Neck Tilt Research Articles

Quality of Life in Adult Patients Receiving Cervical Fusion for Fresh Subaxial Cervical Injury: The Role of Associated Spinal Cord Injury.

Purpose To study postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) after instrumented fusion for fresh subaxial cervical trauma and the effect of spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods From a total of 65 patients, 17 (26%) patients suffered on admission from SCI. Twenty-five patients underwent anterior, 25 posterior, and 15 circumferential cervical surgery for a single cervical injury. Sagittal roentgenographic parameters were measured in 65 age-matched asymptomatic controls and in patients on admission, eight months postoperatively and at final follow-up (lower C2-C7 curvature, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), spinocranial angle (SCA), T1-slope, neck tilt (NT), thorax inlet angle (TIA), cervical tilt (CT), cranial tilt (CrT), and occiput–C2 angle (C0-C2)). In the last evaluation, SCI patients were compared with their counterparts without SCI using national validated HRQOL instruments (SF-36 and neck disability index (NDI)). Results Fusion included an average of 3 vertebrae (range 2-4 vertebrae). All 65 patients were followed for an average of 5.5 years, (range 3-7 years) postoperatively. In the last evaluation, 10 (15.4%) patients with incomplete SCI improved postoperatively at 1-2 grades. At the last observation, patients with SCI showed poorer HRQOL scores than their counterparts without SCI. In particular, each SF-36 domain score was correlated with SCA, T1-slope, cSVA, and CT. At baseline, patients showed higher NT, CrT, and C0-C2 angle than controls. Eight months postoperatively, cSVA, NT, TIA, and cranial tilt (CrT) were increased in patients. In the last observation, there was difference in the sagittal roentgenographic parameters between patients with SCI compared to those without SCI. Patients aged ≥55 years had postoperatively increased cSVA, NT, and CrT compared to their younger counterparts. Conclusion At the final observation, HRQOL scores were lower in patients with SCI than in their non-SCI counterparts, obviously because of the associated neurologic impairment. SF-36 scores correlated with several sagittal roentgenographic parameters. These correlations should be taken in consideration by spine surgeons when performing cervical spine surgery for fresh cervical spine injuries.

Patients' Perception and Satisfaction on Neck and Shoulder Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Cross-sectional. To evaluate the perception and satisfaction among adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients on Neck Tilt with Medial Shoulder Imbalance and Lateral Shoulder Imbalance. Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients were stratified into 6 groups of preoperative/ postoperative Balanced (B), Lateral Shoulder Imbalance (LSI) (>2 cm), and Neck Tilt with Medial Shoulder Imbalance (NT) (Grade 3). Patients were interviewed using Modified Neck and Shoulder Appearance and SRS-22r questionnaires. T1 tilt, Cervical Axis (CA), Clavicle Angle (Cla-A) and Radiographic Shoulder Height (RSH) were measured. A total of 120 Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients were recruited. NT patients were aware and unhappy with their abnormal neck with medial shoulder appearances (P < .001). Similarly, LSI patients were aware and unhappy with their abnormal lateral shoulder appearances (P < .001). NT group had larger preoperative/ postoperative T1 tilt (9.2 ± 5.0°; 9.5 ± 5.3°) and CA (4.6 ± 3.1°; 7.0 ± 2.0°) (P < .01). LSI group had larger preoperative/ postoperative Cla-A (4.8 ± 2.8°; 4.0 ± 1.3°) and RSH (20.1 ± 9.4 mm; 17.0 ± 6.6 mm) (P < .001). Postoperative B group scored higher in overall SRS-22r scores, self-image and satisfaction domains (4.2 ± 0.3; 4.0 ± 0.5; 4.4 ± 0.5) while preoperative LSI scored the lowest comparatively (3.5 ± 0.4; 2.4 ± 0.5; 3.3 ± 0.5) (P < .001). NT and LSI were major concerns among AIS patients. Both NT and LSI groups were unhappy with their appearances. NT group had larger T1 tilt/ CA whereas LSI group had larger Cla-A/ RSH. Postoperative B group scored higher in overall SRS-22r scores, self-image and satisfaction domains.

Predictive effect of cervical spinal cord compression and corresponding segmental paravertebral muscle degeneration on the severity of symptoms in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Previous studies have found that cervical sagittal parameters and spinal cord compression are important risk factors for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). An increasing number of scholars believe that cervical muscle condition is also one of the factors affecting the severity of symptoms in affected patients. To determine whether: the degree of corresponding segmental paravertebral muscle degeneration is related to the severity of symptoms in patients with CSM; the degree of cervical spinal cord compression can predict the severity of symptoms in patients with CSM. A retrospective study. From January 2015 to January 2019, 121 patients with CSM were enrolled. The visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI) and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) were used to assess cervical spinal function and quality of life. From January 2015 to January 2019, 121 patients with CSM were enrolled. The inclusion criterion was the presence of complete cervical lateral radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The following radiographic parameters were measured: (1) C0-C2 Cobb angle; (2) C2-C7 Cobb angle (CL); (3) T1 slope (T1S); (4) neck tilt (NT); (5) C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA); and (6) T1S-CL. The following MRI parameters were measured: (1) up(low)-fat/muscle; (2) up(low)-fat/centrum; (3) up(low)-muscle/centrum; (4) cervical cord compression index (CCI); (5) S-index; and (6) cervical spinal cord compression area ratio (S0/S1). The VAS, NDI and mJOA were used to assess cervical spinal function and quality of life. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the mJOA score: group A (mild-moderate symptom group, mJOA score≥12 points) and group B (severe symptom group, mJOA score<12 points). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlations between cervical sagittal parameters, MRI parameters and functional scores. Logistic regression analysis and ROC curve analysis were performed to identify independent risk factors and critical values. In patients with CSM, the VAS score is positively correlated with NT, up-fat/centrum, S-index and S0/S1. The NDI is positively correlated with NT, up-fat/muscle, up-fat/centrum, S-index, and S0/S1 and negatively correlated with C0-2N and CL. The mJOA score is positively correlated with CL and negatively correlated with C2-7 SVA, CCI, S-index, and S0/S1. Thus, corresponding segmental paravertebral muscle degeneration has relevance to neck pain, but it is not related to limb weakness, neurological dysfunction, gait impairment, sensation or bladder/bowel function dysfunction. Through mJOA score grouping and binary logistic regression analysis, we found that S0/S1 is the only independent risk factor for severe symptoms in patients with CSM. When S0/S1>0.295, the clinical symptoms of patients are more severe. Thus, in clinical practice, when the degree of spinal cord compression exceeds 30%, the clinical symptoms are more severe. In patients with CSM, corresponding segmental paravertebral muscle degeneration has relevance to neck pain, but it does not relate to limb weakness, neurological dysfunction, gait impairment, sensation or bladder/bowel function dysfunction. Cervical spinal cord compression is the only independent risk factor;when the degree of spinal cord compression exceeds 30%, the clinical symptoms are more severe.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL SAGITTAL BALANCE WITH RADIOGRAPHS IN DIFFERENT POSTURES

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the cervical sagittal balance in groups of patients submitted to lateral radiographs of the cervical segment, with the upper limbs in two different positions. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, quantitative, prospective, descriptive study using radiographic analysis of 100 adult individuals, aged between 20 and 70 years. Two lateral radiographs were taken of each patient, one image with the upper limbs crossed over the trunk (flexed elbows) and the other with the upper limbs elevated in front (extended elbows). All patients answered a questionnaire about age, sex, presence of pain in the cervical spine, as well as degree of pain based on the Likert scale. The radiographic parameters evaluated were the COBB angle (Cobb), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope, neck tilt and distance from the center of gravity (COG) of the skull to C7 (COG-C7) with the elbows in extension (Ext) and flexion (Flex). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. Results: Sixty patients were female (60%) and forty were male (40%). The data analysis obtained showed statistical significance in Cobb Flex vs. Cobb Ext (p = 0.000), TIA Flex vs. TIA Ext (p = 0.000), T1 Flex vs. T1 Ext (p = 0.000), Neck tilt Flex vs. Neck tilt Ext (p = 0.000), and COG-C7 Flex vs. COG-C7 Ext (p = 0.000). Conclusion: There was statistical significance in relation to the positioning of the upper limbs in the lateral radiographs, yielding higher values in the angulations with the limbs raised towards the front (extended elbows). Level of evidence II; Prospective Comparative Study.

Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality.

Percepts of verticality are thought to be constructed as a weighted average of multisensory inputs, but the observed weights differ considerably between studies. In the present study, we evaluate whether this can be explained by differences in how visual, somatosensory and proprioceptive cues contribute to representations of the Head In Space (HIS) and Body In Space (BIS). Participants (10) were standing on a force plate on top of a motion platform while wearing a visualization device that allowed us to artificially tilt their visual surroundings. They were presented with (in)congruent combinations of visual, platform, and head tilt, and performed Rod & Frame Test (RFT) and Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV) tasks. We also recorded postural responses to evaluate the relation between perception and balance. The perception data shows that body tilt, head tilt, and visual tilt affect the HIS and BIS in both experimental tasks. For the RFT task, visual tilt induced considerable biases (≈ 10° for 36° visual tilt) in the direction of the vertical expressed in the visual scene; for the SPV task, participants also adjusted platform tilt to correct for illusory body tilt induced by the visual stimuli, but effects were much smaller (≈ 0.25°). Likewise, postural data from the SPV task indicate participants slightly shifted their weight to counteract visual tilt (0.3° for 36° visual tilt). The data reveal a striking dissociation of visual effects between the two tasks. We find that the data can be explained well using a model where percepts of the HIS and BIS are constructed from direct signals from head and body sensors, respectively, and indirect signals based on body and head signals but corrected for perceived neck tilt. These findings show that perception of the HIS and BIS derive from the same sensory signals, but see profoundly different weighting factors. We conclude that observations of different weightings between studies likely result from querying of distinct latent constructs referenced to the body or head in space.

Changes in cervical sagittal alignment and the effects on cervical parameters in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after laminoplasty.

Objective:To monitor changes in cervical parameters before and after laminoplasty surgery. Cervical parameters and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) values that may be affected after laminoplasty were examined before and after surgery. The clinical and radiological course of these values was monitored, and their interaction with all spinal radiological parameters was revealed.Materials and Methods:Nineteen patients who underwent clinical and radiological evaluation for 2 years were followed in this study. Neck disability index, visual analog scale, and short form 36 scores were determined to evaluate HRQOL. For radiological parameters, the C0-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope angle, neck tilt (NT) and thoracic inlet angle were used. The results of the 4-month, 1 year and 2-year follow-ups were statistically evaluated.Results:Both the HRQOL and cervical radiological parameters deteriorated in the first 4 months and returned to normal in the 2nd year. Statistically, all parameters were meaningful (P < 0.05), except for NT.Conclusion:Cervical parameters and HRQOL values, which deteriorated in the early period, recovered in the late period in the long-term follow-up of patients undergoing laminoplasty. The important point is that preoperative cervical parameters suitable for laminoplasty should be present, and spinopelvic parameters should be normal.

Management of pediatric cervicomedullary astrocytoma

Cervicomedullary astrocytomas are low grade gliomas of childhood and young age which are typically centered at the junction of brainstem and cervical spine and present with a long duration of symptoms. The diagnosis of cervicomedullary astrocytomas is normally delayed as these tumours are slow growing and patients present with a long duration of symptoms. The symptoms are typical and can be correlated to the location of the tumour. Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry(IHC) guides us proving the diagnosis. Management of cervicomedullary astrocytomas includes surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A 13 years old female child presented with complaints of headache, vomiting, neck pain and progressive neck tilt. MRI of brain and cervical spine revealed moderate to significant expansile lesion in the dorsal aspect of lower medulla, cervicomedullary junction and the upper cervical cord upto C4-5 disc level.She underwent subtotal resection of the tumour. Histopathology and IHC confirmed her diagnosis as Astrocytoma WHO Grade-II. Patient underwent adjuvant radiation treatment to a radiation dose of 54 Grey in 27 fractions by Volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT) technique over a period of 6 weeks to the gross residual tumour and post-op tumour bed. Patient tolerated the treatment well. Patient experienced mild symptoms like nausea and vomiting during the course of treatment but well managed with supportive medications.

The importance of preoperative T1 slope for determining proper postoperative C2\u20137 Cobb\u2019s angle in patients undergoing cervical reconstruction

BackgroundThis study aimed to explore the relationship among different cervical sagittal parameters in asymptomatic volunteers and the correlation between surgical efficacy and difference of presumed and actual postoperative C2–7 Cobbs’s angle (C2–7COBB), which was calculated based on preoperative T1 slope (T1S) in patients undergoing cervical reconstruction.MethodsIn total, 158 inpatients with cervical spondylosis and 274 asymptomatic volunteers were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical sagittal parameters, such as C2–7COBB, T1S, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and neck tilt (NT), were compared. Then, the correlation among these parameters was analyzed in asymptomatic volunteers, and a regression equation between T1S and C2–7COBB was established and used to analyze the correlation among the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score improvement, the sagittal parameters, and the difference between presumed and actual postoperative C2–7COBB in patients after cervical reconstruction.ResultsThe mean T1S, C2–7COBB, and TIA were significantly decreased in patients (P < 0.01). T1S and NT had a strong correlation with TIA (P < 0.01). T1S demonstrated a moderate correlation with C2–7COBB in asymptomatic volunteers (r = 0.569, P < 0.01). A regression equation had been established as C2–7COBB = 0.742 × T1S − 0.866. The mean C2–7COBB and JOA score improved significantly (P < 0.05) postoperatively. Moreover, the JOA improvement rate showed a significant negative correlation with the difference in the presumed and actual postoperative C2–7COBB (r = − 0.696, P < 0.01).ConclusionOur study successfully established a regression equation for calculating postsurgical C2–7COBB based on the correlation between T1S and C2–7COBB in asymptomatic volunteers. The regression equation could be used for guiding surgeons to accomplish an ideal postsurgical C2–7COBB for patients with cervical spondylosis.

A Nomogram to Predict the Occurrence and Development of Postoperative Neck Tilt in Lenke I and II AIS Patients

To investigate the risk factors and to construct a nomogram for the prediction of postoperative neck tilt (PNT) in patients with Lenke I and II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A total of 95 patients with Lenke I and II AIS who underwent posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusion between the years 2010 and 2018 (with an average 2-year follow-up) at a single institution were retrospectively investigated. The full spine X-rays of patients were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Variables were compared between the PNT group (n= 33) and the non-PNT group (n= 62), and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify the independent predictors for the occurrence of PNT. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were validated by the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve. Variables including the preoperative neck tilt, postoperative upper instrumented vertebrae imbalance, postoperative T1 tilt, and decreasing values in the main thoracic curve (ΔMTC) minus decreasing values in the proximal thoracic curve (ΔPTC) (ΔMTC- ΔPTC) were identified as the predictors for the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.900 (95% confidence interval, 0.857-0.932). Meanwhile, the calibration curve revealed good agreement, and the Hosmer and Lemeshow test determined that the model was well fitted. Preoperative neck tilt, postoperative upper instrumented vertebrae imbalance, postoperative T1 tilt, and ΔMTC-ΔPTC are predictors for the nomogram. The nomogram can provide surgeons with a simple and effective tool to predict the occurrence and development of patients with PNT in Lenke I and II AIS.

Predicting the loss of correction after isolated anterior stabilization in the surgical treatment of subaxial cervical dislocations

Objective. To identify factors leading to the loss of correction and re-dislocation of the vertebrae after isolated anterior reconstruction and stabilization in the surgical treatment of subaxial cervical dislocations. Material and Methods. A retrospective cohort STROBE-type study was carried out using data of 175 patients with dislocations of vertebrae in the subaxial cervical spine who were operated on in 2010–2019. The key parameters of the study were the relevant indices of the cervical sagittal balance and morphological characteristics of the injury: thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 vertebra slope, neck tilt, regional cervical C2–C7 lordosis, fracture of the vertebral body, and fracture of the articular process at the level of dislocation. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out in the RStudio program. Results. At preoperative TIA value of 74.5°, the risk of correction loss corresponds to 28 %. In the group with TIA &lt; 74.5° and that with TIA ≥ 74.5°, the risk of correction loss is 17.3 % (95 % CI: 7–37 %) and 85.7 % (95 % CI: 60–96 %), respectively. With an increase in TIA by 10°, the chance of recurrence increases by 23.3 times. The effect of the articular process fracture on the loss of correction is equivalent to an increase in TIA by 10°, namely, it increases the chance of recurrence by 20.7 times. The parameter “duration of injury” has an effect on the loss of correction, but it is statistically insignificant (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusion. The parameter of the cervical sagittal balance, thoracic inlet angle, as well as the fracture of the articular process at the level of injury are statistically significant factors that determine the initial stability in isolated anterior surgical reconstruction and stabilization of the lower cervical spine for Allen type 3 flexion-distraction injuries.

Impact of cervical sagittal parameters on axial neck pain in patients with cervical kyphosis

BackgroundCervical sagittal alignment (CSA) is closely related with cervical disk degeneration and impacts the spinal function, especially in the setting of cervical kyphosis (CK). In this study, we evaluated the influence of cervical sagittal parameters on the development of axial neck pain (ANP) in patients with CK.MethodsData pertaining to 263 patients with CK who visited the outpatient department of our hospital between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospective analyzed. The most common symptoms of ANP were neck pain, stiffness, or dullness. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate ANP. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated: CK types, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope, neck tilt (NT), cranial tilt, and cervical tilt. Sagittal alignment of CK was classified into 2 types: global and regional type. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ANP.ResultsPatients who complained of ANP were categorized as ANP group (VAS score ≥ 3; n = 92), while those without ANP were categorized as non-ANP group (VAS score < 3; n = 171). There was no significant between-group difference with respect to age (P = 0.196), gender (P = 0.516), TIA (P = 0.139), NT (P = 0.676), CK type (P = 0.533), cranial tilt (P = 0.332), cervical tilt (P = 0.585), or cervical disk degeneration (P = 0.695). The T1 slope and C2-7 SVA in the ANP group were significantly greater than that in the non-ANP group (P < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression, C2-7 SVA [odds ratio (OR) 2.318, 95% confidence interval 1.373–4.651, P = 0.003) and T1 slope (OR 2.563, 95% CI 1.186–4.669, P = 0.028) were identified as risk factors for ANP.ConclusionsOur findings suggest a significant effect of cervical sagittal parameters on the occurrence of ANP in patients with CK. Greater T1 slope and larger C2-7 SVA may lead to the development of neck pain.

Correlations and Age-Related Changes of Cervical Sagittal Parameters in Adults Without Symptoms of Cervical Spinal Disease.

Retrospective study. To determine the correlations and age-related changes of cervical sagittal parameters in adults without obvious cervical spinal disease. Cervical sagittal parameters play essential roles in the pathogenesis and therapy of cervical spinal diseases. However, few studies have investigated the correlations and age-related changes of cervical sagittal parameters. The enrolled participants were divided into three age groups and their cervical sagittal parameters were collected. Correlations and age-related changes of these parameters were analyzed. Significant differences in the C2-C7 angle, center of gravity of the head-C7 sagittal vertical axis (CGH-C7 SVA), C2-C7 SVA, neck tilt (NT), and thoracic inlet angle (TIA) were found among the three age groups. Pearson correlation analysis showed positive correlations between the C0-C2 angle and CGH-C7 SVA, C0-C2 angle and C2-C7 SVA, C2-C7 angle and T1 slope, C2-C7 angle and TIA, CGH-C7 SVA and C2-C7 SVA, C2-C7 SVA and T1 slope, T1 slope and TIA, and NT and TIA as well as negative correlations between the C0-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle, C2-C7 angle and CGH-C7 SVA, and C2-C7 angle and C2-C7 SVA. Paired t tests showed significant changes in the C2-C7 angle in groups I and II, and in the CGH-C7 SVA and C2-C7 SVA in all age groups with increasing age. The results indicate that cross correlations exist between different cervical sagittal parameters in adults without symptoms of cervical spinal disease, and the lower cervical curvature and SVA change obviously with increasing age. 3.

Posterior Occipitocervical Fusion for Unstable Upper Cervical Trauma in Old and Elderly Population, Although Decreases Upper Cervical Rotation, Does Not Significantly Increase Neck Disability Index.

Background Despite the research progress in the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic balance, cervical spine balance has only recently gained increasing interest. To our knowledge, there is a lack of research regarding sagittal occipitocervical spine balance restoration following posterior occipitocervical fusion (POCF). Purpose The primary outcome measure is the evaluation of sagittal cervical alignment roentgenographic parameters and the secondary is the functional outcome (NDI), following POCF for upper (C1 & C2) cervical trauma (UCT) in coexistence with upper cervical spine degeneration. Patients and Methods. Twenty old and elderly patients aged 62 ± 12 years with evident upper cervical degeneration, who received POCF for upper C1 & C2 unstable cervical spine injuries, were included. C2-C7 lordosis, C2-C7 SVA, spinocranial angle (SCA), T1-slope, neck tilt (NT), thorax inlet angle (TIA), cervical tilt (CT), cranial tilt (CrT), and C0-C1 angle were measured. The subfusion angle was used to study the behavior of the unfused cervical segments below fusion. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used for the functional outcome evaluation. 29 age-matched individuals were used as controls for radiographic analysis and self-reported functional status comparison. Results The roentgenographic data were measured 3 and 39 ± 12 months postoperatively. Twelve patients showed no disability, and eight showed mild disability. Postoperatively, the patients stood with less C2-C7 lordosis, SCA, and CT (P < 0.02) but with higher NT (P < 0.02) in comparison to the controls. The patient's neck disability (NDI) was increasing as TIA increases (P=0.023). Subfusion angle seems to adapt to C2-C7 lordosis (P < 0.0033) and C0-C2 angle (P < 0.003) without any changes till the last evaluation. Conclusions POCF sufficiently restored occipitocervical sagittal balance along with functional outcome similar to controls in adult and elderly individuals with evident upper cervical degeneration. We do not recommend POCF for young active individuals without occipitocervical pathology, but in contrary, we recommend the removal of the spinocranial connection hardware after cervical fusion is completed.

Analysis of Cervical Sagittal Balance in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BackgroundAnterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), together with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are both effective clinical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Cervical sagittal balance is critical to preserving normal alignment, and is also associated with clinical outcomes.Material/MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who had suffered from CSM and had undergone 1-level ACCF or 2-level ACDF surgery between December 2016 and November 2017. Forty-eight patients were identified: 25 in the ACDF group and 23 in the ACCF group. All patients received follow-up for more than 12 months. The demographic data, radiographic parameters, and clinical efficacy were compared between and within groups, both pre- and postoperatively.ResultsBoth groups acquired good clinical efficacy; both Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores improved significantly. At the final follow-up visit, patients in the ACCF and ACDF groups did not differ significantly in C2–C7 Sagittal Vertebral Axis (cSVA), T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA), Neck Tilt (NT), Thoracic Inlet Angle (TIA), JOA, or NDI scores. However, the ACDF group had a significantly larger Cobb angle and T1 Slope (T1S) than the ACCF group. The postoperative Cobb angle increased significantly only in the ACDF group, while postoperative T1S significantly increased in both ACCF and ACDF groups.ConclusionsAnterior cervical surgery may change the sagittal balance in terms of T1S or Cobb angle. No significant difference was found between ACCF and ACDF in clinical outcomes or representative global sagittal parameters. ACDF achieved more lordosis improvement than ACCF, with higher T1S. Surgeons need to pay extra attention to cervical sagittal balance, rather than focusing solely on decompression.

RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY

ABSTRACT Objective To compare radiographic findings of patients who underwent laminoplasty and laminectomy with arthrodesis for spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Methods Who were submitted to laminectomy with arthrodesis or laminoplasty to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy with minimum follow-up of 6 months. The radiographic parameters related to the cervical spine evaluated were C0C2 lordosis (C0C2), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), neck tilt (NT), cervical sagittal vertical axis (CSVA), and T1S – CL mismatch (T1S-CL). Results We evaluated 34 patients, 23 (68%) of whom were men. The mean age was 65 years (SD ± 13). There was no statistical difference in any of the preoperative radiographic parameters. Considering the patients submitted to laminectomy alone, a significant difference was observed for C0C2 (P = 0.045), CSVA (P = 0.0008), with differences between IPO and POS times (P = 0.026) and between PRE and POS (P = 0.0013) and T1S – CL mismatch (P = 0.0004), with a difference between IPO and POS (P = 0.0076) and between PRE and POS (P=0.001). Considering the patients submitted to laminoplasty alone, there was no difference over time for any radiographic parameters considered. Comparing the radiographic parameters between the laminectomy and laminoplasty groups in the three time periods, there was no significant difference for any of them. Conclusion This study suggests that patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent laminectomy with instrumentation may present worse radiographic evolution as regards cervical sagittal alignment over time when compared to patients who underwent laminoplasty. Level of evidence III; Retrospective case series.

자가 스트레칭이 두부전방자세와 경부통증에 미치는 영향

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 8 weeks of self stretching on neck posture and neck pain. This study was randomly assigned to the exercise group(n=14; age 24.50±3.03) and the control group(n=14 age 23.93±2.20) for 28 adults in their 20s with turtle posture and neck pain. The exercise program consists of eight posture stretches. The exercise group performed the self-stretching through the previous research paper three times a week for eight weeks. The experimental results are as follows. After 8 weeks there was a significant difference in Cranial rotation angle(CRA)(p<.05). After 8 weeks there was a significant difference in Craniovertebral angle(CVA)(p<.05). After 8 weeks, there was no significant difference in neck tilt angle and neck load. After 8 weeks there was a significant difference in neck pain(p<.001). The conclusion suggests that self-stretching is effective in improving neck posture and reducing neck pain.

The significance of cervical sagittal alignment for nonrecovery after whiplash injury

BACKGROUND CONTEXTWhiplash-associated disorder is a common cause of chronic neck pain. Several radiological cervical angular variables are suggested to have constitutional characteristics, that is, them being minimally influenced by body positioning. However, the association between these variables and pain conditions remains poorly understood. To our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated the association between constitutional angular variables and the outcome after whiplash trauma. PURPOSEOur objectives were (1) to study the inter-rater agreement of sagittal radiologic variables between 2 raters and (2) to investigate any association between these variables and self-perceived nonrecovery after whiplash injury. STUDY DESIGNProspective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLEForty-six patients aged 16 to 70 years, attending an emergency department after a motor vehicle accident resulting in neck pain were recruited. OUTCOME MEASURESSelf-perceived nonrecovery (yes/no) was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measure was pain level on a numeric rating scale. METHODSThe participants underwent computed tomography scans in a supine position. Sagittal alignment variables (T1 slope, neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle [TIA], and C2–C7 angle) on the computed tomography scans were measured by 2 independent raters. Inter-rater agreement was tested with a paired sample t test and Bland-Altman plots for each variable. The patients were followed up after 6 months. RESULTSNo systematic differences for the assessed variables were found between the 2 raters. The overall nonrecovery rate was 28%. For the group with low neck tilt, the nonrecovery rate was 50% (95% CI: 36%–78%) and for the group with high neck tilt, 8% (95% CI: 3%–25%). The nonrecovery rate for the group low TIA was 50% (95% CI 29%–72%) and for those with high TIA 14% (95% CI 4%–26%). The associations remained significant after adjustments for possible confounders. The inter-rater analysis shows satisfactory agreement without proportional bias. CONCLUSIONSThis study indicates the existence of an association between the constitutional sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and the outcome after whiplash injuries.

Predictive formula of cervical lordosis in asymptomatic young population

BackgroundNot a large number of previous studies have reported the normal sagittal balance of the cervical spine and physiological cervical lordosis (CL) has not been clearly defined yet.MethodsThis was a prospective radiological analysis of asymptomatic subjects. The following cervical sagittal parameters were measured: CL, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope (T1S), neck tilt (NT), and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (C2–7 SVA). The Pearson correlation test was calculated, and the stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted by using the CL (dependent variable) and the other cervical sagittal parameters (independent variables) to determine the best sets of predictors. A paired sample t test was conducted between the predicted and measured values.ResultsThe mean age of 307 participants was 24.54 + 3.07. The mean CL, TIA, T1S, NT, and C2–C7 SVA was 17.11° ± 6.31°, 67.87° ± 7.78°, 25.84° ± 5.36°, 42.53° ± 6.68°, and 14.60 ± 8.20 mm, respectively. The formula was established as follows: CL = 0.762 × T1S − 0.392 × C2–C7 SVA + 0.25 × TIA − 13.795 (R = 0.812, R2 = 0.660) (stepwise multiple regression) and CL = 0.417 × TIA − 11.193 (R = 0.514, R2 = 0.264) (simple linear regression). There was no statistical difference between the predicted CL and the measured CL (t = 0.034, P = 0.973).ConclusionsThere was a significant correlation between CL and other cervical sagittal parameters, including TIA, T1S, NT, and C2–C7 SVA in asymptomatic Chinese population. The results of this study may serve as a normal reference value for the study of asymptomatic population.

Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review

Background:Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficient preoperative lordosis which results in poor surgical outcome.Objective:We would like to highlight the relationship between various radiological parameters of cervical alignment and postoperative LCL in patients undergoing laminoplasty.Methods:We performed extensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant articles that report factors affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.Results:On reviewing the literature, patients with high T1 slope have more lordotic alignment of cervical spine preoperatively. They also have more chances of LCL following laminoplasty. C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has no role in predicting LCL following laminoplasty though patients with low T1 slope (≤20°) and high C2–C7 SVA (>22 mm) had correction of kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. C2–C7 lordosis, Neck Tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis has no predictive value for LCL. Lower value of T1 slope (T1S-CL) and CL/T1S has more incidence of developing LCL following laminoplasty. The role of C2–C3 disc angle has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Dynamic extension reserve determines the contraction reserve of SPMLC and lower dynamic extension reserve is associated with higher chances of LCL following laminoplasty.Conclusions:Cervical lordotic alignment is important in maintaining cervical sagittal balance which ultimately is responsible for global spinal sagittal balance and horizontal gaze. Among various radiological parameters, T1 Slope has been reported to be the most important factor affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.

Predictive Effect of Cervical Sagittal Parameters on Conservative Treatment of Single-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy

To explore whether the cervical sagittal parameters affect the conservative treatment of single-segment cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and whether the conservative treatment of single-segment cervical spondylotic radiculopathy can be predicted by cervical sagittal parameters. Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is currently treated with a stepwise approach, and conservative treatment is recommended. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of conservative treatment. Between January 2013 and January 2018, 121 patients with single-segment cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria included complete cervical lateral radiographs. The following radiographic parameters were measured: C0-2 Cobb angle; C2-7 Cobb angle (CL), C7 slope (C7S), neck tilt (NT), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope (T1S), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical tilt, cranial tilt, and cervical curvature index (CCI). Cervical spine function and quality of life were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). According to the therapeutic effect, the patients were divided into group A (effective conservative treatment group) and group B (ineffective conservative treatment group). Effective conservative treatment was defined as conservative treatment for 3 months (1 nonsteroidal analgesic and 1 neurotrophic drug, supplemented by cervical traction and a neck support brace) resulting in a 60% reduction in NDI score. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to calculate the correlation between each sagittal parameter and functional score. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine independent risk factors and critical values. In the effective conservative treatment group (group A), the pretreatment NDI score was significantly positively correlated with the pretreatment VAS score and negatively correlated with CL, C7S, TIA, T1S, cervical tilt, and CCI. In the ineffective conservative treatment group (group B), the pretreatment NDI score was significantly positively correlated with the pretreatment VAS score and NT, and negatively correlated with age, CL, C7S, T1S, cervical tilt, and CCI. Based on logistic regression analysis and ROC curve analysis, we found that a larger C2-7 Cobb angle before treatment was the sole independent risk factor for conservative treatment (P < 0.001). Patients with a C2-7 Cobb angle >7.7° had a greater likelihood of receiving effective conservative treatment. In patients with single-segment cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, a larger C2-7 Cobb angle before treatment was the sole independent risk factor for effective conservative treatment (P < 0.001). Conservative treatment was more likely to be effective when the C2-7 Cobb angle is >7.7°.