Nondisabling Stroke Research Articles

Abstract P187: When A Global Crisis Closes Your Clinic: A Telemedicine Approach for Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Introduction: Recent work has demonstrated the safety and feasibility of rapid outpatient evaluation for presentations of TIA and non-disabling stroke. Our outpatient TIA and stroke clinic, Rapid Access Vascular Evaluation-Neurology (RAVEN) clinic, instituted in 2016, encountered unprecedented challenges in operations during the COVID-19 surge in New York City, leading to the creation of a telemedicine approach to minimize patient and staff exposure risk. To date, few virtual TIA/stroke clinics have reported on safety and feasibility outcomes. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that rapid follow-up of patients with suspected TIA and minor stroke via telemedicine would be feasible and safe during the pandemic. Methods/Results: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with TIA and minor stroke who were referred to the virtual clinic from the emergency department (ED) between March and June 2020 (the local peak of the COVID-19 pandemic) when RAVEN in-person visits were suspended. A total of 24 patients were discharged early from the ED and referred for RAVEN evaluation with 20 patients evaluated as scheduled; 4 were lost to RAVEN follow-up. Ultimately, 60% of these patients were diagnosed with TIA or minor stroke after completing their remote evaluation; the rest were diagnosed as stroke mimics (seizure, migraine with aura, neuropathy, peripheral vertigo, stroke recrudescence). The median NIHSS calculated at initial ED evaluation was 1 with a maximum NIHSS of 5. A new medical intervention for secondary prevention was prescribed for 70% of patients prior to ED discharge. Amongst patients contacted by phone 3-5 months post-RAVEN evaluation, 4 of 15 had an increased modified Rankin score. Of the 24 patients referred for RAVEN evaluation, 7 returned to the ED within 90 days, with 3 patients citing neurologic complaints. On follow-up via phone conducted 2-5 months after RAVEN evaluation, 3 of 17 patients self-reported either a positive COVID-19 test or suspected COVID-19 diagnosis over the study period. Conclusion: A telemedicine-based approach to evaluate TIA and stroke in the RAVEN model helped limit patient infection risk, optimize resource allocation, establish accurate, timely diagnoses, and effectively implement secondary prevention strategies.

Body Mass Index and Arterial Stiffness Are Associated With Greater Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke.

[Figure: see text].

Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

One of the most feared complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is stroke, with increased mortality and disability observed in patients suffering a stroke after TAVI. There has been no significant decline in stroke rates seen over the last 5 years; attention has therefore been given to strategies for cerebral embolic protection. With the emergence of new randomized trial data, we sought to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of cerebral embolic protection during TAVI both on clinical outcomes and on neuroimaging parameters. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of cerebral embolic protection during TAVI. The primary end point was the risk of stroke. The risk of stroke was not significantly different with the use of cerebral embolic protection: relative risk (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.36, p = 0.566. Nor was there a significant reduction in the risk of disabling stroke, non-disabling stroke or death. There was no significant difference in total lesion volume on MRI with cerebral embolic protection: mean difference -74.94, 95% CI -174.31 to 24.4, p = 0.139. There was also not a significant difference in the number of new ischemic lesions on MRI: mean difference -2.15, 95% -5.25 to 0.96, p = 0.176, although there was significant heterogeneity for the neuroimaging outcomes. In conclusion, cerebral embolic protection during TAVI is safe but there is no evidence of a statistically significant benefit on clinical outcomes or neuroimaging parameters.

Endarterectomy versus stenting for the prevention of periprocedural stroke or death in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized trials

BackgroundThe incidence of stroke or death in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) versus carotid artery stenting (CAS) cannot be estimated accurately. We aimed to compare periprocedural stroke or death in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CS) treated with CEA versus CAS.MethodsTen randomized trials (with ≥100 randomized patients per trial) compared the relative effectiveness of CAS and CEA for the prevention of stroke or death.ResultsIn the symptomatic group during the periprocedural period, the results showed that the risk of death or any stroke [risk ratio (RR): 0.627; 95% CI: 0.497–0.792; P<0.001] and the risk of any stroke (RR: 0.654; 95% CI: 0.522–0.820; P<0.001) were significantly greater with CAS than with CEA. The difference in the risk of periprocedural stroke was mostly attributed to nondisabling stroke (RR: 0.407; 95% CI: 0.264–0.627; P<0.001), which was driven especially by ipsilateral ischemic stroke (RR: 0.649; 95% CI: 0.494–0.851; P=0.002) and bradycardia or hypotension (RR: 0.105; 95% CI: 0.051–0.217; P<0.001). However, we found that the CEA group had a higher rate of myocardial infarction than the CAS group (RR: 2.496; P=0.025). Meanwhile, ipsilateral stenosis >70% increased the incidence of periprocedural death or stroke for post-CEA patients (RR: 2.166, 95% CI: 1.112 to 4.220, P=0.023), but no risk factors were identified for post-CAS. Regarding the asymptomatic group, the results demonstrated that patients randomized to CEA had a significantly reduced risk of periprocedural stroke (RR: 0.518; 95% CI: 0.281–0.954; P=0.035), which seems to be driven by periprocedural minor stroke (RR: 0.482; 95% CI: 0.231–0.982; P=0.046).ConclusionsAmong patients with symptomatic CS, CEA was associated with reduced rates of periprocedural stroke and periprocedural nondisabling stroke. Among patients with asymptomatic CS, the rates of minor stroke and stroke in general were higher with stenting than with CEA. Based on the current data, CEA is more beneficial than CAS for 30-day stroke prevention.

Multicentre experience with the frozen elephant trunk technique to treat penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch.

Our goal was to evaluate the use of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for the treatment of penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch. Between January 2008 and January 2020, a total of 34 patients had the FET technique at 3 aortic centres. The indication for the FET technique was unsuitability for thoracic endovascular aortic repair due to the lack of a sufficient proximal landing zone even after supra-aortic rerouting (subclavian transposition, double transposition), ectasia of the ascending aorta/aortic arch (>40 mm) and/or a shaggy proximal thoracic aorta. Additional cardiac procedures were performed in 14 patients (41%), and the beating heart technique was used in 7 patients (21%). Perioperative mortality was 18% (n = 6); 3 of these patients had a major stroke (9%). No case of spinal cord ischaemia was observed, and 2 patients (6%) developed a non-disabling stroke. After a median follow-up of 7 (first quartile: 1; third quartile 29) months, 2 patients (6%) died (1 of malignant disease and 1 of an unclear cause); 10 additional aortic interventions in all aortic segments (29%; endovascular: n = 8 [24%] and conventional surgical: n = 2 [6%]) were performed in 8 patients. The FET technique is a good treatment option for patients with penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch unsuitable for thoracic endovascular aortic repair. However, the high obliterative atherosclerotic load in these patients is accompanied by an un-neglectable risk of perioperative neurological injury. Concomitant cardiac surgical procedures are frequently needed. Patients commonly require secondary aortic procedures in all aortic segments, emphasizing the need for thorough primary conceptual planning and stringent follow-up.

Second Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-2): Randomised Comparison of Carotid Artery Stenting vs Carotid Endarterectomy

Background: Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks, but from recent national registry data each causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence. Methods: International multi-centre randomised trial of CAS vs CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed at 1 month then annually, for mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intent-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and logrank methods. Trial registration: ISRCTN21144362. Findings: From 2008-20, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 CAS and 1814 CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and mean 5-year follow-up. In both groups, 1% suffered disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated CAS, 18 CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 CAS, 29 CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2.5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5.3% CAS vs 4.5% CEA for any stroke (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.86-1.56; p=0.34). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS vs CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR=1.11, 95% CI 0.94-1.31; p=0.21). Interpretation: Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable. Clinical Trial Registration Details: Trial registration: ISRCTN21144362 Funding Information: ACST-2 is funded from the core support from the MRC, BHF and CR-UK for the University of Oxford’s Nuffield Department of Population Health (NDPH), and received grants from the BUPA Foundation and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment program. Analyses were performed in the MRC Population Health Research Unit, NDPH. AH is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Declaration of Interests: None declared. Ethics Approval Statement: Ethics approval was obtained at each centre and at the UK coordinating centre. Informed consent preceded randomisation.

Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy.

Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Cohort study reporting the SentinelTM Cerebral Protection System insertion’s feasibility and safety in 165 adult patients submitted to a transfemoral TAVR procedure from April 2019 to April 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) BAA; (2) non-BAA. Results: Median age, EuroScore II, and STS score were 79 years (74–84), 2.9% (1.7–6.2), and 2.2% (1.6–3.2), respectively. BAA was present in 12% of cases. Successful two-filter insertion was 86.6% (89% non-BAA vs. 65% BAA; p = 0.002), and debris was captured in 95% (94% non-BAA vs. 95% BAA; p = 0.594). No procedural or vascular complications associated with Sentinel insertion and no intraprocedural strokes were reported. There were two postprocedural non-disabling strokes, both in non-BAA. Conclusion: This study demonstrated Sentinel insertion feasibility and safety in BAA. No procedural and access complications related to Sentinel deployment were reported. Being aware of the bovine arch prevalence and having the techniques to navigate through it allows operators to successfully use CEPDs in this anatomy.

Progression of Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability Despite Best Medical Management.

Beat-to-beat variability in blood pressure (BP) is associated with recurrent stroke despite good control of hypertension. However, no study has identified rates of progression of beat-to-beat BP variability (BPV), its determinants, or which patient groups are particularly affected, limiting understanding of its potential as a treatment target. In consecutive patients one month after a transient ischaemic attack or nondisabling stroke (Oxford Vascular Study), continuous noninvasive BP was measured beat-to-beat over 5 minutes (Finometer). Arterial stiffness was measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Sphygmocor). Repeat assessments were performed at the 5-year follow-up visit and agreement determined by intraclass correlation coefficient. Rates of progression of systolic BPV (SBPV) and diastolic BPV (DBPV) and their determinants were estimated by mixed-effect linear models, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. One hundred eighty-eight of 310 surviving, eligible patients had repeat assessments after a median of 5.8 years. Pulse wave velocity was highly reproducible but SBPV and DBPV were not (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.71, 0.10, and 0.16, respectively), however, all 3 progressed significantly (pulse wave velocity, 2.39%, P<0.0001; SBPV, 8.36%, P<0.0001; DBPV, 9.7, P<0.0001). Rate of progression of pulse wave velocity, SBPV, and DBPV all increased significantly with age (P<0.0001), with an increasingly positive skew and were particularly associated with female sex (pulse wave velocity P=0.00035; SBPV P<0.0001; DBPV P<0.0001) and aortic mean SBP (SBPV P=0.037, DBPV P<0.0001). Beat-to-beat BP variability progresses significantly in high-risk patients, particularly in older individuals with elevated aortic systolic pressure. Beat-to-beat BPV and its progression represent potential new therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Conventional Angiography in the Assessment of Recently Symptomatic Patients with Ipsilateral Carotid Stenosis

Background and PurposeBenefits of revascularization for moderate and severe (≥50%) carotid stenosis were established based on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We aimed to assess the discrepancy between invasive and non-invasive angiography in a consecutive, prospective cohort of patients with recent stroke and non-invasive imaging suggesting ≥50% ipsilateral carotid stenosis. Materials and MethodsWe reviewed prospectively-collected data for consecutive patients admitted with recent stroke/TIA and ≥50% ipsilateral carotid stenosis on non-invasive imaging over 28 months. All patients underwent DSA to confirm the degree of stenosis per NASCET criteria. All patients with <50% stenosis by DSA were treated with medical therapy only and their recurrent event rates were assessed at 6 months. Results148 symptomatic patients with ≥50% ipsilateral carotid stenosis on CTA (82%) and MRA (18%) underwent DSA to confirm degree of stenosis. Median age was 73 years and 64% were male. DSA demonstrated <50% stenosis in 28 patients (19%). Median presenting NIHSS was 1 (IQR 0-3). Median carotid stenosis evaluated by non-invasive imaging was 70% (IQR 60-85%) and by DSA was 40% (IQR 30-45%). One of 28 patients (4%) experienced recurrent nondisabling stroke (NIHSS 1) after stopping dual antiplatelet therapy. ConclusionIn nearly one-in-five cases with recent stroke due to ipsilateral carotid stenosis deemed to be candidates for revascularization based on CTA or MRA, DSA led to institution of medical therapy only due to insufficiently severe stenosis. In patients treated with medical therapy based on the findings of <50% stenosis on DSA, the rate of recurrent stroke is low.

Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to candidacy in adults with transposition of the great arteries and a systemic right ventricle.

Clinical experience with continuous flow ventricular assist devices (VADs) in patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) including dextro-TGA and congenitally corrected TGA is rare, and indications as well as potential benefits or specific hurdles remain unclear. Therefore, our goal was to report on our experience regarding VAD therapy in adult patients with TGA as a bridge to candidacy. We performed a single-centre retrospective study of all adult patients with TGA with systemic right ventricular failure who had continuous flow VAD implants between 2010 and 2018. Study end points were all causes of death, major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events or pump thrombosis. Follow-up continued until the time of the heart transplant. A total of 6 patients (4 men) had a continuous flow VAD implanted in the context of a failing systemic right ventricle (dextro-TGA after the Mustard procedure: n = 3; congenitally corrected TGA: n = 3). Demographics: mean age 32 ± 5.7 years; median Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support: level II (range 1-4), mean pulmonary artery 48 ± 13 mmHg, mean pulmonary vascular resistance 5.6 ± 3.5 Wood units. Postoperative data: intensive care unit stay: 16 ± 9.7 days; in-hospital survival: 100%; no early VAD-related complications occurred. Mean follow-up: 33 ± 18 months; persistent left-side paresis: n = 1; minor (non-disabling) stroke: n = 2. Post-VAD pulmonary artery: 19 ± 3.4 mmHg; P < 0.005; post-VAD pulmonary resistance: 2.2 ± 0.55 Wood units; P = 0.066. Four patients had heart transplants after a mean waiting time of 30 months after the VAD was implanted; 2 patients are still on the waiting list (waiting time: 52 and 24 months). Continuous flow VAD therapy is a feasible therapeutic option in adult patients with TGA and a failing systemic right ventricle as a bridge to candidacy and a bridge to a heart transplant.

Age and sex distribution of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: A population-based study.

BackgroundBeat-to-beat blood pressure variability is associated with increased stroke risk but its importance at different ages is unclear.AimsTo determine the age-sex distribution of blood pressure variability in patients with transient ischemic stroke or minor stroke.MethodsIn consecutive patients within six weeks of transient ischemic stroke or non-disabling stroke (Oxford Vascular Study), non-invasive blood pressure was measured beat-to-beat over five minutes (Finometer). The age-sex distribution of blood pressure variability (residual coefficient of variation) was determined for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. The risk of top-decile blood pressure variability was estimated (logistic regression), unadjusted, and adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors.ResultsIn 908 of 1013 patients, excluding 54 in atrial fibrillation and 51 with low quality recordings, residual coefficient of variation was positively skewed with a median systolic residual coefficient of variation of 4.2% (IQR 3.2–5.5) and diastolic residual coefficient of variation of 3.9% (3.0–5.5), with 90th centile thresholds of 7.2 and 7.3%. Median systolic residual coefficient of variation was higher in patients under 50 years (4.5 and 3.0–5.3) compared to 60–70 years (4.1 and 3.2–5.2), but rose to 4.5% (3.5–6.9) above 80 years, with an increasingly positive skew. The proportion of patients with markedly elevated blood pressure variability in the top-decile increased significantly per decade (OR 1.72, p < 0.001), after adjustment for sex and risk factors.ConclusionsMedian beat-to-beat blood pressure variability fell in midlife, reflecting loss of physiological, organized blood pressure variability. However, rates of markedly elevated blood pressure variability significantly increased with greater age, suggesting that blood pressure variability may be particularly important in older patients.

Physiological determinants of residual cerebral arterial pulsatility on best medical treatment after TIA or minor stroke

Cerebral arterial pulsatility is strongly associated with cerebral small vessel disease and lacunar stroke yet its dependence on central versus local haemodynamic processes is unclear. In a population-based study of patients on best medical managment, 4–6 weeks after a TIA or non-disabling stroke, arterial stiffness and aortic systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures were measured (Sphygmocor). Middle cerebral artery peak and trough flow velocities and Gosling’s pulsatility index were measured by transcranial ultrasound. In 981 participants, aortic and cerebral pulsatility rose strongly with age in both sexes, but aortic diastolic pressure fell more with age in men whilst cerebral trough velocity fell more in women. There was no significant association between aortic systolic or diastolic blood pressure with cerebral peak or trough flow velocity but aortic pulse pressure explained 37% of the variance in cerebral arterial pulsatility, before adjustment, whilst 49% of the variance was explained by aortic pulse pressure, arterial stiffness, age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors. Furthermore, arterial stiffness partially mediated the relationship between aortic and cerebral pulsatility. Overall, absolute aortic pressures and cerebral blood flow velocity were poorly correlated but aortic and cerebral pulsatility were strongly related, suggesting a key role for transmission of aortic pulsatility to the brain.

Stroke Care Within the COVID-19 Pandemic-Increasing Awareness of Transient and Mild Stroke Symptoms Needed.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic might affect health care resources and alter patient admission to hospital in case of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aim to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting utilization of recanalization procedures and numbers of patients with stroke and TIA admitted to a primary care stroke center.Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we compared patients admitted from January 2019 until February 2020 with patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic (March/April 2020) in Germany. We included patients with stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) or TIA as classified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems version 10 (ICD-10).Results: The number of patients per month with ischemic stroke or TIA was found to have significantly decreased from January 2019 until February 2020 compared to the COVID-19 pandemic (March/April 2020) (ischemic stroke 69.1 ± 4.5 vs. 55 ± 5.7, p < 0.001, TIA 22.1 ± 4.1 vs. 14.5 ± 6.4, p < 0.034). Contrarily, percentages and numbers of recanalization procedures per month were not influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic (intravenous thrombolysis [iv-tPA] 9.4 ± 3.7 vs. 10.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.697, mechanical thrombectomy [MT] 13.1 ± 3.1 vs. 14.5 ± 3.5, p = 0.580, iv-TPA or MT 19.4 ± 4.1 vs. 19.0 ± 0.0, p = 0.889).Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, resources of the healthcare system in a primary care university hospital in Germany still allowed for unchanged numbers of recanalization procedures due to ischemic stroke. However, the numbers of patients admitted to the hospital specifically due to ischemic stroke or TIA decreased, suggesting that the awareness for non-disabling stroke symptoms has to be increased.

The Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique for the Treatment of Type B and Type Non-A Non-B Aortic Dissection

To evaluate outcomes of patients with acute complicated or chronic Type B or non-A non-B aortic dissection who underwent the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique. Between April 2013 and July 2019, 41 patients presenting with acute complicated (n=29) or chronic (n=12) descending thoracic aortic dissection were treated by the FET technique, which was the treatment of choice when supra-aortic vessel transposition would not suffice to create a satisfactory proximal landing zone for endovascular aortic repair, when a concomitant ascending or arch aneurysm was present, or in patients with connective tissue diseases. One patient (2%) died intra-operatively secondary to an aortic rupture in dwnstream aortic segments. No post-operative deaths occurred. Four patients (10%) suffered a non-disabling posto-operative stroke and were discharged with no clinical symptoms (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0, n=1), no significant disability (mRS 1, n=2), or with slight disability (mRS 2, n=1). No spinal cord ischaemia was observed. The primary entry tear was either surgically resected or excluded from circulation in all patients. During follow up, one patient (2%) died after two years (not aorta related) and 16 patients (39%) underwent an aortic re-intervention after 7.7 [interquartile range 0.7, 15.8] months (endovascular aortic repair: n=14; open thoraco-abdominal aortic replacement: n=1, hybrid approach: n=1). The FET technique is an effective treatment option for acute complicated and chronic Type B or non-A non-B aortic dissection in patients in whom primary endovascular aortic repair is non-feasible. While the post-operative outcome is acceptable with a relatively low incidence of non-disabling strokes, this study also underlines the considerable need for aortic re-interventions. Continuous follow up of all patients undergoing the FET procedure is essential.

Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Stroke is the third leading cause of death and the most common cause of long-term disability. Severe narrowing (stenosis) of the carotid artery is an important cause of stroke. Surgical treatment (carotid endarterectomy) may reduce the risk of stroke, but carries a risk of operative complications. This is an update of a Cochrane Review, originally published in 1999, and most recently updated in 2017. To determine the balance of benefit versus risk of endarterectomy plus best medical management compared with best medical management alone, in people with a recent symptomatic carotid stenosis (i.e. transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or non-disabling stroke). We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal to October 2019. We also reviewed the reference lists of all relevant studies and abstract books from research proceedings. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing carotid artery surgery plus best medical treatment with best medical treatment alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted the data. We assessed the results and the quality of the evidence of the primary and secondary outcomes by the GRADE method, which classifies the quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low. We included three trials involving 6343 participants. The trials differed in the methods of measuring carotid stenosis and in the definition of stroke. Using the primary electronic data files, we pooled and analysed individual patient data on 6092 participants (35,000 patient-years of follow-up), after reassessing the carotid angiograms and outcomes from all three trials, and redefining outcome events where necessary, to achieve comparability. Surgery increased the five-year risk of any stroke or operative death in participants with less than 30% stenosis (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.56; 2 studies, 1746 participants; high-quality evidence). Surgery decreased the five-year risk of any stroke or operative death in participants with 30% to 49% stenosis (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.19; 2 studies, 1429 participants; high-quality evidence), was of benefit in participants with 50% to 69% stenosis (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.94; 3 studies, 1549 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and was highly beneficial in participants with 70% to 99% stenosis without near-occlusion (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.67; 3 studies, 1095 participants; moderate-quality evidence). However, surgery decreased the five-year risk of any stroke or operative death in participants with near-occlusions (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.53; 2 studies, 271 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Carotid endarterectomy reduced the risk of recurrent stroke for people with significant stenosis. Endarterectomy might be of some benefit for participants with 50% to 69% symptomatic stenosis (moderate-quality evidence) and highly beneficial for those with 70% to 99% stenosis (moderate-quality evidence).

The Structure of SleepDisordered Breathing and Cognitive Impairment in Cerebrovascular Diseases

Abstract. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is considered one of the risk factors for cognitive impairment (CogI). The role of central apnea (CA) in the development of CI has not been established. Aim — to study the features of the structure of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with chronic cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and clarify their significance as a risk factor for CogI. Material and methods. 100 patients (50 men, 50 women) at the age of 65 (58; 74.5) years were examined. Most had arterial hypertension (AH) and atherosclerosis of the brachiocephalic arteries; less commonly, stable forms of coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2. All patients were diagnosed with stage I–II dyscirculatory encephalopathy. Previously, non-disabling stroke was suffered by 37% of patients (mRS 0–2 points). Everyone completed the MoCA test. SDB was verified during cardiorespiratory monitoring (CT-04-3R (M), “INKART”, St. Petersburg). We estimated the number of episodes of SDB, obstructive apnea, CA, apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), duration and degree of desaturation. The correlation, discriminant and ROC analysis, the calculation of the odds ratio (OR) and the confidence interval (CI) of the occurrence of the event are performed. Results. SDB (AHI ≥ 5) according to the type of OSAS and CA were detected in 82% of patients. The average AHI was 13 (8; 21). CogI (MoCA &lt; 26) were detected in 28% of patients without SDB and 52% of patients with SDB (p = 0.03). The relationship between the assessment of MoCA and AHI (Spearman, r = –0.24, p = 0.02) was established. A discriminant analysis with step-by-step inclusion of cardiovascular risk factors and SDB parameters revealed that CA, the degree of AH, age and DM are associated with the development of CN (Wilks’s Lambda: 0.75542; approx. F(4,73) = 5.9087, p &lt; 0.0004). A threshold value of CA ≥ 5 was established (AUC 0.741, 95% CI 0.595–0.828; sensitivity 64%, specificity 76%), while the OR is 5.5 (95% CI 2.09–14.90). Conclusion. In 82% of patients with chronic CVD, SDB is detected, which is associated with a twofold increase in the frequency of CogI. Moreover, the most significant is the presence in the SDB structure of 5 or more episodes of CA, which serve not as a cause of CogI, but as a marker of more severe structural and functional cerebral changes.

Safety and efficacy of a hybrid approach for repair of complicated aberrant subclavian arteries

ObjectiveAberrant subclavian artery (ASA), a well-described aortic arch anomaly, is frequently associated with dysphagia and development of Kommerell diverticulum (KD) with aneurysmal degeneration. Historically, open repair has been performed, which can be associated with significant morbidity. More recently, hybrid approaches using different arch vessel revascularization techniques in combination with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (hybrid TEVAR) have been described, but there is a paucity of literature describing outcomes. The objective of this analysis was to describe our experience with management of complicated ASAs using hybrid TEVAR, further adding to the literature describing approaches to and outcomes of hybrid ASA repair. MethodsA retrospective, single-institution review was performed of all patients treated for ASA complications using hybrid TEVAR (2002-2018). The primary end point was technical success, defined as absence of type I or type III endoleak intraoperatively and within 30 days postoperatively. Secondary end points included complications, reintervention, and survival. Centerline measurement of KD diameters (maximum diameter = opposing aortic outer wall to diverticulum apex) was employed. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate secondary end points. ResultsEighteen patients (1.4% of 1240 total TEVAR procedures; male, 67%; age, 59 ± 13 years) were identified (left-sided arch and right ASA, 94% [n = 17]; right-sided arch and left ASA, n = 1 [6%]; retroesophageal location and associated KD, 100%); median preoperative KD diameter was 60 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 37-108 mm). Operative indications included diverticulum diameter (61%), dysphagia (17%), rupture (11%), rapid expansion (6%), and endoleak after TEVAR (6%). All procedures used some combination of supraclavicular revascularization and TEVAR (staged, 50% [n = 9]), whereas partial open arch reconstruction was used in 17% (n = 3).There were no perioperative deaths or spinal cord ischemic events. Major complications occurred in 22% (n = 4): nondisabling stroke, one; arm ischemia, one; upper extremity neuropathy, one; and iatrogenic descending thoracic aortic dissection, one. Technical success was 83%, but 44% (n = 8) had an endoleak (type I, n = 3; type II, n = 5 [intercostal, n = 2; aneurysmal subclavian artery origin, n = 3]) during follow-up (median, 4 months; IQR, 1-15 months). Two endoleaks resolved spontaneously, three were treated, and three were observed (1-year freedom from reintervention, 75% ± 10%). Median KD diameter decreased by 7 mm (IQR, 1-12 mm), and 78% (n = 14) experienced diameter reduction or stability in follow-up. The 1- and 3-year survival was 93% ± 6% and 84% ± 10%, respectively. ConclusionsHybrid open brachiocephalic artery revascularization with TEVAR appears to be safe and reasonably effective in management of ASA complications as evidenced by a low perioperative complication risk and reasonable positive aortic remodeling. However, endoleak rates raise significant concerns about durability. Therefore, if this technique is employed, the mandatory need for surveillance and high rate of reintervention should be emphasized preoperatively. This analysis represents a relatively large series of a hybrid TEVAR technique to treat ASA complications, but greater patient numbers and longer follow-up are needed to further establish the role of this procedure.

Prognosis of Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale at Older Ages and Implications for Trials

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure may prevent recurrent stroke after cryptogenic transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke (TIA/stroke) in patients aged 60 years or younger. Patent foramen ovale is associated with cryptogenic stroke in the older population, but risk of recurrence is unknown. Data on prognosis of patients receiving medical treatment at older ages (≥60 years) are essential to justify trials of PFO closure. To examine the age-specific risk of recurrence in patients with cryptogenic TIA/stroke with PFO. A prospective study was nested in the population-based Oxford Vascular Study between September 1, 2014, and March 31, 2019, with face-to-face follow-up for 5 years. A total of 416 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of cryptogenic TIA or nondisabling stroke, screened for PFO at a rapid-access TIA/stroke clinic, were included. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies reporting on ischemic stroke recurrence after cryptogenic TIA/stroke in patients with PFO who were receiving medical therapy alone, or with PFO vs no-PFO was conducted. Sample size calculation for future trials on PFO closure was performed for patients aged 60 years or older. Patent foramen ovale and age as modifiers of risk of recurrent stroke after cryptogenic TIA/stroke in patients receiving only medical therapy. Risk of ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with cryptogenic TIA/stroke and PFO receiving medical therapy only, and in patients with vs without PFO, stratified by age (<65 vs ≥65 years), as well as sample-size calculation for future trials of PFO closure in patients aged 60 years or older. Among the 153 Oxford Vascular Study patients with PFO (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [13.7] years; 80 [52.3%] men), recurrent ischemic stroke risk (2.05 per 100 patient-years) was similar to the pooled estimate from a systematic review of 23 other studies (9 trials and 14 observational studies) (2.00 per 100 patient-years; 95% CI, 1.55-2.58). However, there was heterogeneity between studies (P < .001 for heterogeneity), owing mainly to risk increasing with mean cohort age (meta-regression: R2 = 0.31; P = .003). In the pooled analysis of 4 studies including patients with or without PFO, increased risk of stroke recurrence with PFO was seen only at age 65 years or older (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.2; P = .001 for difference; P = .39 for heterogeneity). The pooled ischemic stroke risk was 3.27 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 2.59-4.13) in 4 cohorts with mean age 60 years or older. Assuming the more conservative 2.0 per 100 patient-years ischemic stroke risk in the PFO nonclosure arms of future trials in patients aged 60 years or older, projected sample sizes were 1080 per arm for 80% power to detect a 33% relative risk reduction. The findings of this study suggest that age is a determinant of risk of ischemic stroke after cryptogenic TIA/stroke in patients with PFO, such that trials of PFO closure at older ages are justified; however, projected sample sizes are large.

Efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonist on post-TAVI patients: a meta-analysis

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been a favored option for the patient who suffered from symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) for post-TAVI patients are still controversial. This meta-analysis aims at comparing the clinical outcome and safety of NOACs and VKA in the patients after receiving TAVI.MethodWe searched literature articles in all reachable databases, and observational study as well as randomized controlled trial would be included in order to perform a comprehensive analysis. All-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, disabling or nondisabling stroke were main pooled outcome measures. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were adopted to explore heterogeneity. Assessment of bias was performed under the suggestion of Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool.ResultsWe collected 3841 non-duplicate citations from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov, and eventually 7 studies were included for this meta-analysis. As a result, VKA showed priority against NOACs in the field of anti-thromboembolism (4435 participants, RR:1.44, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.99, I2 = 0%, P = 0.02).ConclusionWith corroborative analysis of severe complications, VKA is shown to be more protective on post-TAVI patients in disabling or nondisabling stroke scenario but not in mortality or bleeding event.

Association between electrocardiographic and echocardiographic atrial abnormalities and prognosis in cryptogenic stroke

Background and PurposeThe role of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well known. However, the usefulness of left atrial (LA) electrical and morphological abnormalities to identify more disabling strokes in sinus rhythm patients is less studied. We evaluated the association between electrocardiographic P-wave abnormalities and echocardiographic LA measures with neurological disability in patients with cryptogenic stroke. MethodsIn a retrospective cohort, we included all consecutive hospitalized patients with cryptogenic stroke. Patients were classified according to modified Rankin scale at hospital discharge and at 3 months. LA abnormalities were identified by electrocardiographic (ECG) P-wave, axis and LA enlargement criteria, and by bidimensional echocardiograph through left atrial diameter and volume index. ResultsAmong the 143 patients with CS (63.4 ± 14.2 years, 53% women), 70 patients were classified as non-disabling stroke (Rankin score < 2) and 73 patients as disabling stroke (Rankin score ≥ 2) at hospital discharge. On echocardiogram, more patients with disabling stroke presented with enlarged LA volume index (48% vs. 25%; p = 0.01). This difference remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc and NIHSS scores (p = 0.02) and even when the LA volume index was analyzed as a continuous variable (p = 0.055). Also, enlarged LA volume index was more prevalent (52% vs. 25%; p = 0.03) among those with disabling stroke at 3 months after hospital discharge. Among ECG criteria, only the LA enlargement assessed by downward deflection was more prevalent in disabling stroke. ConclusionOur study demonstrated an association between left atrial enlargement, assessed by downward deflection from ECG and volume index from echocardiogram, and more disabling cryptogenic strokes. This information could help to identify patients with poorer prognosis, or a subgroup where atrial cardiopathy may play a role in cardioembolic pathway.