Abstract Introduction/Objective Using O pRBCs for non-O patients for acute events is not unusual in a level 1 trauma hospital. However, we occasionally utilize this blood type to meet the needs of our patients that are not acutely bleeding. In this study, we evaluated the utilization of O units in non-O patients to improve our transfusion practices. Methods/Case Report We reviewed the indications of the O pRBCs transfused to non-O patients from October 2023 to March 2024. We evaluated the number of units used in acute events such as massive transfusion protocol (MTP), acute blood loss, sickle cell disease (SCD) patients in crises, bleeding associated with surgery and in patients with symptomatic anemia. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) There were 258 O pRBCs transfused to non-O blood type from October 2023 to March 2024. 135(52%) of these units were used for bleeding patients, of which 91%(124/135) were used for acute events. Most of the units utilized for acute hemorrhage had activated MTP (92%, 89/124) due to trauma (88%, 78/89). Only 12%(31/258) were used by SCD patients, with a little over half of these units being used acutely and the rest used prophylactically. About 69% of the 16 units used in surgery were due to bleeding. Lastly, 76 units (29%) were used for symptomatic anemia patients with 45% of these units transfused for anemia of prematurity. Conclusion In a level 1 trauma hospital, advocating for conserving O units is crucial to ensure enough units are available for trauma. As anticipated, acute bleeding was found to be the leading cause for patients with non-O blood types to receive O pRBCs. Notably, the prevalence of using O units for acute and prophylactic transfusion is relatively the same for SCD patients and phenotypically matching the Rh and Kell systems likely plays a role.
Read full abstract