1. Methods for solving the problem. Numerically solving the Laval-nozzle direct problem for viscous gas in the framework of the steady-state Navier‐Stokes equations is hampered by a necessity to determine, in the course of solving, the critical gas-flow rate. Another difficulty consists in the fact that, in the case of high Reynolds numbers, these equations are of a mixed elliptic-hyperbolic type [1, 2]. Therefore, the basic numerical method for solving the direct problem in the framework of the Navier‐Stokes equations is the relaxation method [3‐5]. Besides an increase in the dimension of the problem under consideration, the disadvantage of this method is the slow (requiring several hundreds time steps) flow relaxation caused by a weak attenuation of wave processes in the subsonic part of nozzles. Methods based on different simplified forms of the Navier‐Stokes equations [2, 6], which are valid at certain restrictions imposed on the nozzle contour and the character of the flow, are sufficiently more efficient These simplified equations are of the evolution type with respect to the longitudinal coordinate (along the main flow direction) and, therefore, can be integrated by the use of rapid marching algorithms. For example, the marching calculation method based on the slenderduct approximation allows us to calculate the entire flow field in a nozzle with small inclinations of the contour to the main flow direction and a small dimensionless duct curvature K w [2, 7]. The smooth-duct approximation [8‐12] based on using an orthogonal coordinate system adapted to the duct geometry provides a better accuracy. This approximation accounts for the transverse pressure gradient associated with the centrifugal force. The accuracy of the method is determined by deviations of directions and curvatures of streamlines and longitudinal lines of the coordinate network used. The smooth-duct approximation makes it possible to calculate with an acceptθ tan able accuracy viscous flow in nozzles with moderate values of ≤ 1 and K w ≤ 0.5 [9, 11]. Below, we propose an improved modification of the smooth-duct model. It well describes the entire field of viscous flow in nozzles with a considerable duct curvature ( K w ≤ 2 ) and thus, covers all requirements of practice. In contrast to both the parabolic slender-duct model and smooth-duct model, the set of equations describing the new model is elliptic in the subsonic zones and hyperbolic in supersonic ones. For numerically solving the direct problem in the framework of these equations, an efficient marching method was developed. This method is based on the global iteration along streamlines and the longitudinal component of the pressure gradient. The method makes it possible to calculate, by a unified manner, viscous flow in the subsonic and supersonic zones. It is by orders of magnitude more efficient with respect to time consumed and computer memory required compared to the relaxation methods. Two global iterations are sufficient to determine within the accuracy of 0.01% such integral characteristics as the critical flow rate and the nozzle thrust. 2. The flow model. We consider the steady laminar flow of viscous gas in a plane or axial-symmetric Laval nozzle. The system of the simplified Navier‐Stokes equations in terms of the adapted ( ξ , η ) coordinate system [8, 9, 11] and natural variables has the following form. The ξ -projection of the momentum equation is