In Brazil, the number of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rapidly increasing. In spite of that, we still have few population-based studies on CKD especially regarding patients initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT). Offering the best care for patients initiating of RRT is still a challenge and can result in increased risks for complications and health care related costs. This study consists of a historical cohort of patients in RRT provided by the Sistema Unico de Saude (SUS). All patients initiating RRT from 2012 to 2018, at the city of Contagem, Minas Gerais, Brazil, were included. Data were extracted from an administrative database, the Authorization System for High Complexity/Cost Procedures (APAC). Patients were assessed for their baseline characteristics at the time of initiation of RRT: creatinine clearance, definitive vascular access, primary modality of RRT. Mortality rate and transplantation were also evaluated. This study resulted in no interventions. Privacy of subjects and the confidentiality of their personal information were handled in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. During the study period, 2.436 patients (mean age 53.6 SD 14.8 years; male 55.1%) initiated RRT. 87.7% initiated RRT while hospitalized in an acute care or intensive care unit. 95.1% had a double-lumen dialysis catheter as first vascular access. DM was the most prevalent isolated cause for CKD (35.1%). Peritoneal dialysis was the initial treatment modality for only 4.4%. Median creatinine clearance (CKD-EPI) at the initiation of RRT was 8.4 SD 6.1 ml/min/m2. There was no difference in the Cr Cl when patients were stratified in groups concerning age or diagnosis. After a mean follow-up time of 2.1 SD 1.9 years, the observed mortality was 14.1%. 32 patients were transplanted. Despite the well-known recommendations on how to best transition patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) to renal replacement therapy, the care of these patients remains a challenge. Our results suggest that pre-dialysis interventions regarding issues as dialysis modality planning, definitive vascular access, and elective RRT initiation are still important challenges to be addressed in our location. In the absence of a national clinical registry, administrative data can be a source of “real-world” evidence to provide reliable information on opportunities to improve care and outcomes.
Read full abstract