A N investigation has recently been carried out in the National Aeronautical Establishment (NAE) 0.38x1.5 m two-dimensional test section1 to determine: 1) The possibility of edge-tone noise suppression by overlaying the perforated floor and ceiling with a fine gauze or screen. 2) The change in wall interference characteristics due to the application of point 1. 3) The effect of edge-tone noise suppression on twodimensional airfoil test data. The investigation was performed with a 0.254 m chord model of the BGK No. 1 airfoil and covered the Mach number range of 0.3-0.8 at chord Reynolds numbers of 10-21 x 106. A full account of the investigation is given in Ref. 2. This Note deals primarily with selected data related to point 3. However, first some brief comments on points 1 and 2. The fine gauze technique, first demonstrated by Vaucheret,3 was found to be both a practical and an effective means for edge-tone suppression, as demonstrated in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. It was also found that the presence of the gauze, although reducing the geometric porosity from 20.5 to 8%, had a very minor effect on the wall interference characteristics. Measurements on the BGK No. 1 airfoil comprised balance, wake, and surface pressure. Only the latter two are discussed here. The data depicted in Fig. 2 were obtained by a sidewallmounted differential pressure transducer, with the reference side detuned and connected to the plenum chamber. The frequency response of the active side was flat up to 16 kHz. The data are presented in the form of the root mean square of the fluctuating wall static pressure coefficient, Cpj^, referenced to the mean value of the freestream dynamic pressure. The significant reduction in noise level due to the edge-tone suppression is clearly evident. In fact, at the higher Mach number the measured noise level is reduced to a level comparable to that inherent in the wall boundary layer itself. For a well-developed turbulent boundary layer, the wall CPRMS (referenced to the dynamic pressure at the edge of the boundary layer) is known to be about 0.6-0.7%. To what degree then are model test data influenced by this improvement in flow quality? The obvious thought that comes to mind is that the edge tones could excite the TollmienSchlichting waves and thus cause early transition. A cursory investigation reveals that, at the Reynolds numbers here of interest, the dangerous frequencies are an order of magnitude higher than the edge-tone frequencies. Thus the edge tones are not expected to influence the boundary-layer transition. However, we may speculate that they could interfere with, for instance, a turbulent boundary layer close to separation, although the mechanism in such a case would be far from clear. We shall first examine drag data obtained from wake pressure measurements. In Fig. 3 we have plotted the drag coefficient vs freestream Mach number, both corrected for wall interference effects, for two values of the normal force coefficient CN, 0.3 and 0.6. The data points are obtained by a