Abstract Background Conflicting findings in recent literature question the significance of traditional coagulation variables in predicting bleeding associated with central venous catheter (CVC) removal. This audit evaluates the necessity and compliance of conducting same-day coagulation screens at Churchill Hospital. The study assesses the practice's relevance, compliance rates, and associated costs, offering implications for clinical decision-making, resource utilization, and potential modifications to current practices. The findings may lead to the adoption of new predictive factors or a targeted approach to coagulation testing, optimizing patient care and resource allocation in CVC removals. Methods This retrospective audit focused on surgical patients in the upper gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary and pancreatic, lower gastrointestinal, and transplant surgery departments at the Churchill Hospital. The study encompassed all instances of central venous catheter (CVC) removal that occurred between January 1st, 2022, and December 31st, 2022. Data retrieval was conducted using electronic patient records, and coagulation test results were interpreted utilizing the reference ranges available in the electronic patient record system (INR 0.9-1.2, PT 9-12, APTT 20-30). Results 78 patients had an average age of 53 years and a mean hospital stay of 35 days. The average duration of CVC in-situ was 8.9 days. Patients underwent an average of 5.07 coagulation tests per stay, equivalent to 0.28 tests per admission day. Among the audited patients (n=67), 41.8% had same-day coagulation screens, 17.9% had the screen one day prior to CVC removal, and 40.3% had the screen more than one day before removal. Analysis showed that 88% had normal INR values, with only eight patients having abnormal values. Furthermore, 74.6% and 58.2% had normal PT and APTT values, respectively. Conclusions This retrospective audit of CVC removals in surgical patients at Churchill Hospital revealed a concerning in-compliance rate of 44% with coagulation screens during CVC removals. Most patients had normal coagulation parameters, questioning the need for same-day screens. Delays and high costs (£64.76 per patient, £12.95 per screen) were incurred. Individualized risk-based approach, considering bleeding history, could be more efficient. Implementing targeted coagulation testing saves costs and optimizes resource utilization. Further evaluation required to improve patient care and resource allocation in CVC removals, reducing reliance on routine same-day screens.
Read full abstract