosylase hNTH1, apurinic endonuclease (APE), and DNA polymerase β (Pol β), which catalyze the first three steps in BER, are able to process their substrates in both 601- and 5S ribosomal DNA (rDNA)-based nucleosomes. hNTH1 formed a discrete ternary complex that was displaced by the addition of APE, suggesting an orderly handoff of substrates from one enzyme to the next. In contrast, DNA ligase IIIα-XRCC1, which completes BER, was appreciably active only at concentrations that led to nucleosome disruption. Ligase IIIα-XRCC1 was also able to bind and disrupt nucleosomes containing a single base gap and, because of this property, enhanced both its own activity and that of Pol β on nucleosome substrates. Collectively, these findings provide insights into rate-limiting steps that govern BER in chromatin and reveal a unique role for ligase IIIα-XRCC1 in enhancing the efficiency of the final two steps in the BER of lesions in nucleosomes.

Mechanisms for ATP‐dependent chromatin remodelling: the means to the end

Chromatin remodelling is the ATP-dependent change in nucleosome organisation driven by Snf2 family ATPases. The biochemistry of this process depends on the behaviours of ATP-dependent motor proteins and their dynamic nucleosome substrates, which brings significant technical and conceptual challenges. Steady progress has been made in characterising the polypeptides of which these enzymes are comprised. Divergence in the sequences of different subfamilies of Snf2-related proteins suggests that the motors are adapted for different functions. Recently, structural insights have suggested that the Snf2 ATPase acts as a context-sensitive DNA translocase. This may have arisen as a means to enable efficient access to DNA in the high density of the eukaryotic nucleus. How the enzymes engage nucleosomes and how the network of noncovalent interactions within the nucleosome respond to the force applied remains unclear, and it remains prudent to recognise the potential for both DNA distortions and dynamics within the underlying histone octamer structure.

Activity of FEN1 Endonuclease on Nucleosome Substrates Is Dependent upon DNA Sequence but Not Flap Orientation

We demonstrated previously that human FEN1 endonuclease, an enzyme involved in excising single-stranded DNA flaps that arise during Okazaki fragment processing and base excision repair, cleaves model flap substrates assembled into nucleosomes. Here we explore the effect of flap orientation with respect to the surface of the histone octamer on nucleosome structure and FEN1 activity in vitro. We find that orienting the flap substrate toward the histone octamer does not significantly alter the rotational orientation of two different nucleosome positioning sequences on the surface of the histone octamer but does cause minor perturbation of nucleosome structure. Surprisingly, flaps oriented toward the nucleosome surface are accessible to FEN1 cleavage in nucleosomes containing the Xenopus 5S positioning sequence. In contrast, neither flaps oriented toward nor away from the nucleosome surface are cleaved by the enzyme in nucleosomes containing the high-affinity 601 nucleosome positioning sequence. The data are consistent with a model in which sequence-dependent motility of DNA on the nucleosome is a major determinant of FEN1 activity. The implications of these findings for the activity of FEN1 in vivo are discussed.

Methyltransferases prefer monomer over core-trimmed nucleosomes as in vitro substrates

Epigenetics is an area of increasing interest for drug discovery, driving the need for assays that use nucleosome substrates. Our studies showed that SUV39H1, a histone lysine methyltransferase, and Dnmt3b/Dnmt3L, a DNA methyltransferase, both exhibited approximately five times more activity on monomer nucleosomes than on DNA-core-trimmed nucleosomes in a scintillation proximity assay (SPA). The methyltransferases recognize and have a preference for nucleosomes with longer DNA strands. Our findings suggest that the use of monomer nucleosomes as substrates using SPA technology could lead to more robust screening assays and potentially more specific small molecule inhibitors of epigenetic enzymes.

The ATPase motor of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler is negatively regulated by a pair of N‐terminal chromodomains

ATP‐dependent chromatin remodeling complexes play a central role in the assembly, disassembly, and repositioning of nucleosomes. While the remodeling reaction is driven by a conserved ATPase motor, it is not known how this motor is regulated by auxiliary domains. We have solved the crystal structure of the Chd1 chromodomains coupled to the ATPase motor, which suggests that the chromodomains negatively regulate the ATPase motor. In the crystal, a conserved acidic helical linker between the chromodomains contacts a DNA‐binding surface on the ATPase motor, blocking DNA access to the motor. Naked DNA is a poor substrate for the Chd1 ATPase, and we find that disruption of this chromodomain‐ATPase interface permits naked DNA to stimulate ATPase activity to the same extent as nucleosome substrates. Small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) experiments suggest that in solution the chromodomains are not rigidly fixed against the ATPase motor but instead may occupy conformations distinct from that observed in the crystal structure. We propose that the chromodomains allow Chd1 to distinguish between nucleosomes and naked DNA by physically gating access to the ATPase motor.This work was supported by the NIGMS.

H3K36 Methylation Antagonizes PRC2-mediated H3K27 Methylation

H3K27 methylation mediated by the histone methyltransferase complex PRC2 is critical for transcriptional regulation, Polycomb silencing, Drosophila segmentation, mammalian X chromosome inactivation, and cancer. PRC2-mediated H3K27 methylation can spread along the chromatin and propagate the repressive chromatin environment; thus, chromatin components that antagonize the activity of PRC2 are important for restraining Polycomb silencing. Here we report that in HeLa cells, H3 histones unmethylated at Lys-36 are mostly methylated at Lys-27, with the exception of newly synthesized H3. In addition, K27me3 rarely co-exists with K36me2 or K36me3 on the same histone H3 polypeptide. Moreover, PRC2 activity is greatly inhibited on nucleosomal substrates with preinstalled H3K36 methylation. These findings collectively identify H3K36 methylation as a chromatin component that restricts the PRC2-mediated spread of H3K27 methylation. Finally, we provide evidence that the controversial histone lysine methyltransferase Ash1, a known Trithorax group protein that antagonizes Polycomb silencing in vivo, is an H3K36-specific dimethylase, not an H3K4 methylase, further supporting the role of H3K36 methylation in antagonizing PRC2-mediated H3K27 methylation.

The Structure of NSD1 Reveals an Autoregulatory Mechanism Underlying Histone H3K36 Methylation

The Sotos syndrome gene product, NSD1, is a SET domain histone methyltransferase that primarily dimethylates nucleosomal histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36). To date, the intrinsic properties of NSD1 that determine its nucleosomal substrate selectivity and dimethyl H3K36 product specificity remain unknown. The 1.7 Å structure of the catalytic domain of NSD1 presented here shows that a regulatory loop adopts a conformation that prevents free access of H3K36 to the bound S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Molecular dynamics simulation and computational docking revealed that this normally inhibitory loop can adopt an active conformation, allowing H3K36 access to the active site, and that the nucleosome may stabilize the active conformation of the regulatory loop. Hence, our study reveals an autoregulatory mechanism of NSD1 and provides insight into the molecular mechanism of the nucleosomal substrate selectivity of this disease-related H3K36 methyltransferase.

Regulation of Histone H2A and H2B Deubiquitination and Xenopus Development by USP12 and USP46

Post-translational histone modifications play important roles in regulating gene expression programs, which in turn determine cell fate and lineage commitment during development. One such modification is histone ubiquitination, which primarily targets histone H2A and H2B. Although ubiquitination of H2A and H2B has been generally linked to gene silencing and gene activation, respectively, the functions of histone ubiquitination during eukaryote development are not well understood. Here, we identified USP12 and USP46 as histone H2A and H2B deubiquitinases that regulate Xenopus development. USP12 and USP46 prefer nucleosomal substrates and deubiquitinate both histone H2A and H2B in vitro and in vivo. WDR48, a WD40 repeat-containing protein, interacts with USP12 and USP46 and is required for the histone deubiquitination activity. Overexpression of either gene leads to gastrulation defects without affecting mesodermal cell fate, whereas knockdown of USP12 in Xenopus embryos results in reduction of a subset of mesodermal genes at gastrula stages. Immunohistochemical staining and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that USP12 regulates histone deubiquitination in the mesoderm and at specific gene promoters during Xenopus development. Taken together, this study identifies USP12 and USP46 as histone deubiquitinases for H2A and H2B and reveals that USP12 regulates Xenopus development during gastrula stages.