130 SHOFAR Summer 1998 Vol. 16, No.4 When Chazan does tum to the Hebrew sources, he finds Ephraim ben Jacob of Bonn. The latter looks back toward the late twelfth century to illustrate the pain ofexile. He fmds eleven "anti-Jewish incidents" worthy ofnote in what Chazan considers a "rich catalogue." These incidents, however, are garnered from throughout all of Europe, i.e., from York in the north to Vienna in the south, and for the quarter-century between 1171 and 1196. Ofthese incidents, one may be struck by the banality of the case of the Jew who, Ephraim admits, murdered a Christian girl. As a result, the murderer was killed by a mob along with six other Jews whose houses were subsequently robbed. In another case, two Jewish merchants at the Cologne fair are characterized as being "unjustly" accused of passing counterfeit coins. However, they paid a bribe and avoided punishment. If one "incident" in all of Europe every two years or so on average is considered a rich catalogue, what do we make of violence and lawlessness in contemporary American cities? Indeed, if one has to stoop to listing a merchant "unjustly" accused of passing counterfeit coins and the lynching of a murderer with six of his friends, Chazan's argument becomes risible on its face. Finally, the expulsion of the Jews from England and France cannot be explained by the efforts of Church reformers and the influence of popular hatred. Indeed, the proper context for the policies of Edward I and Philip IV is the growing economic recession of the later thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries, during which the monarchs continued to mismanage their fiscal affairs. The treatment of the Jews, who, as Chazan correctly argue,s, were led by their banking community, has its analogue in the policy toward the Lombard bankers and the Templar bankers in England and France, respectively. Indeed, anti-Lombard and anti-Templar vituperation may be compared with that levied against the Jews. Of course, neither the Lombards nor the Templars has benefited from a highly literate and exceptionally successful posterity. Thus, like all winners in the long term, some Jews are prone to interpret the history of these episodes in a manner that best fits a self-image terribly skewed by the notion of exile and despite the events of May 1948. Bernard S. Bachrach Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton and University of Minnesota The Gates of November: Chronicles of the Slepak Family, by Chaim Potok. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996. 249 pp. $25.00. Chaim Potok, well-known author offictional works such as The Chosen and My Name is Asher Lev, has written a nonfiction work that may receive similar acclaim. Over the years numerous books by western authors such as William Korey (The Soviet Cage, Book Reviews 131 1971), Leonard Schroeter (The Last Exodus, 1979), Martin Gilbert (The Jews ofHope, 1984, and Shcharansky: Hero of Our Time, 1986), this reviewer (Challenging the Kremlin, 1992), and others have detailed and analyzed the plight and struggle of Soviet Jewish refuseniks. Cognizant ofthese studies as well as the fact that interest in Russian Jewry has dropped offsince the collapse ofthe Soviet Union, Potok determined that his book could still make a valuable contribution by addressing two basic questions: first, under what conditions would individuals tum against a political system and thereby give up position and comfort and bring ruin to their lives; and second, could a single family serve as a microcosm to help us understand what happened to all the peoples of the former Soviet Union. Though the book answers both questions well, the second seems far more enthralling and illuminating. How Vladimir (Volodya) and Masha Slepak gradually became disillusioned with the Soviet system, applied to emigrate to Israel, were denied permission to do so, and suffered terribly as refuseniks-all this is reminiscent of the stories of other highly visible, internationally known refuseniks like Anatoly Shcharansky, Evgeny Lein, Iosif Begun, and Ida NudeI. Major developments in the mid to late 1960s, both inside and outside the Soviet Union, were catalysts that led to their decision to leave the USSR: the arrest in 1965 and trial in 1966 ofSoviet...
Read full abstract