The purpose of this study is to examine the consiliency of ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’ which combine descriptive negation, command and forbidden negation among the negative meanings of ancient Chinese.
 It is to provide the easyness of discrimination by providing the semantics of the word to the learners who complain of the discrimination of ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’ having the meaning of the descriptive denial, command and forbidden denial.
 There are many previous studies on ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’ and ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’ still are being studied. As a diachronic consideration, there is a study on the prohibition markers of the period of Chinese in the period of Chinese in the modern times - focusing on ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’. This study investigated the classification by the two-minute method of exemption and prohibition in the sense of the negative form of the 'lecture duty' aspect. The public consideration is “the” law.,This study analyzed the grammar function of negative adverbs '' specifically by using the literature statistical survey of ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’.
 This study also analyzed the literary examples of the public disclosures and compared the discriminatory qualities of ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’ and ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’ based on the public disclosure.,Furthermore, the semantics of narrative denial, command or forbidden denial were analyzed and the differences in syntactic thoughts were analyzed.,This is to solve the discrimination difficulties of ancient Chinese learners and to analyze the grammar function of ‘勿’, ‘毋’, ‘無’, ‘莫’.
Read full abstract