1. Introduction This article uses census tract data from the city of Detroit and a reduced-form crime equation to investigate the effects of alcohol availability on crime. A fact of urban life in the United States is high crime rates, rates that differ across neighborhoods in cities and easy availability of alcohol. A disproportionately large number of crimes are committed by people who have just consumed alcohol (Cook and Moore 1993a). The homicide rate among youths in poor inner cities, where alcohol consumption tends to be high, is four times as high as the national average among all youths (FBI 1996). Parker (1993) reports that, all things equal, homicides are higher in high alcohol consumption neighborhoods than in low alcohol consumption neighborhoods. According to the National Institute of Criminal Justice statistics, 40% of all violent crime victimization, 40% of all fatal motor vehicle accidents, and 67% of all domestic violence in 1995 were alcohol related. In addition, 40% of all violent offenders in jail reported using alcohol just before committing the crime (Greenfeld 1998). Similarly, a disproportionately large share of crimes in the United Kingdom occurs in or near pubs during peak hours of operation (Hutchinson, Henderson, and Davis 1995). Besides being perpetrators, a large number of victims of crime had used alcohol at the time of their victimization. In this study, I use the term commission of crime more broadly to include perpetrators as well as the victims of crime. In spite of these statistics, easy availability of alcohol and its use continue to be part of the American culture. A Harris poll reports that 38% of adult males think they drink too much but will not change their behavior and 28% of high school students think that adults should be able to drink all the alcohol they want (FBI 1996). However, a recent study conducted by the University of Michigan for the National Institute of Drug Abuse found that over 80% of Americans disapprove of youth drinking (University of Michigan Institute for Social Research 1998). In spite of these statistics linking alcohol to crime, with the exception of the relationship between alcohol control policy and drunk driving, economists have not investigated the effects of alcohol availability on crime rates generally. Given the high correlation between alcohol availability and crime, Dilulio (1995) suggests using zoning laws to decrease alcohol availability as a means of decreasing crime. It is not clear whether there is a causal relationship between alcohol availability and crime rates. Does alcohol availability increase crime? If increased alcohol availability leads to increased crime, what is the mechanism through which alcohol availability affects crime? While answers to these questions may be important for policy formulation and implementation, my concern is with the investigation of the effects of alcohol availability on crime rates. If alcohol availability increases crime rates, it may be possible to formulate alcohol control policies that also depress crime. While there are few theoretical models that link alcohol availability to specific crimes, empirical studies of the effects of geographical availability of alcohol on crime rates generally are few and far between in the economics literature. More empirical studies could help establish the link that has been made between alcohol control policies and crime. Results of studies investigating the connection between alcohol availability and crime have implications for further research and policy. For example, if alcohol availability increases crime rates, then decreasing alcohol availability may decrease crime and improve social welfare. If there is a positive link between alcohol availability and crime rates, then alcohol availability should be included in the supply of offense equation as an added explanatory variable. There is, therefore, the need to better understand the relationship between the geographical availability of alcohol and crime rates in the economics of crime literature. …
Read full abstract