Reviewed by: Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries: The Rhetoric of Lines Across America ed. by Barbara Couture and Patti Wojahn Adam Hubrig Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries: The Rhetoric of Lines Across America Barbara Couture and Patti Wojahn, Eds. University Press of Colorado, 2016. 314 pp. Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries: The Rhetoric of Lines Across America Barbara Couture and Patti Wojahn, Eds. University Press of Colorado, 2016. 314 pp. At a time when both physical and symbolic borders from national borders to socio-economic inequality are at the front of political debate, the exigency of Crossing Borders, Drawing Boundaries: The Rhetoric of Lines Across America cannot be overstated. The collection explores the rhetorics of borders and their immediate implications for our students, our classrooms, and our communities. The essays in this collection operate in concert to highlight how the rhetoric of lines impacts democratic discourse as well as offer sites of intervention for rhetoricians and compositionists. The collection opens with a foreword by Nancy Welch titled "Crossing the Threshold." Welch's forward presents the main theme of the collection to "explore how borders are socially, historically, and linguistically constructed—and thus how they can be rhetorically examined and contested" (xi). Welch praises the collection authors for their recognition that the rhetoric of consciousness raising is inherently limited in rhetorical effect, but identifies this sort of rhetorical education a necessary threshold to cross—by teachers and students alike—for meaningful change to be achieved (xii). In chapter one, collection editors Couture and Wojahn highlight the book's organization and major themes. The book, divided into two sections, first concerns itself with "symbolic" boundaries, and the authors' investigate imagined borders, like a national boundary and spirituality. The second section explores "living borders" and Couture and Wojahn's sites of inquiry center on dismantling and challenging the rhetoric of spaces. The collection editors preview how several disparate threads of border rhetoric are gathered up to offer broader insights into thinking about the rhetorics of difference. Part one opens with Victor Villanueva's thoughtful application of Kenneth Burke's rhetorical trope of the metonym to interrogate a hegemonic sense of nationalism in "Metonymic Borders and Our Sense of Nation." Metonym, is defined by Villanueva [End Page 157] as "a reduction with grand representational possibilities" (31), and he continues to use this rhetorical trope to unpack American cultural identity. Drawing on an American understanding of "nation" as complicated by its relationship to Puerto Rico and establishing how a sense of "nation" is deeply racialized, Villanueva argues that both a collective understanding of "border" and "nation" are "metonymy, a fiction within a fiction of a nation, a trope that serves racism in an era that no longer admits racism" (34). From this argument, Villanueva urges "We, the rhetoricians, can instead accept that part of what we must do […] is both to see and to publicize the rhetoric at play and then work to demystify and dymythify the ideological" (41), a pressing call to action for public rhetoric scholars. Christopher Schroeder continues inquiry into imagined borders in chapter three as he productively scrutinizes how notions of literacy and language create their own borders and boundaries and how code-switching works to cross these boundaries. Schroeder's examination of a multilingual press in Chicago and an advice column written primarily in English that mixes Spanish into responses, seeks to challenge "tacit English-only language policies that reflect misunderstandings about the relative role of English within the larger debates… over the official designation of an official language, linguistic civil and political rights and educational policies for minority students" (52). Through this linguistic study of code-switching, Schroeder underscores how hierarchical perspectives about English are often tied to cultural identity. In chapter four, Jonathan P. Rossing examines the potential of humor as a rhetorical intervention into cultural processes that create marginalized identities. Through a study of Stephen Colbert's satirical representation of a conservative pundit, Rossing examines how rhetorically savvy humor "appropriates and defamiliarizes common arguments about immigration so as to call into question their logic" and ultimately deconstruct notions of racial borders (63). Rossing offers humor as site to create new meanings, perspectives, and understandings (69). While Rossing acknowledges that "humor...