Risk Of Neoplasia In Patients Research Articles

Far From Checkmate: Gastrointestinal Neoplasia Risk in Patients With Pathogenic Variants in CHEK2.

Far From Checkmate: Gastrointestinal Neoplasia Risk in Patients With Pathogenic Variants in CHEK2.

Neoplasia risk in patients with Lynch syndrome treated with immune checkpoint blockade.

Metastatic and localized mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are exquisitely sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). The ability of ICB to prevent dMMR malignant or pre-malignant neoplasia development in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) is unknown. Of 172 cancer-affected patients with LS who had received ≥1 ICB cycles, 21 (12%) developed subsequent malignancies after ICB exposure, 91% (29/32) of which were dMMR, with median time to development of 21 months (interquartile range, 6-38). Twenty-four of 61 (39%) ICB-treated patients who subsequently underwent surveillance colonoscopy had premalignant polyps. Within matched pre-ICB and post-ICB follow-up periods, the overall rate of tumor development was unchanged; however, on subgroup analysis, a decreased incidence of post-ICB visceral tumors was observed. These data suggest that ICB treatment of LS-associated tumors does not eliminate risk of new neoplasia development, and LS-specific surveillance strategies should continue. These data have implications for immunopreventative strategies and provide insight into the immunobiology of dMMR tumors.

Increased Colorectal Neoplasia Risk in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Serrated Polyps with Dysplasia

BackgroundThe impact of serrated polyps on the advanced colorectal neoplasia (CRN) risk in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is unknown. Serrated polyps are histologically categorized as hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs).AimsWe aimed (1) to characterize the serrated polyps in IBD patients, (2) to identify factors associated with the presence of serrated polyps in IBD, and (3) to assess the CRN risk in IBD patients with serrated polyps.MethodsWe established a retrospective cohort of IBD patients with and without colonic serrated polyps. Cox-regression analysis with time-dependent variables was used to compare advanced CRN risk in IBD patients with and without serrated polyps.ResultsOf the 621 enrolled IBD patients, 198 had a serrated polyp (92 HPs, 88 SSLs without dysplasia, 13 SSLs with dysplasia, and 5 TSAs). Independent factors associated with serrated polyps were ulcerative colitis (UC) (odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19–2.62, p = 0.005), male gender (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.11–2.40, p = 0.013), and older age (per year increase, OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.05–1.08, p < 0.001). TSAs and SSLs with dysplasia were risk factors for subsequent advanced CRN (HR 13.51, 95% CI 3.11–58.68, p < 0.001), while HPs (HR 1.98, 95% CI 0.46–8.60, p = 0.36) and SSLs without dysplasia (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.11–6.88, p-0.89) did not impact the subsequent advanced CRN risk.ConclusionsUC, male gender and older age were associated with the presence of serrated polyps. The majority of serrated polyps (91%) were HPs and SSL without dysplasia and did not affect the CRC risk. However TSAs and SSLs with dysplasia, representing a small subgroup of serrated polyps (9%), were associated with subsequent advanced CRN.

The risk of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus indefinite for dysplasia: a multicenter cohort study

Background and AimsCurrent understanding of the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus with indefinite dysplasia (BE-IND) stems from small retrospective and pathology registry studies. In this multicenter cohort study, we aimed to determine the incidence and prevalence of neoplasia in BE-IND.MethodsPatients with confirmed BE-IND from 2 academic centers were included if they had no previous evidence of dysplasia and underwent endoscopic follow-up (FU) of ≥1 year. The rate of progression to neoplasia was calculated and categorized as prevalent (progression within 1 year of FU) and incident (progression after 1 year of FU). Multivariable regression adjusted for relevant clinical features was performed to identify risk factors for progression.ResultsFour hundred sixty-five patients diagnosed with BE-IND were identified between 1997 and 2017, of which 223 (48.0%) were excluded. Of the remaining 242 patients, 184 (76.0%) had no evidence of dysplasia during FU. In 23 patients (9.5%), prevalent neoplasia occurred (20 low-grade dysplasia [LGD], 2 high-grade dysplasia [HGD], 1 intramucosal cancer [IMC]), whereas 35 patients (14.5%) developed incident neoplasia (27 LGD, 5 HGD, 3 IMC), after a median 1.5 years (interquartile range, 0.6-3.2 years). The incidence rates of any neoplasia and HGD/IMC were 3.2 and 0.6 cases/100 patient-years, respectively. BE length correlated with an increased risk of prevalent (odds ratio, 1.18 per 1 cm; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.38; P = .033) and incident neoplasia (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.03; P = .016).ConclusionPatients with BE-IND should be closely monitored, because nearly a quarter harbor or will shortly develop dysplasia. BE length is a clinical predictor of neoplastic progression; however, more-accurate molecular biomarkers for risk stratification are warranted.

Computed tomography diagnosed first time diverticulitis and colorectal cancer.

Computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast is the gold standard for diagnosing diverticulitis. Published results concerning follow-up colonoscopy after an episode of acute diverticulitis to rule out cancer are conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of underlying colonic malignancy in patients diagnosed with a first time diverticulitis with a state of the art CT investigation with intravenous contrast. Retrospective analysis of all patients with a first episode of diverticulitis diagnosed with CT at Danderyds Hospital, Stockholm, between January 1, 2015, and November 16, 2016. Data on modified Hinchey classification, age, sex, laboratory parameters, body mass index, and colonoscopy findings were recorded. The study identified 518 patients with a CT-verified first time diverticulitis. Four hundred twenty-six (82%) of the 518 patients underwent follow-up colonoscopy and constitute our study cohort. CT showed that 402 patients had uncomplicated diverticulitis (modified Hinchey Ia), and 24 patients had complicated diverticulitis (modified Hinchey ≥Ib). Colonoscopy showed cancers in 2 (0.5%) of the 426 patients initially diagnosed as acute diverticulitis. In addition, 13 (3%) patients had advanced adenomas, and 121 (28%) patients had benign adenomas upon follow-up colonoscopy. Patients with CT-verified complicated diverticulitis (modified Hinchey ≥Ib) had a significantly higher risk for colon cancer compared with patients with an uncomplicated first time diverticulitis. Our study supports routine follow-up colonoscopy after a first episode of CT-diagnosed complicated diverticulitis. In contrast, we do not find an increased risk for neoplasia in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis.

P307 Colorectal neoplasia risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and serrated lesions

Abstract Background The presence of serrated lesions (SLs) is an established risk factor for colorectal neoplasia development in the general population. However, the impact of SLs on the colorectal neoplasia risk in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is unknown. In addition, SLs might have been misclassified in IBD patients in the past, in part due to revisions of classification systems. Presently, SLs are categorised as hyperplastic lesions, sessile SLs, and traditional serrated adenomas. We aimed (1) to compare the colorectal neoplasia risk in IBD patients with SLs vs. IBD patients without SLs, and 2) to study the subclassification of SLs in IBD patients before and after histopathological review by two expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Methods We identified all IBD patients with colonic SLs from 1996 to 2019 in a tertiary referral centre using the local histopathology database. Patients with neoplasia prior to SL diagnosis were excluded. Clinical data from patients’ charts were retrieved until June 2019. A subgroup of 135 SLs was reviewed by two pathologists. The log-rank analysis was used to compare the cumulative (advanced) neoplasia incidence in IBD patients with SL vs. IBD patients without SL undergoing surveillance in the same time period. Patients were censored at the end of surveillance or at colectomy. Results We identified 376 SLs in 204 IBD patients (61.9% ulcerative colitis (UC)). In the original reports, 91.9% was classified as a hyperplastic lesion. After histopathological review, 120/136 (88%) of the SLs were confirmed (16 were no SL). Of the 120 confirmed SLs, 62.2% was classified as a sessile SL, 37.8% as a hyperplastic lesion, and 0.8% as a traditional serrated adenoma. The mean time from IBD diagnosis to the first serrated lesion was 14.3 ( ± 12.3) years. A total of 41/204 (20.0%) of patients developed neoplasia (3 CRC, 3 HGD, and 35 LGD; including 2 HGD and 17 LGD at the moment of serrated lesion detection). In the 304 patients without SL (52.6% UC), 63 developed neoplasia (20.7%; 8 CRC, 5 HGD and 50 LGD). Patients who received follow-up colonoscopies after SL (n = 127) had an increased cumulative risk of neoplasia (p &amp;lt; 0.01), but no increased risk of advanced neoplasia (p = 0.50) compared with the group of IBD patients without SL (Figure 1). Conclusion The presence of SLs in IBD patients was associated with a relatively high risk of synchronous colorectal neoplasia as well as an increased risk of subsequent neoplasia, although not with an increased risk of advanced neoplasia. Histopathological review confirmed the SL diagnosis in the majority of lesions, although a large proportion of the hyperplastic lesions was reclassified as a sessile SL.

Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasia Risk in Patients Younger Than 50

Current postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines were developed based on data from individuals aged 50 and older. There is increased colonoscopy

Risk of second primary neoplasia in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma: Role of HPV status in the outcome.

e17544 Background: Patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) have better prognosis and a lower risk of appearance of second primary neoplasm (SPN) than HPV-negative OPC patients. The aim of our study was to analyze the risk of developing SPN in a large group of patients with OPC according to HPV status in the primary tumor and its relationship with toxic habits. Methods: This study includes patients from a prospective data-base: 484 OPC patients were treated from 1991 to 2017 for which the HPV DNA positivity was evaluated by PCR in available tumor specimens. HPV DNA positive samples were further tested for HPV E6*I mRNA detection and/or p16INK4a immunohistochemistry. The mean follow-up of patients included in the study was 4.9 years (SD 5.1 years). We estimated the incidence of SPN in all cancer sites and in cancer sites related to tobacco and alcohol consumption according to the HPV status in the primary tumor. Results: Ninety-nine (20.5%) out of 484 OPCs included in the study were HPV-related. During the follow-up period, 127 patients with HPV-negative tumors (33.0%) and 19 patients with HPV-positive tumors (19.2%) had a SPN. Considering only the tobacco/alcohol-related SPNs, 106 of the patients with HPV-negative tumors (27.5%), and 12 patients with HPV-positive tumors (12.1%) had a tobacco/alcohol-related SPN (P &lt; 0.0001). Five-year and 10-year SPN-free survival for HPV-negative versus HPV-positive OPC patients was 61.0% versus 81.5%, and 37.6% versus 73.8%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). When restricting the analyses to tobacco/alcohol-related SPNs, the corresponding survival rates were 66.6% versus 86.8% and 45.9% versus 83.5% for 5-year and 10-year survival rates, respectively (P &lt; 0.0001). The frequency of tobacco/alcohol-related SPNs occurrence throughout the follow-up period for patients with HPV-negative OPC was 27.5%, for patients with HPV-positive tumors with a previous history of severe tobacco and/or alcohol use was 21.4%, and for patients with HPV-positive tumors without a history of severe tobacco and/or alcohol consumption it was 8.5% (P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: HPV status and previous toxic habits might allow classifying patients regarding the risk of tobacco/alcohol-related SPNs. HPV-related OPC patients without previous history of severe tobacco and/or alcohol use have a significant low risk of SPN development, particularly in those locations related to tobacco use or alcohol consumption

604 - Consecutive Negative Findings on Colonoscopy During Surveillance Predict a Low Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients with Longstanding Colitis: Results of a 15-Year Multicenter, Multinational Cohort Study

604 - Consecutive Negative Findings on Colonoscopy During Surveillance Predict a Low Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients with Longstanding Colitis: Results of a 15-Year Multicenter, Multinational Cohort Study

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor use is associated with decreased colorectal neoplasia risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving colonoscopy: a retrospective study.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to clarify the factors that influence the incidence of colorectal neoplasia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).Study Design and SettingAmong a total of 1176 patients who underwent total colonoscopy at our hospital, we retrospectively analyzed 168 patients with type 2 DM. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were then performed to identify the risk factors associated with colorectal neoplasia.ResultsA multivariate analysis of these patients demonstrated that male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.67–10.37, p = 0.002), taking statins (OR = 4.59, 95% CI = 1.69–13.43, p = 0.003), taking alpha glucosidase inhibitor (α-GI) (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13–0.87, p = 0.023) and taking low-dose aspirin (LDA) (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.10–0.95, p = 0.040) were independent factors associated with an increased (male gender and statins) or decreased (α-GI and LDA) risk of colorectal neoplasia.ConclusionsWhile male gender and taking statins are risk factors, taking α-GI as well as LDA may reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with type2 DM.

Pattern of Inflammation on Surveillance Colonoscopy Does Not Predict Development of Colitis-associated Neoplasia.

Identification of colonoscopic features which increase colitis-associated neoplasia risk in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may allow patient risk stratification. Our objective was to investigate whether colonoscopic features correlate with the risk of developing colitis-associated neoplasia in patients with UC on surveillance. In this retrospective case-control study, patients with UC who underwent surveillance colonoscopies from 1998 to 2011 were included. Patients with UC with neoplasia were compared with a matched control group of patients with UC without neoplasia in a 1:3 ratio. A total of 111 eligible patients with UC with colon neoplasia were compared with 356 patients with UC without colon neoplasia. On univariate analysis, colitis-associated neoplasia was associated with male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-3.89, P ≤ 0.001) and smoking history (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.1-2.39, P = 0.045) but not with colonoscopic features, including tubular colon/shortened colon, scarring, segment of severe inflammation, inflammatory polyps, colonic stricture, or macroscopically normal appearance colonoscopy. In multivariate analysis, only male gender (OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.77-4.08, P ≤ 0.001) was found to be associated with an increased risk, whereas the use of 5-aminosalicylates was associated with a decreased risk for colitis-associated neoplasia (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.84, P = 0.009). In patients with UC, colonoscopic features especially on standard-definition white-light colonoscopy did not appear to reliably predict the development of colitis-associated neoplasia. This will leave room for image-enhanced endoscopy technology and molecular markers for the early and accurate detection of colitis-associated neoplasia.

Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis of 16 observational studies.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) carry an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia (dysplasia and cancer), whereas the association between PSC and the development of colorectal neoplasia in Crohn's disease (CD) is controversial. A meta-analysis was carried out to compare the risk of this neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with and without PSC. A systematic research of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify studies that compared the risk of colorectal neoplasia (dysplasia and cancer) in patients with IBD with and without PSC. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the random-effects model by STATA 12.0. A total of 16 studies (four cohort studies, 12 case-control studies; nine prospective studies and seven retrospective studies) were selected for further study. These studies included 13 379 IBD patients, of whom 1022 also had PSC. Patients with IBD and PSC were at an increased risk of colorectal dysplasia and cancer compared with patients with IBD alone [OR 3.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.14-4.90]. This increased risk was present even when the risk of colorectal cancer alone was analysed (OR 3.41; 95% CI: 2.13-5.48). Data only from patients with UC showed that PSC was associated with an increased risk for the development of colorectal neoplasia and cancer in patients with UC (OR 2.98; 95% CI: 1.54-5.76) (OR 3.01; 95% CI: 1.44-6.29), but there were high heterogeneity among studies (I=76.9 and 62.8%, respectively). Heterogeneity of the studies was affected by the study design (prospective or retrospective). The OR of colorectal neoplasia was 2.32 (95% CI: 0.70-7.70, P=0.133) and that of cancer was 2.91 (95% CI: 0.84-10.16, P=0.388) for patients with CD and concurrent PSC. Patients with IBD and PSC have a markedly higher risk for the development of colorectal neoplasia than patients with IBD, but not PSC. Stratification by IBD type show that the presence of PSC is associated with an increased risk for the development of colorectal neoplasia in patients with UC; however, there is a nonsignificant association in CD patients. When the risk of colorectal cancer alone is analysed, the conclusion does not change.

Overexpression of p53 predicts colorectal neoplasia risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and mucosa changes indefinite for dysplasia.

Background and aims: We previously demonstrated a significant colorectal neoplasia risk in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with mucosal changes indefinite for dysplasia (IND) and the potential diagnostic utility of p53 and cytokeratin 7 immunohistochemistry in IBD-associated neoplasia. The primary aim of this exploratory study was to determine the predictive value of the two markers for neoplasia risk in the IBD-IND population.Methods: We identified 44 eligible cases with IBD and IND in colon biopsy from our pathology database. We semi-quantified the expression of p53 and cytokeratin 7 in the colon biopsies by immunohistochemistry and correlated their expression, demographic information, and clinical features with colorectal neoplasia outcome.Results: The mean age of the cohort was 46.6 ± 15.1 years, with 25 (56.8%) being male. The median follow-up was 101 months (range: 6–247) after IND diagnosis. Among these 44 patients, 11 (25%) progressed to neoplasia (low-grade dysplasia = 6; high-grade dysplasia = 2; cancer 3) at a median follow-up of 66 months (range: 19–145). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age and p53 overexpression were associated with progression to neoplasia.Conclusions: Twenty-five percent of patients with IBD and IND developed colorectal dysplasia or cancer. Overexpression of p53 and age are associated with neoplastic progression.

Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis

A Distinct Mechanism for Reflux in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: A Study Using High Resolution Manometry-Impedance

neoplasia. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to calculate the risk of advanced neoplasia in patients with and without thiopurine or 5-ASA use. Results: A total of 2605 patients with a confirmed IBD diagnosis were included in this study. Of these, 981 patients (38%) used 5-ASA, 315 patients (12%) used thiopurines, 459 patients (18%) used both 5-ASA and thiopurines and 850 patients (33%) used none of these drugs. No statistically significant differences were found for type of IBD, gender, age, duration of IBD and extent of IBD between these groups. Thirty-one patients (1%) developed advanced neoplasia during 16,568 person years of follow-up. Of these, 12 patients (39%) had used 5-ASA, 2 (7%) thiopurines and 1 (3%) both drugs. Increasing age and disease involvement of more than 50% of the colon were associated with an increased risk of developing advanced neoplasia (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.11 and adjusted HR 5.88, 95% CI 2.00-17.3, respectively). Thiopurine use was associated with a significantly decreased risk of developing advanced neoplasia (adjusted HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.73). 5ASA therapy had also a protective effect on developing advanced neoplasia, but this was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.20-1.26). Conclusion: Thiopurine use protects colitis patients against the development of advanced neoplasia. The effect of 5ASA appeared to be less pronounced.

Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Celiac Disease: A Multicentric Study

Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Celiac Disease: A Multicentric Study

Risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with solid organ transplantation

The incidence of colorectal adenomas and advanced neoplasia in the transplant population has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not there was an increased incidence of colorectal adenomas and advanced neoplasia in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients compared with an average-risk population. We reviewed 360 patients with solid organ transplants who underwent colonoscopy between February 1995 and July 2008, and 360 age- and gender-matched patients in an average-risk population. The mean duration from transplantation to colonoscopy in the SOT group was 40.4 ± 34.0 months. Ninety-three (25.8%) adenomas were detected in the SOT group, while 98 (27.2%) adenomas were detected in the control group (p = 0.763). There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the number of patients with advanced neoplasia in the SOT group (24 patients [6.7%]) compared with the control group (3 patients [0.8%]). The independent risk factors of advanced neoplasia were old age (odds ratio [OR], 1.067; 95% CI, 1.019-1.118) and transplantation (OR, 6.069; 95% CI, 1.455-25.314). In summary, there was a significant increase in the incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in SOT recipients. The reason for this finding is unclear, and studies with a larger number of patients are needed to further evaluate this group.

Meta-analysis of systemic lupus erythematosus and the risk of cervical neoplasia

Individuals with SLE have a heightened risk of developing atypical cervical smears or cervical cancer. Many studies have investigated the association between SLE and cervical neoplasia risk. However, the risk for SLE associated with cervical neoplasia risk is unclear. The present meta-analysis clarified the risk of cervical neoplasia in patients with SLE. A systematic review of English-language studies was conducted. Data on the risk of cervical neoplasia risk in patients with SLE were pooled using case-control models. Replication studies that tested the association between SLE and cervical neoplasia risk were reviewed for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis procedure was used to pool odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs to evaluate the association. Seven replication studies fulfilled the selection criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Homogeneity was confirmed across the replication studies. The common OR was 4.17 (95% CI 3.03, 5.74; P < 0.00001) for the study. The association was confirmed when individuals with SLE have an increased susceptibility to cervical neoplasia risk. This meta-analysis demonstrates the positive association between SLE and cervical neoplasia risk. Individuals with SLE have a heightened risk of developing cervical cancer.

Definition of Barrett's Esophagus: Time for a Rethink—Is Intestinal Metaplasia Dead?

The definition of Barrett's esophagus (BE) varies worldwide, particularly with regard to the need to identify goblet cells in esophageal biopsies in order to diagnose this condition. Problems related to the need to identify goblet cells to diagnose BE include the facts that goblet cells are uncommon in pediatric patients with BE, a small percentage of adults with columnar metaplasia of the esophagus do not contain goblet cells, the chances of detecting goblet cells are proportional to the length of columnar metaplasia, sampling error is common, and interpretation and differentiation of goblet cells vs. pseudogoblet cells may be difficult in some circumstances. In addition, goblet cells have been shown to wax and wane over the natural history of BE. Recent studies suggest that the background nongoblet epithelium in BE is biologically intestinalized, and shows a variety of molecular abnormalities similar to the goblet cell-containing epithelium. In addition, several retrospective and outcome studies suggest a well-defined risk of neoplasia in patients with esophageal columnar metaplasia, but without goblet cells. There are important clinical and economic implications to these findings and also with regard to the definition of BE. This review provides evidence to suggest that a diagnosis of BE should not require demonstration of goblet cells in mucosal biopsies, and offers considerable data to support the notion that a nongoblet epithelium is also at risk of malignancy. Guidelines for the diagnosis of BE need to consider revisions that take into account new data regarding nongoblet cell epithelium in BE, and the difficulties in recognizing columnar metaplasia that measures less than 1 cm in length.

Medication Usage and the Risk of Neoplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus

Experimental evidence indicates that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)/aspirin, and statins can protect patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) from developing neoplasias. However, only limited data are available on chemoprevention in patients with BE. A retrospective observational study was performed using data from patients with documented BE. Prescription information was collected from pharmacy records. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the association between prescriptions for PPIs, NSAIDs/aspirin, or statins and the risk of developing esophageal dysplasia or adenocarcinoma during follow-up (from 1982 to 2005). We examined 344 patients diagnosed with BE (mean age 61 years, 90.4% Caucasian, 94.2% male). After BE diagnosis, 67.2% of the patients were prescribed PPIs for a mean duration of 5.1 years; 49.1% were prescribed NSAIDs for a mean duration of 3.6 years, and 25.3% were prescribed statins for a mean duration of 2.8 years. During 2620 patient-years, high grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma developed in 33 patients. PPI treatment after BE diagnosis was associated with a reduced risk of high grade dysplasia or cancer; this association persisted after adjustment for gender, age, and the length of BE. NSAID and/or aspirin therapy were associated with a nonsignificant trend toward lower incidence of high grade dysplasia or esophageal cancer. PPI therapy reduces the risk of neoplasms in patients with BE. NSAIDs/aspirin appear to reduce cancer risk whereas statin use is not significantly associated with the risk of neoplasia in patients with BE.