SESSION TITLE: Chest Infections SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Poster PRESENTED ON: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 at 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM PURPOSE: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are emerging pathogens that affect immunocompromised and immunocompetent subjects. The incidence and prevalence of NTM lung disease is increasing and treatment options are lengthy and fraught with toxicities and poor outcome. The decision to start treatment requires individualized assessment and analysis of antimicrobial resistance patterns. Use of linezolid in NTM patients was recently reported for the first time in a multicenter non-randomized study (Winthrop et al, ERJ, 2015). Here we report the use of linezolid and tidezolid in eleven subjects with recalcitrant pulmonary NTM infection. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of the outcome of oxazolidinone therapy in subjects with a diagnosis of NTM. We identified eleven patients during a 3 year study period. Radiology, microbiology, prior NTM therapy, macrolide sensitivity, oxazolidinone regimen and drug toxicities were noted for all subjects. RESULTS: The majority of patients were female (90%) and caucasian. The median age was 65 years (range 26-77). Common comorbidities were asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, GERD and depression. Six of the eleven subjects had cavitary disease and the remaining had significant bronchiectasis with a nodular or cystic component on radiology. Ten subjects (90%) grew Mycobacterium avium intracellulare. Other subjects grew M abscessus (55%), and M kansasii. Macrolide resistance (erm gene) was confirmed in 6 subjects (55%). Prior to the institution of oxazolidinone therapy, all subjects had been on complex antimicrobial regimens which included amikacin, augmentin, clofazimine, cefoxitin, ethambutol, macrolides, meropenem, moxifloxacin, rifampin and tigecycline. Ten subjects (90%) were treated with oral linezolid. Five patients (45%) had to be transitioned from linezolid to tidezolid due to adverse effects. The most commonly used regimen for linezolid was 600mg once daily (72.7%). This dose was decreased to 300 mg once daily in one patient due to nausea. The most commonly used regimen for tidezolid was 200mg once daily (83%). Average duration of therapy was 10.2 months for linezolid and 6 months for tidezolid. Patients were routinely monitored for symptoms, blood counts and peripheral neuropathy. The most common side effects observed were peripheral neuropathy (three patients), nausea (three patients), thrombocytopenia (one patient) and anemia (one patient). In one case, linezolid was stopped due to drug interaction with an antidepressant. Therapy was discontinued in one patient due to cost considerations. Three patients continue on oxazolidinone therapy without any complications. Vitamin B6 was prescribed for every patient to prevent hematological complications and peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we have demonstrated that both linezolid and tidezolid can be used for longer durations in the treatment of recalcitrant NTM disease. Adverse events requiring cessation of therapy are common but some of these could be due to other therapies or coexistent comorbidities. Larger studies are required to ascertain efficacy and tolerability. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Oxazolinidone antimicrobials could be considered in the treatment regimen of patients with difficult NTM infection. DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Kelsey Luoma, Shivani Singh, Doreen Addrizzo-Harris No Product/Research Disclosure Information