Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Research Articles

Unraveling the impact of irritability on esophageal diseases: Insights from multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis

BackgroundPrevious studies have suggested a potential association between irritability and the risk of various diseases. However, establishing a causal relationship has remained a significant challenge. To address this issue, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR), a sophisticated approach that leverages genotype data to emulate the conditions of randomized controlled trials. This method enables us to investigate the potential causal link between irritability and the susceptibility to esophageal diseases. MethodsWe conducted an extensive multivariable MR analysis using summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) encompassing various esophageal diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal cancer (EC), and Barrett's esophagus. Both univariable and multivariable MR analyses were performed to elucidate and confirm the causal association between genetically predicted irritability and the incidence of esophageal diseases. ResultsBased on our primary causal effects model utilizing MR analyses with the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, genetically predicted irritability was identified as a risk factor for GERD (OR = 2.413; 95 % CI: 1.678–3.470; P = 2.03E-06) and Barrett's esophagus (OR = 2.306; 95 % CI: 1.042–5.101; P = 0.039). However, irritability was not found to be associated with the risk of EC, even after adjusting for BMI, smoking initiation, and alcohol consumption. ConclusionThe multivariable MR analysis performed in this study demonstrated a causal relationship between irritability and esophageal diseases. It is imperative to acknowledge the need for further large-scale prospective studies to validate these findings.

Optimizing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease treatment: A call to shift from omeprazole.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disorder of the upper respiratory tract, which develops due to the regurgitation of acid from the stomach into the oesophagus. If left untreated, GERD may cause serious complications such as Barrett's oesophagus, oesophageal strictures, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. According to a study published by Nirwan JS et al in 2020, individuals suffering from Gastroesophageal reflux disease globally is 1.03 billion.[1] Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently used drugs for the treatment of GERD. Omeprazole belongs to PPIs class of drugs and it has been a drug of choice for GERD because it is affordable, easily available, and it can be taken along with other medicines. However, Proton pump inhibitors are not completely risk-free, chronic use of Proton Pump inhibitors has been associated with decreased calcium and magnesium absorption increasing the risk of osteoporosis and electrolyte disturbances respectively. It also increases the risk of community-acquired pneumonia [2] However, Esomeprazole the s-isomer of omeprazole yields much better results than omeprazole. It is more effective and safe in the treatment of GERD, not only does it decrease the symptoms of the disease rapidly ie. heartburn [4] but also it reduces the relapse of the symptoms twice that of omeprazole. Maintenance of intragastric pH > 4 is an effective measure for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease, esomeprazole has demonstrated improved acid inhibition over omeprazole with a high mean percentage of 24-hour intragastric pH > 4. The healing rate for reflux esophagitis and relapse was also higher for esomeprazole than that of omeprazole.[3] According to a study, the number of individuals with GERD in the South Asia region is around 8000 per 100000 [4]. Knowing the extent of Gastroesophageal patients present in Pakistan and how rapidly this number can escalate due to poor lifestyle modifications. Omeprazole which is the most frequent drug prescribed for the treatment of GERD [5] should be discouraged and Esomeprazole being more beneficial in terms of healing time and relapse of symptoms should be promoted to prevent chronic use adverse effects of Proton pump inhibitors. Overall, such a measure will improve the quality of life of a person suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease which otherwise may lead to more severe implications.

Investigation of pepsin levels in bronchial lavage in patients with interstitial lung disease and chronic cough

AimPepsin is an enzyme that helps digest protein secreted only from the gastric chief cell in an inactive state. Pepsin is a good marker for acidic gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Its presence in sputum or saliva is considered pathologic. In GER, cough is stimulated by broncho-esophageal neurogenic reflex and aspiration of gastric contents into the airways. GER is the most common cause of cough. Gastric acid reflux is also thought to play a role in Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) etiology. In many studies, pepsin and bile acid levels in bronchial lavage were high in patients with interstitial lung disease and chronic cough. In our study, we aimed to evaluate pepsin levels in bronchial lavage in patients with ILD and chronic cough and to investigate the relationship between symptoms and reflux treatment. MethodsBetween January 2021 and February 2022, 212 patients who underwent bronchoscopy in our tertiary clinic were evaluated. These patients were divided into three groups: 52 patients with interstitial lung disease, 81 patients with chronic cough, and 79 patients who underwent bronchoscopy with a pre-diagnosis of lung cancer as the control group. Bronchial lavage obtained by bronchoscopy was analyzed for pepsin levels. ResultsShortness of breath and cough were the most common symptoms in all three groups. Pepsin levels were 16.71 ± 8.6 ng/ml in the chronic cough group, 15.6 ± 8.9 ng/ml in the ILD group, and 10.58 ± 5.4 ng/ml in the lung cancer (control) group. Pepsin levels in the ILD and chronic cough group were statistically significantly higher than in the lung cancer group (p:0.00). There was no statistical difference between the ILD group and the chronic cough group regarding pepsin levels. It was found that pepsin levels were lower in the three groups who received anti-reflux treatment. There was no difference in pepsin levels between ILD subgroups. ConclusionPepsin levels in bronchial lavage were higher in the ILD and chronic cough groups. This suggests that reflux may be involved in the etiology of chronic cough and ILD. Low pepsin values in patients receiving anti-reflux therapy have shown that occult reflux may occur. In our study, the high level of pepsin in bronchial lavage, especially in the chronic cough and ILD group, may be instructive in the etiology and treatment planning of the disease.

EndoFLIP Use in De Novo and Revisional Foregut Surgery

AbstractEndoFLIP technology, utilizing impedance planimetry, has revolutionized the assessment of gastrointestinal sphincters by providing real-time measurements of cross-sectional area and pressure to calculate distensibility. This review explores its application in de novo and revisional foregut surgeries. Preoperatively, EndoFLIP has demonstrated efficacy in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease, hiatal hernia, and esophageal motility disorders, including achalasia, by distinguishing motility patterns and identifying sphincter incompetence. In gastroparesis, EndoFLIP's measurement of pyloric distensibility correlates with gastric emptying and symptom severity, guiding therapeutic decisions for pyloric interventions. Intraoperatively, EndoFLIP optimizes surgical outcomes in antireflux procedures, such as fundoplication and hiatal hernia repairs, by balancing effective reflux control with minimizing postoperative complications like dysphagia and gas bloat. For esophageal myotomy, including Heller myotomy and per oral endoscopic myotomy, EndoFLIP ensures adequate sphincter relaxation, reducing reflux risks. Additionally, during endoscopic pyloromyotomy for gastroparesis, EndoFLIP predicts clinical success by assessing postprocedural distensibility. While promising, further research is essential to establish standardized intraoperative protocols and ideal measurement targets, enhancing the reproducibility and accuracy of EndoFLIP applications. Overall, EndoFLIP offers a significant advancement in foregut surgery, improving diagnostic precision and therapeutic outcomes.

24 h combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring in children with chronic cough

BackgroundChronic cough in children is closely related to gastroesophageal reflux (GER). However, this association has not been adequately studied due to a lack of diagnostic tools. Combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) monitoring is considered the most accurate method for evaluating the association between symptoms and reflux, but data on its use in children with chronic cough are still lacking. We aimed to assess the association between chronic cough and GER in children through MII-pH monitoring.MethodsChildren with chronic cough (> 4 weeks) who were suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) were selected to undergo 24 h MII-pH monitoring at our hospital. Patients were divided into groups according to their age, body position, reflux index (RI) or total reflux events, and the differences between the groups were analyzed. Then the significance and value of 24 h pH and impedance monitoring in chronic cough and the relationship between chronic cough and reflux were discussed.ResultsOverall, 426 patients were included. The median age was 12 months (interquartile range: 6–39.5 months), 129 (30.3%) patients had RI > 7% detected by pH-metry, and 290 (68.1%) patients had positive diagnosis based on the impedance data. GER predominantly occurred in the upright position and mostly involved weakly acidic reflux and mixed gas–liquid reflux. There were 14.1% of children in non-acid GER group were SAP positive showing no difference in acid GER group 13.2% (P = 0.88), whereas patients with SAP > 95% in MII positive group (47[16.2%]) is higher than in MII negative group (P < 0.05).ConclusionTwenty four hour MII-pH monitoring is safe, well tolerated in children, but also has a higher detection rate of gastroesophageal reflux. It can find identify weakly acidic reflux, weakly alkaline reflux and reflux events with different physical properties, which can explain the relationship between GER and chronic cough more comprehensively. It provides new approach for exploring the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of children with chronic cough.

Spectrum of esophageal manometry and 24-h pH impedance findings in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and response to phenotype-based treatment-A prospective observational study.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is classified into erosive reflux disease (ERD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). NERD includes three phenotypes: true NERD, functional heartburn (FH) and reflux hypersensitivity (RH). The management of these NERD phenotypes differs. We aimed at studying the spectrum of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-hour impedance-pH findings in Indian patients with NERD, classifying the phenotypes and assessing the response to phenotype-based treatment. We prospectively studied the clinical characteristics, endoscopy, HRM, 24-hour impedance-pH findings, symptom association and response to phenotype-specific treatment in patients with NERD. Of 53 patients with NERD, the following phenotypes were diagnosed namely: 35(66%) true NERD, 12(22.7%) RH and six(11.3%) FH. The esophagogastric junction-contractile integral (EGJ-CI) was low in 60.4% and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was present in 53% of patients. The respective median values for true NERD, RH and FH groups were as follows: proximal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (P-MNBI) 2250Ω, 2241Ω, 2550Ω, (p = 0.592), distal (D-MNBI) 1431Ω, 2887.5Ω, 2516Ω (p < 0.001), post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) 11.1%, 16%, 18.7% (p = 0.127). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed that D-MNBI and PSPWI discriminated FH and RH from true NERD, respectively, with a cut-off of 2376.5Ω (area under curve [AUC]:0.919, p < 0.001), 22.6% (AUC:0.671, p = 0.184) and 2318Ω (AUC:0.919, p = < 0.001), 16.2%(AUC:0.671, p = 0.079). The median P-MNBI was lower in patients with GERD-associated cough than other symptoms 1325 (1250, -). Fifty (94.3%) patients showed significant improvement in symptom severity scores (p < 0.001) following phenotype-specific treatment. In NERD patients, EGJ-CI and IEM were low. D-MNBI and PSPWI could effectively discriminate true NERD from FH and RH, whereas P-MNBI could help diagnose GERD-associated cough. The phenotype-specific treatment provides better symptom relief for patients.

Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplications differs between endoscopists.

Despite excellent long-term outcomes, a small proportion of patients who undergo fundoplication with hiatal hernia repair (laparoscopic antireflux surgery [ARS]) for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may require reoperation. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) assessment in patients presenting with symptom recurrence plays a critical role in surgical planning of redo-ARS by confirming failure of the fundoplication and revealing the pattern of failure. We aimed to compare the findings documented by external endoscopists (i.e., outside physicians) to those documented by internal endoscopists (i.e., operating foregut or thoracic surgeons) before redo-ARS. After IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent redo-ARS at a tertiary surgical center between November 2016 and March 2023. Patients with both external and internal EGD reports were included, and findings from the two reports were compared. Of 197 patients who underwent redo-ARS, both preoperative EGD reports were available for 181 (136 [75.1%] women; median age, 61years [IQR 53-69]; median BMI, 27.9kg/m2 [IQR 24.9-31.3]). The median time between primary and redo-ARS was 89months (IQR 38-153), and the median time between external and internal endoscopic evaluation was 5months (IQR 2-12). Only 38.9% of external reports mentioned a prior fundoplication. Compared to the operating surgeons, external physicians reported a significantly lower proportion of Barrett's esophagus (52.4%, p < .001), slipped fundoplications (28.8%, p < .001), paraesophageal hernias (20.5%, p < .001), disrupted fundoplications (20%, p < .001), intrathoracic fundoplications (0%, p < .001), and twisted fundoplications (0%, p < .001). External endoscopists' reports of failed fundoplications are often incomplete and lack relevant details. Discrepancies between nonsurgical endoscopists and experienced surgeons are likely explained by a lack of training and experience to discern and document fundoplication changes accurately. To reduce this gap, we strongly recommend the adoption of standard definitions describing post-fundoplication endoscopic changes and the inclusion of relevant training within educational programs.

Esophageal cancers missed at upper endoscopy in Central Norway 2004 to 2021 – A population-based study

IntroductionThe incidence of esophageal cancers is increasing in many Western countries and the rate of missed esophageal cancers (MEC) at upper endoscopy is of concern. We aimed to calculate the MEC rate and identify factors associated with MEC.MethodsThis was a retrospective population-based cohort study including 613 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer in Central Norway 2004–2021. MEC was defined as esophageal cancer diagnosed 6–36 months after a non-diagnostic upper endoscopy. Patient characteristics, tumor localization, histological type and cTNM stage were recorded. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, use of sedation and endoscopists experience at the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis were recorded. The association between these factors and MEC was assessed.ResultsForty-nine (8.0%) of 613 cancers were MEC. There was a significant increase in annual numbers of esophageal cancer (p < 0.001) as well as of MEC (p = 0.009), but MEC rate did not change significantly (p = 0.382). The median time from prior upper endoscopy to MEC diagnosis was 22.9 (12.1–28.6) months. MEC patients were older and were diagnosed with disease with a lower cTNM stage and cT category than non-missed cancers, whereas tumor localization and histological type were similar between the groups. The use of sedation or endoscopist experience did not differ between the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis. High proportions of MEC patients had Barrett’s esophagus (n = 25, 51.0%), hiatus hernia (n = 26, 53.1%), esophagitis (n = 10, 20.4%) or ulceration (n = 4, 8.2%). Significant proportions of MECs were diagnosed after inappropriate follow-up of endoscopic Barrett’s esophagus, histological dysplasia or ulcerations.ConclusionsThe annual number of MEC increased during the study period, while the MEC rate remained unchanged. Endoscopic findings related to gastroesophageal reflux disease such as esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus were identified in a high proportion of patients with subsequent MECs. Cautious follow-up of these patients could potentially reduce MEC-rate.

Effect of Fermented Soybean (FSB) Supplementation on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent chronic condition affecting the well-being of both adults and children in general medical practice. Research on the effects of fermented soybean (SB) supplementation in managing GERD is relatively new, with limited studies available. The existing research often lacks sufficient dosing regimens and study durations to differentiate between transient placebo effects and sustained benefits. In this study, the beneficial effects of FSB supplementation were investigated in 110 voluntary participants (NCT06524271). The participants were required to take 1 g of FSB supplement once daily for 12 weeks. GERD symptoms were evaluated using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), while inflammatory markers, including interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8), were measured to assess inflammation. The Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire was used to evaluate participants' quality of life. The results indicated that FSB supplementation significantly (p < 0.05) alleviated heartburn and regurgitation symptoms and reduced levels of IL-4, IL-6, and IL-8, indicating a notable anti-inflammatory effect. Additionally, significant (p < 0.05) improvements were observed in QOLRAD scores, particularly in vitality, emotional distress, and physical/social functioning. Collectively, our findings support the use of FSB as an adjuvant approach in managing GERD, with notable improvements in patients' quality of life.

Evaluate the Frequency of EosinophilicEsophagitisin Individuals with Refractory GERD

Background: Theeosinophilic infiltrate of the esophagus mucosal distinguishes the esophageal ailment known as Eosinophilicesophagitis (EoE). This study aims to determine the frequency of EoE in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a gastro esophageal reflux condition that is persistent. Methods: The 248 children in total hadelectiveupper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) during the study period were separated in tosix groups: individuals without a history of steroid usage and those with outanesophageal biopsyforthrombocytopenia. As a result, 200 people participated in the study total. Results: After an evaluation of 200 children having elective UGIE, A variety of health problems were found during the investigation, including food bolusimpact (2 %), achalasia cardia (5 %), pepticstricture (6 %), congenitalstricture (3 %), post-esophageal atresia repairanastomoticstricture (4 %), and symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux, including vomiting (10 %), regurgitation (2 %), belchingchest (1,5 %), nocturnal cough (2,5 %), pain/heartburn (12,5 %), and feeding refusal (1 %). There were several unusual illnesses that were observed, including Crohn's disease accounted for 2 %, paediatric intestinal pseudo-obstruction (10 %), abdominal discomfort (17,5 %), celiacdisease (16 %), cow's milk protein allergy (3 %), and un classified IBD (7 %). Conclusion: EoEfrequently affects GERD patients who are recalcitrant to treatment. Dysphagia, food impaction, and heartburn are posible symptoms. EGD and esophageal biopsy should be explored for EoEscreening in elderly individuals with strong GERD who are atopy positive and who have not responded to gastric acid inhibitors.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Medical Comorbidities in the Asian Population: Evidence From a Nationwide Healthcare System Data in South Korea.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a breathing disorder characterized by recurrent airway obstruction during sleep. Previous western studies have investigated the link between medical disorders and the pathophysiology of OSA. The prevalence and comorbidity rates of OSA; however, vary across different countries and racial groups. This study aimed to delve into medical comorbidities in patients with OSA using a large nationwide healthcare database in Korea. This nationwide study used the Korean National Health Insurance claims database (2010-2019). The effect of OSA on the incidence of medical disorders was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) model. The results were reported as crude and adjusted HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis was conducted by sex and age. In total, 103,785 patients with OSA and 207,570 patients without OSA were included. OSA group had significantly higher HRs for ischemic heart disease and stroke even after adjusting for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. The OSA group also showed an increased risk of metabolic syndrome-related diseases, chronic kidney disease, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Female patients with OSA exhibited notably higher rates of comorbid liver cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma. The cardiovascular burden of patients increased in accordance with the patients' age. Korean patients with OSA have a significantly increased risk of cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, which aligns with the previous studies conducted in the western countries. This result holds particular significance as it represents the first nationwide, population-based study conducted in Asia.

Comparing methods for detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux in anaesthetized dogs

ObjectiveTo compare the sensitivity and specificity of pH with multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH-MII), pH-metry (pH) alone and MII alone to direct observation of GOR by endoscopy in anaesthetized dogs. Study designA prospective comparative trial in a live canine model. AnimalsA group of 35 (22 females, 13 males) dogs of various breeds. The mean (range) body weight and age were 31.9 (14–40) kg and 5.6 (0.75–12) years, respectively. MethodsAll dogs were premedicated with medetomidine and morphine, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained on isoflurane in oxygen. A monitoring assembly consisting of an endoscopy camera, endotracheal tube and a disposable flexible pH-MII catheter was used to measure oesophageal pH, MII and directly visualize reflux. Visual reflux score was (0–3) and pH was recorded on a data capture sheet. Reflux was considered to have occurred whenever oesophageal pH was < 4.0 or > 7.5, device software analysing MII data detected fluid or a visual reflux score of 2 or 3 were assigned. Receiver operator curves (ROC) analysis was used to determine sensitivity and specificity for each monitoring method to detect GOR. ResultsEndoscopy identified GOR in 20 dogs (57%), pH-MII in 19 dogs (54%), pH alone in 13 dogs (37%) and MII alone in 12 dogs (24%). ROC analysis showed fair accuracy for pH-MII and pH alone, whereas MII demonstrated low accuracy. Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn conclusion, pH-MII is a reliable method for detecting GOR and emerges as a promising tool for future research. Endoscopy is reliable and provides the ability to subjectively quantify the volume of reflux; however, it lacks the ability to discern the pH of refluxate. pH alone misses reflux events with intermediate pH (4.1–7.4). Incorporation of impedance addresses some of the limitations associated with pH alone and enhances diagnostic accuracy.

Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors: Updated Clinical Guidelines

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in adults has been steadily increasing over the years. GERD is often treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Studies have found upwards of 82% of PPIs are not being used following evidenced-based guidelines. The American College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterology Association released updated guidelines in 2022 for the treatment of GERD and deprescribing of PPIs. It is imperative for health care providers to review the updated guidelines. This report will review the guidelines and suggest a comprehensive deprescribing PPI protocol.

The prevalence, severity, and risk factors of erosive esophagitis in a Middle Eastern population.

Erosive esophagitis (EE) is frequently present in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), some of which may not have GERD symptoms. The prevalence of EE in the Saudi population is unknown. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of EE among patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults who underwent EGD at an academic tertiary care center. Clinical and endoscopic data were collected. The prevalence and severity of EE were determined. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for EE. Records for 3230 patients were reviewed, of which 2805 were included in this study. The mean age was 48.6 ±18.6 years, and 1088 (38.7%) were male. Two hundred and twenty six (8%) patients underwent EGD for GERD-related indications. EE was noted in 309 (11%) patients and 58 (25.6%) with GERD-related indications. For patients with EE, the mean age was 49.2 ± 18.7 years, and 132 (42.7%) were males. LA Grade A esophagitis was the most common (53.9%), followed by grade B (29.6%). Among all patients, only EGD for GERD-related indications and hiatal hernia were significantly associated with EE on multivariate analysis [(aOR = 3.1, 95% CI 2.2-4.4, P < 0.01) and (aOR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, P < 0.01), respectively]. Age, gender, and body mass index were not associated with EE. In this large cohort, EE was present in 11% of patients who underwent EGD and in 25% of patients with GERD. EGD for GERD-related indications and hiatal hernia are independent risk factors for the presence of EE.

Principal quantile treatment effect estimation using principal scores.

Intercurrent events and estimands play a key role in defining the treatment effects of interest precisely. Sometimes the median or other quantiles of outcomes in a principal stratum according to potential occurrence of intercurrent events are of interest in randomized clinical trials. Naïve analyses such as those based on the observed occurrence of the intercurrent events lead to biased results. Therefore, we propose principal quantile treatment effect estimators that can nonparametrically estimate the distribution of potential outcomes by principal score weighting without relying on the exclusion restriction assumption. Our simulation studies show that the proposed method works in situations where the median or quantiles may be regarded as the preferred population-level summary over the mean. We illustrate our proposed method by using data from a randomized controlled trial conducted on patients with nonerosive reflux disease.

Short-term symptomatic outcomes of GERD in patients with gastroparesis after gastric per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Gastroparesis (Gp) patients often have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Management of GERD in Gp patients is a challenge. Many studies have shown that gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM or POP) is moderately effective in reducing nausea and vomiting in patients with Gp. This study aims to determine whether G-POEM can improve GERD in Gp Patients. Patients who underwent G-POEM from July 2021 to October 2022 were enrolled in the study. GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD HRQL) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) were used to assess patients' GERD before and after G-POEM. The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) before and after G-POEM were also documented. The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) was used to assess the severity of Gp before and after G-POEM. A 'Welch two-sample t-test' was used to find differences in GERD HRQL (health-related quality of life) and RSI scores before and after the procedure. Pearson's chi-square test was used to find differences for use of PPI before and after G-POEM. Twenty-three consecutive refractory Gp patients with 30% male (average age 63.2) and 70% female patients (average age 53.9) were enrolled. Of these, 14 had diabetes, 3 had a history of surgery, and 6 had idiopathic Gp. The mean follow-up was 41days (range 7-61days). There was a significant decrease in the mean GERD HRQL score from 16.5 to 6.5 after G POEM with a P-value <0.0001 (95% level of significance) and a significant decrease in mean RSI score from 15.3 to 5.2 after G-POEM with P-value <0.0001 (95% level of significance). The proportion of use of PPI before GPOEM was 0.91, and the proportion of PPI use after GPOEM was 0.43 (P = 0.0008). The mean GCSI pre- and post-GPOEM were 3.53 and 1.59, respectively. Eighteen had clinical success in Gp as defined by decreased mean GCSI score greater than 1. In this short-term outcome study, 87% of patients' GERD HRQL scores and RSI scores decreased after G-POEM. These findings indicate that GPOEM not only effectively reduces Gp symptoms but also improves GERD symptoms leading to decreased or more effective use of PPI in these patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively show G-POEM significantly improves GERD. Further studies with a larger patient population and long-term outcomes are needed.

The effects of air and transportation noise pollution-related altered blood gene expression, DNA methylation, and protein abundance levels on gastrointestinal diseases risk

IntroductionAir pollution and transportation noise pollution has been linked to gastrointestinal (GI) diseases, but their relationship remains unclear. MethodsWe extracted the significantly modulated genes and CpG sites related to air pollution (PM2.5, PM10, and NOx) and transportation noise pollution (aircraft, railway, and traffic road noise) from previous published studies. Genome-wide methylation analysis and colocalization analysis with these CpG sites and GWAS data of GI diseases were performed to disentangle the relationship between pollution-related blood DNA methylation (DNAm) alterations and GI diseases risk. Summary-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) analysis assessed the impact of pollution-related genes on GI diseases risk across methylation, gene expression, and protein levels. Enrichment analysis investigated the implicated biological pathways and immune cell types. ResultsDNAm at cg00227781 [CD300A] (modulated by NOx exposure) and cg19215199 [ZMIZ1] (modulated by PM2.5 exposure) was significantly linked to increased noninfective enteritis and colitis risk, while cg08500171 [BAT2] (modulated by NOx exposure) is significantly associated with an increased gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) risk. Colocalization analysis provides strong evidence supporting a shared causal variant between these associations. Multi-omics levels SMR analysis revealed that pollution-modulated lower DNAm at 5 specific CpG sites were associated with increased expression of 4 genes (IL21R, EVPL, SYNGR1, and WDR46), subsequently increasing the risk of GERD, ulcerative colitis, and gastric ulcer. 7 circulating proteins coded by pollution-modulated genes were observed to be associated with 6 GI diseases risk. Enrichment analysis implicates immune and inflammatory responses, MAPK signaling, and telomere maintenance in these pollution-induced effects. ConclusionWe identified potential links between air and transportation noise pollution-related gene methylation, expression, and protein abundance with GI diseases risk, possibly revealing new therapeutic targets.

Application of Apriori Algorithm in Determining Behavioral Patterns and Lifestyle of GERD Patients

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a condition of reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus which can cause typical symptoms such as heartburn (burning in the epigastric region), acid regurgitation (bitter taste in the mouth), nausea, and dysphagia which can result in damage to the esophageal mucosa and in the long term can cause complications such as Barrett's esophagus. Based on data on patients with GERD disease in 2020-2023, there were 521 patients obtained at Bidadari Binjai General Hospital, with differences in prevalence caused by socioeconomic and lifestyle changes that can increase the incidence of GERD. The purpose of this study is to obtain the results of the combination between item-sets on the behavior patterns and lifestyles of GERD sufferers which are expected to help the agency in processing data on GERD sufferers into more effective information to determine the behavior patterns and lifestyles of GERD sufferers with the Apriori Algorithm method. From the research conducted, the results obtained rules that meet the value of 30% support and 100% confidence, if unhealthy eating patterns are often late eating, then unhealthy lifestyles are often done sleeping after eating and smoking.

Magnetic sphincter augmentation vs subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the treatment of postsleeve gastrectomy gastroesophageal reflux disease

BackgroundObesity affects more than one-third of Americans and can be treated with bariatric surgery, most commonly sleeve gastrectomy (SG). SG has been shown to increase the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in some patients, which can be refractory to medical management. Surgical options for post-SG GERD include magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (SGRY). A comparative analysis of MSA and SGRY for post-SG GERD was performed to evaluate postoperative outcomes. MethodsA retrospectively maintained prospectively gathered database from 2018 to 2023 was used to identify patients who underwent MSA or SGRY for the indication of GERD after SG. Differences among patient characteristics; GERD assessments, including the health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire and the reflux symptom index (RSI); and procedure outcomes were collected and analyzed according to surgery type. ResultsA total of 92 patients (85 females and 7 males) met the inclusion criteria. The study included 17 patients in the MSA group, 71 patients in the SGRY group, and 4 patients who underwent both procedures. The average preoperative body mass index (BMI) of all patients was 33.3. Compared with patients who underwent MSA, those who underwent SGRY presented with higher BMI (29.4 vs 34.2, respectively; P = .013), preoperative GERD-HRQL (35 vs 52, respectively; P = .046), and RSI (14 vs 28, respectively; P = .017). Postoperatively, patients who underwent SGRY demonstrated a higher decrease in mean postoperative DeMeester score than those who underwent MSA (44.2 vs 13.9, respectively; P = .040), with 22 patients (50%) in the SGRY group vs 10 patients (20%) in the MSA group achieving normalization. ConclusionAlthough MSA remains a viable surgical alternative, our study indicated that SGRY can produce better symptom control and decrease acid exposure compared with MSA in patients with post-SG GERD.

Enhanced Risk of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Esophageal Complications in the Ulcerative Colitis Population.

Background: Although heartburn and reflux are frequently reported in ulcerative colitis [UC], the correlation between UC and gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], and its complications, esophageal stricture and Barrett's esophagus [BE], is not well understood. This study aims to examine the prevalence and associated risk of GERD and its complications within the UC population. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset, consisting of 7,159,694 patients, comparing GERD patients with and without UC to those without GERD. We assessed the degree of colonic involvement in UC and the occurrence of esophageal complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted using the chi-squared test or Fisher exact test (two-tailed). Results: A higher prevalence of GERD (23.0% vs. 16.5%) and GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) (22.3% vs. 16%) and erosive esophagitis (EE) (1.2% vs. 0.6%), was found in UC patients (p < 0.01), including pancolitis, proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, and indetermined UC (with undefined colonic involvement). UC patients were more likely to develop GERD (1.421), NERD (1.407), and EE (1.681) (p < 0.01). A higher prevalence of esophageal stricture (16.9 vs. 11.4 per 10,000 patients) and BE without dysplasia (94.5 vs. 39.3 per 10,000 patients) was found in UC (p < 0.05). The odds of developing BE without dysplasia were higher (1.892) in patients with UC (p < 0.01), including ulcerative pancolitis, proctitis, and indeterminate UC (OR of 1.657, 3.328, and 1.996, respectively) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates an increased risk of developing GERD and its complications in UC. This highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring and early intervention to minimize associated GERD-related risks in patients with UC.