non-O Blood Type Research Articles

BLOOD TYPE O IS A RISK FACTOR FOR HYPERFIBRINOLYSIS AND MASSIVE TRANSFUSION AFTER SEVERE INJURY.

Background: Blood type O is the most common blood type and has lower von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels (25%-35% lower than non-O blood types). von Willebrand factor is important for initiating platelet attachment and binding factor VIII. We hypothesized that patients with type O blood are at an increased risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy and bleeding post injury. Study Design: Adult trauma activations with known blood type at a level I trauma center with field systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg were studied retrospectively. The relationships of blood group O versus non-O to coagulation assays, massive transfusion (MT), ventilator-free days, and mortality were adjusted for confounders. Hyperfibrinolysis (HF) was defined as thromboelastogram of percent lysis in 30 min > 3%, and fibrinolysis shutdown was defined as percent lysis in 30 min < 0.9%. von Willebrand factor activity was quantified on 212 injured patients using a STAGO apparatus. Results: Overall, 268 patients met criteria. Type O patients were more likely to develop HF than non-type O blood patients (43% vs. 29%, P = 0.06) and had significantly lower vWF activity (222% vs. 249%, P = 0.01). After adjustment for New Injury Severity Score and blunt mechanism, type O had higher odds of HF (odds ratio, 1.94, 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.47) and increased odds of MT (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-7.49). Other outcomes were not significantly affected. Conclusion: Type O patients with hypotension had increased HF and MT post injury, and these were associated with lower vWF activity. These findings have implications for the monitoring of HF in patients receiving type O whole-blood transfusions post injury.

S29 Dilated Main Pancreatic Duct Without a Visible Pancreatic Mass: Long-Term Follow-Up and Predictors of Future Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage when therapeutic options are limited. Pancreatic imaging abnormalities that predate diagnosis of PDAC may serve as an early detection tool. Dilation of the main pancreatic duct (D-MPD) has been shown to occur up to a year before PDAC diagnosis. However, while D-MPD in the absence of a visible pancreatic mass raises concern for occult neoplasm, the natural history of D-MPD remains poorly understood. From a large cohort of patients with D-MPD and no pancreatic mass, we aimed to assess long-term outcomes and compare patients who were subsequently diagnosed with PDAC to those who did not develop PDAC. Methods: We identified all subjects ≥18 years old at our institution with D-MPD (MPD >3mm) on either abdomen/pelvis CT or MRI scans between 1/1/2012 and 12/31/2017. Patients with prior PDAC, pancreatic surgery, definite pancreas mass or other visible cause of D-MPD were excluded after expert review by study radiologist. Pertinent clinical, demographic, and imaging data were summarized. A stratified univariate Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to evaluate risk factors for PDAC development. Results: Among 2307 patients (baseline CT:1615, MRI: 692) who met our study criteria, 63.7% were female, median age was 71 (IQR 59.5 -80.1), and median follow-up was 1466 days (IQR 1426-1509). The 1-year and 3-year event rates for PDAC were 2.70 and 2.99 per 100-patient years respectively. Out of sixty-three (2.7%) patients who developed PDAC within 3 years of the baseline scan, the majority (58/63) were within 1 year (Figure). Factors associated with a significantly increased 3-year risk of PDAC included male gender, BMI >25, diabetes mellitus, non-O blood type, elevated serum CA 19-9, focal narrowing of MPD, equivocal pancreatic mass and suboptimal baseline scan quality (Table). Conclusion: D-MPD may predate the diagnosis PDAC and raises concern for neoplasm. However, in our study only a small subset of D-MPD patients without an overt pancreatic mass developed PDAC on follow-up. The risk is highest in the first year with rare events after one year of PDAC-free follow-up. Risk factors identified in this study may enrich assessment and guide surveillance of patients with D-MPD. Future studies exploring machine learning tools can further enhance the identification of those at risk of future PDAC and facilitate early detection.Figure 1.: Kaplan-Meier curve estimate of PDAC event rates over the 3-year followup duration Table 1. - Univariate Survival Analysis (w/ strata) assessing the risk of developing PDAC within 3 years from baseline CT/MRI in 2307 patients with D-MPD Characteristics Reference Hazard Ratio 95% HR CI p-value Age (years) ≥50 < 50 7.109 0.987 51.192 0.0515 Body Mass Index (kg/m2) ≥25 < 25 1.972 1.172 3.319 0.0105 Maximum MPD diameter (mm) ≥5-< 10 ≥3-< 5 3.773 1.987 7.167 < .0001 ≥10 ≥3-< 5 20.081 8.455 47.691 < .0001 CA19-9 ≥35 < 35 4.819 2.678 8.670 < .0001 Gender Male Female 1.937 1.181 3.176 0.0088 ABO Blood type Type Non- O Type O 2.238 1.162 4.310 0.0161 Alcohol Ever Use Never Use 1.029 0.612 1.731 0.9137 Aspirin Ever Use Never Use 0.936 0.534 1.640 0.8177 Diabetes mellitus Yes No 2.596 1.554 4.338 0.0003 Chronic Pancreatitis Yes No 0.386 0.094 1.576 0.1847 Acute Pancreatitis Yes No 1.116 0.551 2.260 0.7609 Family History of PDAC Yes No 1.952 0.930 4.097 0.0772 Pancreas Cyst on imaging Yes No 1.444 0.856 2.439 0.1688 Equivocal Mass on imaging Yes No 12.524 7.248 21.640 < .0001 Image Quality Suboptimal but diagnostic Optimal 2.241 1.309 3.839 0.0033 Dilation Pattern Segmental/Multifocal Diffuse 1.175 0.717 1.926 0.5214 Focal Narrowing of the MPD Present Absent 40.800 9.732 171.038 < .0001

A systematic review of prognosis of ABO blood group and rhesus factor on outcomes in patients with bladder cancer.

Background:Bladder cancer (BC) is the 10th most common malignancy worldwide, and some studies reported that ABO blood type or/and rhesus factor has been identified as a prognostic oncologic marker for patients with BC. We carried out a systematic review to assess the prognosis of ABO blood group and rhesus factor on outcomes in patients with bladder cancer.Methods:We searched databases through February 2022 for studies assessing blood group on outcomes in patients with bladder cancer.Results:We included ten studies with 15,204 participants. We found that blood type A is relevant to non-muscle-invasive BC patients treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor and blood type B patients have a lower incidence of disease recurrence and progression. Blood type O and non-O blood type have not been found to be related to disease recurrence. However, in multivariable analyses, blood type O and non-O blood type are associated with cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Other than that, blood type B doesn’t have statistical significance for BC patients accepted radical cystectomy (RC). The same results showed in blood type AB non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with RC.Conclusions:Our study confirmed that a particular association of blood type for prognosis of patients with BC, and ABO blood group antigen expression can be suitable biomarkers for BC. We also found that rhesus factor has no impact on prognosis of BC patients.

Association between inherited thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism in patients with non-O blood type: a meta-analysis.

Hereditary conditions, including non‑O blood group or thrombophilic alterations such as factor V Leiden (FVL) and G20210A prothrombin mutation (G20210A PTM), are usually considered risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This meta‑analysis was carried out to find out if simultaneous occurrence of FVL or PTM and the non‑O blood group may increase the risk of developing VTE. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were explored until March 2021. Eleven publications, comprising 82 465 patients, and 6 studies, including 70 004 patients, were analyzed to evaluate the association between FVL/non‑O group and PTM/non‑O group, respectively. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs were obtained by a random‑effects model. Nearly 6% of the enrolled patients manifested both FVL and the non‑O group, whereas only 1.4% had PTM and the non‑O group. The VTE risk was considerably amplified in FVL and the non‑O group (OR, 5.94; 95% CI, 5.33-6.61; P <0.01), more than if just 1 of these 2 risk factors was present. The equivalent population attributable risk (PAR) of VTE was around 21%. The patients with PTM and the non‑O group manifested a significantly augmented risk of VTE (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 3.00-5.36; P = 0.01), although PAR was considerably lower (3.7%). The co‑occurrence of FVL and the non‑O group enhances the risk of VTE that could have clinical influence and drive therapeutic corrections. The coexistence of PTM and the non‑O blood group seems to play a less important role in the incidence of VTE.

Pancreatic cancer among solid organ transplant recipients in the United States.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is not well studied. Some PC cases may be incidentally detected during hepatobiliary imaging. We evaluated PC among 374,106 SOT recipients during 1995-2017 in the United States using linked data from the national transplant registry and multiple state/regional cancer registries. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to compare PC risk in recipients to the general population. We used multivariate Poisson regression to identify independent risk factors for PC. We assessed survival after PC diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. SOT recipients had elevated incidence for PC compared with the general population (SIR 1.40, 95% CI 1.29-1.52), and this increase was strongest in liver recipients (1.65, 1.41-1.92). Among all recipients, PC incidence was especially increased for cases arising in the head of the pancreas (SIR 1.50, 95% CI 1.34-1.68) and for cases diagnosed at localized stage (1.85, 1.37-2.44). Among SOT recipients, factors independently associated with increased incidence were consistent with those in general population including male sex, older age, non-O blood type, and history of diabetes. Additionally, compared to other organ recipients, liver transplant recipients had higher PC incidence (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.28; 95% CI 1.06-1.54). Overall survival after PC diagnosis was poor (median 4months) and similar between liver and other organ transplant recipients (p = 0.08). PC incidence is elevated among SOT recipients, and more commonly diagnosed in liver transplant recipients perhaps related to incidental detection. However, survival is poor even in liver recipients, arguing against routine PC screening.

The prognostic impact of ABO blood type in pancreatic cancer: Relevance to adjuvant chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of ABO blood type in resected pancreatic cancer (PC), with a focus on adjuvant chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed 510 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PC between 2006 and 2017. Survival outcomes were investigated according to blood type and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (S-1, gemcitabine, or no adjuvant chemotherapy). Among the 510 patients, the overall survival (OS) of patients with blood type O was significantly better compared to those with blood type non-O (5-year OS rate, 46.6% vs 30.5%, P=.025). In 241 patients treated with adjuvant S-1, the 5-year OS of patients with blood type O was significantly better than those with blood type non-O (70.7% vs 44.2%, P=.001). Multivariate analysis showed that blood type non-O was an independent prognostic factor for OS in the overall cohort (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58, P=.002) and in patients treated with adjuvant S-1 (HR: 2.99, P < .001). In patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine or no adjuvant chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in OS between patients with blood type O and those with blood type non-O. Blood type O predicted favorable survival in patients with resected PC, which was associated with adjuvant S-1.

Determiningoptimal donor heart ischemic times in adult cardiac transplantation.

ObjectivesUnsupervised statistical determination of optimal allograft ischemic time (IT) on heart transplant outcomes among ABO donor heart types.MethodsWe identified 36,145 heart transplants (2000–2018) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric testing. Determination of IT cutoffs for survival analysis was performed using Contal and O'Quigley univariable method and Vito Muggeo multivariable segmented modeling.ResultsUnivariable and multivariable IT threshold determination revealed a cutoff at about 3 h. The hourly increase in survival risk with ≥3 h IT is asymmetrically experienced at the early 90 days (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29, p < .001) and up to 1‐year time point (HR = 1.16, p < .001). Beyond 1 year the risk of prolonged IT is less impactful (HR = 1.04, p = .022). Longer IT was associated with more postoperative complications such as stroke (2.7% vs. 2.3, p = .042), dialysis (11.6% vs. 9.1%, p < .001) and death from primary graft dysfunction (1.8% vs. 1.2%, p < .001). O blood type donor hearts with IT ≥ 3 h has significantly increased hourly mortality risk at 90 days (HR = 1.27, p < .001), 90 days to 1 year (HR = 1.22, p < .001) and >1 year (HR = 1.05, p = .041). For non‐O blood types with ≥3 h IT hourly mortality risk was increased at 90 days (HR = 1.33, p < .001), but not at 90 days to 1 year (HR = 1.09, p = .146) nor ≥1 year (HR = 1.08, p = .237).ConclusionsThe donor heart IT threshold for survival determined from unbiased statistical modeling occurs at 3 h. With longer preservation times, transplantation with O donor hearts was associated with worse survival.

Prevalence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies and Potential Determinants among the Belgian Adult Population: Baseline Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

The prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and potential determinants were assessed in a random sample representative of the Belgian adult population. In total, 14,201 individuals (≥18 years) were invited by mail to provide saliva via an Oracol® swab. Survey weights were applied, and potential determinants were estimated using multivariable logistic regressions. Between March and August 2021, 2767 individuals participated in the first data collection. During this period, which coincided with the onset of the vaccination campaign, the seroprevalence in the population increased from 25.2% in March/April to 78.1% in July. Among the vaccinated there was an increase from 74,2% to 98.8%; among the unvaccinated, the seroprevalence remained stable (around 17%). Among the vaccinated, factors significantly associated with the presence of antibodies were: having at least one chronic disease (ORa 0.22 (95% CI 0.08–0.62)), having received an mRNA-type vaccine (ORa 5.38 (95% CI 1.72–16.80)), and having received an influenza vaccine in 2020–2021 (ORa 3.79 (95% CI 1.30–11.07)). Among the unvaccinated, having a non-O blood type (ORa 2.00 (95% CI 1.09–3.67)) and having one or more positive COVID-19 tests (ORa 11.04 (95% CI 4.69–26.02)) were significantly associated. This study provides a better understanding of vaccine- and/or natural-induced presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and factors that are associated with this presence.

ABO blood group type and risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer. Although in the general population blood type non-O is associated with increased VTE risk, the impact of ABO blood type on risk of cancer-associated VTE has not been clarified. To determine the influence of ABO blood type on cancer-associated VTE risk, we conducted an analysis within the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study, a prospective cohort study including patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer observed for the primary outcome VTE. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed and specific time-restricted subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) were calculated to investigate the association between non-O blood type and VTE over time. One thousand, seven hundred and eight patients were included in the analysis (median follow-up time: 24 months; interquartile range: 10-24), and 151 patients developed VTE (8.8%). During the first 3 months of follow-up, there was no association between non-O blood type and VTE risk (SHR: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.67). Thereafter, non-O blood type was associated with a higher VTE risk (SHR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.12-2.85). Furthermore, non-O blood type was associated with increased VTE risk in patients with intermediate and low thrombotic risk tumor types (SHR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.09-2.73) but not in very high-risk types (pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and brain cancer; SHR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.55-1.61). This association was weakened after adjustment for factor VIII. Non-O blood type is a time-dependent predictor of VTE in patients with cancer. It is associated with increased VTE risk beyond 3 months of follow-up and in patients with intermediate- and low-risk tumor types.

Relationship Between ABO Blood Group and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth deadliest cancer, with approximately 900,000 deaths annually. CRC is a multifactorial disease in which a set of factors, including environmental, hereditary, and genetic factors, are integrated into cancer development. Studies have suggested an association between hereditary antigens in the human blood group system and the risk of different cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between blood groups and CRC risk.MethodsA record-based retrospective study was performed between January 2017 and August 2021. This study targeted patients diagnosed with CRC during the study period. Data of patients who agreed to participate were collected using a pre-structured checklist. The extracted data included patients’ demographic blood groups and risk factors, including history of inflammatory bowel disease or CRC.ResultsA total of 199 patients, aged 22 to 96 years (mean age: 61.6 ± 14.7 years), were included. The blood groups of 101 (50.8%), 59 (29.6%), 26 (13.1%), and 13 (6.5%) patients were O, A, B, and AB, respectively. Colon cancer was the most frequently reported cancer (155/199, 77.9%) across all blood groups and showed the highest frequency among patients with blood group O (74/155, 47.7%), without statistical significance (P = 0.111).ConclusionOur study showed a statistically significant relationship between AB and non-O blood types and colon cancer compared to the O blood group.

ABO blood group distribution and risk of malignancy in patients undergoing resection for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)

BackgroundThe ABO blood type has been associated with risk of development of several malignancies, including pancreatic cancer. Data regarding IPMN is equivocal. To investigate this further, we analyzed the association between the ABO blood group and the presence of malignancy in a large cohort of resected IPMN and its influence in survival. Methods819 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IPMN in the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) from January 1993 to December 2020 were identified from prospective institutional databases. Pathological characteristics and blood type were correlated. ResultsThe distribution of blood types A, B, AB and O was 384 (47%), 92 (11%), 44 (5%) and 299 (37%), respectively. This blood type distribution was different than the reference population of the MGH and the CUH, which is 55% non-O blood group, and 45% type O. There was a significant predominance of non-O blood types when compared with O-blood type in patients with malignant IPMN (i.e. patients with high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer) (67% vs 33%, OR 1.31 95%CI: 0.98–1.75, p = 0.069). The association was stronger for IPMN with invasive cancer (OR 1.43 95%CI: 1.01–2.02, p = 0.039). Blood group did not influence survival. ConclusionNon-O blood type is associated with need for resection in IPMN and with presence of invasive carcinoma.

Impact of ABO Blood Group Type on Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer. Non-O blood type is associated with higher levels of factor FVIII activity and von Willebrand factor compared to blood type O, and has been identified as a risk factor for VTE in the general population. However, the impact of ABO blood type on risk of cancer-associated VTE has not been clarified.Methods: To determine the influence of non-O blood type on risk of cancer-associated VTE, we utilized the dataset of the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS), which is a single center, prospective observational cohort study including patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer. Patients were followed for objectively diagnosed, independently adjudicated VTE for a maximum of 2 years. VTE was quantified in competing risk analysis, accounting for all-cause mortality as competing outcome event. A proportional sub-hazard regression model according to Fine & Gray was used for between-group comparisons. Based on the violation of the proportional sub-hazard assumption, we explored potential time-dependent effects of non-O blood type on VTE risk in a restricted cubic spline analysis, modeling differences in risk estimates over follow-up time. Further, time-restricted subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) were obtained specifically for the <3 months and ≥3 months follow-up intervals. In a subgroup analysis, differences in VTE risk according to ABO-blood type were analyzed for patients with very high thrombotic risk tumor types (pancreatic, gastric, glioblastoma), compared to the remainder of patients.Results: In total, 1,708 patients were included in our analysis (46% female, median age: 61 years [interquartile range, IQR: 52-68]). The most common tumor types were lung (19%), breast (16%), and brain (14%) cancer, with 32% of solid tumor patients having metastatic disease at study inclusion. Over a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR: 10-24), 151 patients were diagnosed with VTE (cumulative 2-year incidence: 9.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-10.7) and 649 patients died (2-year mortality: 38%). Overall, blood type O was present in 38% of patients, A in 40%, B in 15%, and AB in 7%. The cumulative incidence of VTE at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months for patients with blood type O was 3.8% (95% CI: 2.5-5.5), 5.7% (95% CI: 4.1-7.7), 7.0% (95% CI: 5.1-9.1), and 7.6% (95% CI: 5.7-9.9), compared to 3.4% (95% CI: 2.4-4.7), 6.5% (95% CI: 5.1-8.1), 8.4% (95% CI:6.8-10.2), and 10.2% (95% CI: 8.4-12.2) in patients with non-O blood type (Gray´s test: p=0.103, Figure 1). Upon visual inspection of cumulative incidence functions, a violation of the proportional sub-hazard assumption was suspected. In restricted cubic spline analysis, estimating hazard ratio (HR) for VTE of patients with non-O compared to O blood type, a time-varying effect of non-O blood type towards an increased VTE risk was observed (Figure 2). Based on that, time-restricted competing risk regression models were performed. During the first 3 months of follow-up, no differences in VTE risk were found (SHR for non-O vs. O blood type: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.60-1.67, p=0.992). Beyond the first 3-month follow-up, patients with non-O blood type had an increased VTE risk compared to patients with blood type O (SHR 1.79, 95%CI: 1.12-2.85, p=0.015). In a subgroup analysis, no association with VTE risk was found in patients with very high thrombotic risk tumor types (SHR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.55-1.61, p=0.824). In contrast, in patients with low/intermediate risk cancer, non-O blood type was associated with increased risk of VTE (SHR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.09-2.73, p=0.019).Conclusion: Non-O blood type was identified as a time dependent risk factor for cancer-associated VTE. In the first 3 months after study inclusion, characterized as the highest VTE risk period in our cancer cohort, no differences in VTE risk between blood types were found. Afterwards, beyond the first 3 months of follow-up, an increased VTE-risk in non-O blood types was observed, comparably in magnitude to the risk difference in the general non-cancer population. Further, an association of non-O blood type with VTE risk in patients with low/intermediate thrombotic risk cancers was observed, whereas no effect was present in those with very high-risk tumors. These findings indicate non-O blood type as a putative risk factor for VTE in patients with cancer in comparably low thrombotic risk scenarios. [Display omitted] DisclosuresPabinger: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sanchyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Association between non-O blood group and spontaneous abortion in women with inherited thrombophilia

Abstract Background Spontaneous abortion is reported to be one of the most frequent pregnancy complications reaching a prevalence up to 15%. The association between congenital thrombophilia and pregnancy loss has been debated in several studies with conflicting results. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the prevalence of inherited thrombophilia (i.e antithrombin, protein S and C deficiencies, factor V Leiden and prothrombin variant) in a group of women with a personal history of miscarriage. The prevalence non-O blood group, considered the most common thrombophilic condition, was concomitantly considered. Materials and methods A group of n. 566 women with a personal history of spontaneous abortion recruited among caregivers of patients admitted to the Medical Department of our University Hospital between December 2011 and December 2019 were enrolled. Women under 18 yrs, those with a personal history of venous and/or arterial thrombosis and with an acquired thrombophilic condition were excluded. An equally number of healthy women without a personal history of pregnancy loss acted as controls. The Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as an estimate of pregnancy loss developing. Results Out of n. 566 enrolled women, n. 127 (22.4%) had an inherited thrombophilic condition. The prevalence of congenital thrombophilia was significantly higher in women with miscarriage than controls (OR 2.12; CI 95% 1.51–2.92). Non-O blood type was observed in n. 325 (57.4%) women. The prevalence of non-O blood group was significantly higher in women with pregnancy loss (p 0.01) and the association of thrombophilia and non-O blood type further increased the risk of pregnancy loss (OR 3.28; CI 95% 2.01–5.36). Conclusions Both inherited thrombophilia and non-O blood type should be considered risk factors for pregnancy loss. The knowledge of this information may help the clinician to better manage women with pregnancy loss. Further studies are required to confirm our findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Incidence, risk factors and clinical course of pyogenic spondylodiscitis patients with pulmonary embolism

PurposeIn patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis, surgery is considered the treatment of choice to conduct proper debridement, stabilise the spine and avoid extended bed rest, which in turn is a risk factor for complications such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective clinical study with analysis of a group of 99 patients who had undergone treatment for pyogenic discitis at our institution between June 2012 and August 2017. Included parameters were age, sex, disease pattern, the presence of deep vein thrombosis, resuscitation, in-hospital mortality, present anticoagulation, preexisting comorbidities, tobacco abuse, body mass index, microbiological germ detection and laboratory results.ResultsAmong the analysed cohort, 12% of the treated patients for pyogenic spondylodiscitis suffered from a radiologically confirmed pulmonary embolism. Coronary heart disease (p < 0.01), female sex (p < 0.01), anticoagulation at admission (p < 0.01) and non-O blood type (p < 0.001) were associated with development of pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolism was significantly associated with resuscitation (p < 0.005) and deep vein thrombosis (p < 0.001). Neurosurgery was not associated with increased risk for pulmonary embolism compared to conservative-treated patients (p > 0.05).ConclusionSurgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis was not associated with an elevated risk of pulmonary embolism in our analysis. However, we describe several risk factors for pulmonary embolism in this vulnerable cohort. Prospective studies are necessary to improve prevention and postoperative management in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

The Impact of ABO Blood Type on Developing Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The impact of ABO blood type in the development of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients remains controversial. To develop a sense of the current opinion in this area, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. In March 2021, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Scopus for studies that compared cancer patients who had a blood type of either O or non-O (A, B, and AB). Our objective was to use multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine how ABO blood type was associated with the development of venous thromboembolism. Our selection criteria were met by a total of nine studies in 25,884 patients for the systematic review and five studies in 22,777 patients for the meta-analysis. In cancer patients, we found that non-O blood type was associated with a nearly two-fold increase in risk of venous thromboembolism (pooled OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.44–2.10). Additionally, among the eligible patients, 21,889 patients were post-operative urological cancer patients. In these patients, the analysis also showed an association between non-O blood type and increasing risk of venous thromboembolism after pelvic surgery for malignancy (pooled OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.36–2.20). Our meta-analysis suggested that non-O blood type is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism among patients with cancer. As blood type is routinely determined preoperatively by objective and standardized methods, we anticipate that our results will be useful for managing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, especially after pelvic surgery for urological cancers.

ABO Blood Type and the Risk of Cardovascular Events: An Analysis of Framingham Data and Meta-Analysis

Objective An association between ABO blood group and cardiovascular risk has been postulated and explored in the literature but results have been inconsistent. A possible mechanism for variability in ischemic risk by blood group was elucidated in the late 1980s and early 1990s when evidence emerged that levels of von Willebrand factor varied depending upon blood type. The lowest levels were observed in people with two O genes, the highest level in people who were genotypically AA, BB, or AB, and intermediate levels with AO and BO. Additionally a study which quantified plasma levels of factor VIII-VWF showed they are 25% higher in non-O individuals than in those with type O. Based upon this preliminary supportive data we sought to to examine this relationship using Framingham data with the full cohort and more than 30 years of follow up.Methods and Results A large prospective cohort study consisting of 4018 subjects without prior cardiovascular events was conducted with 38 years of follow up. All data collected in the Framingham Heart Study cohort were reviewed for use as potential confounders. We used the log-rank test for equality of survivor functions to assess the unadjusted association between ABO blood group and MI, stroke, and the combined endpoint of non-fatal MI or death associated with CHD (coronary heart disease). We compared blood group O to non-O (combining the A,B, and AB groups) and to (A or B) and AB individually with the goal of comparing those patients that should be least likely to clot in a VWF-dependent manner to those with intermediate and high risk. We designated A and B as intermediate risk because genotyping was unavailable and therefore phenotypic blood groups A and B included a mixture of AO, AA, BO, and BB which should place them between O and AB individuals in terms of VWF levels and risk of cardiovascular events. The reported hazard ratios describe the risk of events in the non-O blood groups compared to O. We used a Cox regression model to adjust for potential confounders. In analyses adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and comparing participants with blood group O to those with A, B, or AB, there was no statistically significant relationship found between blood group and any cardiovascular outcome. Comparing the most disparate groups, non-O vs O found the correlation to be MI (HR =1.10 with confidence interval 0.96 to 1.25), stroke(1.03, confidence interval 0.89 to 1.19) , or the combined end point of non-fatal MI and death (HR of 1.04 with confidence interval of 0.93 -1.16).A meta-analysis of 5 prior studies plus this cohort demonstrated that non-O blood types are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events [OR 1.12 (1.06 to 1.18).Conclusion Our analysis yielded a non-significant effect but when included in a meta-analysis demonstrated 12% increased risk in cardiovascular events for people with non-0 compared with O blood types. ABO blood group could be considered when evaluating risk factors for primary prevention for cardiovascular disease. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

ABO blood groups do not predict progression of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

ABO blood groups are associated with genetically predisposed variations in von Willebrand factor (VWF) resulting in higher risks of thrombotic events in non-O blood types and bleeding complications in blood type O. The role of ABO blood groups in progression of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TICH) is unknown. Given statistically lower VWF levels in blood type O in the general population, we hypothesized that blood type O patients have a higher risk of such progression. A retrospective review of adult trauma patients with isolated TICH admitted to a Level 1 trauma center over eight years was conducted. Patients were categorized with blood type O and non-O (types A, B, AB) delineation. The primary outcome was radiological progression of TICH during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes included surgical intervention after follow-up computed tomography (CT), complications, days on mechanical ventilation (DMV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality. Of 949 patients, 432 (45.5%) had blood type O. When comparing O and non-O groups, no significant differences were found in gender, age, race, admission vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale, coagulation profile, TICH type, or Injury Severity Score. No difference in TICH progression was found between O and non-O groups: 73 (17%) vs 80 (15%), respectively, p = 0.55. Blood type O mortality was 12 (3% vs. 23 (4%), p = 0.174). Rate of TICH surgical intervention after follow-up CT, DMV, complications, and ICU and hospital LOS did not differ. No association between ABO blood types and radiological progression of TICH was identified.

The association of ABO blood groups and trauma outcomes: A retrospective analysis of 3779 patients.

Background:There is currently a lack of understanding regarding the link between ABO blood types with outcomes of traumatically injured patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of ABO blood types with outcomes in traumatically injured patients separated by injury type.Methods:This retrospective study evaluated trauma patients at an urban, Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or <16 years old. Recorded outcomes included: ABO blood group, mortality, Injury Severity Score (ISS), race, injury type, mechanism of injury, and complications. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics including Chi-squared, Kruskal–Wallis, and F-test calculations.Results:A total of 3779 patients were included in this study. No significant differences were present in mean age or ISS between blood types. In patients with penetrating injuries, blood type O was associated with a significant increase in mortality (P = 0.017), red blood cell transfusion (P = 0.027), and massive transfusion protocol (MTP) (P = 0.026) compared to non-O blood types. In patients with blunt injuries, blood type AB was associated with a significant increase in mortality rate compared to non-AB blood types (P = 0.03).Conclusion:ABO blood type is connected with an underlying process which affects trauma outcomes, including mortality. Blood type O is associated with increased blood transfusion, MTP, and mortality during the initial hospitalization following a traumatic penetrating injury, while blood type AB is associated with increased mortality during the initial hospitalization following a blunt traumatic injury.

Abstract P620: Non-O Blood Group and Risk of Early-Onset Ischemic Stroke in Oral Contraceptive Users

Introduction: While oral contraceptive (OC) use is generally safe, women at higher risk for vascular disease are advised to use alternative forms of contraception. Smoking, a prothrombotic factor, is a contraindication for OC use in women over age 35. ABO blood group, specifically the non-O blood types, has also been associated with thrombosis risk. We therefore hypothesized that the effects of smoking and OC use on stroke risk would be accentuated in women with non-O blood groups. Methods: Using data from the Genetics of Early Onset Stroke Study, we used 3 polymorphisms within the ABO locus to classify blood group type in women under age 50, including 347 cases and 383 controls. Logistic regression was used to assess the stroke risk of current OC use, defined as use within 30 days, adjusted for other risk factors, and stratified by O and non-O blood group type. Results: Of the 347 women with early-onset stroke, 45% had African ancestry, 51% had European ancestry, and 4% had other ancestry. The median age was 42 years. After adjusting for race, age, hypertension, diabetes, migraines and aura, and smoking status, the odds ratio (OR) for stroke for smoking alone and OC use alone were 3.0 (95% CI 2.1-4.2) and 3.7 (95% CI 1.7-8.4), respectively in this population. Blood group (O vs non-O) did not appreciably alter the magnitude of these associations. However, the joint risk of smoking and OC use was substantially higher in women with blood group non-O (OR = 9.5, 95% CI 3.2-34.9) vs in women with blood group O (OR=4.9, 95% CI 0.4-110.2). Conclusions: Our findings are consistent with the possibility that non-O type blood group confers an increased risk of early onset stroke among OC users who smoke. Further studies are needed to confirm or refute this possibility and to determine whether non-O blood type should be considered in assessing the risk of OC use.

ABO Blood Group and Inhibitor Risk in Severe Hemophilia A Patients: A Study from the Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers.

Considering the profound influence exerted by the ABO blood group system on hemostasis, mainly through the von Willebrand factor and factor VIII (FVIII) complex, we have conducted a study evaluating the possible role of blood type on the risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A. A total of 287 consecutive Caucasian patients with severe hemophilia A (202 without FVIII inhibitors and 85 with FVIII inhibitors) followed at seven Italian Hemophilia Treatment Centers belonging to the Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers (AICE) were included in the study. A higher prevalence of O blood group was detected in patients without inhibitors as compared in inhibitor patients (55 vs. 30.6%; p < 0.001). Among the other variables analyzed (age, F8 mutation, type and intensity of treatment and treatment regimen), F8 mutation class (high-risk vs. low-risk), and treatment regimen (on-demand vs. prophylaxis) were significantly correlated with inhibitor development. However, on a multivariate analysis, only the effects of F8 mutation and ABO blood type were independent of other covariates, being that non-O blood type is associated with a 2.89-fold increased risk of inhibitor development. In conclusion, our study supports the protective effect of O blood type on inhibitor risk in severely affected hemophilia A patients.