Abstract Progeny of Sarcophaga bullata produced from mothers with a history of short day will not enter pupal diapause even if they are reared in a strong diapause‐inducing environment (LD 12:12 h at 20oC). Short‐day exposure and diapause commitment are normally inseparable, but this maternal effect provides a tool for examining separately the effect of photoperiod and diapause commitment. Duration of the wandering period of the third instar is longer in diapause‐destined larvae than in non‐diapause‐destined larvae, and fecundity of flies that have experienced pupal diapause is lower than in long‐day flies that have not been through diapause. The puparia of diapausing pupae contain more hydrocarbons than puparia of nondiapausing pupae, and this contributes to higher rates of net transpiration for the nondiapausing flies. Flies showing the maternal effect (short‐day experience but no diapause) show an intermediate response: length of wandering, fecundity rate and quantities of puparial hydrocarbon are between the extremes observed in the other two groups of flies. Thus, the maternal effect switches the developmental programme to nondiapause, but the progeny retain some characteristics of diapause. Evidence from reciprocal crosses indicates that the photoperiodic history of the female, rather than the male, is responsible for the influence on fecundity.