Abstract

Purpose To study postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) after instrumented fusion for fresh subaxial cervical trauma and the effect of spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods From a total of 65 patients, 17 (26%) patients suffered on admission from SCI. Twenty-five patients underwent anterior, 25 posterior, and 15 circumferential cervical surgery for a single cervical injury. Sagittal roentgenographic parameters were measured in 65 age-matched asymptomatic controls and in patients on admission, eight months postoperatively and at final follow-up (lower C2-C7 curvature, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), spinocranial angle (SCA), T1-slope, neck tilt (NT), thorax inlet angle (TIA), cervical tilt (CT), cranial tilt (CrT), and occiput–C2 angle (C0-C2)). In the last evaluation, SCI patients were compared with their counterparts without SCI using national validated HRQOL instruments (SF-36 and neck disability index (NDI)). Results Fusion included an average of 3 vertebrae (range 2-4 vertebrae). All 65 patients were followed for an average of 5.5 years, (range 3-7 years) postoperatively. In the last evaluation, 10 (15.4%) patients with incomplete SCI improved postoperatively at 1-2 grades. At the last observation, patients with SCI showed poorer HRQOL scores than their counterparts without SCI. In particular, each SF-36 domain score was correlated with SCA, T1-slope, cSVA, and CT. At baseline, patients showed higher NT, CrT, and C0-C2 angle than controls. Eight months postoperatively, cSVA, NT, TIA, and cranial tilt (CrT) were increased in patients. In the last observation, there was difference in the sagittal roentgenographic parameters between patients with SCI compared to those without SCI. Patients aged ≥55 years had postoperatively increased cSVA, NT, and CrT compared to their younger counterparts. Conclusion At the final observation, HRQOL scores were lower in patients with SCI than in their non-SCI counterparts, obviously because of the associated neurologic impairment. SF-36 scores correlated with several sagittal roentgenographic parameters. These correlations should be taken in consideration by spine surgeons when performing cervical spine surgery for fresh cervical spine injuries.

Highlights

  • Relationships between sagittal lumbopelvic alignment and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) measures have been shown in spinal deformity surgery [1]

  • Sagittal alignment was studied after degenerative cervical spine disease surgery [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], but to our knowledge, less attention was paid to the difference in postoperative HRQOL between spinal cord injury (SCI) and non-SCI patients who underwent cervical spine fixation after fresh subaxial injury of surgery

  • The radiographs were taken on a digital X-ray system and analyzed using commercial software that allows for measurements with 0.1 mm increments and enhancing of vertebral levels at the cervicothoracic junction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Relationships between sagittal lumbopelvic alignment and HRQOL measures have been shown in spinal deformity surgery [1]. Sagittal alignment was studied after degenerative cervical spine disease surgery [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], but to our knowledge, less attention was paid to the difference in postoperative HRQOL between SCI and non-SCI patients who underwent cervical spine fixation after fresh subaxial injury of surgery The purpose of this investigation was to correlate postoperative HRQOL and presence of SCI and postoperative sagittal cervical balance with HRQOL (NDI and SF-36)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call