Node-negative Patients Research Articles

Prognostic significance of anatomic site-specific depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma - An eastern Indian multi-center study

A crucial parameter in determining the prognosis of oral cavity cancer is depth of invasion (DOI). This research aimed to correlate pathological DOI at different intra-oral anatomical sites for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with the risk of regional lymph node metastasis (LNM). This study also investigated the correlation of 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) with tumor depth. DOI measurement of the primary tumor at different intra-oral anatomic sites of clinically node negative patients who underwent curative surgery with elective neck dissection (END) was carried out as per AJCC 8th Edition staging guidelines in 3 DOI groups of ≤5 mm(A), >5 to ≤10 mm(B) and >10 mm(C). Association of groupwise DOI values with histopathological parameters including LNM and 3 years survival was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.1 95 % CI: 1.0–1.2, p < 0.05) showed DOI to be a significant predictor for sub-clinical nodal metastasis observed in 136/382 OSCC patients. Receiver operating curve suggested that at 5 mm DOI (4 mm for early-stage OSCC), the risk of occult LNM was >20 % for all intra-oral sites combined. DOI <5 mm group demonstrated a superior 3-year OS (OR = 19.8 % CI: 7.8–49.9) and DSS (OR = 14.7 % CI: 5.9–37.0). Thus, DOI is an independent predictor of nodal metastasis and has significant association with LNM, OS and DSS. Our findings suggest that a DOI of ≥4 mm is an accurate cut-off value for performing END in early-stage OSCC and > 5 mm for advanced cases across all evaluated oral anatomic sites.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Metastatic Disease following Surgery for Clinically Localized Cutaneous Melanoma.

The NCCN considers "baseline staging" (whole body CT or PET scan +/- brain MRI) for all asymptomatic melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. The true yield of these workups is unknown. We created cohorts of adult malignant melanoma patients, using the National Cancer Database (2012-2020) to mimic three common scenarios: (1) clinically node negative, with positive sentinel lymph node(s) (SLNB[+]); (2) clinically node negative, with negative sentinel lymph node(s) (SLNB[-]); (3) clinically node positive with confirmed lymph node metastases (cN[+] and pN[+]). Multivariable regression, supervised decision trees, and nomograms were constructed to assess the risk of metastases based on key features. 10,371 patients were SLNB[+], 55,172 were SLNB[-], and 4,012 were cN[+] and pN[+]. The proportion of patients with any metastatic disease (brain metastases) were as follows: SLNB[+]: 1.4% (0.3%); SLNB[-] 0.3% (<0.1%); cN[+] and pN[+] 11.6% (1.6%). On multivariable regression, Breslow depth > 4, ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion were associated with greater risk of metastatic disease. A supervised decision tree for SLNB[+] and SLNB[-] patients found the only groups with >2% risk of metastases were T4 tumors or T2/T3 tumors with ulceration and LVI. Most groups had a negligible risk (<0.1%) of brain metastases. This is the first large analysis to guide the use of imaging for cutaneous melanoma. Among clinically node negative patients, metastatic disease is uncommon and brain metastases are exceedingly rare. Further investigation could promote a tailored approach to metastatic workups guided by individual risk factors.

Preoperative prediction model of lymph node metastasis in the inguinal and femoral region based on radiomics and artificial intelligence

ObjectiveTo predict preoperative inguinal lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer patients using a machine learning model based on imaging features and clinical data from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods52 vulvar...

319. EXTENSIVE LYMPHADENECTOMY MAY IMPROVE SURVIVAL IN NODE NEGATIVE OESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract Background Lymph node metastases are a major prognostic factor in survival of patients with oesophageal cancer. The number of lymph nodes removed during oesophagectomy has been previously proven to be associated with improved survival. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of lymph node harvest on survival specifically in pathologically node negative (pN0) patients with oesophageal cancer. Methods Data were extracted from a prospectively populated single-surgeon database of oesophageal resections for cancer. All consecutive patients with pN0 were included. Patient-specific risk adjusted analysis of overall and disease-free survival was performed to identify the number of lymph nodes associated with improved survival. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 137 patients (49 squamous cell carcinoma and 88 adenocarcinoma). Adjusted for cancer stage, tumour (histological type, degree of differentiation, lympho-vascular invasion, neo-adjuvant therapy) and patient related factors (age, sex), increased lymph node number was associated with significant improvement in overall (P = 0.045) and disease free (P = 0.030) survival. Lymph node count ≥ 17 was associated with improved overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion In this cohort of patients with pathologically node-negative oesophageal cancer, lymph node count of 17 or above was associated with significantly improved survival.

382. NUMBER OF LYMPH NODES RESECTED IS ASSOCIATED WITH OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATHOLOGICALLY NODE-NEGATIVE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract Background Lymphadenectomy is a key part of curative resection of esophageal cancer, with multiple quality assurance systems suggesting a minimum of 15 lymph nodes should be resected and subjected to pathological examination. Nevertheless, whether the absolute number of nodes resected is a surrogate marker for quality in surgery and staging, or has therapeutic benefit is debated. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with resected pathologically node-negative disease (both treated and untreated with neoadjuvant therapy). Methods A review of our institutional prospectively maintained database was conducted from 2010-2020 inclusive. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer aged 18+ who consented to data inclusion. Exclusion criteria were patients undergoing resection for benign disease, patients with Siewert III tumours undergoing gastrectomy or extended total gastrectomy, patients undergoing re-operative surgery, or patients where final pathology was not available. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed as appropriate. Results 195 patients (49%) had pathologically node negative disease, with median lymph node count of 25. 47% of patients were clinically node positive, but pathologically node negative following neoadjuvant therapy. On univariable survival analysis, number of nodes resected was a significant predictor of overall survival (HR 0.96, 0.93-0.98, p=0.001). On multivariable analysis, R status (HR 4.9, 1.2-21.1, p=0.03), number of nodes resected (HR 0.97, 0.94-0.99, p=0.02) and prior cN+ status (HR 2.28, 1.16-4.49, p=0.02) were predictors of overall survival. Patients with cN0, (y)pN0 disease had improved overall survival compared with cN+, (y)pN0 (median not reached vs 43.4 months, p=0.04). Conclusion Lymphadenectomy is a key part of resection of esophageal cancer. In pathologically node negative patients, the extent of lymphadenectomy remains a key predictor of overall survival. Conversion from clinically node positive to pathologically node negative disease is associated with worse outcomes compared to clinically and pathologically node negative disease. Even in early stage cancer, a thorough, multi-field lymphadenectomy should be encouraged.

Closing the gap: prognostic and predictive biomarker validation for personalized care in a Latin American hormone-dependent breast cancer cohort.

Several guidelines recommend the use of different classifiers to determine the risk of recurrence (ROR) and treatment decisions in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer. However, data are still lacking for their usefulness in Latin American (LA) patients. Our aim was to evaluate the comparative prognostic and predictive performance of different ROR classifiers in a real-world LA cohort. The Molecular Profile of Breast Cancer Study (MPBCS) is an LA case-cohort study with 5-year follow-up. Stages I and II, clinically node-negative HR+HER2- patients (n = 340) who received adjuvant hormone therapy and/or chemotherapy, were analyzed. Time-dependent receiver-operator characteristic-area under the curve, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (CPHR) models were used to compare the prognostic performance of several risk biomarkers. Multivariate CPHR with interaction models tested the predictive ability of selected risk classifiers. Within this cohort, transcriptomic-based classifiers such as the recurrence score (RS), EndoPredict (EP risk and EPClin), and PAM50-risk of recurrence scores (ROR-S and ROR-PC) presented better prognostic performances for node-negative patients (univariate C-index 0.61-0.68, adjusted C-index 0.77-0.80, adjusted hazard ratios [HR] between high and low risk: 4.06-9.97) than the traditional classifiers Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index (univariate C-index 0.53-0.59, adjusted C-index 0.72-0.75, and adjusted HR 1.85-2.54). RS (and to some extent, EndoPredict) also showed predictive capacity for chemotherapy benefit in node-negative patients (interaction P = .0200 and .0510, respectively). In summary, we could prove the clinical validity of most transcriptomic-based risk classifiers and their superiority over clinical and immunohistochemical-based methods in the heterogenous, real-world node-negative HR+HER2- MPBCS cohort.

Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastrointestinal Carcinomas: A View from a Proteomics Perspective.

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is one of the major prognostic factors in human gastrointestinal carcinomas (GICs). The lymph node-positive patients have poorer survival than node-negative patients. LNM is directly associated with the recurrence and poor survival of patients with GICs. The early detection of LNM in patients and designing effective therapies to suppress LNM may significantly impact the survival of these patients. The rapid progress made in proteomic technologies could be successfully applied to identify molecular targets for cancers at high-throughput levels. LC-MS/MS analysis enables the identification of proteins involved in LN metastasis, which can be utilized for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. This review summarizes the studies on LN metastasis in GICs using proteomic approaches to date.

Axillary Recurrence in Sentinel Lymph Node Negative Mastectomy Patients at 16 Years Median Follow Up: Natural History in the Absence of Radiation

BackgroundAxillary recurrence following lumpectomy with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is rare, possibly due to routine use of whole breast radiation. In this study, we characterized the rate of any axillary recurrence among mastectomy patients with a negative SLNB and no adjuvant radiation therapy. MethodsWe identified women who underwent mastectomy with SLNB for early-stage breast cancer (1999-2005) and included patients with pathologically negative nodes and no axillary dissection or adjuvant radiation. The primary outcome was ipsilateral axillary recurrence. ResultsA total of 234 women, median age 50 years, underwent 242 mastectomies. Histology showed 112 (46%) invasive cancers, 16 (7%) ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) with microinvasion, and 114 (47%) pure DCIS. Cancers were predominantly estrogen receptor positive (59%) and moderate (41%) or high grade (32%). A mean of 2 final sentinel nodes were excised (range 1-6) and 21 patients (9%) had isolated tumor cells on SLNB pathology. At 16 years median follow up (range 1-22 years), 3 patients (1.2%) developed an isolated axillary failure, and 1 had concurrent axillary and chest wall recurrences (total axillary recurrence rate 1.7%). Three of four axillary recurrences occurred in patients with moderate or high-grade estrogen receptor-positive DCIS without invasion on mastectomy histology. Median time to axillary recurrence was 70.5 months (range 29-132 months). ConclusionsAxillary recurrence is rare after a negative SLNB, even in the absence of adjuvant radiation. This supports the safety of forgoing additional surgery or radiation to the axilla in the early-stage breast cancer and a negative SLNB.

Impact of Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Clinically Node-Negative Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Lymph node status is a prominent prognostic factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the prognostic value of performing lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with clinical node-negative ICC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of LND on long-term outcomes in this subgroup of patients. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent radical liver resection for clinically node-negative ICC from three tertiary hepatobiliary centers. The propensity score matching analysis at 1:1 ratio based on clinicopathological data was conducted between patients with and without LND. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in the matched cohort. Among 303 patients who underwent radical liver resection for ICC, 48 patients with clinically positive nodes were excluded, and a total of 159 clinically node-negative ICC patients were finally eligible for the study, with 102 in the LND group and 57 in the non-LND group. After propensity score matching, two well-balanced groups of 51 patients each were analyzed. No significant difference of median RFS (12.0 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.37) and median OS (22.0 vs. 26.0 months, P = 0.47) was observed between the LND and non-LND group. Also, LND was not identified as one of the independent risks for survival. Among 51 patients who received LND, 11 patients were with positive lymph nodes (lymph node metastasis (LNM) (+)) and presented significantly worse outcomes than those with LND (-). On the other hand, postoperative adjuvant therapy was the independent risk factor for both RFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.623, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.393 - 0.987, P = 0.044) and OS (HR: 0.585, 95% CI: 0.359 - 0.952, P = 0.031). Furthermore, postoperative adjuvant therapy was associated with prolonged survivals of non-LND patients (P = 0.02 for RFS and P = 0.03 for OS). Based on the data, we found that LND did not significantly improve the prognosis of patients with clinically node-negative ICC. Postoperative adjuvant therapy was associated with prolonged survival of ICC patients, especially in non-LND individuals.

The clinical value of carbon nanoparticles in sentinel lymph node biopsy for early vulvar cancer

ObjectiveCarbon nanoparticle (CNP)-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been extensively adopted as a cost-effective and highly efficient method for tracing malignant tumors except for those associated with vulvar cancer. The current study aimed to validate the feasibility and efficacy of CNPs in tracking sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with early vulvar cancer. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with vulvar cancer at our institution from January 2016 to April 2022 who were pathologically diagnosed and underwent SLNB or inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFLND). CNPs were the only lymphatic tracer used in SLNB. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes and follow-up results, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were compared between the SLNB and IFLND groups. ResultsData from 52 patients were collected and investigated. Forty groins of 22 patients who underwent SLNB with CNP tracing were included. Black-stained SLNs were detected in 32 groins of 19 patients, and the rates of CNP detection by patient and by groin were 86.4 % and 80 %, respectively. Patients who underwent SLNB had better perioperative outcomes than those who underwent IFLND in certain aspects (groin drainage rate: 41.2 % and 80 %, respectively, p < 0.05; daily drainage volume (ml): 12.49 and 36.4, respectively, p < 0.05; and inguinal wound healing rate: 100 % and 80 %, respectively, p < 0.05). The results of survival analysis indicated similar prognoses for node-negative patients who underwent CNP-guided SLNB or IFLND. ConclusionsSentinel lymph node mapping with CNPs in vulvar cancer is feasible and demonstrates considerable biosecurity. With a satisfactory SLN detection rate achieved expediently, CNPs are a promising lymphatic tracer worthy of further utilization in vulvar cancer and could be an alternative option to canonical tracers.

False Negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: Managing the axilla in patients with node-positive breast cancer who converted to node-negative patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a challenging issue. We aim to analyze the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this group of patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we reviewed the results of SLNB and ALND in 368 breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2015 to 2019. The study included patients with pathologically proven axillary lymph nodes undergoing NAC. We collected the data from the Breast Diseases Research Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Results: The average age of the patients was 46.58±10.91. Of all the patients, 205 (55.7%) had positive SLN in the histologic analysis after surgery, while 163 (44.3%) had negative results. The study also revealed that the FNR of SLNB was 9.8% (n=16). Our results showed that SLN had 86.55% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting involved nodes. Furthermore, after multivariable analysis, we observed that a higher number of ALND dissections were associated with a higher FNR (Odds ratio; OR=1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.42); while a higher number of SLN excisions was linked with a lower FNR (OR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98). Conclusion: After NAC in breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes, SLNB is feasible with a low FNR; the latter is correlated with the number of nodes removed during the procedure.

Distinct Indications for Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Invasive Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas Compared with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundSurgical and adjuvant management of mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) lacks formal guidelines and data is limited to institutional studies. Factors associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy and any associated impact on survival remain to be clarified. In the absence of other data, guidelines that recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma have been extrapolated to MCN.Patients and MethodsThe National Cancer Database (2004–2019) was utilized to identify all patients that underwent pancreatic resection for invasive MCNs. Patients that received neoadjuvant therapy or did not undergo lymphadenectomy were excluded. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors associated with survival were assessed.ResultsFor 161 patients with invasive MCN, median overall survival (OS) was 133 months and 45% of patients received adjuvant therapy. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that poorly differentiated tumors [odds ratio (OR) 4.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47–11.98; p = 0.008] and positive lymph node status (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.02–6.98; p = 0.042) were independent predictors of receiving adjuvant therapy. Lymph node positivity [hazard ratio (HR) 2.90, 95% CI 1.47–5.73; p = 0.002], positive margins (HR 5.28, 95% CI 2.28–12.27; p < 0.001), and stage III disease (HR 12.46, 95% CI 1.40–111.05; p = 0.024) were associated with worse OS. Receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy was independently associated with decreased risk of mortality in node positive patients (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10–0.69; p = 0.002). Survival was not associated with adjuvant therapy in patients with negative lymph nodes or margin negative status.ConclusionIn contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), where adjuvant therapy improves OS for every tumor stage, surgery alone for invasive MCN is not associated with improved OS compared with surgery plus adjuvant therapy in node-negative patients. Surgery alone is likely sufficient for a subset of invasive MCN.

Implementation of Choosing Wisely® Recommendations for Lymph Node Surgery in Male Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe Choosing Wisely® (CW) campaign recommended de-implementation of surgical management of axillary nodes in specified patients. This study aimed to assess trends in the application of CW guidelines for lymph node (LN) surgery in males with breast cancer.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for males diagnosed with breast cancer from 2017 to 2020. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on CW criteria. Cohort 1 included all T1-2, clinically node-negative patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy and with ≤ 2 positive nodes, and Cohort 2 included all T1-2, node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients aged ≥ 70 years. In Cohort 1, patients who underwent sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) alone were compared with axillary LN dissection (ALND) or no LN surgery, while in Cohort 2, patients who underwent LN surgery were compared with those with no LN surgery.ResultsOf 617 patients who met the criteria for Cohort 1, 73.1% underwent SLNB alone compared with ALND (11.8%) or no LN surgery (15.1%). Those who received SLNB alone were younger (65 vs. 68 vs. 73 years; p < 0.001). The annual proportion of males who underwent SLNB alone remained stable from 2017 to 2020. Overall, 1565 patients met the criteria for Cohort 2, and 84.9% received LN surgery. LN surgery was omitted in older patients (81 vs. 77; p < 0.001). The proportion of elderly males with early-stage breast cancer who underwent LN surgery increased from 2017 to 2020.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that CW recommendations are not being routinely applied to males. These findings reinforce the need for additional studies and subsequent recommendations for optimal application of axillary surgery de-implementation for males diagnosed with breast cancer.

Prediction of the number of positive axillary lymph nodes according to sentinel lymph node involvement and biological subtypes in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for assessing axillary lymph node status in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. However, the approach to axillary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment is still controversial. In the present study, our objective was to predict the pathological nodal stage based on SLNB results and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who initially presented with clinical N1 positivity but whose disease status was converted to clinical N0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).Materials and methodsAfter NAC, 150 clinically node-negative patients were included. The relationships between clinicopathologic parameters and the number of positive lymph nodes in SLNBs and ALNDs were assessed through binary/multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsAmong 150 patients, 78 patients had negative SLNBs, and 72 patients had positive SLNBs. According to the ALND data of 21 patients with SLNB1+, there was no additional node involvement (80.8%), 1–2 lymph nodes were positive in 5 patients (19.2%), and no patient had ≥ 3 lymph nodes involved. Following the detection of SLNB1 + positivity, the rate of negative non-sentinel nodes were 75% in the luminal A/B subgroup, 100% in the HER-2-positive subgroup, and 100% in the triple-negative subgroup. Patients with a lower T stage (T1-3 vs. T4), fewer than 4 clinical nodes before NAC (< 4 vs. ≥4), and a decreased postoperative Ki-67 index (< 10% vs. stable/increase) were included. According to both univariate and multivariate analyses, being in the triple-negative or HER2-positive subgroup, compared to the luminal A/B subgroup (luminal A/B vs. HER2-positive/triple-negative), was found to be predictive of complete lymph node response.ConclusionThe number of SLNB-positive nodes, tumor-related parameters, and response to treatment may predict no additional nodes to be positive at ALND.

Combined Fluorescein and Methylene Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients of Early Carcinoma Breast: A Promising Technique.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is currently the gold standard for clinically node-negative patients of carcinoma breast. Fluorescein is a safe, low-cost agent, and easily available. Fluorescein has shown a promising role in sentinel lymph node evaluation in carcinoma breast in combination with methylene blue dye with a detection rate of more than 90% and a false-negative rate of less than 10% in previous studies. This study aims to determine the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of fluorescein and methylene blue dye in early breast cancer. The identification rate and false-negative rate of the combined blue and fluorescent dye method were 100% and 7.14% respectively. The accuracy of the combined blue and fluorescein dye method was 98.3%. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the combined blue dye and fluorescein dye method were 92.8%, 100%, 97.8%, and 100% respectively. Thus, the combined blue and fluorescein dye method is an easy, safe, cost-effective, and reliable method of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer patients.

Lymph Node Yield is Associated with Improved Overall Survival and Increased Time to Recurrence in Node-Negative Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Therapy.

To determine if lymph node yield (LNY) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) in patients with node-negative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Lymph node yield has been associated with survival in solid gastrointestinal cancers, including PDAC. Patients with pathological T stage I-III, node-negative (N0), PDAC treated with NAT followed by pancreatoduodenectomy were identified in the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) pancreatectomy database and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). A cutoff point of 22 nodes was identified in the NCDB using the point with the optimal (log-rank test) split. Overall survival and TTR were evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses. In the MGH cohort, 233 node-negative patients following NAT were included. A LNY ≥ 22 was associated with prolonged median OS (59 months vs. 25 months, P<0.001) and prolonged TTR (32 months vs. 14 months, P=0.019). On multivariable analysis, LNY was an independent predictor of survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P=0.034) per sampled node. In the NCDB, 2,029 node-negative patients following NAT were included. A LNY ≥ 22 was associated with prolonged median OS (49 months vs. 33 months, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, LNY was an independent predictor of survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, P<0.001) per sampled node. Lymph node yield was associated with improved oncologic outcomes in patients treated with NAT followed by pancreatoduodenectomy in two independent datasets. Responsible mechanisms by which LNY impacts the outcomes of node-negative patients following NAT warrant further exploration.

Tumor budding -a potential biomarker in low grade salivary gland carcinomas?

Low-grade salivary gland carcinoma is regularly treated with surgical therapy of the salivary gland without elective neck dissection in T1/2 carcinomas, either alone or with adjuvant radiation therapy. However, occult metastasis and locoregional recurrence influence therapy and outcome. Tumor budding is an emerging prognostic pathological factor in many carcinomas, but has not yet been adequately considered in salivary gland carcinomas. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 64 patients diagnosed with low-grade carcinoma of the major salivary glands treated between 2003 and 2017. Pathological risk factors and TNM classification were thoroughly assessed for each case. All hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained histological specimens underwent careful examination, and tumor budding was identified following the guidelines set forth by the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference in 2016. Tumor budding was not statistically significant concerning 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) (p=0.969) and mean overall survival (log-rank p=0.315). Whereas 5-year disease-free survival rate (5-YDFSR) was 87% in the low tumor budding group and 61.1% in the intermediate and high tumor budding group (p=0.021). Mean disease-free survival accounted for 100.2 months (CI: 88.6;111.9) in the low budding score group and 58.7 months (CI: 42.8;74.6) in the other group (log-rank p=0.032). Notably, pT1/2 showed significantly lower tumor buds than pT3/4 stages (2.43 tumor buds/0.785 mm2 vs. 4.19 tumor buds/0.785 mm2, p=0.034). Similar findings were noted comparing nodal-positive and nodal-negative patients, as well as patients with and without lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion (each p<0.05). Tumor budding might be used as an additional prognostic factor for recurrence in low-grade salivary gland carcinoma, seemingly associated with a higher nodal metastasis rate and advanced tumor stages and a worse 5-YDFSR. Consequently, the evaluation of tumor budding in resection specimens of low-grade salivary gland tumor may prove valuable in decision-making for neck dissection and follow-up strategy.

Quality assessment of radiotherapy in the prospective randomized SENOMAC trial

Background and purposeRecommendations for regional radiotherapy (RT) of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer are debated. We here report a RT quality assessment of the SENOMAC trial. Materials and MethodsThe SENOMAC trial randomized clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1–2 SLN macrometastases to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) or SLN biopsy only between 2015–2021. Adjuvant RT followed national guidelines. RT plans for patients included in Sweden and Denmark until June 2019 were collected (N = 1176) and compared to case report forms (CRF). Dose to level I (N = 270) and the humeral head (N = 321) was analyzed in detail. ResultsCRF-data and RT plans agreed in 99.3 % (breast/chest wall) and in 96.6 % of patients (regional RT). Congruence for whether level I was an intended RT target was lower (78 %). In accordance with Danish national guidelines, level I was more often an intended target in the SLN biopsy only arm (N = 334/611, 55 %,) than in the cALND arm (N = 174/565, 31 %,). When an intended target, level I received prescribed dose to 100 % (IQR 98–100 %) of the volume. However, even when not an intended target, full dose was delivered to > 80 % of level I (IQR 75–90 %). The intentional inclusion of level I in the target volume more than doubled the dose received by ≥ 50 % of the humeral head. ConclusionCongruence between CRF data and RT plans was excellent. Level I received a high dose coverage even when not intentionally included in the target. Including level I in target significantly increased dose to the humeral head.

Surgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Stage I Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 25-Year Experience

ObjectivesSmall-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is usually a wide-spread, highly-lethal malignancy but occasionally presents as localized, limited stage cancer amenable to local treatment. We reviewed our experience using surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to assess safety, survival rates and treatment toxicity in clinical stage I SCLC patients. Materials and MethodsElectronic medical records of patients with clinical stage I lymph node-negative SCLC who underwent surgical resection or SBRT between 1996 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model was constructed. ResultsOf 96 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 77 underwent resection and 19 underwent SBRT. Surgical patients were younger (mean 68.4 ± 9.2 years surgery versus 74.3 ± 6.6 years SBRT, P = .005) and had better pulmonary function (81.5 ± 19.6 FEV1% of predicted surgery versus 44.0 ± 20.9% SBRT, P < .001). SBRT patients had significantly more comorbidities. For both cohorts, 59 tumors were pure SCLC and 37 were mixed SCLC/NSCLC histology. Median survivals were 21 months versus 31 months for SBRT and surgery patients respectively (P = .07). There were no treatment-related mortalities. Mean length of hospital stay for surgical patients was 5.4 ± 5.7 days. Survival was longer in lymph node-negative surgery patients (median 48 months node-negative versus 19 months node-positive, P = .04). For node-negative-surgery patients, the estimated 2- and 5-year survival rates are 60% and 48%. ConclusionsOur single-institutional experience over 25 years demonstrates that local treatment with surgery or SBRT for clinical stage I SCLC is safe and effective, with survivals lower than similar stage non–small-cell carcinoma patients. However, our results compare favorably with prior small-cell surgical series and far better than reported results of chemoradiotherapy for similar stage patients, thereby validating current recommendations for employing surgery or SBRT for stage I SCLC.

Is a completion axillary dissection in patients with early breast cancer with a positive sentinel node necessary? An NCDB-based trial emulation of ACOSOG Z0011.

e12592 Background: The ACOSOG Z0011 Study is a practice-changing phase III clinical trial that promotes the de-escalation of axillary surgery in early breast cancer patients, which supports no completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in clinically node negative patients with 1 or 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (pSLN). Strong evidence for patients with 3 positive SLN was still lacking. We emulated the Z0011 trial using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to validate the post-trial evidence in the real-world setting followed by a deeper investigation in the subgroups by the number of pSLN. Methods: NCDB PUF 2020 was queried for clinical T1-2 N0 M0 breast cancer patients diagnosed 2010-2017. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were the same as in the Z0011 trial except for the inclusion of 3 positive sentinel lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone and ALND were defined using Site-Specific Factor 19. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was modeled by the Cox proportional hazard model. The propensity score-based average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) weighting schema was implemented to generate pseudo samples based on this eligible study population and its subgroups as pSLN = 1, 2, and 3, where covariate balance between the two cohorts was achieved for all observed demographic and disease characteristics. Results: 25,774 patients were included in the analysis. 20311 (78.8%) patients were in the SLNB alone group, and 5463 (21.2%) patients were in the ALND group respectively. The utility rate of SLNB increased steadily over the years from 53.7% in 2010 to 91.0% in 2017. The median age was 60, which was older than that in the Z0011 trial (55). The median follow-up time was 6.78 [95% CI: 4.98-8.81] years. By multivariable analysis using the original sample, SLNB alone and the ALND group had similar survival (HR = 0.99 [95% CI: 0.90-1.09]; P = 0.83). By ATT weighting, the SLNB group had significantly improved survival (HR= 0.88 [95% CI: 0.82-0.95]; P = 0.001). The magnitude of HR is close to that in the Z0011 trial (HR= 0.87 [95% CI: 0.62-1.23]), but the statistical significance was mainly driven by a much larger sample size in this study. In the subgroup ATT weighting analysis for pSLN = 1, the SLNB group had significantly better survival compared to the ALND group (HR = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.93]; P &lt; 0.001). Survival was equivalent for subgroup patients with pSLN = 2 (HR = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.91-1.19]; P = 0.54), while in the subgroup of pSLN = 3 patients, the SLNB group had a significantly worse survival when compared to the ALND group (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.04-1.45]; P = 0.02). Conclusions: This NCDB-based Trial-Emulation study validates the result of the ACOSOG Z0011 clinical trial through a post-trial and real-world setting, where we confirmed that patients with 1 or 2 pSLN are suitable for SLNB alone, but for patients with 3 pSLN, ALND may still maintain a viable option.