Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurement Research Articles

Comparison of invasive blood pressure monitoring vs. non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in critically ill children receiving vasoactive agents-a prospective observational study.

The primary aim of this study was to compare non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement using the automated oscillometric method with invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement using peripheral arterial line insertion in critically ill children receiving vasoactive agents. Single-centre, prospective cohort study. Tertiary care 15 bedded Pediatric ICU in Urban Indian city. All critically ill children between the ages of 1 month to 16 years with shock on vasoactive medications and with IBP monitoring. Forty children with 1,072 paired BP measurements were incorporated in the final analysis. Among all normotensive children (Total number of paired measurements = 623) receiving vasoactive agents, Bland-Altman analysis revealed an acceptable agreement between Invasive mean blood pressure (MBP) and non-invasive MBP with a bias of -2.10 mmHg (SD 11.35). The 95% limits of agreement were from -24.34 to 20.14 mmHg. In children with hypotension (Total number of paired measurements = 449), Bland-Altman analysis showed disagreement between Invasive MBP and non-invasive MBP i.e., a bias of -8.44 mmHg (SD 9.62). The 95% limits of agreement were from -27.29 to 10.41 mmHg. A limited agreement exists between invasive blood pressure (IBP) and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements in critically ill children requiring vasoactive agents. This discrepancy can lead to either an underestimation or an overestimation of blood pressure. While NIBP can serve as a screening tool for hemodynamically stable children, those who are hemodynamically unstable and necessitate the initiation of vasoactive agents should undergo IBP monitoring.

Validation of oscillometric ratio and maximum gradient methods for non-invasive blood pressure measurement with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements as reference.

Most non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurements are carried out using instruments which implement either the Ratio or the Maximum Gradient oscillometric method, mostly during cuff deflation, but more rarely during cuff inflation. Yet, there is little published literature on the relative advantages and accuracy of these two methods. In this study of 40 lightly sedated individuals aged 64.1 ± 9.6 years, we evaluate and compare the performance of the oscillometric ratio (K) and gradient (Grad) methods for the non-invasive estimation of mean pressure, SBP and DBP with reference to invasive intra-arterial values. There was no significant difference between intra-arterial estimates of mean pressure made via Korotkoff sounds (MP-OWE) or the gradient method (MP-Grad). However, 17.7% of MP-OWE and 15% of MP-Grad were in error by more than 10 mmHg. SBP-K and SBP-Grad underestimated SBP by 14 and 18 mmHg, whilst accurately estimating DBP with mean errors of 0.4 ± 5.0 and 1.7 ± 6.1 mmHg, respectively. Relative to the reference standard SBP-K, SBP-Grad and DBP-Grad were estimated with a mean error of -4.5 ± 6.6 and 1.4 ± 5.6 mmHg, respectively, noting that using the full range of recommended ratios introduces errors of 12 and 7 mmHg in SBP and DBP, respectively. We also show that it is possible to find ratios which minimize the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean error for any particular individual cohort. We developed linear models for estimating SBP and SBP-K from a range of demographic and non-invasive OWE variables with resulting mean errors of 0.15 ± 5.6 and 0.3 ± 5.7 mmHg, acceptable according to the Universal standard.

Atrial fibrillation ablation performed under general anesthesia is associated with significantly low arterial blood pressure and higher incidence of hypotensive events

Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation is a pivotal treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). When performed under general anesthesia (GA), it may be associated to hypotensive events, with unclear prevalence and prognostic impact. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement is a validated and reliable tool for intraprocedural beat-to-beat advanced hemodynamic monitoring. Purpose To assess and compare the hemodynamic impact of GA during AF ablation using a CNBP (ClearSight) system. Methods In an observational single large volume center study we prospectively enrolled all patients undergoing AF ablation at our institution with CNBP monitoring, as per local practice. Patients were assigned to deep sedation (DS) or general anesthesia (GA) group according to the chosen sedation regimen. The following parameters were compared between the two strategies: systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume index (SVI). Hypotension events (HE) (MAP < 65 mmHg) were counted and compared between groups. Results Two hundred patients were enrolled from September 2022 to August 2023. 170 patients underwent AF ablation under DS (76,7% male, mean age 56,77±15,76), while 30 patients were treated under GA (70% male, mean age 60,72±13,79). A total of 117709 measurements were analyzed and compared, for an overall monitoring time of 39293,66 minutes. Patients treated under GA had significantly lower average SBP (104,83±21,48 mmHg vs 138,05±22,09 mmHg, p<0,001), DBP (59,59±11,89 mmHg vs 76,12±12,75 mmHg, p<0,001), MAP (74,96±15,02 mmHg vs 97,12±15,38 mmHg, p<0,001). We also observed significantly lower CO (4,40±1,47 L/min vs 5,16±1,62 L/min, p<0,001), CI (2,22±0,71 L/min/m2 vs 2,61±0,78 L/min/m2, p<0,001) SV (62,37±18,04 mL/beat vs 70,65±24,95 mL/beat, p<0,001) and SVI (31,40±8,54 mL/beat/m2 vs 35,80±12,07 mL/beat/m2, p<0,001). Patients treated under GA witnessed a higher number of per-patient HE (10,53±9,16 vs 0,61±2,07, p<0,001), and higher HE duration (4,8±6,62 min vs 2,82±3,66, p<0,001). Conclusion AF ablation performed under general anesthesia is associated with significantly lower systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, reduced cardiac output, stroke volume and stroke volume index when compared to deep sedation. Patients undergoing AF ablation under GA witness higher incidence and duration of hypotensive events. CNBP is a valid tool for beat-to-beat procedural hemodynamic assessment and can help identifying and treat hypotensive events. Further studies are needed to assess the potential prognostic impact of intraprocedural hypotension during AF ablation.

#2570 Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in dialysis patients using pulse wave velocity

Abstract Background and Aims Dialysis patients are at high risk of circulatory dysregulation and hypotension during treatment. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a potentially life-threatening complication. The main causes are high ultrafiltration volumes and high ultrafiltration rates when patients tend to gain a lot of weight between dialysis treatments. A lack of patient compliance with regard to drinking volumes and a lack of residual diuresis are risk factors for this. Close circulatory monitoring and therapy settings to avoid absolute or relatively high UF rates to prevent IDH are frequently used. These are primarily the frequent non-invasive measurement of blood pressure using cuffs, the measurement of relative blood volume and the adjustment of ultrafiltration rates to these values. Prophylactically, the dialysis time can be extended, ultrafiltration profiles or ultrafiltration breaks can be planned, the dialysate temperature can be lowered and the composition of the dialysate can be adjusted. Despite all attempts, however, the incidence of IDH in everyday clinical practice is too high. The non-invasive measurements with cuffs are not carried out frequently enough, the measurement of the relative blood volume only covers a partial range, sudden changes in vascular tension or cardiac output are not recorded. Method The pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a well-known parameter for describing the propagation of the pressure wave after ejection of the heart beat volume in the arteries. The PWV is dependent on blood pressure, vessel wall tension and cardiac output. Changes in blood pressure can therefore be recognised by measuring the PWV. With the help of a measuring device (PESAS) for the ECG signal and peripheral pulse plethysmography, PWV can be measured non-invasively, continuously, for every heartbeat and, above all, hardly noticed by the patient. The PESAS allows the time-synchronised measurement of ECG and peripheral plethysmography curves and thus the determination of PWV. It is an experimental device. We would like to present a study showing the use of a measuring device (PESAS) in 15 prevalent dialysis patients for the detection of IDH. All study participants were examined during 3 dialysis treatments. Results The measurement of PWV in chronic dialysis patients during treatment is technically feasible. The measurement is tolerated by the patients. Changes in PWV could be detected in the patients during the course of dialysis; these were also dependent on the ultrafiltration rates. Individual patient reactions to volume withdrawal varied, with both increases and decreases in PWV being demonstrated. An acute change in PWV was usually associated with a drop in blood pressure. Continuous measurement allowed IDH events to be detected earlier than intermittent blood pressure measurement with cuffs. Sudden drops in blood pressure could be detected better and earlier with the PESAS system than by measuring the relative blood volume. Conclusion The PESAS system is suitable for monitoring dialysis patients to prevent IDH. Further adjustments and optimisation of the evaluation algorithms are necessary.

A Wireless Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement System Using MAX30102 and Random Forest Regressor for Photoplethysmography Signals

Hypertension, often termed “the silent killer”, is associated with cardiovascular risk and requires regular blood pressure (BP) monitoring. However, existing methods are cumbersome and require medical expertise, which is worsened by the need for physical contact, particularly during situations such as the coronavirus pandemic that started in 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to develop a cuffless, continuous, and accurate BP measurement system using a photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor and a microcontroller via PPG signals. The system utilizes a MAX30102 sensor and ESP-WROOM-32 microcontroller to capture PPG signals that undergo noise reduction during preprocessing. Peak detection and feature extraction algorithms were introduced, and their output data were used to train a machine learning model for BP prediction. Tuning the model resulted in identifying the best-performing model when using a dataset from six subjects with a total of 114 records, thereby achieving a coefficient of determination of 0.37/0.46 and a mean absolute error value of 4.38/4.49 using the random forest algorithm. Integrating this model into a web-based graphical user interface enables its implementation. One probable limitation arises from the small sample size (six participants) of healthy young individuals under seated conditions, thereby potentially hindering the proposed model’s ability to learn and generalize patterns effectively. Increasing the number of participants with diverse ages and medical histories can enhance the accuracy of the proposed model. Nevertheless, this innovative device successfully addresses the need for convenient, remote BP monitoring, particularly during situations like the COVID-19 pandemic, thus making it a promising tool for cardiovascular health management.

Associations between anxiety, sleep, and blood pressure parameters in pregnancy: a prospective pilot cohort study

BackgroundThe potential effect modification of sleep on the relationship between anxiety and elevated blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is understudied. We evaluated the relationship between anxiety, insomnia, and short sleep duration, as well as any interaction effects between these variables, on BP during pregnancy.MethodsThis was a prospective pilot cohort of pregnant people between 23 to 36 weeks’ gestation at a single institution between 2021 and 2022. Standardized questionnaires were used to measure clinical insomnia and anxiety. Objective sleep duration was measured using a wrist-worn actigraphy device. Primary outcomes were systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean (MAP) non-invasive BP measurements. Separate sequential multivariable linear regression models fit with generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to separately assess associations between anxiety (independent variable) and each BP parameter (dependent variables), after adjusting for potential confounders (Model 1). Additional analyses were conducted adding insomnia and the interaction between anxiety and insomnia as independent variables (Model 2), and adding short sleep duration and the interaction between anxiety and short sleep duration as independent variables (Model 3), to evaluate any moderating effects on BP parameters.ResultsAmong the 60 participants who completed the study, 15 (25%) screened positive for anxiety, 11 (18%) had subjective insomnia, and 34 (59%) had objective short sleep duration. In Model 1, increased anxiety was not associated with increases in any BP parameters. When subjective insomnia was included in Model 2, increased DBP and MAP was significantly associated with anxiety (DBP: β 6.1, p = 0.01, MAP: β 6.2 p < 0.01). When short sleep was included in Model 3, all BP parameters were significantly associated with anxiety (SBP: β 9.6, p = 0.01, DBP: β 8.1, p < 0.001, and MAP: β 8.8, p < 0.001). No moderating effects were detected between insomnia and anxiety (p interactions: SBP 0.80, DBP 0.60, MAP 0.32) or between short sleep duration and anxiety (p interactions: SBP 0.12, DBP 0.24, MAP 0.13) on BP.ConclusionsWhen including either subjective insomnia or objective short sleep duration, pregnant people with anxiety had 5.1–9.6 mmHg higher SBP, 6.1–8.1 mmHg higher DBP, and 6.2–8.8 mmHg higher MAP than people without anxiety.

Novel Metric for Non-Invasive Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Measurements Demonstrates Physiological Blood Pressure Fluctuations during Pregnancy.

Beat-to-beat (B2B) variability in biomedical signals has been shown to have high diagnostic power in the treatment of various cardiovascular and autonomic disorders. In recent years, new techniques and devices have been developed to enable non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurements. In this work, we aim to establish the concept of two-dimensional signal warping, an approved method from ECG signal processing, for non-invasive continuous BP signals. To this end, we introduce a novel BP-specific beat annotation algorithm and a B2B-BP fluctuation (B2B-BPF) metric novel for BP measurements that considers the entire BP waveform. In addition to careful validation with synthetic data, we applied the generated analysis pipeline to non-invasive continuous BP signals of 44 healthy pregnant women (30.9 ± 5.7 years) between the 21st and 30th week of gestation (WOG). In line with established variability metrics, a significant increase (p < 0.05) in B2B-BPF can be observed with advancing WOGs. Our processing pipeline enables robust extraction of B2B-BPF, demonstrates the influence of various factors such as increasing WOG or exercise on blood pressure during pregnancy, and indicates the potential of novel non-invasive biosignal sensing techniques in diagnostics. The results represent B2B-BP changes in healthy pregnant women and allow for future comparison with those signals acquired from women with hypertensive disorders.

Measuring blood pressure from Korotkoff sounds as the brachial cuff inflates on average provides higher values than when the cuff deflates

Objectives. In this study, we test the hypothesis that if, as demonstrated in a previous study, brachial arteries exhibit hysteresis as the occluding cuff is deflated and fail to open until cuff pressure (CP) is well below true intra-arterial blood pressure (IAPB), estimating systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from the presence of Korotkoff sounds (KS) as CP increases may eliminate these errors and give more accurate estimates of SBP and DBP relative to IABP readings. Approach. In 62 subjects of varying ages (45.1 ± 19.8, range 20.6–75.8 years), including 44 men (45.3 ± 19.4, range 20.6–75.8 years) and 18 women (44.4 ± 21.4, range 20.9–75.3 years), we sequentially recorded SBP and DBP both during cuff inflation and cuff deflation using KS. Results. There was a significant (p < 0.0001) increase in SBP from 122.8 ± 13.2 to 127.6 ± 13.0 mmHg and a significant (p = 0.0001) increase in DBP from 70.0 ± 9.0 to 77.5 ± 9.7 mmHg. Of the 62 subjects, 51 showed a positive increase in SBP (0–14 mmHg) and 11 subjects showed a reduction (−0.3 to −7 mmHg). The average differences for SBP and DBP estimates derived as the cuff inflates and those derived as the cuff deflates were 4.8 ± 4.6 mmHg and 2.5 ± 4.6 mmHg, not dissimilar to the differences reported between IABP and non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Although we could not develop multiparameter linear or non-linear models to explain this phenomenon we have clearly demonstrated through ANOVA tests that both body mass index (BMI) and pulse wave velocity are implicated, supporting the hypothesis that the phenomenon is associated with age, higher BMI and stiffer arteries. Significance. The implications of this study are that brachial sphygmomanometry carried out during cuff inflation could be more accurate than measurements carried out as the cuff deflates. Further research is required to validate these results with IAPB measurements.

NON-INVASIVE CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE AND INTRACRANIAL WAVEFORM ASSESSMENT IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS

Objective: Hypertension (HT) remains as the leading cause of death around the globe and brain diseases, such as cognitive decline. The association between HT and cerebrovascular diseases is strong, mainly with stroke and cognitive impairment, but the mechanistic bases remain to be established. The objective of this study is to observe central blood pressure, arterial stiffness and intracranial pressure in long-term chronic hypertensive patients. Design and method: Patients above 18 years were assessed from November 2022 to August 2023 with non-invasive central blood pressure and intracranial pressure waveform measurements in a cross-sectional analysis. Peripheral and central blood pressure parameters were obtained using a validated oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph). Non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement was performed with the validated Brain4Care (B4C) sensor. Using the B4C non-invasive evaluation, the cut-off point identified to define ICHT by the P2/P1 ratio was &gt; 1.2, and the cut-off for time to peak (TTP) was &gt; 0.25 seconds. To compare P2/P1 and TTP values between the categories of quantitative variables, the chi-square test was used; the Mann Whitney or ANOVA tests were used for bivariate analyses; and for correlations, the Spearman test was used. It was adopted as significant at p &lt; 0,05. Results: Non-invasive central blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and intracranial pressure waveform assessment were performed in 145 patients with essential long-term hypertension over a period of ten months. The median age was 69.0 (61.8 – 75.7) years, 77.9% were female, and the median BMI was 29.0 (25.4 – 33.1) kg/m2. The average time since the hypertension diagnosis was 20.0 years. The median value of P2/P1 ratio for all cohort was 1.4 (1.2 – 1.5) and TTP 0.24 (0.21 – 0.29) seconds. A bivariate analysis was performed considering ICHT or not and the parameters of central BP and PWV assessments, with findings of higher central SBP, central DBP, and peripheral DBP among patients with ICHT by the parameter of P2/P1. Conclusions: Central systolic blood pressure levels are more linked to intracranial hypertension, while diastolic blood pressure values are similar, raising questions about the most suitable blood pressure assessment method for brain disorders.

ACNN-BiLSTM: A Deep Learning Approach for Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement Using Multi-Wavelength PPG Fusion.

As an essential physiological indicator within the human body, noninvasive continuous blood pressure (BP) measurement is critical in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. However, traditional methods of blood pressure prediction using a single-wavelength Photoplethysmographic (PPG) have bottlenecks in further improving BP prediction accuracy, which limits their development in clinical application and dissemination. To this end, this study proposed a method to fuse a four-wavelength PPG and a BP prediction model based on the attention mechanism of a convolutional neural network and bidirectional long- and short-term memory (ACNN-BiLSTM). The effectiveness of a multi-wavelength PPG fusion method for blood pressure prediction was evaluated by processing PPG signals from 162 volunteers. The study compared the performance of the PPG signals with different individual wavelengths and using a multi-wavelength PPG fusion method in blood pressure prediction, assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE) and AAMI-related criteria. The experimental results showed that the ACNN-BiLSTM model achieved a better MAE ± RMSE for a systolic BP and diastolic BP of 1.67 ± 5.28 and 1.15 ± 2.53 mmHg, respectively, when using the multi-wavelength PPG fusion method. As a result, the ACNN-BiLSTM blood pressure model based on multi-wavelength PPG fusion could be considered a promising method for noninvasive continuous BP measurement.

Blood Pressure Measurement Device Accuracy Evaluation: Statistical Considerations with an Implementation in R

Inaccuracies from devices for non-invasive blood pressure measurements have been well reported with clinical consequences. International standards, such as ISO 81060-2 and the seminal AAMI/ANSI SP10, define protocols and acceptance criteria for these devices. Prior to applying these standards, a sample size of N &gt;= 85 is mandatory, that is, the number of distinct subcjects used to calculate device inaccuracies. Often, it is not possible to gather such a large sample. Many studies apply these standards with a smaller sample. The objective of the paper is to introduce a methodology that broadens the method first developed by the AAMI Sphygmomanometer Committee for accepting a blood pressure measurement device. We study changes in the acceptance region for various sample sizes using the sampling distribution for proportions and introduce a methodology for estimating the exact probability of the acceptance of a device. This enables the comparison of the accuracies of existing device development techniques even if they were studied with a smaller sample size. The study is useful in assisting BP measurement device manufacturers. To assist clinicians, we present a newly developed “bpAcc” package in R to evaluate acceptance statistics for various sample sizes.

Doppler ultrasound is more accurate than pulse oximeter plethysmography in the measurement of systolic arterial pressure from the median caudal artery in anesthetized dogs.

To compare the accuracy of doppler ultrasound (DOP) and pulse oximeter plethysmography (POP) in the measurement of systolic arterial pressure (SAP) to invasive blood pressure (IBP) in anesthetized dogs. 40 client-owned healthy dogs > 10 kg. Dogs were anesthetized for surgical procedures in dorsal recumbency. Invasive blood pressure was measured from a dorsal pedal artery. DOP and POP device probes were placed over the median caudal artery with a flow-occluding cuff for noninvasive blood pressure measurement. Systolic arterial pressure measured by DOP, loss of pulse oximeter plethysmograph (POPL), and return of pulse oximeter plethysmograph (POPR) were compared to SAP measured by IBP. A linear mixed model was used to determine correlation. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to determine bias, SD, and limits of agreement. The accuracy of DOP and POP was compared to IBP across different tensive states. Conditional R2 values for DOP, POPL, and POPR versus IBP were 0.92, 0.85, and 0.87, respectively (all P < .001). The biases for DOP, POPL, and POPR compared to IBP were +7.6 ± 13.1, +3.9 ± 14.4, and +8.6 ± 15.2 mm Hg (bias ± SD), respectively. Limits of agreement (lower, upper) were (-18.1, +33.3), (-24.3, +32.1), and (-21.2, +38.4) mm Hg for DOP, POPL, and POPR, respectively. DOP and POP overestimated SAP during hypotension (SAP < 90 mm Hg), DOP to a lesser magnitude. DOP measured from the median caudal artery may be acceptable for SAP measurement in dorsally recumbent, healthy anesthetized dogs > 10 kg. POP was determined an unacceptable method.

Detecting aortic valve stenosis based on the non-invasive blood pressurewaveform-a proof of concept study.

The incidence of aortic valve stenosis (AoS) increases with age, and once diagnosed, symptomatic severe AoS has a yearly mortality rate of 25%. AoS is diagnosed with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), however, this gold standard is time consuming and operator and acoustic window dependent. As AoS affects the arterial blood pressure waveform, AoS-specific waveform features might serve as a diagnostic tool. Aim of the present study was to develop a novel, non-invasive, AoS detection model based on blood pressures waveforms. This cross-sectional study included patients with AoS undergoing elective transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. AoS was determined using TTE, and patients with no or mild AoS were labelled as patients without AoS, while patients with moderate or severe AoS were labelled as patients with AoS. Non-invasive blood pressure measurements were performed in awake patients. Ten minutes of consecutive data was collected. Several blood pressure-based features were derived, and the median, interquartile range, variance, and the 1st and 9th decile of the change of these features were calculated. The primary outcome was the development of a machine-learning model for AoS detection, investigating multiple classifiers and training on the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC). In total, 101 patients with AoS and 48 patients without AoS were included. Patients with AoS showed an increase in left ventricular ejection time (0.02s, p = 0.001), a delayed maximum upstroke in the systolic phase (0.015s, p < 0.001), and a delayed maximal systolic pressure (0.03s, p < 0.001) compared to patients without AoS. With the logistic regression model, a sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.67, and AUROC of 0.79 were found. The majority of the population without AoS was male (85%), whereas in the population with AoS this was evenly distributed (54% males). Age was significantly (5years, p < 0.001) higher in the population with AoS. In the present study, we developed a novel model able to distinguish no to mild AoS from moderate to severe AoS, based on blood pressure features with high accuracy. Clinical registration number: The study entailing patients with TAVR treatment was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03088787, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03088787 ). The study with elective cardiac surgery patients was registered with the Netherland Trial Register (NL7810, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL7810 ).

Evaluation of the oscillometric method for noninvasive blood pressure measurement during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial blood pressure.

There is little quantitative clinical data available to support blood pressure measurement accuracy during cuff inflation. In this study of 35 male and 5 female lightly anaesthetized subjects aged 64.1 ± 9.6 years, we evaluate and compare the performance of both the oscillometric ratio and gradient methods during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial measurements. We show that the oscillometric waveform envelopes (OWE), which are key to both methods, exhibit significant variability in both shape and smoothness leading to at least 15% error in the determination of mean pressure (MP). We confirm the observation from our previous studies that K1 Korotkoff sounds underestimate systolic blood pressure (SBP) and note that this underestimation is increased during cuff inflation. The estimation of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is generally accurate for both the ratio and the gradient method, with the latter showing a significant increase during inflation. Since the gradient method estimates SBP and DBP from points of maximum gradient on each OWE recorded, it may offer significant benefits over the ratio method. However, we have shown that the ratio method can be optimized for any data set to achieve either a minimum mean error (ME) of close to 0 mmHg or minimum root mean square error (RMSE) with standard deviation (SD) of <5.0 mmHg. We conclude that whilst cuff inflation may offer some advantages, these are neither significant nor substantial, leaving as the only benefit, the potential for more rapid measurement and less patient discomfort.

Finger cuff versus invasive and noninvasive arterial pressure measurement in pregnant patients with obesity.

Pregnant patients with obesity may have compromised noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement. We assessed the accuracy and trending ability of the ClearSight™ finger cuff (FC) with invasive arterial monitoring (INV) and arm NIBP, in obese patients having cesarean delivery. Participants were aged ≥18 years, ≥34 weeks gestation, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg m-2. FC, INV, and NIBP measurements were obtained across 5-min intervals. The primary outcome was agreement of FC measurements with those of the reference standard INV, using modified Bland-Altman plots. Secondary outcomes included comparisons between FC and NIBP and NIBP versus INV, with four-quadrant plots performed to report discordance rates and evaluate trending ability. Twenty-three participants had a median (IQR) BMI of 45 kg m-2 (44-48). When comparing FC and INV the mean bias (SD, 95% limits of agreement) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 16 mmHg (17, -17.3 to 49.3 mmHg), for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) -0.2 mmHg (10.5, -20.7 to 20.3), and for mean arterial pressure (MAP) 5.2 mmHg (11.1, -16.6 to 27.0 mmHg). Discordance occurred in 54 (26%) pairs for SBP, 41 (23%) for DBP, and 41 (21.7%) for MAP. Error grid analysis showed 92.1% of SBP readings in Zone A (no-risk zone). When comparing NIBP and INV, the mean bias (95% limits of agreement) for SBP was 13.0 mmHg (16.7, -19.7 to 29.3), for DBP 5.9 mmHg (11.9, -17.4 to 42.0), and for MAP 8.2 mmHg (11.9, -15.2 to 31.6). Discordance occurred in SBP (84 of 209, 40.2%), DBP (74 of 187, 39.6%), and MAP (63 of 191, 33.0%). The FC and NIBP techniques were not adequately in agreement with INV. Trending capability was better for FC than NIBP. Clinically important differences may occur in the setting of the perfusion-dependent fetus.

Pulse-wave analysis during routine blood pressure measurement shows potential to distinguish between sinus and nonsinus rhythm.

To investigate whether pulse-wave analysis (PWA) performed by trained evaluators facilitates detection of nonsinus rhythm. Same-day, high-definition oscillometry pulse-wave data and ECG results of 155 animals (144 dogs and 11 cats) were analyzed. In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 18 participants from various backgrounds, all of whom received PWA training. The ability to distinguish between sinus and nonsinus rhythms was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The pulse-wave datasets were divided into 5 ECG categories. Agreement between ECG diagnoses and PWA-based arrhythmia detection was evaluated using Cohen κ values, and the correlation between the academic year of veterinary students and their κ values was assessed. All cardiology researchers demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in distinguishing pathological rhythms using PWA (area under the curve, 0.704 to 0.761), with the highest accuracy in detecting atrial fibrillation (area under the curve, 0.811 to 0.845). Fair agreement with ECG categorization was achieved by all 3 cardiology researchers, 2 of 5 general practitioners, and 3 of 10 veterinary undergraduates. The veterinary undergraduates' years of study were correlated with their diagnostic performance (Spearman ρ = 0.658; P = .019). PWA during routine noninvasive blood pressure measurement showed significant potential for the detection of pathological arrhythmias, notably atrial fibrillation. This approach yielded improved effectiveness when it was used by veterinarians with cardiology experience. Thus, introducing hands-on training courses, particularly those focused on cardiology and interactive workshops, may enable frontline veterinarians to promptly identify arrhythmias using PWA, facilitating timely ECG examinations or referrals.

Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic sphygmomanometry, oscillometry and high-definition oscillometry for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats.

Systemic arterial hypertension is a common occurrence and can have serious adverse consequences in cats. Therefore, measuring blood pressure is very important. There are many indirect blood pressure measurement devices available. This study compared Doppler, oscillometric (petMAP Graphic II, SunTech Vet20, the Cardell Insight-X0000) and high-definition oscillometry devices for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. In this prospective study, blood pressure was measured in 32 cats using the different devices according to the recommendations of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Consensus Statement. Blood pressures (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP]), time to complete measurements, number of attempts needed, coefficient of variation (CV) between the blood pressure measurements of the different devices, ease of completing measurements and apparent stress level of the cat were assessed. There was a significant difference between devices in the time taken to obtain blood pressure readings and the number of attempts necessary to obtain six reliable measurements. The CV of the Doppler device was significantly smaller than that of the rest of the devices, but there were no other differences between the devices. The mean SBP, DBP and MAP measured by the petMAP device were significantly higher than the measurements from the other devices. The perceived ease of measurement was not significantly different between the various machines. The perceived level of stress of measurement with the Doppler device was significantly higher compared with the other devices but did not lead to an increased SBP. Using a Doppler device to measure blood pressure in conscious cats is fast, relatively easy and gives reliable results. A disadvantage is that the Doppler device can only measure SBP, while oscillometric devices also provide DBP and MAP. However, in veterinary medicine, systolic hypertension is considered the most relevant.

Effect of phenylephrine rescue injection on hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery when guided by both heart rate and SBP during an early warning window: A randomised controlled trial.

Spinal anaesthesia is now the most common technique for caesarean delivery. However, because of the intermittent nature of noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements, maternal blood pressure may become hypotensive between the measurements. There is thus an inbuilt delay before the anaesthesiologist can intervene to counteract the hypotension. Based on the principle that changes in blood pressure can induce compensatory changes in the heart rate (HR), combining the NIBP with real-time HR, we designed two warning windows to predict hypotension and hypertension. To evaluate whether phenylephrine administration guided by these warning windows would help maintain haemodynamic stability. A teaching hospital. A randomised controlled trial. One hundred and ten pregnant women scheduled for elective caesarean delivery were enrolled, from which, after exclusions, 86 were eligible for the study. All eligible patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of phenylephrine as soon as spinal anaesthesia was initiated. Thereafter, patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the test group (Win-Group): rescue phenylephrine administration was triggered by an early warning window of HR above 100 beats per minute (bpm) and SBP 90 to 110 mmHg; pausing the infusion phenylephrine was triggered by a HR lower than 60 bpm and SBP greater than 90 mmHg. In the control group, phenylephrine was guided by BP only when it appeared on the monitor: SBP less than 90 mmHg was the trigger for administering rescue phenylephrine; SBP greater than 110 mmHg was the trigger for pausing the phenylephrine infusion. The primary outcome was incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of hypertension and other adverse haemodynamic events. The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the Win-Group than in the BP-Group (27.8 vs. 66.7%, P = 0.001). The minimum SBP was significantly higher in Win-Group than in BP-Group (93.9 ± 9.49 vs. 86.7 ± 11.16 mmHg, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypertension between groups. After spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, when phenylephrine infusion is guided by HR along with BP from a warning window it effectively reduces the incidence of hypotension without any significant effect on incidence of hypertension. Chictr.org.cn; Identifier: ChiCTR 2100041812.

Sensitivity improvement of subharmonic-based pressure measurement using phospholipid-coated monodisperse microbubbles

The use of the subharmonic signal from microbubbles exposed to ultrasound is a promising safe and cost-effective approach for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure. Achieving a high sensitivity of the subharmonic amplitude to the ambient overpressure is crucial for clinical applications. However, currently used microbubbles have a wide size distribution and diverse shell properties. This causes uncertainty in the response of the subharmonic amplitude to changes in ambient pressure, which limits the sensitivity. The aim of this study was to use monodisperse microbubbles to improve the sensitivity of subharmonic-based pressure measurements. With the same shell materials and gas core, we used a flow-focusing microfluidic chip and a mechanical agitation method to fabricate monodisperse (∼2.45-µm mean radius and 4.7 % polydisperse index) and polydisperse microbubbles (∼1.51-µm mean radius and 48.4 % polydisperse index), respectively. We varied the ultrasound parameters (i.e., the frequency, peak negative pressure (PNP) and pulse length), and found that there was an optimal excitation frequency (2.8 MHz) for achieving maximal subharmonic emission for monodisperse microbubbles, but not for polydisperse microbubbles. Three distinct regimes (occurrence, growth, and saturation) were identified in the response of the subharmonic amplitude to increasing PNP for both monodisperse and polydisperse microbubbles. For the polydisperse microbubbles, the subharmonic amplitude decreased either monotonically or non-monotonically with ambient overpressure, depending on the PNP. By contrast, for the monodisperse microbubbles, there was only a monotonic decrease at all PNPs. The maximum sensitivity (1.18 dB/kPa, R2 = 0.97) of the subharmonic amplitude to ambient overpressure for the monodisperse microbubbles was ∼6.5 times higher than that for the polydisperse microbubbles (0.18 dB/kPa, R2 = 0.88). These results show that monodisperse microbubbles can achieve a more consistent response of the subharmonic signal to changes in ambient overpressure and greatly improve the measurement sensitivity.

Can Currently Available Non-invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitors Replace Invasive Measurement With an Arterial Catheter?

Deviations from normal blood pressure (BP) during general anesthesia have been clearly linked to several adverse outcomes. Measuring BP accurately is therefore critically important for producing excellent outcomes in health care. Normal BP does not necessarily guarantee adequate organ perfusion however and adverse events have occurred even when BP seemed adequate. Invasive blood pressure monitoring has recently evolved beyond merely measuring BP. Arterial line-derived pulse contour analysis is used now to assess both cardiac output and stroke volume variation as indices of adequate intravascular volume. Confirmation of acceptable cardiac output with data derived from invasive intra-arterial catheters has become very important when managing high-risk patients. Newer devices that measure BP continuously and non-invasively in the digital arteries via a finger cuff have also become available. Many clinicians contemplate now if these new devices are ready to replace invasive monitoring with an arterial catheter. Unlike non-invasive devices, intra-arterial catheters allow frequent blood sampling. This makes it possible to assess vital parameters like pH, hemoglobin concentration, ionized calcium, potassium, glucose, and arterial partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide frequently. Non-invasive continuous BP measurement has been found to be unreliable in critically ill patients, the elderly, and patients with calcified arteries. Pulse contour-derived estimates of cardiac output and stroke volume variation have been validated better with data derived from arterial lines than that from the newer finger cuff monitors. Significant advances have been recently made with non-invasive continuous BP monitors. Invasive monitoring with an arterial line however remains the gold standard for measuring BP and assessing pulse contour analysis-derived hemodynamic variables in critically ill patients. In the future, non-invasive continuous BP monitors will likely replace intermittent oscillometers in the operating room and the postoperative period. They will however not eliminate the need for arterial catheterization in critically ill patients.