Noncomputable Degrees Research Articles

Extending CL-reducibility on array noncomputable degrees

Given a function f, f-bounded-Turing (f-bT-) reducibility is the Turing reducibility with use function bounded by f. In the special case where f=id+c (with id being the identity function and c a constant), this is referred to as cl-reducibility. In [7], it was proven that there exist two left-c.e. reals such that no left-c.e. real (id+g)-bT-computes both of them whenever g is computable, nondecreasing, and satisfies ∑n2−g(n)=∞. Moreover, such maximal pairs exist precisely within every array noncomputable degree. This result generalizes a prior result on cl-reducibility, which states that there exist two left-c.e. reals such that no left-c.e. real cl-computes both of them. An open question remained as to whether a similar extension could apply to another result on cl-reducibility, which asserts that there exists a left-c.e. real not cl-reducible to any random left-c.e. real. We answer this question affirmatively, providing a simpler proof compared to previous works. Additionally, we streamline the proof of the initial extension.

Enumerations of families closed under finite differences

Slaman and Wehner independently built a family of sets with the property that every non-computable degree can compute an enumeration of the family, but there is no computable enumeration of the family. We call such a family a Slaman–Wehner family. The original Slaman–Wehner argument relies on all sets in the family constructed being finite, and in particular, it diagonalizes against computably enumerated families using only finite differences. In this paper we ask whether this is a necessary feature, that is, whether there is a Slaman–Wehner family closed under finite differences. This question remains open but we obtain a number of interesting partial results which can be interpreted as saying that the question is quite hard. First of all, no Slaman–Wehner family closed under finite differences can contain a finite set, and the enumeration of the family from a non-computable degree cannot be uniform (whereas, in the Slaman–Wehner construction, it is uniform). On the other hand, we build the following examples of families closed under finite differences which show the impossibility of several natural attempts to show that no Slaman–Wehner family exists: (1) a family that can be enumerated by every non-low degree, but not by any low degree; (2) a family that can be enumerated by any set in a given uniform list of c.e. sets, but which cannot be enumerated computably; and (3) a family that can be enumerated by a given Δ 2 0 set, but which cannot be computably enumerated.

Thin Set Versions of Hindman’s Theorem

We examine the reverse mathematical strength of a variation of Hindman’s Theorem (HT) constructed by essentially combining HT with the Thin Set Theorem to obtain a principle that we call thin-HT. This principle states that every coloring c:N→N has an infinite set S⊆N whose finite sums are thin for c, meaning that there is an i with c(s)≠i for all nonempty sums s of finitely many distinct elements of S. We show that there is a computable instance of thin-HT such that every solution computes ∅′, as is the case with HT, as shown by Blass, Hirst, and Simpson (1987). In analyzing this proof, we deduce that thin-HT implies ACA0 over RCA0+IΣ20. On the other hand, using Rumyantsev and Shen’s computable version of the Lovász Local Lemma, we show that there is a computable instance of the restriction of thin-HT to sums of exactly 2 elements such that any solution has diagonally noncomputable degree relative to ∅′. Hence there is a computable instance of this restriction of thin-HT with no Σ20 solution.

THE COMPUTATIONAL CONTENT OF INTRINSIC DENSITY

AbstractIn a previous article, the author introduced the idea of intrinsic density—a restriction of asymptotic density to sets whose density is invariant under computable permutation. We prove that sets with well-defined intrinsic density (and particularly intrinsic density 0) exist only in Turing degrees that are either high (${\bf{a}}\prime { \ge _{\rm{T}}}\emptyset \prime \prime$) or compute a diagonally noncomputable function. By contrast, a classic construction of an immune set in every noncomputable degree actually yields a set with intrinsic lower density 0 in every noncomputable degree.We also show that the former result holds in the sense of reverse mathematics, in that (over RCA0) the existence of a dominating or diagonally noncomputable function is equivalent to the existence of a set with intrinsic density 0.

AVOIDING EFFECTIVE PACKING DIMENSION 1 BELOW ARRAY NONCOMPUTABLE C.E. DEGREES

AbstractRecent work of Conidis [3] shows that there is a Turing degree with nonzero effective packing dimension, but which does not contain any set of effective packing dimension 1.This article shows the existence of such a degree below every c.e. array noncomputable degree, and hence that they occur below precisely those of the c.e. degrees which are array noncomputable.

A HIERARCHY OF COMPUTABLY ENUMERABLE DEGREES

AbstractWe introduce a new hierarchy of computably enumerable degrees. This hierarchy is based on computable ordinal notations measuring complexity of approximation of${\rm{\Delta }}_2^0$functions. The hierarchy unifies and classifies the combinatorics of a number of diverse constructions in computability theory. It does so along the lines of the high degrees (Martin) and the array noncomputable degrees (Downey, Jockusch, and Stob). The hierarchy also gives a number of natural definability results in the c.e. degrees, including a definable antichain.

Degree invariance in the Π10classes

AbstractLet denote the collection of all Π10 classes, ordered by inclusion. A collection of Turing degrees in is called invariant over if there is some collection of Π10 classes representing exactly the degrees such that is invariant under automorphisms of . Herein we expand the known degree invariant classes of , previously including only {0} and the array noncomputable degrees, to include all highn and non-lown degrees for n > 2. This is a corollary to a very general definability result. The result is carried out in a substructure G of , within which the techniques used model those used by Cholak and Harrington [6] to obtain the same definability for the c.e. sets. We work back and forth between G and to show that this definability in G gives the desired degree invariance over .

Turing degrees of reals of positive effective packing dimension

A relatively longstanding question in algorithmic randomness is Jan Reimann's question whether there is a Turing cone of broken dimension. That is, is there a real A such that { B : B ⩽ T A } contains no 1-random real, yet contains elements of nonzero effective Hausdorff dimension? We show that the answer is affirmative if Hausdorff dimension is replaced by its inner analogue packing dimension. We construct a minimal degree of effective packing dimension 1. This leads us to examine the Turing degrees of reals with positive effective packing dimension. Unlike effective Hausdorff dimension, this is a notion of complexity which is shared by both random and sufficiently generic reals. We provide a characterization of the c.e. array noncomputable degrees in terms of effective packing dimension.

Lattice embeddings and array noncomputable degrees

AbstractWe focus on a particular class of computably enumerable (c. e.) degrees, the array noncomputable degrees defined by Downey, Jockusch, and Stob, to answer questions related to lattice embeddings and definability in the partial ordering (ℜ︁, ≤) of c. e. degrees under Turing reducibility. We demonstrate that the latticeM5 cannot be embedded into the c. e. degrees below every array noncomputable degree, or even below every nonlow array noncomputable degree. As Downey and Shore have proved that M5 can be embedded below every nonlow2 degree, our result is the best possible in terms of array noncomputable degrees and jump classes. Further, this result shows that the array noncomputable degrees are definably different from the nonlow2 degrees. We note also that there are embeddings of M5 in which all five degrees are array noncomputable, and in which the bottom degree is the computable degree 0 but the other four are array noncomputable. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

The -spectrum of a linear order

AbstractSlaman and Wehner have constructed structures which distinguish the computable Turing degree 0 from the noncomputable degrees, in the sense that the spectrum of each structure consists precisely of the noncomputable degrees. Downey has asked if this can be done for an ordinary type of structure such as a linear order. We show that there exists a linear order whose spectrum includes every noncomputable degree, but not 0. Since our argument requires the technique of permitting below a set, we include a detailed explantion of the mechanics and intuition behind this type of permitting.