NCI CTC Research Articles

Anlotinib combined with penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

367 Background: Recently, PD-1 blockades combined with dual chemotherapy regimens in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC. However, the safety profile of conventional dual chemotherapy remained unsatisfactory. Therefore, PD-1 blockades combined with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and single chemotherapy regimen might offer a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, demonstrated promising therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for ESCC patients in China clinically. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with penpulimab (PD-1 blockade) and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC were recruited and treated with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) and penpulimab (200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus nab-paclitaxel (220mg/m 2 , iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 using CT scans every two cycles. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 30. Primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included safety, ORR, DCR and OS. Results: From Jul 2022 to Sep 2024, a total of 30 patients were enrolled, with 29 patients who had received first tumor response were included in this analysis. The best overall response indicated that there were 1 CR (3.4%), 23 PR (79.3%), 2 SD (6.9%) and 3 NE (10.3%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 82.8% (95%CI: 64.2%-94.2%), DCR was 89.7% (95%CI: 72.6%-97.8%). The primary median PFS of the 29 patients was 10.84 months (95%CI: 7.57-14.11). Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events among the 29 patients with the incidence >20% were anemia (62%), leukopenia (31%), peripheral neurotoxicity (28%) and rash (21%). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were leukopenia (7%), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase was elevated (3%), glutamic oxalacetic transaminase increased (3%), hypertension (3%), diarrhea (3%) and rash (3%). Conclusions: The combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profile. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in subsequent trials. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2400089133 .

Update results of anlotinib combined with TQB2450 (PD-L1 blockade) as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase II clinical trial.

e16035 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients with ESCC when combining PD-1 blockades with chemotherapy in the first-line setting. However, the safety profile of conventional chemotherapy remains unsatisfactory, suggesting the chemotherapy-free regimen a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, has shown therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for ESCC patients in China. TQB2450 is a novel PD-L1 blockade developed by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus TQB2450 as first-line therapy for patients with advanced ESCC. Preliminary results were presented at the 2023 ASCO-GI Symposium (Abs 377), the 2023 ASCO (Abs 4041) and the 2023 ESMO (1531P), the consecutively updated results were presented in this report. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC, whose age was between 18 and 75 years, with ECOG PS of 0 or 1 score and life expectancy of > 3 months were inclusion criteria. Eligible patients were administered with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) plus TQB2450 (1200mg, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST using CT scans every 2 cycles for the first 6 cycles, and every 3 cycles thereafter. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 46. The primary endpoint was ORR, secondary endpoints included safety, PFS, DCR, DoR and OS. Results: From Mar 2022 to Sep 2022, a total of 46 patients were enrolled. At the data cut-off date (Dec, 2023), there were 1 CR (2.2%), 31 PR (67.4%), 10 SD (21.7%), 1 PD (2.2%) and 3 NE (6.5%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 69.6% (95%CI: 54.2%~82.3%), DCR was 91.3% (95%CI: 79.2%~97.6%). At the data cut-off date, 16 patients discontinued treatment due to PD, the preliminary prognostic result exhibited that the median PFS of the 46 pts was 15.44 months (95%CI: NA~NA). Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in 46 patients were hypertension (8.7%), neutrophil count decreased (4.3%), hyponatremia (4.3%), lymphocyte count decreased (4.3%), white blood cell count decreased (2.2%), platelet count decreased (2.2%), hand-foot syndrome (2.2%), hemoptysis (2.2%) and toothache (2.2%). Conclusions: The preliminary results highlighted that anlotinib plus TQB2450 as a first-line therapy for advanced ESCC showed encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile. Furthermore, these conclusions required to be confirmed in subsequent trials. Clinical trial information: NCT05038813 .

Update results of anlotinib combined with penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

e16017 Background: Recently, PD-1 blockades combined with dual chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC. However, the safety profile of conventional dual chemotherapy remained unsatisfactory. Therefore, PD-1 blockades combined with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and single chemotherapy regimen might be a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, demonstrated promising therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for patients with ESCC in China clinically. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with penpulimab (PD-1 blockade) and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. Preliminary results were presented at the 2024 ASCO-GI Symposium (Abs 340), the consecutively updated results were presented in this report. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC were recruited and treated with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) and penpulimab (200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus nab-paclitaxel (220mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 using CT scans every two cycles. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 30. Primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included safety, ORR, DCR and OS. Results: From Jul 2022 to Dec 2023, a total of 27 patients were enrolled, 25 patients who had received first tumor response were included in this analysis. The best overall response indicated that there were 1 CR (4.0%), 18 PR (72.0%), 3 SD (12.0%) and 3 NE (12.0%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 76.0% (95%CI: 54.9%-90.6%), DCR was 88.0% (95%CI: 68.8%-97.5%). Median PFS of the 25 patients was not yet reached. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events among the 27 patients with the incidence > 20% were anemia (40.7%), peripheral nerve toxicity (37.0) and white blood cell decreased (25.9%). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were white blood cell decreased (7.4%), diarrhea (3.7%), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase was elevated (3.7%), glutamic oxalacetic transaminase increased (3.7%), hypertension (3.7%) and immune enteritis (3.7%). Conclusions: The combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profile. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in subsequent trials.

Abstract PS12-07: Phase II clinical trial of palbociclib and binimetinib in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK4/6

Abstract Background: We previously demonstrated that a kinase-based taxonomy of TNBC was most parsimonious than next-generation sequencing in defining TNBC subtypes associated with prognostic categories in early disease. The most aggressive TNBC variants were driven by a heterogeneous set of genetic aberrations that converged in the increased activity of 6 kinases: KIT, PNKP, PRKCE, P70S6K, ERK and CDK6 (Nat Commun; 9:3501-18). The combined inhibition of these kinases in pairs led to potent tumor regression in preclinical models, being the most powerful combination that one directed against CDK6 and ERK. This prompted us to design a phase II trial testing the combination of palbociclib (against CDK6) and binimetinib (against the ERK upstream kinase MEK, since no ERK inhibitor was available at that moment outside phase I trials) in advanced TNBC. Hyperactivation of CDK6 and/or ERK was selected as entry criterion. Trial design: This was a single-arm, prospective, multicentric, open-label, phase II investigator-initiated trial. CDK6 and phosphor-ERK levels were measured in tumor samples by immunohistochemistry and normalized with a reference sample collection to a Z-score. Patients with scores for either kinase above the median were candidates for the trial. Key inclusion criteria included metastatic >18year-old TNBC, adequate organ function, measurable disease, and progression to 1-2 prior treatment lines (including immunotherapy, and a PARP inhibitor in case of germline BRCA1/2 mutation). Patients started continuous oral binimetinib at 45 mg/BID and palbociclib 100 mg/day from days 1 to 21, in 28-day cycles. Patients experiencing ≤ grade 1 tolerable side effects as the greatest toxicity were escalated to palbociclib to 125 in cycle 2. RECIST 1.1 and NCI CTC AE V 5.0 were used for assessing disease control (q8 weeks) and toxicity. The primary aims were to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination, and the secondary one to detect biomarkers of activity. At the time of trial design, in absence of available Sacituzumab for prescription, the reference PFS to beat in advanced lines for physician’s choice in TNBC was 1.7 month (NEJM; 384:1529-41, 2021). With alpha and beta errors of 0.05 and 0.2, the minimum number of patients to demonstrate a 30% improvement in PFS to 2.5 months was 25. Results: From November 2020 to April 2023, 69 patients were screened and 24 entered the trial (5 positive for phosphor-ERK; 2 for CDK6; 17 for both). Toxicity was generally mild and included grade 1-2 diarrhea (33% of the patients), grade 1-2 asthenia (50%), grade 1-3 neutropenia (75%), grade 2 retinal toxicity (8.3%) and grade 3 rash (4.2%); no grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. Median PFS was 1.83 months (range 0.3 to 11.3+). Phospho-ERK and CDK6 levels were not correlated (Pearson’s R= -0.089; P=0.68); CDK6 levels did not show association with PFS time (R = -0.120; P=0.58). Interestingly, however, phosphor-ERK levels in the baseline tumor sample showed correlation with PFS time (R = 0.428; P=0.037). Conclusion: The combination of palbociclib and binimetinib was generally safe, and PFS time showed correlation with baseline phosphorylation levels of ERK. However, the trial did not meet its primary endpoint. Citation Format: Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Alfonso Cortes, Juan Miguel Cejalvo, Luis Manso, Serafin Morales, Jose A Garcia-Saenz, Jorge Silva, Juan A Guerra, Diego Malón-Giménez, Silvana Mouron, Eduardo Caleiras, Miguel Quintela-Fandino. Phase II clinical trial of palbociclib and binimetinib in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK4/6 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-07.

Anlotinib plus TQB2450 (PD-L1 blockade) combined with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: A single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

498 Background: Efficacy and prognosis of chemotherapy in first-line setting for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) was dismal currently. Recently, PD-1/PD-L1 blockades combined with dual chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited superior efficacy for patients with BTC. Nevertheless, it's important to highlight that both the TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials had reported a median OS of less than 13 months. This underscored the necessity for further advancements to meet the demands of clinical practice. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, demonstrated promising therapeutic activity as second-line therapy for patients with BTC. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus TQB2450 (PD-L1 blockade) combined with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced BTC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced BTC (ICC, ECC, GBC) were recruited and treated with anlotinib (10mg, po, d1~14, q3w) and TQB2450 (1200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus nab-paclitaxel (200mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) and cisplatin (60mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 using CT scans every two cycles. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 20. Primary endpoint was ORR and secondary endpoints included safety, DCR, PFS, OS and biomarker explore. Results: From April 2023 to Aug 2023, a total of 18 patients were enrolled, 14 patients who had received first tumor response were included in this analysis. The best overall response indicated that there were 6 PR (42.9%), 7 SD (50.0%) and 1 PD (7.1%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 42.8% (95%CI: 17.7%-71.1%), DCR was 92.9% (95%CI: 66.1%-99.8%). Median PFS of the 14 patients was not yet reached. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events among the 18 patients with the incidence >30% were leukopenia (67%), fever (39%), pain in extremity (33%) and malaise (28%). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were leukopenia (28%), fever (6%), malaise (6%), stomachache (6%), oral mucositis (6%), thrombocytopenia (6%), vomit (6%), rash (6%) and hypotension (6%). Conclusions: Preliminary results suggested that anlotinib plus TQB2450 combined with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced BTC exhibited encouraging efficacy and manageable adverse events. The conclusion should be validated in more patients consecutively. Clinical trial information: NCT05812430 .

Anlotinib combined with penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

340 Background: Recently, PD-1 blockades combined with dual chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC. However, the safety profile of conventional dual chemotherapy remained unsatisfactory. Therefore, PD-1 blockades combined with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and single chemotherapy regimen might be a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, demonstrated promising therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for patients with ESCC in China clinically. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with penpulimab (PD-1 blockade) and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC were recruited and treated with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) and penpulimab (200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus nab-paclitaxel (220mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 using CT scans every two cycles. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 30. Primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included safety, ORR, DCR and OS. Results: From Jul 2022 to Aug 2023, a total of 23 patients were enrolled, 19 patients who had received first tumor response were included in this analysis. The best overall response indicated that there were 14 PR (73.7%), 2 SD (10.5%) and 3 NE (15.8%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 73.7% (95%CI: 48.8%-90.9%), DCR was 84.2% (95%CI: 60.4%-96.6%). Median PFS of the 19 patients was not yet reached. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events among the 23 patients with the incidence >20% were leukopenia (30%) and anemia (30%). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were leukopenia (9%), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase was elevated (4%), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase increased (4%), hypertension (4%) and diarrhea (4%). Conclusions: The combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profile. The conclusions needed to be confirmed in subsequent trials.

Neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with APF for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective single-arm clinical trial.

6080 Background: Seeking out a more effective and less-toxic regimen is necessary for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody tislelizumab combined with APF (albumin-bound paclitaxel, platinum and fluorouracil) followed by surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: In this prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study, previously untreated patients with locally advanced HNSCC, aged 18-75 years without severe comorbidities and contraindications to immunotherapy are enrolled. Eligible patients received A (200 mg/m2 d1) P (60 mg/m2 d1- d2) F (600 mg/m2 CIV120h) induction chemotherapy along with tislelizumab (200 mg d1) every 3 weeks. The curative effect is evaluated (RECIST 1.1) after 3 cycles and a multidisciplinary team discuss whether to perform surgery. For patients undergoing surgery, treatment is completed if there is no residual and extra-capsular lymph node invasion; in case of positive surgical margin, or extracapsular lymph node invasion, or residual lymph nodes, patient will receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (tumor bed and neck lymph drainage area 66 Gy~70 Gy, P 60 mg/m2). Those not suitable for surgery will receive radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy (GTV 66Gy~70Gy, PTV 50Gy, P 60 mg/m2) within 3 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint of efficacy evaluation is the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Safety evaluation indicators include vital signs, laboratory indicators and adverse events (NCI CTC AE4.0). Results: From Apr 2022 to Jan 2023, 12 patients are screened and enrolled. For the 7 patients who complete 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, 3 patients (42.8%) successfully undergo surgery, with 2 patients (28.5%) achieving pCR and 1 patient (14.3%) achieving major pathological response (MPR). For the other 4 patients, 1 patient (14.3%) achieve pCR by multipoint biopsy of the primary lesion and 2 patients (28.5%) obtain radiologic partial response (PR) by MRI. 1 patient’ lymph nodes tend to increase during radiotherapy and that patient withdraw from clinical trial and undergo salvage surgery. The objective response rate (ORR) of neoadjuvant treatment is 85.7% and pCR rate is 42.9%. Grade 2 or higher AEs during neoadjuvant therapy include grade 2 liver function damage (n = 1, 8.3%), grade 3 myelosuppression (n = 1, 8.3%). 1 (8.3%) patient developed radiation-related oral mucositis (RTOG 2). No other obvious adverse reactions of radiotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy are observed. Conclusions: Combining Tislelizumab with APF followed by surgery or radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy is feasible and effective in patients with locally advanced HNSCC, and further studies are needed to verify its effectiveness and safety.

Updated results of anlotinib combined with TQB2450 (PD-L1 blockade) as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase Ⅱ clinical trial.

4041 Background: PD-1 blockades combined with chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC recently. However, the safety profile of conventional chemotherapy was still disappointing. Therefore, the chemotherapy-free regimen might be a promising strategy. As a novel multitarget TKI mainly targeting VEGFR1-3, anlotinib was a potential first-line combination therapy and second-line monotherapy for patients with ESCC in China. TQB2450 was a novel PD-L1 blockade developed by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with TQB2450 as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. The preliminary results were reported in 2023 ASCO-GI Symposium (Abs 377) and the update results were reported here. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC, whose age was between 18 and 75 years, with ECOG PS of 0 or 1 and life expectancy of > 3 months were eligible as the inclusion criteria. Eligible patients were administered with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) plus TQB2450 (1200mg, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST using CT scans every 2 cycles for the first 6 cycles, and every 3 cycles thereafter. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 46. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included safety, PFS, DCR, DoR and OS. Results: From Mar 2022 to Sep 2022, a total of 46 patients were enrolled. At the data cut-off date (Dec, 2022), there were 1 CR (2.2%), 27 PR (58.7%), 14 SD (30.4%) and 4 NE (8.7%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 60.9% (95%CI: 45.4%~74.9%), DCR was 91.3% (95%CI: 79.2%~97.6%). The median PFS of the 46 pts was not yet available. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-related adverse events in 46 patients with the incidence > 10% were hypertension (28%), hypothyroidism (20%), leukocytosis (20%), hyperthyroidism (17%), anemia (15%), fatigue (15%), neutrophil count decreased (11%), constipation (11%), sinus bradycardia (11%) and hand-foot syndrome (11%). The common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (4%), hand-foot syndrome (2%), hyponatremia (2%), platelet count decreased (2%) and lymphocyte count decreased (2%). Conclusions: Preliminary results suggested that anlotinib combined with TQB2450 as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC exhibited encouraging efficacy and manageable adverse events. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in trials continued subsequently. Clinical trial information: NCT05038813 .

Anlotinib combined with TQB2450 (PD-L1 blockade) as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase II clinical trial.

377 Background: PD-1 blockades combined with chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC recently. However, the safety profile of conventional chemotherapy was still disappointing. Therefore, the chemotherapy-free regimen might be a promising strategy. And it had been proved that PD-1 blockades combined with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in second-line treatment for advanced ESCC showed potential efficacy and manageable toxicity. As a novel multitarget TKI mainly targeting VEGFR1-3, anlotinib was a potential first-line combination therapy and second-line monotherapy for patients with ESCC in China. TQB2450 was a novel PD-L1 blockade developed by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China), which is currently undergoing several clinical studies in China, involving ESCC and other solid tumors. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with TQB2450 as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC, whose age was between 18 and 75 years, with ECOG PS of 0 or 1 and life expectancy of more than 3 months were eligible as the inclusion criteria. Eligible patients were administered with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) plus TQB2450 (1200mg, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST using CT scans every 2 cycles for the first 6 cycles, and every 3 cycles thereafter. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 46. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included safety, PFS, DCR, DoR and OS. Results: From Mar 2022 to Aug 2022, a total of 36 patients were enrolled, 23 patients included in per-protocol set. In best overall response assessment, there were 14 PR (60.9%), 8 SD (34.8%) and 1 NE (4.4%). In consequence, the preliminary ORR was 60.9% (95%CI: 38.5%~80.3%), DCR was 95.7% (95%CI: 78.1%~99.9%). No patients had disease progression at the date of data cutoff. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-related adverse events in 36 patients with the incidence >10% were hypertension (33%), fatigue (17%), decreased white blood cell count (14%), hyperthyroidism (11%) and decreased neutrophil count (11%). The common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were decreased platelet count (3%) and decreased lymphocyte count (3%). Conclusions: Preliminary results suggested that anlotinib combined with TQB2450 as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC exhibited encouraging efficacy and manageable adverse events. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in trials continued subsequently. Clinical trial information: NCT05038813 .

EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience

AIM: To assess the toxicities and early clinical outcomes in patients of primary and recurrent ependymomas treated with image guided pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2019- December 2021, we analyzed consecutive patients of ependymomas treated with image guided PBS-PBT. They were also analyzed molecularly, and all recurrent/re-irradiated patients were considered for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Acute toxicities were assessed based on NCI CTC v5.0, local control and radiological response by 3-monthly MRI post therapy. RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive patients with ependymoma (13 Grade III and 4 Grade II) (median age-9 years) were analyzed. 9 patients were primary, 7 were treated at first recurrence and 1 at second recurrence. Majority had posterior fossa (PF) tumors (12) followed by supratentorial (ST) (3) and spine (2). Among PF ependymomas, 10 had global loss of H3K27me3, whereas amongst ST, 1 had YAP1 fusion, 1 had L1CAM positivity and other, negative L1CAM and p65/RELA on immunohistochemistry. Gross/near-total resection was achieved in 87% patients. Primary ependymomas were treated with focal radiotherapy; and among recurrent cases, 7 received CSI followed by primary site boost to a total median dose of 55CGE (50.2-55.8CGE). Grade 2 dermatitis, grade 2 and 3 hematological toxicities (CSI) were noted in 3,2 and 2 patients respectively. Grade 2 fatigue noted in 53% of all and 71% receiving CSI. With a median follow-up of 10 months (2-24 months), local control (LC) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 87.5% (primary-100%, recurrent-75%) and overall survival (OS) was 94% (primary-100%, recurrent-88%). CONCLUSION: Our experience of treating patients of ependymoma with complete resection followed by PBS-PBT including CSI is encouraging with low acute toxicities. Recurrent/molecularly aggressive cases may be considered for CSI. Keywords: PT, proton beam therapy, ependymomas, primary and recurrent

Phase I trial of the RAF/MEK clamp VS-6766 in combination with everolimus using an intermittent schedule with expansion in NSCLC across multiple KRAS variants.

9018 Background: VS-6766 is a small molecule RAF/MEK clamp that results in the reduction of p-MEK and p-ERK. Preclinical data show synergy of VS-6766 with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus across a panel of KRAS mutated (mt) NSCLC cell lines. This clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel intermittent regimen of VS-6766 and everolimus with an expansion in KRAS mt NSCLC (NCT02407509). Methods: The trial used a 3+3 dose escalation design with an intermittent once a week schedule A, and if tolerated, twice a week schedule B (Mon-Thu or Tue-Fri) for both drugs on a 3 weeks on/1 week off, 28 day cycle. Patients with RAS or RAF mt cancers were eligible for the dose escalation cohort, and 20 patients with KRAS mt NSCLC will be treated in the dose expansion cohort. Toxicity was evaluated by NCI CTC V4 and efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Results: A total of 28 patients have been treated; median age 60 yrs (range 36-78), and median lines of previous treatment 3 (range 0-7). Sixteen patients have been treated in the dose escalation (3 in schedule A and 13 in the schedule B). The doses of 4 mg of VS-6766 and 5 mg everolimus (once weekly) were tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the dose intensity escalated to schedule B (twice weekly). At 4 mg VS-6766 twice weekly, DLTs were observed in two out of six patients and included grade 4 CPK elevation and grade 3 rash. Thus, the dose in schedule B (twice weekly) was de-escalated to 3.2 mg VS-6766 and the dose of everolimus was kept at 5 mg. No DLTs were reported in 6 patients and thus this was declared as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). At the RP2D, the grade 3-4 drug related AE were rash (18%) and pruritus (7%). In the dose escalation cohorts, 3 partial responses (PRs) were reported (2 KRAS G12D low grade serous ovarian cancer and 1 NRAS Q61K mt thyroid cancer). In the KRAS mt NSCLC expansion cohort, 10 patients are evaluable for efficacy and 2 confirmed responses were reported ( KRAS mutations G12V and G13A) with an objective response rate (ORR) 20% to date. The disease control rate (PR + SD) at the first scheduled evaluation was 90%. The median progression free survival (PFS) in the KRAS mt NSCLC cohort is 6.35 months (95% CI 3.52 – not reached). Updated ORR and PFS data will be presented. Conclusions: A tolerable intermittent dosing schedule targeting both the MAPK and PI3K pathways has been established. The combination of VS-6766 with everolimus has shown activity in patients with a variety of KRAS mutation variants including responses in KRAS mt NSCLC.

Comparable effectiveness of 45- and 20-min post-infusion scalp cooling time in preventing paclitaxel-induced alopecia — a randomized controlled trial

PurposeScalp cooling can prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Previously, the post-infusion cooling time (PICT) could be successfully reduced in docetaxel-treated patients from 90 to 45 and 20 min. Therefore, it seems plausible that the PICT can be shortened for paclitaxel-treated patients as well.MethodsPatients treated with weekly paclitaxel were included in this multi-centre trial and randomly assigned to a PICT of 45 or 20 min. The results were compared to a standard PICT of 90 min, derived from prospective collected data from the Dutch Scalp Cooling Registry. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who decide to not wear a wig or head covering. Secondary endpoints were the degree of CIA assessed with the Dean scale for assessment of hair loss; alopecia graded according to NCI CTC toxicity version 4.03 (CTCAE4.03); tolerance of scalp cooling and perceived distress of CIA.ResultsNinety-one patients were enrolled in this study; 74 patients were evaluable for hair loss. Hair preservation was successful in 27 patients (75%) with a PICT of 45 min and in 31 patients (82%) with a PICT of 20 min. There was no difference in success rate with the standard PICT of 90 min (85%, p = 0.29). Similar success rates were seen when using the Dean scale and CTCAE assessment, with no differences between groups (p = 0.12 and p = 0.38).ConclusionsA 20 min PICT is as effective as 45 and 90 min to prevent weekly paclitaxel-induced alopecia and should be the new standard of care.Trial registerClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03266185.

Abstract OT2-19-08: Phase IB/II trial of palbociclib and binimetinib in advanced triple-negative breast cancer with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK4/6

Abstract Background: Novel effective and safe therapies are required for advanced TNBC after progression to standard-of-care first line treatment with anti-PD-1/L1 + chemotherapy. We have found that the most aggressive TNBC variants are driven by a heterogeneous set of genetic aberrations that converge in the increased activity of 6 kinases: KIT, PNKP, PRKCE, P70S6K, ERK and CDK6 (Nat Commun; 9:3501-18). Although the inhibition of each kinase in monotherapy yielded little efficacy in preclinical models, the combinations targeting pairs of the former kinases led to therapeutic synergy in most cases. The combined inhibition of CDK6 and ERK led to 5-fold increase in overall survival in preclinical TNBC models (PDXs and spontaneous murine cancer models). The greatest activity was observed in models with increased activity of either CDK6 or ERK. Thus, we aimed to test the safety and preliminary efficacy of combined ERK and CDK6 inhibition with binimetinib and palbociclib in women with advanced TNBC with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK6. The combination has been preliminary tested in lung cancer, where a phase I dose-escalation trial established the RP2D in binimetinib 45 mg/BID plus Palbociclib 125 mg daily 21/7. Trial design: Single-arm, prospective, multicentric, open-label, phase IB/II trial with intra-patient dose-escalation. Patients candidate for pre-screening will have determined the activity of ERK and CDK6 with an in-house developed assay and acquisition algorithm at the central lab. Those testing positive for either marker will undergo full screening. Patients will start treatment with continuous oral binimetinib at 45 mg/BID and palbociclib 100 mg/day from days 1 to 21, in 28-day cycles. Patients experiencing ≤ grade 1 tolerable side effects as the greatest toxicity will be allowed to escalate to palbociclib to 125 in cycle 2. Fresh biopsies will be harvested at baseline and disease progression, in order to establish patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and perform WES. PBMCs will be harvested at baseline, +24 hours, and at the beginning of cycle 2, to study changes in the immunophenotype. RECIST 1.1 and NCI CTC AE V 5.0 criteria will be used for assessing disease control (q8 weeks) and toxicity. Eligibility criteria: Pre-screening: Women >18 year old diagnosed of advanced, non-curable TNBC; 2) who have received a minimum of 1 treatment line including immunotherapy; 3) no more than 2 treatment lines for advanced disease; 4) Adequate organ function and recovery from previous toxicity to < tolerable G2. Full screening: 5) Demonstration of hyper-activation of CDK6 and/or ERK in the tumor sample; 6) PD to the previous treatment regimen within the last 28 days. Specific aims: Primary: 1) To determine the progression-free survival time of the combination of binimetinib and palbociclib in TNBC patients with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK6 in second/third line 2) To assess the safety and tolerability of the former combination Secondary: 1) 6-month PFS rate, response rate, and overall survival of the combination 2) To study biomarkers of sensitivity and primary and acquired resistance to the combination taking advantage of PDOs 3) To determine the immunodynamics of the combination. Statistical methods: The null hypothesis is that the median PFS time for second/third line TNBC with best physician’s choice is 1.7 months (NEJM; 384:1529-41, 2021). With alpha and beta errors of 0.05 and 0.2, the minimum number of patients to demonstrate a 30% improvement in PFS to 2.5 months is 25. Preliminary data suggest that approximately 40% of the patients show hyper-activation of CDK6 and/or ERK; thus, and assuming a methodological failure of 10%, the minimum number of patients to screen is 69. Present accrual/target accrual: 27 screened of 69 planed; 11 accrued of 25 planned Citation Format: Luis Manso, Alfonso Cortes, Juan M Cejalvo, Serafin Morales, Jose A García Saenz, Ramon Colomer, Rodrigo Sanchez-Bayona, Jorge Silva, Juan A Guerra, Diego Malon, Silvana Mouron, Eduardo Caleiras, Miguel Quintela-Fandino. Phase IB/II trial of palbociclib and binimetinib in advanced triple-negative breast cancer with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK4/6 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-19-08.

Abstract OT2-20-01: Rogaratinib, palbociclib and fulvestrant in advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+), FGFR1/2-positive breast cancer: Phase I trial plus an expansion cohort

Abstract Background: Novel therapies are needed upon progression to first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) plus endocrine therapy in advanced HR+ breast cancer. One frequent alteration driving resistance to CDKi plus hormones is FGFR1/2 amplification/overexpression. We have demonstrated that a combined assay of RNAScope and FISH, detecting RNA overexpression and genomic amplification of FGFR1/2, captures more FGFR-aberrant cases than either test alone. When these alterations exist, the triple estrogen receptor (ER), CDK4/6 and FGFR1/2 blockade is able to revert acquired resistance to CDKi (Breast Cancer Res; 23:21-37; 2021). Rogaratinib is a selective FGFR1-4 kinase inhibitor with significant activity in FGFR-aberrant malignancies. In this trial we will test the safety of the triple blockade combining fulvestrant, palbociclib and rogaratinib. We will also study its role as a resistant-reversion combo for FGFR1/2-positive, HR+ patients progressing to a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) in the first-line metastatic setting. Trial design: Single-arm, prospective, multicentric, open-label, phase I dose-escalation trial. Patients will be pre-screened for amplification and/or overexpression of FGFR1/2 by FISH and RNAScope, during their first-line treatment. Positive patients will start treatment: on day 1, patients will receive rogaratinib q12 hours. On day 2, patients will continue on rogaratinib, receive fulvestrant (500 ug IM) and start on palbociclib (100 mg/day on days 1-21). A second fulvestrant dose (500 ug) will be administered in day +15. The first cycle will be 29 days, followed by 28-day cycles (continuous rogaratinib q12 hours days 1-28, fulvestrant 500 ug day 1, and palbociclib 100 mg/day days 1-21). Rogaratinib will be escalated, starting on 400 mg/bid in 200 mg/bid increments, following a classic 3+3 schedule. Patients experiencing ≤ grade 1 tolerable side effects as the greatest toxicity will be allowed to escalate palbociclib to 125 in cycle 2. A full pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacodynamics (plasma FGF23 and phosphate levels) will be performed on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1. The impact of the triple combination in immunodynamics will be assessed on PBMCs on days 2 and 15. Ten additional HR+, FGFR1/2 + patients will be accrued at the RP2D in an expansion cohort to study efficacy. RECIST 1.1 and NCI CTC AE V 5.0 criteria will be used for assessing disease control (q8 weeks) and toxicity. Eligibility criteria: Pre-screening: Women >18 year old diagnosed with advanced, non-curable HR+ breast cancer; 2) who are receiving first-line treatment with an AI and any oral CDKi; 3) Adequate organ function. Full screening: 4) Positivity for amplification (FISH ratio>2.2) and/or overexpression (RNAScope score of 3+ or 4+) of either FGFR1/2. 5) PD to first-line AI + CDKi within the last 28 days. 6) Recovery from previous toxicity to < tolerable G2. Specific aims: Primary: 1) To determine RP2D of the triple combination of fulvestrant, palbociclib and rogaratinib. 2) To assess the safety and toxicity of the former combination 3) To study the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunodynamics of the triplet. Secondary: 1) To determine the PFS time and 6-month PFS rate of the triplet in FGFR1/2 amplified/overexpressed patients AI + CDKi doublet. Statistical methods: We will follow a 3+3 escalation schedule; thus, the minimum and maximum number of patients for the dose-escalation phase will range between 6 and 18 (no escalation planned beyond 800 mg/bid rogaratinib). Ten additional patients will be accrued in the expansion cohort (N=28). The anticipated rate of positive screening is 40%; thus, we will screen approximately 70 patients. . Present accrual/target accrual: 55/70 screened; 16 FGFR1/2-positive (of 28 planned); 2 accrued and treated. Citation Format: Sonia Pernas, Cristina Hernando, Begoña Bermejo, Noelia Martinez-Jañez, Jose A García Saenz, Serafin Morales, Luis Manso, Jorge Silva, Juan A Guerra, Diego Malon, Silvana Mouron, Eduardo Caleiras, Miguel Quintela-Fandino. Rogaratinib, palbociclib and fulvestrant in advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+), FGFR1/2-positive breast cancer: Phase I trial plus an expansion cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-20-01.

Sélection de patientes et tolérance précoce de l’irradiation mammaire selon le protocole « Fast Forward » : résultats préliminaires

Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy has become routine practice for a selected population of patients treated for early-stage breast cancer. In April 2020, the Fast Forward (FF) study was published which introduced another extreme hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen in five sessions over a week. The aim of this work is to evaluate the population of first patients in whom this regimen was used in our department, as well as the results in terms of early toxicity. We retrospectively analysed all the patients treated in our department according to the Fast Forward protocol after establishing an institutional consensus regarding the selection of patients with breast cancer without indication for lymph node irradiation. All patients received breast-only irradiation at a total dose of 26Gy in five fractions according to protocol. All patients were treated by modern conformational techniques with planning large volume coverage between 95 and 100%. Acute toxicity of the treatment was assessed using the NCI CTC v4.0 scale and the general condition was assessed according to the WHO classification. Between August 2020 and May 2021, 30 patients were included, treated on the breast alone without complement on the tumour bed or irradiation of the lymph node areas. The median age of the patients was 80years (range: 60-85years) with performance status 2 in 27 cases (89%). Only one patient had metastatic disease (3%), one patient presented locally advanced and 28 (94%) patients had early stage disease. Three patients (10%) were treated in dorsal decubitus according to the "field in the field" technique and 27 patients (90%) in isocentric lateral decubitus, which made it possible to avoid the organs at risk such as the heart (average dose of less than 1Gy) and the lungs. The early toxicity observed was grade I radio dermatitis in 8 patients (27%). No grade 2 and 3 toxicity, as well as radiation-induced pain or lymphedema were observed. The results of this series of patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy according to the Fast Forward protocol on the breast alone with adapted techniques show that the protocol is feasible, with little early toxicity but a greater follow-up is necessary to assess long-term toxicity.

Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide and Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide As Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Conditioning Regimen in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Abstract Introduction Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma and standard treatment is yet to be established. Induction therapy with methotrexate-based chemotherapy regimen and consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy followed-by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a good treatment option with promising outcomes, but only few studies are available. Asan Medical Center had previously used busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide regimen (BuCyE) as standard high-dose chemotherapy in consolidation therapy until thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide regimen (TBC) was introduced in December, 2012. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes and toxicity profile of BuCyE and TBC as conditioning regimens for ASCT in consolidation therapy of PCNSL patients. Methods The registry data set of PCNSL, collected from March 1993 to May 2017 at a single institute, Asan Medical Center, was retrospectively reviewed and patients who had BuCyE or TBC as conditioning regimens were enrolled in analyses. BuCyE group had busulfan with dose of 3.2 mg/kg IV in day-7 to day-5, etoposide 200 mg/ IV in day-5 to day-4 and cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV in day-3 to day-2. TBC group had thiotepa with dose of 250 mg/ IV in day-9 to day-7, busulfan 3.2 mg/kg IV in day-6 to day-4 and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg IV in day-3 to day-2. OS was defined as from beginning of high-dose chemotherapy conditioning to any cause of death, and PFS as from beginning of ASCT to disease progression or any cause of death. Analyses with chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were done to compare variables between two groups. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank tests and multivariate analyses were done with known prognostic factors. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 21.0. Results Total 241 patients with diagnosis of PCNSL were identified and 73 patients who had ASCT as frontline or salvage setting with conditioning regimens of either TBC (45 patients) or BuCyE (28 patients) were enrolled in analyses. Median follow-up duration was 3.7 years [IQR 0.01-10.3], median OS was 6.1 years [95% CI 3.7-8.5], and median PFS was 6.5 [95% CI 1.4-11.7]. Median age was 54 years (range, 17-65), 27.4% of patients were 60 years or older and 54.8% of patients was male. Fifty three patients (72.6%) had upfront ASCT after induction therapy and 27.4% of patients had relapsed or refractory disease. ECOG performance status and infused dose of CD34 positive cells showed no statistical difference between two groups. Proportion of patient with refractory or relapsed disease was significantly higher in TBC group [TBC 37.8%, BuCyE 10.7%, p = 0.012]. Median OS of TBC group was not reached and median OS of BuCyE group was 4.5 years [95% CI 1.8-7.2] and TBC group showed better OS with log-rank test (p = 0.048). Median PFS of TBC group was not reached and median PFS of BuCyE group was 1.3 years [95% CI 0.00-2.7] and TBC group showed better PFS with log-rank test (p = 0.007). In multivariate analyses with age, ECOG performance status, CSF protein level, serum LD level, TBC group showed significantly better OS with HR of 0.20 [95% CI 0.04-0.97, p = 0.046] and better PFS with HR of 0.24 [95% CI 0.09-0.66, p = 0.006] compared to BuCyE group. Severe oral mucositis, nausea, vomiting (NCI CTC grade 3 or 4) was higher in TBC group. Median days to engraftment were 8 days (range, 3-19) in TBC group, and 9 days (range, 3-15) in BuCyE group. Median admission duration was 17 days (range, 4-42) in TBC group, and 18.5 days (range, 14-36) in BuCyE group. One case of treatment-related mortality was reported in TBC group due to septic shock. Conclusion TBC regimen showed better outcomes in both OS, PFS compared to BuCyE. Although TBC group showed more oral mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, it maybe tolerable regimen compared with BuCyE considering the fact that admission duration and days to engraftment was not inferior. Further long-term follow-up results with TBC regimen are warranted. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract CT143: Phase I study of the combination of a RAF-MEK inhibitor CH5126766 and FAK inhibitor defactinib in an intermittent dosing schedule with expansions in KRAS mutant cancers

Abstract Background: Preclinical experiments in-vitro show MEK inhibitors can cause upregulation of p-FAK in KRASM cells. The combination of a MEK and FAK inhibitor could overcome this in-vitro and in-vivo. Methods: We are conducting an open label phase I dose escalation with expansion study (NCT03875820). Dose escalation evaluated a twice a week schedule (Mon/Thurs) CH5126766/VS-6766 (CH) 3 weeks out of 4 with a twice a day dosing schedule of defactinib (Def) administered 3 weeks out of 4. The dose levels explored were cohort 1 (CH 3.2 mg, 200 mg Def), cohort 2a (CH 4 mg Def 200 mg) and cohort 2b (CH 3.2 mg and Def 400 mg). Pharmacokinetic data were collected at cycle 1 d15 when both drugs were administered. In a subset of patients consenting to multiple biopsies, 3 biopsies were performed (baseline, after a single dose of CH run in and after 8-15 days of the combination therapy). At the recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD), expansion cohorts in patients with low grade ovarian cancer (LGSOC, n=20), KRASM non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n=20) and KRASM colorectal cancer (CRC, n=10) will be treated. Results: Forty two patients have been treated on the trial so far. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 3 patients in cohort 1 and thus patients were recruited to cohort 2a and 2b. The cohort 2b dose level was deemed intolerable because of 2/3 patients experiencing DLTs of grade 2 rash not allowing dosing of 75% of the planned dose. No DLTs were seen in the first 6 patients treated on schedule 2a. However, given chronic grade 2 toxicities in patients on treatment > 6 months, the RP2D was deemed to be cohort 1. The most common side effects in the study were rash, CK elevation, AST elevation, hyperbilirubinemia and nausea, most of which were NCI CTC grade 1-2. All changes were reversible. The mean AUC of CH and Def at R2PD was 6179 ng*hr/ml and 2071 ng*hr/ml, respectively, which is in the range of what was seen in the single agent dose escalation studies. Sequential biopsies were obtained in 7 patients and 6/7 showed an increase in p-FAK following single agent CH which was reduced in 5/7 with combined CH and Def therapy. The response rate was 67% (4/6) or 50% (4/8) in KRASM LGSOC or all LGSOC patients treated to date, respectively. A range of KRASM were found in tumors of LGSOC patients who responded (G12V, G12A and G12D). Of the 4 patients with LGSOC who have responded to treatment, 3 have had a prior MEK inhibitor and are currently are on study for a median of 20.5 months (range 7-23 months). Expansion cohorts in LGSOC and KRASM NSCLC and CRC are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusion: We report a novel intermittent schedule of the combination of a RAF-MEK and FAK inhibitor with very promising clinical activity in patients with KRASM LGSOC including those who had been previously treated with a MEK inhibitor. Citation Format: Rajiv Shinde, Angelika Terbuch, Martin Little, Reece Caldwell, Roopa Kurup, Ruth Riisnaes, Mateus Crespo, Ruth Ruddle, Bora Gurel, Adam Stewart, Jenny King, Mona Parmar, Alison Turner, Florence Raynaud, Muneeb Mahmud, Christina Yap, Jonathan A. Pachter, Gordon B. Mills, Anna Minchom, Juanita Lopez, Susana N. Banerjee, Johann S. de Bono, Matthew Krebs, Udai Banerji. Phase I study of the combination of a RAF-MEK inhibitor CH5126766 and FAK inhibitor defactinib in an intermittent dosing schedule with expansions in KRAS mutant cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT143.

Intratumor immunotherapy utilizing real time radiological image guidance: Early experience from a tertiary cancer center.

e15223 Background: Intratumoral (IT) delivery of immunotherapeutic agents is a compelling approach to overcoming the systemic barriers of toxicity and lack of efficacy associated with many novel agents. In this context, the application of IT delivery is growing rapidly, however the feasibility and safety profile of these interventions for lesions that require real time radiological image-guidance remains unknown. Methods: Patients who underwent IT injections of immunotherapeutic agents across several clinical trials over a 5 year period at a single tertiary cancer center were included in this analysis. Technical success & procedure related adverse events of the IT injection and the frequently accompanying concomitant or sequential image-guided biopsy of injected (adscopal) and non-injected (abscopal) sites were analyzed. Results: A total of 256 patients with metastatic &/or unresectable solid malignancies underwent a total of 1096 (median 5) image-guided IT investigational agent injections during the study period. There were no adverse events attributable to the technical component of the procedure, specifically during the needle insertions or 3862 concomitant biopsies. Soft tissue and nodal lesions in the extraparietal locations & visceral lesions in deeper, intraparietal locations and solid organs were also injected (adrenal, liver and lung). The median injected lesion tumor length was 3.3cm. Serious adverse events (NCI CTC AE ≥ 3) including dyspnea and severe flu-like symptoms developing within 24 hours of the injection & required hospitalization following 1.5% of injections. Conclusions: Intratumoral immunotherapeutic injections & tissue sampling with real time radiological image guidance are feasible across a wide range of regions and organs irrespective of agent and histology. Post-delivery anticipated & adverse events were rare & manageable.

Vefora, GETUG-AFU V06 study: Randomized multicenter phase II/III trial of fractionated cisplatin (CI)/gemcitabine (G) or carboplatin (CA)/g in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) with impaired renal function (IRF)—Results of a planned interim analysis.

461 Background: Standard treatment for advanced UC is chemotherapy (CT) combining CI and G. 70% of pts with UC are over 65 and 40% of them are unfit for CI because of IRF or comorbidities. CA replaces frequently CI, when creatinine clearance (Cr Cl) is < 60 ml/min according to Cockroft and Gault formula (CGF). However, CA tends to show a lower efficacy than CI, due to decreased dose intensity of CT. Methods: We performed a multicentre randomized phase II/III study in order to compare the activity and safety of a CT regimen with fractionated CI or CA for advanced UC in 1st line setting among pts unfit for standard CT because of IRF (40 ≤ Cr Cl ≤ 60ml/min) according to CGF. We report here the results of the interim analysis of phase II. Treatment: Arm A: CA AUC4,5 D1+ G 1000 mg/m² D1, [D1 = D21]; Arm B: fractionated CI 35 mg/m² D1D8 + G 1000 mg/m² D1D8, [D1 = D21] The co-primary objectives of the phase II were to evaluate activity (non-progression (RECIST V1.1) at (D21 C6)) and safety defined by the absence during treatment of: IRF: Cr Cl <35 mL/min or deterioration of Cr Cl >20%; delayed CT (≥ 2 weeks); decrease twice G dose on day 1 for: NCI CTC grade III or IV non-hematologic toxicity; hematologic toxicity; A two-stage Bryant and Day design was used. Results: A planned first step analysis was performed after randomization of 25 and 21 pts from April 2015 to January 2018. 23 and 19 of them were evaluable (resp. Arm A/B). 8 failures were reported for safety reason in experimental arm B, 7 for renal toxicity. Conclusions: According to our pre planned first step analysis, the trial met criteria for excessive toxicity in experimental arm (fractionated CI), predominantly renal toxicity. The study was therefore definitely stopped. Survival results will be available at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02240017 . [Table: see text]

Careful dose modification of apatinib as third or further-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer patients with poor performance status.

The retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of careful dose modification of apatinib as third or further-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer (aGC) patients with poor performance status (PS = 2 or 3).Patients with aGC of poor PS who had received at least 2 lines of chemotherapy were treated with apatinib at a dose of 250 mg initially and best supportive care (BSC). During the whole treatment, the dose of apatinib was adjusted according to the status of PS (group treatment). Meanwhile, patients of poor PS (PS = 2 or 3) with aGC who received BSC alone after second or further-line treatment in the recent 5 years in our institution have been investigated for their median overall survival (mOS) as control. Kaplan-Meier curve was adopted for the description of OS in the 2 groups. Univariate analysis was conducted with log-rank test between OS and the potential characteristics including gender, age, PS status, primary tumor lesion, Her-2 status, and previous lines of treatment. Toxicities were assessed with the criteria of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) version 4.0.A total of 23 patients who received apatinib plus BSC treatment and 41 patients treated with BSC alone were reviewed in the present study. Median exposure time of apatinib was 2.4 months ranging from 0.2 to 5.1 months. The median OS in the group treatment was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.735-5.865) comparing to the control as 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.473-2.727, P = .0004). In addition, PS status was shown as the only independently significant factor to influence the OS (P = .049). Fatigue (82.6%), appetite decrease (73.9%), and anemia (69.6%) appeared to be the most common adverse events at any grade during the therapy of apatinib.The outcomes of the present study revealed that therapeutic model of careful dose modification of apatinib therapy initiated with low dose plus BSC as third or further-line treatment might be more beneficial on survival time comparing to BSC alone in patients with aGC of poor PS, however, as well as apparent adverse events.