Current improved techniques for making human and other mammalian mitotic chromosornc preparations have been used to show that the diploid chromosome number of the domestic sheep is 54 (Gimenez-Martin and LopezSaez, 1962; Borland, 1964; McFee, Banner and Murphree, 1965). This confirms the finding of a number of earlier worlters who used embryo and testicular material for thcir studies (Shivngo, 1930; Berry, 1938, 1941; Ahmed, 1940; Maltino, 1943; Melsnder, 1959). Latterly the X Chromosome has been identified as the largcst of the ncrocentric group of cl~romosomes by ~McFee et al. (1965), who also confirmed the Y to be the smallest chromosome and suggested that it was probably submetacentric. None of these workers has suggested, however, any means of identifying individual chromosomes of either the 3 pairs of large metacentric chromosomes or the 23 pairs of smaller acrocentric chromosomes. Nor have they described the modal chromosome number of counted metaphases from a number of narmal sheep of a similar age group. In man the presence of secondary constrictions on certain chromosomes of the human karyotype is now an accepted aid to identification The London conference on the normal Human Karyotype, 1963). There are, however, varying reports on the incidence of these and their value in cl~romosome recognition. The most constant constrictions in the human karyotype are the terminal satellites which occur on the short arms of all acrocentic chromosomes (Ferguson-Smith and Handmalter, 1961, 1963). These latter chromosomes are now known to be associated with nucleolus formation (FergusonSmith, 1964). Secondary constrictions have been described, however, on a number of the other chromoson~es at various positions on either the short or long arms (Muldal and Ockey, 1961; De la Chapelle, 1961; Ferguson-Smith, Ellis and Dicltson, 1962). The incidence of these secondary constrictions does show, however, considerable variations between different workers (Palmer and Funderburlt. 1965). This has been shown to be associated with various fdctors, including concentration of colchicine (Palmer and Funderburk, 1965), the use of calcium free medium (Sasalti and Maltino, 1963) or B.U.d.R. (5 Bromo deoxyuridine) (Kabaclt, Saksela and Mellman, 1964). None of these workers has discussed the effect of type of hypotonic solution used during Chromosome ~ r e ~ a r a t i o n . 1 1 Interest in disease of domestic animals associated with chromosomal abnormality has already been summarised by Pakes and Griesemer (1965) and Hare, Weber, McFeely and Tsu-Ju Yang (1966). Among the various reports there is only passing reference to secondary constrictions on the chromosomes of the domestic animals except in the cat in which one pair of the small group E chromosomes is satellited (Chu, Thuline and Norby, 1961; Jones 1965).