Negative Percent Agreement Research Articles

Clinical Performance of the BD Respiratory Viral Panel for BD MAX™ System in Detecting SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A and B, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus

Using a nasopharyngeal (NP) or anterior nasal (NS) swab from prospectively collected or retrospective specimens, we assessed the clinical performance of the BD Respiratory Viral Panel (BD RVP) for BD MAX System against FDA-cleared or authorized comparators. Across prospective and retrospective specimens, positive percent agreement (PPA) was ≥ 98.4% for SARS-CoV-2, ≥ 96.7% for influenza (flu) A, ≥ 91.7% for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and 100% for flu B (retrospective only) while negative percent agreement (NPA) was ≥ 97.7% across all targets, leading to the assay FDA clearance. A head-to-head comparison of NS versus NP results with BD RVP was also performed; PPA was ≥ 90% and NPA ≥ 98.2% for SARS-CoV-2, flu A and RSV. These findings confirm that the BD MAX RVP assay performs well for detection and differentiation of the three viruses in NP and NS specimens, with strong interrater agreements for NS versus NP comparisons.

Performance evaluation of microfluidic microplate-based fluorescent ELISA for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2–specific IgG and IgM

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of newly developed microfluidic microplate-based fluorescent ELISA for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection: the Veri-Q opti COVID-19 IgG and IgM ELISAs (hereafter, “Opti IgG/M”; MiCo BioMed, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), in comparison with conventional ELISAs. A total of 270 serum samples were analyzed, among which 90 samples were serially obtained from 25 COVID-19 patients. Another 180 samples were collected from 180 SARS-CoV-2–negative individuals. As comparative assays, we used SCoV-2 Detect IgG/M ELISA (hereafter, “InBios IgG/M”; InBios, Seattle, WA, USA) and Veri-Q COVID-19 IgG/IgM ELISA (hereafter, “Veri-Q IgG/M”; MiCo BioMed). Compared with conventional ELISAs, the Opti IgG yielded 97.1–100.0% positive percent agreement, 95.2–98.0% negative percent agreement, 96.3–97.8% total percent agreement, and kappa values of 0.90–0.94. Between the Opti IgM and the InBios IgM, the values were 93.7%, 96.6%, 95.9%, and 0.89, respectively. For the Opti IgG, sensitivities for the samples collected from 0–7, 8–14, 15–21, and ≥ 22 days after symptom onset were 40.0, 58.3, 94.1, and 100.0%, respectively. The values for the Opti IgM were 30.0, 54.2, 88.2, and 80%, respectively. The diagnostic specificities of the Opti IgG and IgM were 99.4 and 97.2%, respectively. The microfluidic microplate-based fluorescent ELISAs showed comparable diagnostic performance to conventional ELISAs for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. With the combination of high throughput, a simplified workflow, and the ability to analyze reduced volumes, this new technology has great potential for improving SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing.

Evaluation of flow cytometry-based fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen test to measure the humoral immunity against the varicella-zoster virus

The fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen (FAMA) test is the gold standard for measuring the immunity induced by varicella vaccines with high sensitivity and specificity. However, certain aspects of the FAMA test, such as time consumption, non-automation, and subjective interpretation by observers using fluorescence microscopy, are obstacles to handling large amounts of samples. To overcome these hurdles, flow cytometry was adopted to analyze and compare the flow FAMA titer with the classic FAMA titer. In addition, to save time in FAMA antigen preparation and reduce lot-to-lot variation, the stability of the FAMA antigen stored in liquid nitrogen was investigated. The FAMA test was performed on sera from 229 children, and antibody titers were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy (classic FAMA) and flow cytometry (flow FAMA). For comparison, glycoprotein enzyme immunoassay (gpEIA) titer was also measured. A strong correlation was found between the flow and classic FAMA titers, and the flow FAMA and gpEIA titers, with Pearson's r of 0.9316 and 0.8588, respectively. Between the classic FAMA and gpEIA titers, the Pearson's r value was 0.8156. The positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and area under the curve of the flow FAMA against classic FAMA were 95.0 %, 86.8 %, and 0.909, respectively. And those of the flow FAMA against gpEIA were 80.0 %, 87.6 %, and 0.838, respectively. The FAMA antigen stored in liquid nitrogen was stable for up to 12 months. Based on the above data, flow FAMA has the potential to be used as an alternative to classic FAMA. Moreover, pre-made FAMA antigen may reduce the preparation time and lot-to-lot variation of FAMA test.

Clinical application and evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pathogen detection for suspected central nervous system infections

Central nervous system Infections (CNSIs) is a disease characterized by complex pathogens, rapid disease progression, high mortality rate and high disability rate. Here, we evaluated the clinical value of metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnosis of central nervous system infections and explored the factors affecting the results of mNGS. We conducted a retrospective study to compare mNGS with conventional methods including culture, smear and etc. 111 suspected CNS infectious patients were enrolled in this study, and clinical data were recorded. Chi-square test were used to evaluate independent binomial variables, taking p < 0.05 as statistically significant threshold. Of the 111 enrolled cases, 57.7% (64/111) were diagnosed with central nervous system infections. From these cases, mNGS identified 39.6% (44/111) true-positive cases, 7.2% (8/111) false-positive case, 35.1% (39/111) true-negative cases, and 18.0% (20/111) false-negative cases. The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS were 68.7% (44/64) and 82.9% (39/47), respectively. Compared with culture, mNGS provided a higher pathogen detection rate in CNSIs patients (68.7% (44/64) vs. 26.5% (17/64), p < 0.0001). Compared to conventional methods, positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement was 84.60% (44/52) and 66.1% (39/59) separately. At a species-specific read number (SSRN) ≥ 2, mNGS performance in the diagnosis of definite viral encephalitis and/or meningitis was optimal (area under the curve [AUC] 0.758, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.663–0.854). In bacterial CNSIs patients with significant CSF abnormalities (CSF WBC > 300*106/L), the positive rate of CSF mNGS is higher. To sum up, conventional microbiologic testing is insufficient to detect all neuroinvasive pathogens, and mNGS exhibited satisfactory diagnostic performance in CNSIs and with an overall detection rate higher than culture (p < 0.0001).

A comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP3 and CCP3.1) autoantibody tests in rheumatoid arthritis

BackgroundAnti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are a specific serological biomarker used in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In clinical practice ACPA can be identified using immunoassays targeting synthetic cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP). The 3rd generation anti-CCP IgG antibody (CCP3) offers improved sensitivity compared to the earlier versions. Recently, CCP3.1, capable of detecting both IgG and IgA antibodies, was introduced to enhance sensitivity, especially in patients with early RA. MethodsWe assessed serum CCP3.1 against CCP3 in 331 subjects undergoing RA panel serology, comprising 136 patients with RA and 195 patients without RA. Sera were tested for anti-CCP IgG (CCP3) and anti-CCP IgG/IgA (CCP3.1) antibodies. Clinical performance of these tests was compared at manufacturer-suggested cutoffs. A separate set of 81 patients with a diagnosis of RA by 2010 criteria and whose samples were obtained from within 1-year of RA diagnosis was similarly assessed to evaluate assay performance in an independent clinical RA cohort. ResultsOverall diagnostic accuracy was similar; CCP3 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, CCP3.1 had an AUC of 0.89. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for CCP3 were 79 %, 91 %, 86 %, and 86 %, respectively. For CCP3.1, sensitivity was 78 %, specificity 93 %, PPV 89 %, NPV 86 %. Both assays demonstrated excellent agreement; positive percent agreement of 94 % and negative percent agreement of 99 %. ConclusionOur findings indicate comparable diagnostic accuracy between CCP3 and CCP3.1 assays in these clinical cohorts.

Evaluation of a BioFire multiplex PCR panel for detection of joint infections using retrospective and prospectively collected specimens.

The BioFire Joint Infection Panel (JI panel) is a newly FDA-approved multiplex PCR assay for detection of common bone and joint pathogens with 39 targets which include select Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, yeast, and antimicrobial resistance genes. We evaluated the performance of the JI panel in detecting joint infections in our patient population. Sixty-three frozen, residual joint fluid specimens were retrospectively tested using the JI panel. An additional 104 residual joint fluid specimens were de-identified and prospectively tested within 1 week of collection. Results from routine bacterial cultures were used as the reference standard, which included inoculation to agar plates and blood culture bottles. For the frozen specimens, the JI panel showed a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 92.8% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 97.1%. PPA was 71.4% and NPA was 94.8% for fresh specimens. A total of 12 discrepancies were observed among the 167 specimens tested. The JI panel demonstrated good overall agreement with routine culture for the detection of joint infections and may improve timely diagnosis when used in conjunction with bacterial culture. However, potential false-positive and false-negative results were observed in both retrospective and prospective testing of specimens.IMPORTANCEThe BioFire JI panel is a new commercially available multiplex PCR assay for detecting common pathogens causing bone and joint infections. The test is performed directly on joint fluids with a fast turnaround time of 1 hour. Our study shows that while the JI panel overall shows good agreement with routine culture, discrepancies were observed in 7% of cases and results should be interpreted with appropriate clinical context.

Sample-to-answer direct real-time PCR detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia spp., and Babesia spp. infections in whole-blood specimens.

This work demonstrates that detection of tick-borne illnesses, such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, or ehrlichiosis, can be performed directly from whole blood with no extraction. The assay described here has a high positive and negative percent agreement with existing methods and is used as the standard of care. An increasing incidence of tick-borne illness combined with shortage of well-trained technologists to perform traditional manual testing, testing options that can be adapted to various lab settings, are of the utmost importance.

Utility of Serial Microbial Cell-free DNA Sequencing for Inpatient and Outpatient Pathogen Surveillance Among Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

This study characterizes the clinical utility and validity of the Karius test (KT), a plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing platform, as an infection surveillance tool among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients, including monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and detecting infections relative to standard microbiologic testing (SMT). A prospective, observational cohort study was performed among adult HCT recipients as inpatients and outpatients. Serial KTs were performed starting with 1 sample within 14 days before HCT, then weekly from 7-63 days posttransplant then monthly from 3-12 months post-HCT. Diagnostic performance of KT versus CMV polymerase chain reaction was evaluated with positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement. Infectious events (<12 months post-HCT) were extracted from medical records. For infectious events without positive SMT, 2 clinicians adjudicated KT results to determine if any detections were a probable cause. Difference in time from KT pathogen detection and infection onset was calculated. Of the 70 participants, mean age was 49.9 years. For CMV surveillance, positive percent agreement was 100% and negative percent agreement was 90%. There was strong correlation between CMV DNA and KT molecules per microliter (r 2: 0.84, P < .001). Of the 32 SMT+/KT+ infectious events, KT identified 26 earlier than SMT (median: -12 days) and an additional 5 diagnostically difficult pathogens identified by KT but not SMT. KT detected CMV with high accuracy and correlation with quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Among infectious events, KT demonstrated additive clinical utility by detecting pathogens earlier than SMT and those not detected by SMT.

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of QIAreach QuantiFERON-TB compared to QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Accurate tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains challenging, especially in resource-limited settings. This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of the QIAreach QuantiFERON-TB (QFT) assay, with a specific focus on comparing its diagnostic performance with the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus). We systematically reviewed relevant individual studies on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to January 20, 2024. The focus was on evaluating the diagnostic parameters of the QIAreach QFT assay for TB infection, which included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and concordance with the QFT-Plus assay. QIAreach QFT demonstrated strong diagnostic performance with a pooled sensitivity of 99% (95% CI 95–100%) and specificity of 94% (95% CI 85–97%). Additionally, it showed a PLR of 15.6 (95% CI 6.5–37.5) and NLR of 0.01 (95% CI 0–0.03). The pooled PPV and NPV were 88% (95% CI 70–98%) and 100% (95% CI 99–100%), respectively. Concordance analysis with QFT-Plus revealed a pooled positive percent agreement of 98% (95% CI 88–100%) and pooled negative percent agreement of 91% (95% CI 81–97%), with a pooled overall percent agreement of 92% (95% CI 83–98). In conclusion, QIAreach QFT has shown promising diagnostic performance, with a strong concordance with QFT-Plus. However, further studies are needed to comprehensively evaluate its diagnostic performance in the context of TB infection.

In-house homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional Italian pilot study

AimsPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPIs) represent a standard of care for the clinical management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has emerged...

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Pluslife Mini Dock RHAM technology with Abbott ID Now and Cepheid GenXpert: A retrospective evaluation study

Rapid and sensitive detection of pathogens is critical in interrupting the transmission chain of infectious diseases. Currently, real-time (RT-)PCR represents the gold standard for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. RNase HII-assisted amplification (RHAM) is a promising technology, enabling reliable point-of-care (PoC) testing; however, its diagnostic accuracy has not yet been investigated. The present study compared the Pluslife Mini Dock (RHAM technology), with Abbott ID Now and Cepheid GeneXpert IV. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were determined in 100 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 210 SARS-CoV-2 negative samples. Further, the reliability of the Pluslife Mini Dock was investigated in different SARS-CoV-2 variants (Delta and Omicron subvariants). The PPA was 99.00% for Pluslife, 100.00% for Abbott ID Now, and 99.00% for Cepheid GeneXpert, with an NPA of 100.00%, 98.90%, and 93.72%, respectively. Abbott ID Now demonstrated the highest rate of invalid results. All SARS-CoV-2 analysed variants were detected by the Pluslife device. Altogether, the Pluslife Mini Dock demonstrated a PPA of 99.16% (235/237) for CT < 36 and an NPA of 100.00% (313/313), respectively. In conclusion, the Pluslife Mini Dock demonstrated better analytical performance than Abbott ID Now and Cepheid GeneXpert IV, representing a highly accurate and rapid PoC alternative to RT-PCR.

Clinical application of targeted tumour sequencing tests for detecting ERBB2 amplification and optimizing anti-HER2 therapy in gastric cancer

BackgroundEvaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression caused by erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) amplification (AMP) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is essential for treating unresectable metastatic gastric cancer (GC). A targeted tumour sequencing test enables comprehensive assessment of alterations in cancer-related genes, including ERBB2. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance between the targeted tumour sequencing test and IHC/FISH for detecting HER2-positive GC and to clarify the significance of ERBB2 AMP and concomitant genetic alterations in HER2 downstream pathways (DPs) in anti-HER2 therapy for unresectable metastatic GC patients.MethodsERBB2 copy number alteration (CNA) was examined via a targeted tumour sequencing test in 152 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GC tissues. ERBB2 CNA was compared to HER2 status evaluated by IHC/FISH in FFPE block sections, which were identical to those subjected to the targeted tumour sequencing test. Treatment outcomes of anti-HER2 therapy in 11 patients with unresectable metastatic GC was evaluated.ResultsERBB2 AMP (≥ 2.5-fold change) was detected by the targeted tumour sequencing test in 15 patients (9.9%), and HER2 positivity (IHC 3 + or IHC 2+/FISH positive) was detected in 21 patients (13.8%). The overall percent agreement, positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement and Cohen’s kappa between ERBB2 CNA and HER2 status were 94.7%, 66.7%, 99.2% and 0.75, respectively. Progression-free survival for trastuzumab therapy in patients with ERBB2 AMP was significantly longer than that in patients with no ERBB2 AMP detected by the targeted tumour sequencing test (median 14 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.007). Treatment response to trastuzumab therapy was reduced in patients with ERBB2 AMP and concomitant CNAs of genes in HER2 DPs. One patient with ERBB2 AMP and concomitant CNAs of genes in HER2 DPs achieved a durable response to trastuzumab deruxtecan as fourth-line therapy.ConclusionsA targeted tumour sequencing test is a reliable modality for identifying HER2-positive GC. ERBB2 AMP and concomitant genetic alterations detected through the targeted tumour sequencing test are potential indicators of treatment response to trastuzumab therapy. The targeted tumour sequencing test has emerged as a plausible candidate for companion diagnostics to determine indications for anti-HER2 therapy in the era of precision medicine for GC.

Diagnosing OSA and Insomnia at Home Based Only on an Actigraphy Total Sleep Time and RIP Belts an Algorithm "Nox Body Sleep™".

The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced clinical sleep protocols with stricter hospital disinfection requirements. Facing these new rules, we tested if a new artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm: The Nox BodySleep™ (NBS) developed without airflow signals for the analysis of sleep might assess pertinently sleep in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and chronic insomnia (CI) as a control group, compared to polysomnography (PSG) manual scoring. NBS is a recurrent neural network model that estimates Wake, NREM, and REM states, given features extracted from activity and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) belt signals (Nox A1 PSG). Sleep states from 139 PSG studies (CI N = 72; OSA N = 67) were analyzed by NBS and compared to manually scored PSG using positive percentage agreement, negative percentage agreement, and overall agreement metrics. Similarly, we compared common sleep parameters and OSA severity using sleep states estimated by NBS for each recording and compared to manual scoring using Bland-Altman analysis and intra-class correlation coefficient. For 127,170 sleep epochs, an overall agreement of 83% was reached for Wake, NREM and REM states (92% for REM states in CI patients) between NBS and manually scored PSG. Overall agreement for estimating OSA severity was 100% for moderate-severe OSA and 91% for minimal OSA. The absolute errors of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and total sleep time (TST) were significantly lower for the NBS compared to no scoring of sleep. The intra-class correlation was higher for AHI and significantly higher for TST using the NBS compared to no scoring of sleep. NBS gives sleep states, parameters and AHI with a good positive and negative percentage agreement, compared with manually scored PSG.

Detection of comprehensive oncogenic driver alteration of non-small cell lung cancer from cytology specimens by multi-gene PCR panel.

8579 Background: The analysis of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel test requires a sufficient amount of tissue specimens (TS), but the collection of tissue specimens can be sometimes challenging in clinical practice. Despite being easier and safer to collect than TS, cytology specimens (CS) are considered unsuitable for NGS due to the small number of tumor cells. The AmoyDx Pan Lung Cancer PCR Panel (AmoyDx), a multi-gene PCR panel that amplified mutation or fusion variants of 11 genes (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET, MET HER2, BRAF, KRAS, and NTRK1-3) by real-time PCR, can be performed with smaller amounts of nucleic acid than NGS, and CS may be suitable for multi-gene analysis using this panel. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of multi-gene analysis using CS, and the concordance rate of gene alteration between CS and TS in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We enrolled consecutive NSCLC patients obtaining CS through bronchoscopy, including transbronchial brushing (TBB) and transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) from September 2020 to March 2023. These CS were preserved as frozen pellets. The difference in the amount of nucleic acid, the success rate and the concordance rate of gene alteration with AmoyDx were evaluated between CS and pared TS collected simultaneously with CS. Results: A total of 131 (Ad/Sq/NSCLC-NOS: 113/2/16) cases were enrolled in this study. Fifty-nine specimens were obtained through TBB and another 72 were obtained through TBNB. The median nucleic acid concentration (NanoDrop [ng/μL]) isolated from CS was comparable to that isolated from TS (DNA 114/99, p=0.96; RNA 36/27, p=0.63). However, the median DNA concentration in CS was significantly lower (80/102, p=0.01) in TBB samples, while in TBNA samples, it was higher (134/90, p=0.03). Almost all CS (99.2%,130/131) and TS (99.2%,130/131) were analyzed successfully with AmoyDx, with only one RNA analysis failure in each group. Among CS, 78 (60%) samples exhibit gene alteration, including EGFR/KRAS/BRAF/HER2/ALK/ROS1/MET/RET: 44/9/2/5/8/1/8/1, while 77 (59%); 44/9/2/6/6/1/8/1 in TS. The positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and overall percent agreement of CS using analysis compared with the results of TS using analysis were 99% (76/77), 96% (52/54), and 98% (128/131), respectively. Conclusions: CS exhibit an extremely high success rate for multi-gene analysis, with nucleic acid yield comparable to TS. Moreover, the concordance rate of gene alteration between CS and TS is also remarkably high. CS emerge as a viable alternative to TS for analyzing driver gene alteration in multi-gene PCR analysis.

Analytical validation of the Labcorp Plasma Complete test to enable precision oncology through solid tumor liquid biopsy comprehensive genomic profiling.

3063 Background: To help guide treatment decisions and enable clinical trial matching for cancer patients, tumor genomic profiling is an essential precision oncology tool. Liquid biopsy may be used as a complementary approach to assess tumor-specific DNA alterations circulating in the blood. The Labcorp Plasma Complete test is a next-generation-sequencing (NGS), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling test that identifies actionable and clinically relevant variants in advanced and metastatic solid cancers across 521 genes. Methods: The Labcorp Plasma Complete test is a hybrid capture based, targeted NGS test, optimized for 25 ng of cfDNA input and is intended for variant detection in all solid cancer indications. The test interrogates all coding exons of 521 genes to comprehensively detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion and deletions (indels). The test also reports copy number amplifications (CNAs) and gene translocations in 12 genes, and microsatellite instability (MSI). In total, 631 cancer patient plasma samples were evaluated by the test including lung, breast, colorectal, head and neck, pancreatic, gynecologic, and prostate cancers among other indications. Well-characterized reference samples (Genome in a Bottle) were utilized to assess analytical specificity. Contrived cell lines and clinical samples were utilized to establish analytical sensitivity, accuracy, as well as precision, reproducibility, and repeatability (PRR). Results: The test yielded results for 98.3% (620/631) of cases and identified variants in 94.7% (587/620) with a median of 6 variants per case. Clinically actionable variants were detected in 42.1% of clinical samples. Analytical specificity was ≥99.9999% for SNVs and 100% for indels, CNAs, translocations, and MSI. Analytical sensitivity (limit of detection, 95%) was verified for each variant type, with a median variant allele frequency (VAF) of 1.42% for SNVs and 1.43% for indels, 1.7-fold for amplifications, 0.35% fusion read fraction for translocations, and 0.82% VAF for MSI. The intra-laboratory PRR study resulted in 94.9% average percent agreement (APA) and 99.9% average negative agreement (ANA) for sequence variants (SNVs and indels) and 100% APA and ANA for CNAs, translocations, and MSI. Orthogonal assays including other NGS tests and digital PCR were utilized to assess Labcorp Plasma Complete accuracy which demonstrated an aggregate analytical concordance of 96.28% positive percent agreement and &gt;99.9999% negative percent agreement for all variants. Conclusions: The analytical validation of the Labcorp Plasma Complete test demonstrates that the liquid biopsy approach is highly sensitive, specific, accurate, reproducible, and robust for comprehensive genomic profiling to complement tissue-based testing and inform clinical decision making.

Comparison of diagnostic performance between Oncomine Dx target test and AmoyDx panel for detecting actionable mutations in lung cancer

Companion diagnostic (CDx) tests play important roles in identifying oncogenic driver genes and tailoring effective molecularly targeted therapies for lung cancer patients. In Japan, the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and the AmoyDx pan lung cancer PCR panel (AmoyDx) are prominent CDx tests and only one of these tests is covered by the domestic insurance system. However, these CDx tests cover different target regions and apply different technologies (ODxTT is amplicon-based next-generation sequencing and AmoyDx is multiplex PCR-based assay), which may lead to missing of actionable mutations affecting patient prognosis. Here, we performed a direct comparison analysis of 1059 genetic alterations of eight driver genes from 131 samples and evaluated the concordance between two CDx tests for detecting actionable variants and fusions. When excluding the eight uncovered variants (ODxTT: two variants, AmoyDx: six variants), the overall percent agreement was 97.6% (1026/1051) with 89.0% of overall positive percent agreement (89/100) and 98.5% of overall negative percent agreement (937/951). Of the 25 discordant genetic alterations, two were undetected despite being covered in the AmoyDx (one EGFR variant and one ROS1 fusion). Furthermore, there were potential false positives in the ODxTT (nine MET exon 14 skippings) and in the AmoyDx (five variants, six ROS1 and three RET fusions). These potential false positives in the AmoyDx likely due to non-specific amplification, which was validated by the unique molecular barcoding sequencing. The ODxTT missed two uncovered EGFR rare variants, which was visually confirmed in the raw sequencing data. Our study provides insights into real-world performance of CDx tests for lung cancer and ensures reliability to advance precision medicine.

Comparison of three colloidal gold immunoassays and GeneXpert Carba-R for the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae blaKPC-2 variants.

The increasing use of ceftazidime-avibactam has led to the emergence of a wide range of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant blaKPC-2 variants. Particularly, the conventional carbapenemase phenotypic assay exhibited a high false-negative rate for KPC-2 variants. In this study, three colloidal gold immunoassays, including the Gold Mountainriver CGI test, Dynamiker CGI test and NG-Test CARBA5, and GeneXpert Carba-R, were used to detect the presence of KPC-2 carbapenemase and its various variants in 42 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. These strains covered blaKPC-2 (13/42) and 16 other blaKPC-2 variants including blaKPC-12 (1/42), blaKPC-23 (1/42), blaKPC-25 (1/42), blaKPC-33 (6/42), blaKPC-35 (1/42), blaKPC-44 (1/42), blaKPC-71 (1/42), blaKPC-76 (8/42), blaKPC-78 (1/42), blaKPC-79 (1/42), blaKPC-100 (1/42), blaKPC-127 (1/42), blaKPC-128 (1/42), blaKPC-144 (1/42), blaKPC-157 (2/42), and blaKPC-180 (1/42). For KPC-2 strains, all four assays showed 100% negative percentage agreement (NPA) and 100% positive percentage agreement (PPA) with sequencing results. For all 16 KPC-2 variants, GeneXpert Carba-R showed 100% NPA and 100% PPA, and the three colloidal gold immunoassays showed 100% NPA, while the PPAs of the Gold Mountainriver CGI test, Dynamiker CGI test, and NG-Test CARBA5 were 87.5%, 87.5%, and 68.8%, respectively. We also found a correlation between the mutation site in the amino acid of the variants and false-negative results by colloidal gold immunoassays. In conclusion, the GeneXpert Carba-R has been proven to be a reliable method in detecting KPC-2 and its variants, and the colloidal gold immunoassay tests offer a practical and cost-effective approach for their detection. For the sample with a negative result by a colloidal gold immunoassay test but not matching the drug-resistant phenotype, it is recommended to retest using another type of kit or the GeneXpert Carba-R assay, which can significantly improve the accuracy of detection.

Implementation of a High-Accuracy Targeted Gene Expression Panel for Clinical Care

This study describes the validation of a clinical RNA expression panel with evaluation of concordance between gene copy gain by a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay and high gene expression by an RNA expression panel. The RNA Salah Targeted Expression Panel (RNA STEP) was designed with input from oncologists to include 204 genes with utility for clinical trial prescreening and therapy selection. RNA STEP was validated with the nanoString platform using remnant formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded-derived RNA from 102 patients previously tested with a validated clinical NGS panel. The repeatability, reproducibility, and concordance of RNA STEP results with NGS results were evaluated. RNA STEP demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility, with excellent correlation (r>0.97, P<0.0001) for all comparisons. Comparison of RNA STEP high gene expression (log2 ratio ≥ 2) versus NGS DNA-based gene copy number gain (copies ≥ 5) for 38 mutually covered genes revealed an accuracy of 93.0% with a positive percentage agreement of 69.4% and negative percentage agreement of 93.8%. Moderate correlation was observed between platforms (r=0.53, P<0.0001). Concordance between high gene expression and gene copy number gain varied by specific gene, and some genes had higher accuracy between assays. Clinical implementation of RNA STEP provides gene expression data complementary to NGS and offers a tool for prescreening patients for clinical trials.

Performance comparison of BD Phoenix CPO detect panel with Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

BackgroundWe aimed to compare the performance of carbapenemase classification in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) obtained using the BD Phoenix CPO Detect panel (CPO panel) and Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assays. We analyzed 55 CRKP strains from clinical specimens collected between November 2020 and November 2022. The CPO panel was used to detect both antibiotic susceptibility and phenotypic carbapenemase classes, while Xpert Carba-R was employed to identify KPC, NDM, VIM, OXA-48, and IMP genes. Due to the limited availability of molecular kits, we arbitrarily selected 55 isolates, identified as carbapenemase-producing according to the CPO panel and with meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration values > 8 mg/L.ResultsAccording to the Xpert Carba-R assay, 16 of the 55 isolates (29.1%) were categorised as Ambler Class A (11 of which matched CPO panel Class A identification); three isolates (5.5%) were identified as Class B and 27 isolates (49.1%) as Class D (in both cases consistent with CPO panel B and D classifications). A further eight isolates (14.5%) exhibited multiple carbapenemase enzymes and were designated as dual-carbapenemase producers, while one isolate (1.8%) was identified as a non-carbapenemase-producer. The CPO panel demonstrated positive and negative percent agreements of 100% and 85.7% for Ambler Class A, 100% and 100% for Class B, and 96.4% and 100% for Class D carbapenemase detection, respectively.ConclusionWhile the CPO panel’s phenotypic performance was satisfactory in detecting Class B and D carbapenemases, additional confirmatory testing may be necessary for Class A carbapenemases as part of routine laboratory procedures.

Fit-for-Purpose Ki-67 Immunohistochemistry Assays for Breast Cancer

New therapies are being developed for breast cancer, and in this process, some “old” biomarkers are reutilized and given a new purpose. It is not always recognized that by changing a biomarker’s intended use, a new biomarker assay is created. The Ki-67 biomarker is typically assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to provide a proliferative index in breast cancer. Canadian laboratories assessed the analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy of their Ki-67 IHC laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) of relevance for the LDTs’ clinical utility.Canadian clinical IHC laboratories enrolled in the Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance Pilot Run for Ki-67 in breast cancer by invitation. The Dako Ki-67 IHC pharmDx assay was employed as a study reference assay. The Dako central laboratory was the reference laboratory. Participants received unstained slides of breast cancer tissue microarrays with 32 cases and performed their in-house Ki-67 assays. The results were assessed using QuPath, an open-source software application for bioimage analysis. Positive percent agreement (PPA, sensitivity) and negative percent agreement (NPA, specificity) were calculated against the Dako Ki-67 IHC pharmDx assay for 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30% cutoffs.Overall, PPA and NPA varied depending on the selected cutoff; participants were more successful with 5% and 10%, than with 20% and 30% cutoffs. Only 4 of 16 laboratories had robust IHC protocols with acceptable PPA for all cutoffs. The lowest PPA for the 5% cutoff was 85%, for 10% was 63%, for 20% was 14%, and for 30% was 13%. The lowest NPA for the 5% cutoff was 50%, for 10% was 33%, for 20% was 50%, and for 30% was 57%.Despite many years of international efforts to standardize IHC testing for Ki-67 in breast cancer, our results indicate that Canadian clinical LDTs have a wide analytical sensitivity range and poor agreement for 20% and 30% cutoffs. The poor agreement was not due to the readout but rather due to IHC protocol conditions. International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) recommendations related to Ki-67 IHC standardization cannot take full effect without reliable fit-for-purpose reference materials that are required for the initial assay calibration, assay performance monitoring, and proficiency testing.