Abstract

Beat-to-beat variability in blood pressure (BP) is associated with recurrent stroke despite good control of hypertension. However, no study has identified rates of progression of beat-to-beat BP variability (BPV), its determinants, or which patient groups are particularly affected, limiting understanding of its potential as a treatment target. In consecutive patients one month after a transient ischaemic attack or nondisabling stroke (Oxford Vascular Study), continuous noninvasive BP was measured beat-to-beat over 5 minutes (Finometer). Arterial stiffness was measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Sphygmocor). Repeat assessments were performed at the 5-year follow-up visit and agreement determined by intraclass correlation coefficient. Rates of progression of systolic BPV (SBPV) and diastolic BPV (DBPV) and their determinants were estimated by mixed-effect linear models, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. One hundred eighty-eight of 310 surviving, eligible patients had repeat assessments after a median of 5.8 years. Pulse wave velocity was highly reproducible but SBPV and DBPV were not (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.71, 0.10, and 0.16, respectively), however, all 3 progressed significantly (pulse wave velocity, 2.39%, P<0.0001; SBPV, 8.36%, P<0.0001; DBPV, 9.7, P<0.0001). Rate of progression of pulse wave velocity, SBPV, and DBPV all increased significantly with age (P<0.0001), with an increasingly positive skew and were particularly associated with female sex (pulse wave velocity P=0.00035; SBPV P<0.0001; DBPV P<0.0001) and aortic mean SBP (SBPV P=0.037, DBPV P<0.0001). Beat-to-beat BP variability progresses significantly in high-risk patients, particularly in older individuals with elevated aortic systolic pressure. Beat-to-beat BPV and its progression represent potential new therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Highlights

  • Beat-to-beat variability in blood pressure (BP) is associated with recurrent stroke despite good control of hypertension

  • Patients with episodic hypertension after a cerebrovascular event have a high risk of recurrent stroke,[1,2] residual visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure (BPV) on treatment has a poor prognosis despite good control of mean BP1,2 and benefits of some antihypertensive drugs in the prevention of stroke may partly result from reduced variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP).[3,4]

  • Demographic characteristics were similar between patients undergoing arterial stiffness and beat-to-beat blood pressure variability (BPV) (Table 1), and between patients having any repeat study versus those eligible surviving patients who did not return for follow-up (Table S1 in the Data Supplement)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Beat-to-beat variability in blood pressure (BP) is associated with recurrent stroke despite good control of hypertension. Patients with episodic hypertension after a cerebrovascular event have a high risk of recurrent stroke,[1,2] residual visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure (BPV) on treatment has a poor prognosis despite good control of mean BP1,2 and benefits of some antihypertensive drugs in the prevention of stroke may partly result from reduced variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP).[3,4] Strong associations between visit-to-visit BP variability with cardiovascular events,[5] renal impairment,[6] and cognitive decline[7] have been demonstrated in population-based cohorts and specific disease cohorts,[6,8] with similar predictive value of BP variability day-to-day on home readings.[9] use of both visit-to-visit and home BP variability require a prolonged period of assessment, good patient compliance, and follow-up visits.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.