Nasal Valve Collapse Research Articles

Surgical Management of the Internal Nasal Valve: A Review of Surgical Approaches.

Nasal valve collapse is relatively common with a lifetime prevalence of up to 13%. Etiologies include prior rhinoplasty, other surgical procedures, facial paralysis, congenital defects, trauma, and aging. Internal nasal valve collapse leads to impairment of nasal breathing, which significantly disturbs quality of life. Many approaches to increase the cross-sectional area of the internal nasal valve have been described. The main categories reviewed in this article are cartilage grafting, implants, and suture suspension techniques. Cartilage grafting techniques include alar batten graft, butterfly graft, spreader graft, autospreader graft, and alar composite graft. The implant technique includes the titanium butterfly implant. The suspension techniques included are the transconjunctival approach, Mitek bone anchor, flaring suture, lateral pull-up, and piriform rim suspension. Surgeons must carefully consider functionality, cosmesis, and technical difficulty when selecting an approach. We review indications, general approach, benefits, and considerations for a number of available techniques to help surgeons decide what approach might be best suited to the individual patient. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Effect of alar rim graft on external nasal valve collapse and alar contour

Background: Alar rim collapse is an agonizing problem that has both cosmetic and functional sequalae. It has been usually addressed with batten grafts. In this study, we are describing a simple technique for insertion of alar rim grafts to fix external nasal valve collapse.Patients and Methods: Between January 2018 and October 2020, eighteen patients with alar rim collapse or deformities were addressed using alar rim septal cartilage grafting.Results: All patients who underwent alar rim grafting for external nasal valve collapse were evaluated functionally and aesthetically with post-operative follow up ranging from 12 to 24 month. During which, they showed marked improvement in their nasal airway patency with complete satisfaction for the aesthetic outcome. No complications were encountered.Conclusion: Alar rim grafting is a simple and effective approach to provide support for the external nasal valve and alar contour. In cases of malpositioned lower lateral cartilage, alar flaring, nasal tip deformities, mild retraction, or contour asymmetries, these cartilage grafts showed good outcomes in primary or revision cases.

Functional and aesthetic outcomes of spreader graft and auto-spreader flap after nasal hump removal

BackgroundFollowing the reduction of the nasal hump to a desired level, spreader grafts are usually positioned to prevent the complication of nasal valve collapse. Auto-spreader flap is a new technique that gained more popularity recently and can be used as an alternative to spreader graft. This RCCT compared between both techniques aesthetically and functionally as well as the operative time.ResultsForty patients, 17 males (42.5%) and 23 females (57.5%), were included. The mean duration of operation in auto-spreader flap was 11.8 ± 3.4 min, while it was 19.2 ± 3.2 min in spreader graft. The difference between the two procedures was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Functional assessment of nasal obstruction was done for all patients in both groups preoperative that was (75.6 ± 19.9) which showed marked improvement when re-evaluated 3 moths postoperatively (18.9 ± 14.7), and after 6 months NOSE scale was (29.1 ± 20.2). The overall aesthetic satisfaction was 62.5% (25 of 40) irrespective of the surgery done. Sixteen out of 20 patients in spreader group and 9 out of 20 in auto-spreader flap group.ConclusionAuto-spreader flap and spreader graft are very effective surgical procedure for treatment of nasal obstruction due to internal nasal valve dysfunction, but the auto-spreader flap had shorter operative time. However, spreader graft has a superior aesthetic outcome.

Management of External Nasal Valve Collapse: Literature Review

Rhinoplasty is one of the most frequent cosmetic surgeries in the world and among the most common complications is valve collapse due to excessive resection of the alar cartilage. Facial paralysis, as well as aging, can collapse the lateral wall in inspiration due to dysfunction of the nasal muscle, causing weakening of the fibroalveolar tissue of the nasal lateral wall, and there are also genetic causes that produce valve collapse. Currently, various techniques are practiced to improve valve collapse and none are one hundred percent effective, most of them focus on correcting the nasal valve itself or the triangular cartilage, which indicates that they are fixed on a single factor and not on multifactorial etiology that produces it. This study reviews the clinical evidence that guides a correct diagnosis and effective management of external nasal valve dysfunction, using various techniques that are currently used to improve nasal valve collapse.

Discussion: Evaluation of Validity and Specificity of the Cottle Maneuver in Diagnosis of Nasal Valve Collapse.

Discussion: Evaluation of Validity and Specificity of the Cottle Maneuver in Diagnosis of Nasal Valve Collapse.

Evaluation of Validity and Specificity of the Cottle Maneuver in Diagnosis of Nasal Valve Collapse.

Despite the widespread use of the Cottle maneuver as a finding to define nasal valve collapse, no studies have confirmed the association between a positive Cottle maneuver and need for nasal valve repair. This study demonstrates the low construct validity of the Cottle maneuver. One hundred healthy volunteer students and employees at Boston Medical Center were recruited for this study. Participants were asked to evaluate their breathing on a 10-point scale, rating their subjective airflow in each nostril while occluding the contralateral nostril, where 0 indicated complete obstruction and 10 indicated complete patency. Following the baseline ratings, participants were asked to rate their breathing once again while examiners preformed the Cottle and modified Cottle maneuvers. Overall, 97 percent of participants reported improved airflow in each nostril following the Cottle maneuver (p < 0.00001); 98 percent reported improved airflow in each nostril following the modified Cottle maneuver (p < 0.00001). If the clinical consensus regarding the observed improvement in nasal airflow is to be followed, nearly all the participants recruited are experiencing some surgically correctable nasal obstruction. Given the population from which our cohort was collected-students and residents from a medical campus-such a conclusion seems extremely unlikely. We believe the more likely explanation for the high positive test rate is flawed assumptions of the Cottle and modified Cottle maneuvers. Therapeutic, V.

Treating Symptomatic Midvault Soft Tissue Collapse in Revision Rhinoplasty with a Nasal Wall Implant.

Summary:Persistent nasal airway obstruction (NAO) due to midvault soft tissue collapse in patients following rhinoplasty or nasal surgery is a clinical challenge for surgeons. An absorbable lateral nasal wall implant is one option available to help treat midvault soft tissue collapse and to improve NAO symptoms. Previous studies have not investigated its use in complex revision functional rhinoplasty with respect to patient-reported outcomes. Data were collected on all patients with a history of previous nasal procedures who underwent Latera implant placement in conjunction with functional rhinoplasty from January to December 2018. The Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation and Visual Analogue Scale were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Eight implants were placed in 6 revision functional rhinoplasty patients with midvault collapse. All patients responded to the survey. Mean follow-up was 16 ± 4 months. There were no implant-related adverse events. Mean Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation score was 33 ± 33, and mean Visual Analogue Scale score was 20 ± 9. In total, 1 patient reported complete resolution of NAO, whereas 2 patients reported mild, 1 reported moderate, 1 reported severe, and 1 reported extreme symptoms. Four of the 6 patients reported nasal obstruction improvement, with all reporting improvement in midvault soft tissue collapse. Apart from being used in nasal valve collapse treatment, a lateral nasal wall implant is a potentially useful solution that may help surgeons improve patients’ NAO symptoms in complex functional rhinoplasty cases. However, in certain cases, a patient’s nasal obstructive symptoms may continue to be multifactorial.

Effectiveness of using a bioabsorbable implant (Latera) to treat nasal valve collapse in patients with nasal obstruction: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Nasal obstruction is a common cause of breathing problems with lateral wall insufficiency (LWI) a key anatomic contributor. Recently, a bioabsorbable nasal implant was introduced to correct LWI and treat nasal obstruction. The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of the bioabsorbable nasal implant for treating nasal obstruction caused by LWI. Five databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database) were independently reviewed by 2 researchers, starting at the earliest time point recorded in the database to September 2019. Studies that scored endoscopic lateral wall movement and nasal obstruction related to quality of life (QOL) postoperatively before and after bioabsorbable nasal implants and those that compared the outcomes of nasal implants (treatment group) with outcomes of sham surgery (control group) were included in the analysis. Five studies (396 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Bioabsorbable nasal implants significantly reduced endoscopic lateral wall motion compared to pretreatment values and also improved QOL at 12 months postoperatively. Most adverse effects following the nasal implant, such as skin or mucosal reaction, infection, or implant retrieval, were reported with a 5% incidence rate. All adverse outcomes were resolved without significant sequelae. Compared with sham surgery, bioabsorbable nasal implants significantly improved disease-specific QOL. Bioabsorbable nasal implants may reduce nasal wall movement and subjective symptom scores compared to preoperative status. More randomized clinical trials must be conducted to further verify the effectiveness of bioabsorbable nasal implants.

Emerging Trends in Nasal Surgery: What Is the Impact of a Bioabsorbable Nasal Implant?

A bioabsorbable nasal valve implant (NVI) was introduced in 2016 as a minimally invasive solution to nasal valve collapse. Historically the introduction of less invasive procedures performable in-office has resulted in an increase in volume. Our objective is to evaluate this trend as it relates to nasal vestibular repair, and its impact on healthcare utilization. We interrogated the Medicare Part B national database for nasal vestibular repair (CPT code: 30465), Unlisted nasal procedure (30999) and septoplasty (30520) from 2010 to 2017. Septoplasty was used as a surrogate for overall nasal procedural rate. Linear regression modeling was used to examine the changes in reported vestibular repair rate adjusting for septoplasty rate. In the Medicare population, the rate of septoplasty was stable from 2010 to 2017, increasing from 26,962 to 30,194 at an annual rate of 1.5%. Coding for unlisted nasal procedure increased from 272 to 333 at an adjusted annual rate of 1.1% over this time period. Coding for nasal vestibular repair increased from 2026 to 5331 over this interval at an adjusted annual rate of 0.9% from 2010 to 2016 but significantly increased to 5% between 2016 to 2017 (P < .0001). The reported volume of nasal vestibular repair increased significantly in the year following Food and Drug Administration approval of NVIs. In the absence of a corresponding increase in septoplasty, this temporal relationship suggests that the introduction of NVIs impacted the utilization of this procedural code. N/A Laryngoscope, 2020.

The relationship between the Ottawa Valve Collapse Scale (OVCS) and clinical outcomes in septoplasty patients

The Ottawa Valve Collapse scale (OVCS) was developed to classify the severity of nasal valve collapse (NVC) in patients with nasal obstruction. The goal of this study was to determine, in patients who have nasal obstruction due to a septal deviation, whether those with a higher OVCS grade will have a reduced improvement in patient-centered clinical outcomes at one-year following septoplasty with inferior turbinate diathermy compared to those with a normal or lower OVCS grade. This study was a prospective study of 78 patients who completed an assessment using the NOSE questionnaire before and at one-year following the surgical intervention. A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to asses for differences in scores between OVCS groups. There was a significant improvement in NOSE scores one year post-septoplasty (p < 0.01). There was no difference in NOSE score improvement when comparing the grades of the OVCS at one-year (F = 0.09, p = 0.968). Though the OVCS was designed to categorize the severity of NVC preoperatively, there is no evidence that it is helpful in predicting which patients will demonstrate poor results following septoplasty. Future studies are required to further evaluate the OVCS and whether complimentary assessments will improve its clinical utility.

The nasal valve: new insights on the static and dynamic NV with MR-imaging.

We assessed the static nasal valve angle with MR imaging in healthy subjects and evaluated the complex mechanism of nasal valve dynamics during physiologic and forced inspiration. In 17 healthy subjects, measurements of the static nasal valve angle were conducted on MR scans, using a TSE Axial T2-weighted sequence and a 3mm slice thickness. The dynamic changes of nasal valve movement were detected using MR Cine-imaging techniques. The static median angle of the nasal valve was found to be 28.6° with a range of 12.7°-39.3°. The median degree of nasal valve collapse during forced inspiration was 68% (range 20-99%) of the baseline (static nasal valve angle). In the moderately forced inspiration (3s) the median nasal valve angle declined to 76% of the baseline angle (range 42-100%). In the physiologic or unforced inspiration, the median nasal valve angle was reduced to 86.3% of the baseline angle (range 52-100%). MRI, as a non-invasive tool, is a reliable method for evaluation of the static nasal valve angle and for the illustration of the complex nasal valve dynamics.

Functional Outcomes, Quantitative Morphometry, and Aesthetic Analysis of Articulated Alar Rim Grafts in Septorhinoplasty.

The design, use, and indications for the articulated alar rim graft (AARG) and the functional and aesthetic improvements that can be achieved have not been fully characterized. To analyze the functional and aesthetic outcomes of AARG placement on nasal airway function, nasal base shape change, and appearance. A case series study of patients who underwent septorhinoplasty with placement of AARG at University of California, Irvine Medical Center, from 2015 to 2018 was carried out. Surgical data recorded included stage of rhinoplasty (primary vs revision), use of spreader grafts, rim grafts (and dimensions), caudal septal extension graft (CSEG), lateral crural tensioning (LCT), and turbinate reductions. Preoperative and postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Survey (NOSE) surveys were analyzed and correlated with AARG geometry, use of CSEG, and the LCT maneuver. Preoperative and postoperative alar base views were evaluated by fitting base shape to a parametric numerical model to categorize each to 1 of 6 shape categories. Blinded reviewers rated alar furrow severity and the alar ridge presence using a Likert scale for both preoperative and postoperative images to subjectively gauge aesthetic outcomes. Overall, 90 patients with both preoperative and postoperative NOSE scores who underwent septorhinoplasty and placement of an AARG were included. Of the 90 patients, 60 were women (mean age, 38.2 years). Patient NOSE scores (70.4 preoperatively to 25.1 postoperatively) significantly improved from preoperation to postoperation (P < .001), regardless of AARG size, CSEG, or LCT. Alar base shape parametric analysis showed preoperative to postoperative improvements were significant for anterior-to-posterior ratio mass distribution (95% CI, -0.16 to 0.02; P = .05) and vertical projection-to-horizontal base width ratio (95% CI, 0.01-0.32; P = .02) in flat noses and cloverleafing for narrow noses (95% CI, -0.05 to -0.01; P = .001); enhancement approached significance for reduction in lateral scalloping in cloverleaf noses (P = .06). Aesthetic analysis showed that there was a statistically significant improvement for the alar furrow (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.29 for rater 1; -0.54 to -0.27 for rater 2; and -0.59 to -0.27 for rater 3; P < .001) for all raters and for the alar ridge (95% CI, 0.16-0.48; P < .001) for 1 rater. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that AARG use is associated with statistically significant improvement in NOSE scores. Placement of AARGs may improve posterior mass ratios in flat noses and lateral cloverleafing in narrow noses as suggested by quantitative shape change parameter analysis. The placement of AARGs was associated with aesthetic and functional enhancement in the cloverleaf deformity, which is associated with a prominent alar furrow, and often external nasal valve collapse. Patient selection is key when placing AARGs. NA.

Rhinoplasty outcomes and trends.

This article reviewed studies that support the use of implants for nasal valve surgery and augmentation rhinoplasty. For nasal valve collapse, there is a trend for rhinoplasty surgeons to use Monarch nasal implant, absorbable valve implant and titanium butterfly implant rather than traditional cartilaginous grafts. For augmentation rhinoplasty, it is still a gold standard to use autologous cartilage. However, alloplastic implants are still very popular for Asian rhinoplasty. A combination of implant materials for augmentation rhinoplasty can improve outcomes while minimizing complications. Application of implants and newer techniques in nasal valve surgery and augmentation rhinoplasty are important to enhance the outcome in rhinoplasty.

Twelve-month outcomes of a bioabsorbable implant for in-office treatment of dynamic nasal valve collapse.

ObjectivesTo examine 12‐month outcomes for in‐office treatment of dynamic nasal valve collapse (NVC) with a bioabsorbable implant.Study DesignProspective, multicenter, nonrandomized study.MethodsOne hundred sixty‐six patients with severe‐to‐extreme class of Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were enrolled at 16 U.S. clinics (November 2016–July 2017). Patients were treated with a bioabsorbable implant (Latera, Spirox Inc., Redwood City, CA) to support the lateral wall, with or without concurrent inferior turbinate reduction (ITR), in an office setting. NOSE scores and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were measured at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The Lateral Wall Insufficiency (LWI) score was determined by independent physicians observing the lateral wall motion video.ResultsOne hundred five patients were treated with implant alone, whereas 61 had implant + ITR. Thirty‐one patients reported 41 adverse events, all of which resolved with no clinical sequelae. Patients showed significant reduction in NOSE scores throughout 12 months postoperatively (77.4 ± 13.4 baseline vs. 36.2 ± 22.7 at 1 month postoperatively, 33.0 ± 23.4 at 3 months, 32.1 ± 24.6 at 6 months, and 30.3 ± 24.3 at 12 months; P < 0.001). They also showed significant reduction in VAS scores postoperatively (69.7 ± 18.1 baseline vs. 31.3 ± 27.1 at 12 months postoperatively, P < 0.001). These results were similar in patients treated with implant alone and those treated with the implant + ITR. Consistent with patient‐reported outcomes, postoperative LWI scores were demonstrably lower (1.42 ± 0.09 and 0.93 ± 0.08 pre‐ and postoperatively, P < 0.001).ConclusionIn‐office treatment of dynamic NVC with a bioabsorbable implant improves clinical evidence of LWI at 6 months and improves nasal obstructive symptoms in a majority of patients up to 12 months.Level of Evidence2b Laryngoscope, 130:1132–1137, 2020

Assessment of bioabsorbable implant treatment for nasal valve collapse compared to a sham group: a randomized control trial.

BackgroundDynamic nasal valve collapse (NVC) is a common factor contributing to nasal obstruction; however, it is often underdiagnosed and untreated. An in‐office, minimally invasive procedure addressing dynamic NVC uses a bioabsorbable implant (Latera) to support the lateral nasal wall. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the treatment in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with sham control.MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, single‐blinded RCT, 137 patients from 10 clinics were randomized into 2 arms: treatment arm (70 patients) and sham control arm (67 patients). Outcome measures were followed through 3 months after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the responder rate (percentage of patients with reduction in clinical severity by ≥1 category or ≥20% reduction in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation [NOSE] score).ResultsBefore the procedure, there were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics and nasal obstruction symptom measures between the 2 arms. Three months after the procedure, responder rate was significantly higher for the treatment arm compared to the control (82.5% vs 54.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the treatment arm also had a significantly greater decrease in NOSE score (–42.4 ± 23.4 vs –22.7 ± 27.9, p < 0.0001) and significantly lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (–39.0 ± 29.7 vs –13.3 ± 30.0, p < 0.0001) than the sham control arm. Seventeen patients reported 19 procedure/implant‐related adverse events, all of which resolved with no clinical sequelae.ConclusionOur study shows the safety and effectiveness of the bioabsorbable implant in reducing patients’ nasal obstruction symptoms.

Internal Nasal Valve Expanding Graft for Middle Vault Reconstruction.

Various surgical techniques and approaches for addressing nasal valve collapse have been described in the literature. Still, new techniques continue to be developed and old techniques continue to be improved upon. The aim of the present study was to validate the use of the internal nasal valve expanding graft for middle vault reconstruction and to review the authors' experience using this technique. A total of 32 patients who underwent middle vault reconstruction were retrospective reviewed. Analysis using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)-scale was performed pre- and postoperatively. Visual Analogue Scale scores for nasal airflow per side were collected on a 10-point scale, with 1 indicating total obstruction and 10 indicating a perfect nasal airway. Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale was used to assess nasal obstruction. Minimum follow-up period was 6 months after the operation. Pre- and postoperative VAS scores were used to assess degree of nasal valve collapse according to examination findings. It was significant that there was improvement in nasal valve collapse after surgery (P < 0.05). Based upon pre- and postoperative calculations made using NOSE scores, there was significant improvement regarding nasal blockage or congestion, troubled breathing and sleeping, and air through nose during exercise, respectively (P < 0.05). No complications in terms of septal perforation, hematoma, synechiae, or infection that required further intervention were noted at postoperative follow-ups. In conclusion, internal nasal valve expanding graft has now been shown to be successful for middle vault reconstruction in a group of appropriately selected patient.

Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage.

Developing cartilage constructs with injectability, appropriate matrix composition, and persistent cartilaginous phenotype remains an enduring challenge in cartilage repair. Fourteen patients with minor contour deformity were treated with fluid cartilage filler gently injected as autologous fluid graft in deep planes of defect of the nose that were close to the bone or the cartilage. A computerized tomographic scan control was performed after 12 months. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to investigate differences in cartilage density between native and newly formed cartilages. The endpoints were the possibility of using fluid cartilage as filler with aesthetic and functional improvement and versatility. Patients were followed up for two years. The constructs of fluid cartilage graft that were injected in the deep plane resulted in a persistent cartilage tissue with appropriate morphology, adequate central nutritional perfusion without central necrosis or ossification, and further augmented nasal dorsum without obvious contraction and deformation. This report demonstrated that fluid cartilage grafts are useful for cartilage regeneration in patients with outcomes of rhinoplasty, internal nasal valve collapse, and minor congenital nose aesthetics deformity.

Literature scans: cartilage grafts in nasal tip rhinoplasty

In the last years, surgical strategies in rhinoplasty were deeply modified with a gradual shifting from a reductive rhinoplasty, with aggressive intervention and trimming of the cartilages, to a more conservative and then “additive” rhinoplasty. We aimed to report the different types of autologous cartilage graft and the specific indications for each one. The authors reviewed 201 papers published in the last 10 years in the international literature database PUBMED and EMBASE deciding to isolate only those articles providing either retrospective or prospective data pertaining to outcomes, descriptions, and complications of the cartilage grafts use in nasal tip’s rhinoplasty. Of the 201 articles, 96 were initially selected. Of these, 38 met the predetermined criteria for inclusion. Nasal septum, concha, and the ribs are the main sources for autografts to be used in rhinoplasty. Septal cartilage is easy to harvest, it is versatile, could be useful for many types of grafts, and it has a low percentage of resorption, extrusion, and warping. Cartilage from the auricular concha can be used to correct both the internal and external nasal valve collapse with satisfactory results. Costal chondral grafts are usually used for structural support when septal cartilage is not available. It is possible to divide autologous grafts into two main categories: structural grafts (columellar strut, septal extension, and the alar batten grafts) and contour improving grafts (onlay tip, shield, cap, and the alar rim grafts) useful for the structural support to the tip and smoothing and hiding irregularities. Level of Evidence: Not ratable.

Diagnosis and management of septal deviation and nasal valve collapse - a survey of Canadian otolaryngologists

BackgroundManagement of nasal valve collapse (NVC) in patients with a septal deviation can be challenging. Our objective was to determine the opinions of Canadian Otolaryngologists regarding the diagnosis and management of nasal obstruction in patients with septal deviation and NVC.MethodsA twenty-question survey was developed for the purpose of our study. Questions were divided into the following areas: diagnosis, management and prognosis. We included all otolaryngologists who were members of the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology.ResultsThe response rate to our survey was 18%. The most commonly identified cause of a failed septoplasty was incomplete septoplasty (41.9%), followed by nasal valve collapse (25.6%). The Cottle manoeuvre (62.8%) and visual inspection (39.5%) were noted to be the most important diagnostic tools for external and internal NVC respectively. However, physicians often rely on a variable number of different examinations when making a diagnosis of nasal valve collapse. When evaluating which patients with a septal deviation also required nasal valve surgery, 27.9% of responders believed the current physical examination methods provided a high accuracy, while 55.8% indicated moderate accuracy and 16.3% indicated low accuracy. Compared to other subspecialties in Otolaryngology, Facial Plastic and Reconstruction Surgeons noted higher septoplasty failure rates in patients with co-morbid NVC.ConclusionsNVC is an important concern for otolaryngologists performing septoplasty. Although most physicians believe that the physical exam provides a moderate effectiveness when predicting who requires a functional rhinoplasty, diagnostic methods used for NVC is varied and inconsistent.

Assessment of Pliability and Elasticity of the External Nasal Skin in Patients With Unilateral Nasal Valve Collapse

Understanding the skin biomechanics, specifically pliability and elasticity, in patients with nasal valve collapse may allow for new methods to assess which patients require more advanced nasal valve surgery. To test the hypothesis that in patients with unilateral nasal valve collapse, the side of the nose with the collapse will have lower elasticity and increased pliability compared with the normal side, as assessed by a blinded observer using the Cutometer MPA 580. Prospective, investigator-blinded, case-control cohort study of patients with unilateral nasal valve collapse and subjective nasal obstruction conducted in an academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinic. Patients were assessed using the Cutometer MPA 580 by a blinded assessor. Three measurements were performed bilaterally on the exterior skin of the nose corresponding to the level of the inferior edge of the upper lateral cartilage. Measurements taken at the skin inferior to the zygoma were used as a control. Primary outcome measures of the nasal skin were pliability (Uf, defined as the lengthening of the skin after 3 seconds of constant load) and elasticity (Ua/Uf, defined as the percentage of the skin that returned to its normal position 3 seconds after the release from the 3-second constant load). Of the 27 patients included in the study, 15 (56%) were male, and 12 (44%) were female; mean (SD) age, 44 (21) years (range, 16-90 years). There was no difference between the measurements of the skin overlying the area of nasal valve collapse in elasticity: side without collapse (0.960% [0.031%]) vs side with collapse (0.967% [0.036%]) (mean difference, 0.007%; 95% CI, -0.018% to 0.021%) (P = .90). However, there was a significant difference in pliability: side of the nose without collapse (0.520 [0.139] mm) vs side with collapse (0.610 [0.200]) (mean difference, 0.090 mm; 95% CI, 0.014-0.156 mm) (P = .02). Although the skin in patients with nasal valve collapse appears to maintain its elasticity, it demonstrates an increased ability to stretch and lengthen compared with nasal skin of those without valve collapse. Future studies are required to determine whether the biomechanical changes are related to the length and severity of nasal obstruction, or whether these changes in the skin may help predict who will benefit from nasal valve surgery and whether these patients are at an increased risk of surgical failure. 2.